solution

please read “E-commerce & Cyberlaw” of the text: Google in the Jury Room. A current problem with jurors is their “Googling” to get information. For example, in a public corruption trial, a juror eventually admitted to the judge that she had googled the following: 1. Whether the jury could have just six members 2. What the penalty was for the crimes charged 3. The definition of bribery She then shared all of this information with her fellow jurors during their interactions and deliberations. The court held that the definition of “bribery” was the central focus of the case and ordered a mistrial. Then you will answer the following questions: What is a mistrial? Do you agree or disagree with the judge’s order for a mistrial and why? What is voir dire and how may a juror be removed from serving on the jury?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

In his book The Examined Life, philosopher Robert Nozick suggests the following “thought experiment”: Imagine a machine that could give you any experience (or sequence of experiences) you might desire. When connected to this experience machine, you can have the experience of writing a great poem or bringing about world peace or loving someone and being loved in return. You can experience the felt pleasures of these things, how they feel “from the inside.” You can program your experiences for tomorrow, or this week, or this year, or even for the rest of your life. If your imagination is impoverished, you can use the library of suggestions extracted from biographies and enhanced by novelists and pschologists. You can live your fondest dreams “from the inside.” Would you choose to do this for the rest of your life? If not, why not? . . . The question is not whether to try the machine temporarily, but whether to enter it for the rest of your life. Upon entering, you will not remember having done this; so no pleasures will get ruined by realizing they are machine produced. Nozick suggests that at least the first instinctive impulse of most of us would be to choose not to enter the machine where we would live forever in a dream world that, unknown to us, was not real. 1. Would you enter the experience machine? Why or why not? 2. Nozick claims that the reason most of us would not enter the experience machine forever is because we don’t just care about the feelings and sensations we experience but also want our lives to be based on reality and not on illusion. Do you agree? Is it enough to spend your life just thinking that you are accomplishing great things, are engaged in fulfilling and worthwhile activities, and are loved by, say, your children and a wonderful spouse? Or would these things have to be real to be worth devoting your life to them? Explain. 3. If a person in the experience machine thinks his experiences are real, then are they real? Is reality whatever you experience and think is real?

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

The neutrino is perhaps the most bewildering of all the elementary particles known to physics and among the most philosophically provocative. It has no physical properties—no mass, no electric charge, and no magnetic field. It is neither attracted nor repelled by the electric and magnetic fields of passing particles. Thus, a neutrino originating in the Milky Way or in some other galaxy and traveling at the speed of light can pass through the earth as if it were so much empty space. Can it be stopped? Only by a direct, head-on collision with another elementary particle. The chances of that are infinitesimally small. Fortunately, there are so many neutrinos that collisions do occur. Otherwise, physicists would never have detected them. Just think, even as you read this sentence, billions of neutrinos coming from the sun and other stars are passing through your skull and brain. And how would the universe appear to a neutrino? Eminent astronomer V. A. Firsoff provides a picture: The universe as seen by a neutrino eye would wear a very unfamiliar look. Our earth and other planets simply would not be there, or might at best appear as thin patches of mist. The sun and other stars may be dimly visible, in as much as they emit some neutrinos. . . . A neutrino brain might suspect our existence from certain secondary effects, but would find it very difficult to prove, as we would elude the neutrino instruments at his disposal. Our universe is no truer than that of the neutrinos—they exist, but they exist in a different kind of space, governed by different laws. . . . The neutrino . . . is subject neither to gravitational nor to electromagnetic field. . . . It might be able to travel faster than light, which would make it relativistically recede in our time scale. QUESTIONS 1. What impact does the presence of neutrinos have on your view of reality? 2. Arthur Koestler writes: “To the unprejudiced mind, neutrinos have indeed a certain affinity with ghosts—which does not prevent them from existing.” What does this mean?

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

Answer these questions for the following simple set of project tasks. Task times are shown in hours. ? 5 B 2 ? 4 D 5 E 3 WI F 6 G 7 a. What is the length of the critical path? Length of the critical path hours b. What are the earliest start and latest start for E? Earliest start th/nd hour Latest start th/nd hour c. What is the latest start for B? Latest start th/nd hour d. If all other tasks are completed in their expected durations, will the project length be affected if task B actually takes five hours instead of the expected two? Yes No
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"