H, a factory owner, hires B to transport a broken machine part to a repair shop in another town. B agreed to deliver the part the next day, but he did not deliver it until two days later. Because of the delay, H lost five days’ worth of production. If H sues B for lost profits, he will:

Group of answer choices

Win because the UCC applies to the contract

Be awarded punitive damages because B caused the lost profits by delaying the delivery

Lose because it is unreasonable to seek compensation for lost profits

Win if he told B that the machine part was critical for him to be able to operate his production line and every day of lost production meant he would lose money

Lose because the UCC applies to the contract

Kelly is a judge of the Supreme Court of Trinidad and Tobago. She is sitting on a case where there is an issue about whether a contract had to be in writing to be legally enforceable. The barrister for the plaintiff has cited:

A case in the San Fernando District Court that found for the plaintiff.

The barrister for the defendant has argued:

A case in the High Court on different facts, where two judges expressed an opinion that if the facts in Kelly’s case applied, they would find for the defendant.

Which of these precedents must Kelly follow?

Ensure to present the law, the facts, supporting case law evidence for the argument and a firm conclusion or solution to the case above.