Anthropology

Bias in science (and society):
Although many researchers are aware of measurement bias (e.g., measurement error), the bias to which I am referring is, in large part, an unconscious bias that stems from one’s own cultural systems. All people are influenced by their culture; it shapes their views and interpretations for every situation. Scientists, as people, are not immune to the effects of cultural influence when it comes to framing hypotheses or interpretation of data (i.e., what are legitimate questions, who should be the focus of the study, etc.).

For this exercise you will explore two examples of how unconscious bias influenced (and continues to influence) Anthropology.

Evaluate an example:
The class session for this forum will consist of partner/group discussion followed by full class discussion.

For the partner/group discussion, you need to choose one of the following articles to read, answer the questions listed below for that article before class, and be prepared to share with your partner/group. You also need to consider the two questions under the “Everyone” bullet point.
For the full class discussion, your group/partnership needs to be prepared to share the consensus answers to the questions with everyone.
Article choices (choose 1):
Primatology: http://www.nytimes.com/1984/09/18/science/new-view-of-female-primates-assails-stereotypes.html?pagewanted=all (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Piltdown man: http://www.livescience.com/56327-piltdown-man-hoax.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Questions:
Primatology:
In the mid-1980s there was a shift in how primate societies were understood. Summarize the information provided in the section “A Transformed Understanding” about the four areas of primate sex differences in behavior highlighted by the shift.
Do you think the bias referred to in the article is legitimate? Why or why not?
Piltdown:
The Piltdown skull was ‘discovered’ in 1912, and for 40 years it dominated the story of human evolution. According to the article, why was the Piltdown discovery such a ‘success’?
What do you think was the unconscious bias that influenced the persistence of this discovery? (consider our discussions about the history of evolutionary theory AND perceptions about what it means to be human)
Everyone:
Can you find/think of an example of potential bias from your field of study? Consider how research questions are framed and how they are funded.
Do you think this type of bias has an impact on science? Why or why not?
Think of at least two ways that scientists can work toward decreasing this type of bias in their research.
Written submission: (On Canvas, total word count 250-500)
Briefly summarize the article you choose to read for the forum.
Provide a summary of the discussion your group had about the example(s):
What type of bias(es) did your group decide were influencing the research/reception of research?
Did everyone agree on which (if any) bias(es) played a role in the examples you read? If not, what were the disagreements about?
Provide a summary of:
Examples that either your group or others in the class presented of potential bias in a different area of science (not biological anthropology).
Ways in which scientists can work toward decreasing this type of bias. If you feel that this type of bias is not important in science, tell me why you feel that way.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

FORUMS FOR HUMAN SEXUALITY HEALTH

This is literally just a discussion. It has no word limit and is based off of opinion.  Answers will vary between 50 words or more but it doesn’t have to be a lot just get the point across. Each powerpoint is to help answer or you can google. 

Week 1 Forum

Discussion Question 1.1
Gender/Sexual Orientation/Biological Sex.
Discuss the differences among gender, sexual orientation, and biological sex. This is important because some people mistakenly believe that homosexuality is a form of gender confusion or that gay men or lesbians want to be the other sex. Some believe that gay men are “feminine” and lesbians “masculine,” mistakenly confusing gender and orientation issues.Provide evidence or reasoning to support your particular perspective.

Week 2 Forum

Discussion Question 2.1.

Theory : Havelock Ellis argued against nineteenth-century beliefs that masturbation had no ill health effects. Why has morally proscribed behavior—such as masturbation—often been seen to have dangerous health consequences? Today some continue to link morally proscribed behavior to negative health consequences, such as homosexuality and AIDS. From a public health point of view, what are the consequences of viewing health problems as moral problems? Provide evidence or reasoning to support your particular perspective. Which theoretical perspective, as described in Chapter 2, closely represents your view?

Discussion Question 2.2.

Gay/Lesbian Research. Discuss why current gay/lesbian research has moved away from the “origins” of homosexuality. What are the methodological and political limits on conducting research on homosexuality?

Week 3 Forum

Discussion 3.1

Uncovering the Breasts in Public.

Periodically women complain about laws requiring them to cover their breasts in public, whereas men are not so required. Occasionally women protest such laws, go in public with their breasts uncovered, and are arrested. What is the justification for such laws? Are they discriminatory against women? Explain.

