solution

At point A, John would be willing to give up three gallons of gasoline for one bag of sugar and remain equally well off. Thus giving up two gallons of gasoline for one bag of sugar as in a move from point A to point B would make John better off (John would end up on a higher indifference curve, U2 J versus U1 J ). Maria would be willing to participate in the trade represented by the move from point A to point B since she is willing at point A to give up one gallon of gasoline in exchange for one bag of sugar. A move from point A to point B results in Maria getting two gallons of gasoline for one bag of sugar and makes Maria better off (she ends up on indifference curve U2 M versus U1 M at point A)

At point A, John would be willing to give up three gallons of gasoline for one bag of sugar and...

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

Kate will be better off with food stamps but will consume more food with the excise subsidy. Her optimal point with the food stamps is E on budget line AA′Z′, with the $100 cost shown by the distance ET. Her optimal point with the excise subsidy is E′ on budget line AZ1 with the $100 cost equal to E′T′. The trick is to locate the size of the excise subsidy per unit that costs exactly $100, and this implies that the optimal point with the excise subsidy is where Kate’s price-consumption curve intersects A′Z′. Note that with a larger excise subsidy per unit (lower price), total cost would exceed $100, and vice versa

Kate will be better off with food stamps but will consume more food with the excise subsidy. Her...

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

With the supply curve of the follower firms shown as S0, the dominant firm faces a demand curve PAD and marginal revenue curve PALM. The dominant firm can only affect the price if it sets a price below P. If the dominant firm’s marginal cost curve is MC1, price will be P with both the dominant firm and other firms supplying a total output of Q. If MC2 is the cost curve, the dominant firm supplies the entire market at P and produces Q. Only if the MC curve is lower than MC3 will price and total output differ from P and Q. In most cases, a horizontal supply curve of other firms means the dominant firm will have no effect on price and output.

With the supply curve of the follower firms shown as S0, the dominant firm faces a demand curve PAD...

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

There are at least three reasons the statement is false. First, price may be above average cost in the absence of advertising, and equal to average cost when advertising increases competition. Second, the firm may operate at a lower point on the higher average cost curve as a result of advertising. Even though advertising results in the firm operating on AC′ rather than AC, the firm may be at point B with advertising and point A without advertising (because advertising leads to more elastic demand curves). Third, even if the money price of the product does rise as a result of advertising, the full price may still be lower

There are at least three reasons the statement is false. First, price may be above average cost in...

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"