Week 4 Forum

Discussion 4.1

Penis Size.
Discuss cross-cultural concern about or interest in penis size. What different meanings may large or gigantic penises signify? Slides of art from ancient Rome, Japan, and Mesoamerica, as well as contemporary erotic art (as illustrated in Chapter 4), may be used to illustrate the point. What are some myths about penis size? How does the stereotype of black and Latino men having large penises reinforce ethnic stereotypes?

Week 5 Forum

What have you learned about development of gender stereotypes and about sex differences in self-esteem that helps explain why women’s progress in entering male-dominated professions has been slow? (Use examples in Ch 5 to help answer question).

Chapter Two

Studying Human Sexuality

Sex, Advice Columnists,
and Pop Psychology

  • The sex information/advice genre seeks to:
  • Inform—transmit information that is factual and accurate
  • Entertain—attract audiences through hosts’ personalities as well as high-interest or bizarre material
  • Often includes moral judgments
  • Use social science and psychiatry to give authority

Use and Abuse of Statistics

  • Popular media may summarize social science research in an oversimplified or distorted manner
  • Sensationalize findings
  • Over generalize results of research
  • Report statistics that agree with widely-held preconceptions
  • Popular media may not emphasize the importance of replication

Thinking Critically about Sex

    • Basic scientific principles require a commitment to objectivity
    • observation of reality while excluding researchers’ feelings or beliefs

 

    • Subjectivity is to be avoided
    • Difficult to achieve especially in the area of sexuality
    • Sexuality can bring out powerful emotions and moral ambivalence

 

Value Judgments: Limitations

  • Do not tell us what motivates people
  • Do not tell us how frequently people behave in a given way
  • Do not tell us how people feel
  • Only tell us how we ourselves feel

Value Judgments vs. Objectivity

  • Value judgments only reveal the thoughts or feelings of one person
  • Objectivity describes reality
  • Objective positions can be tested
  • Cultural relativity requires that we examine appropriateness within the cultural norms where it exists

Value Judgments vs. Objectivity

  • Value judgments imply how a person ought to behave
  • Objective statements describe how people actually behave
  • Value judgments cannot be empirically evaluated
  • Objective statements can be empirically evaluated

Opinions, Biases, and Stereotypes Interfere with the Pursuit of Knowledge

 

  • Opinions are unsubstantiated beliefs or conclusions according to an individual’s personal thoughts
  • Biases are personal leanings or inclinations
  • Stereotypes are sets of overgeneralized beliefs about an individual, a group, or an idea, etc.

Stereotypes

  • A schema is a way of organizing information which often underlies stereotypes
  • Sexual stereotyping is often used to justify discrimination or social groups
  • Women
  • Poor people
  • African Americans, Latino/as, Asian Americans
  • Gay men, lesbians, bisexuals, transgender people

Stereotypes

  • Stereotypes structure our knowledge by shaping:
  • What we see
  • What we notice
  • What we remember
  • How we explain things

Attitudes and Behavior

  • Attitude: a predisposition a person has to act, think, or feel in certain ways
  • Behavior: the way a person acts

 

  • Behavior does not predict attitude and vice versa
  • Frequent discrepancies exist between the two on individual and cultural levels which can result in confusion

Common Fallacies: Egocentrism and Ethnocentrism

  • Fallacy: an error in reasoning that affects our understanding of a subject
  • Egocentric fallacy: the belief that our own personal experience and values are generally held by others
  • Ethnocentric fallacy: the belief that one’s own ethnic group, nation, or culture’s values and customs are innately superior to others’

Egocentrism and Ethnocentrism

  • Often occur in our consideration of different ethnic groups
  • Transmitted from one generation to another
  • Prevent understanding from a culturally relative position

Sex Research Methods

  • Scientific Method: the method by which a hypothesis is formed from impartially gathered data and tested empirically.
  • Induction: drawing a general conclusion from specific facts
  • Seeks to describe the world rather than to evaluate or judge it

Research Concerns

  • Ethical
  • Concerns use of human beings as subjects of research
  • Methodological
  • Concerns center on information-gathering techniques and accuracy
  • A representative sample of people is necessary to draw accurate conclusions

Ethical Issues

  • Informed consent
  • Full disclosure of purpose, risk, benefits
  • Agreement to participate may be withdrawn
  • Protection from harm
  • Emotional distress must be avoided
  • Identity of subjects must be confidential

Sampling

  • Sample: a portion of a larger group of people are observed or studied
  • Inferences are made to the larger group
  • Good samples are:
  • Random
  • Representative
  • Unbiased

Limitations of Samples Restrict Generalizations

  • Depend on volunteers or clients
  • Takes place at universities or colleges with student volunteers
  • Some ethnic groups are underrepresented
  • Gay men, lesbian women, bisexual and transgendered people may not be publicly identified

Clinical Research

  • An in-depth examination of an individual or group that comes to a specialist for assistance with disorders and problems
  • Limited by an emphasis on pathological behavior
  • Shaped by cultural definitions of what is pathological

Survey Research

  • Questionnaires
  • Administered quickly
  • Forced choice allows many formats
  • Interviews
  • Allow more information to be gathered
  • Allow subjects to guide topics
  • Sexual diaries
  • Collect richer information
  • May work well with some subjects but not all

Survey Research Limitations

    • Subjects may report self behavior with bias
    • Interviewers may collect information with a bias
    • Subjects may be embarrassed in an interview
    • Accuracy of subjects’ memory fades as time passes
    • Difficult for subjects to accurately estimate factors such as how long sexual encounters last

 

Observational Research

  • The researcher unobtrusively observes and makes notes about people’s behavior
  • Serious ethical issues in observing sexual behavior without subjects’ knowledge or consent
  • Known observation generally affects behavior

Participant Observation

  • The researcher participates in the behaviors which she or he is studying
  • Used frequently by anthropologists
  • Is sex research controversial because it compromises objectivity?

Experimental Research

    • The systematic manipulation variables to examine the effect on behavior

 

  • Independent variables: factors that can be manipulated and changed by the experimenter
  • Dependent variables: factors that are likely to be affected by changes in the independent variable

An Example of Experimental Research

    • Examine effect of various amounts of alcohol on sexual arousal
    • Alcohol—independent variable
    • Plethysmograph measurement of arousal—dependent variable
    • Causal effect demonstrated

 

 

The Sex Researchers

  • In 19th century, Western sexuality began to be studied from a scientific framework
  • Fascinated with “pathologies” of sex: fetishism, sadism, masturbation, homosexuality
  • Since that time, a liberalizing trend in our thinking about sexuality
  • 20th century researchers viewed sexuality more positively

The Sex Researchers

  • Three themes evident in later 20th century sex researchers’ work:
  • Belief that sexual expression is essential to an individual’s well being
  • Desire to broaden the range of legitimate sexual activity, including homosexuality
  • Belief that female sexuality is equal to male sexuality

Richard von Krafft-Ebing
(1840-1902)

  • Psychopathia Sexualis (1886):
  • A collection of the case histories of fetishists, sadists, masochists, and homosexuals
  • Attributed variations in Victorian sexuality to “hereditary taint,” “moral degeneracy,” and masturbation
  • Brought public attention to sexual behaviors that had never been documented

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)

  • Dramatically impacted Western ideas
  • Sexuality begins at birth with five-stage development:
  • Oral stage (birth to 1 year)
  • Anal stage (age 1-3)
  • Phallic stage (age 3-5)
  • Latency stage (age 6-puberty)
  • Genital stage (puberty onward)

Sigmund Freud: Phallic stage

    • Oedipal Complex: Boy develops sexual desires for mother and fears father
    • Castration anxiety: Fears his father will cut off his penis: castration anxiety
    • Electra complex: Girl develops sexual desire for father and fears mother
    • Penis envy: Girls never acquire the “lost penis” and therefore fail to develop an independent character like that of boys
    • By age 6, boys and girls resolve their complexes by relinquishing their desires for their parents and identifying with their same-sex parent

 

Sigmund Freud: Impact

  • Freud was pioneering in commitment to science and explorations of the unconscious
  • Over the past generation, his influence among American sex researchers has dwindled
  • Lack of empiricism
  • Inadequate description of female development
  • Questions of relevance to contemporary society
  • In the field of sex research, his work is now primarily of historical interest

Havelock Ellis (1859-1939)

  • One of the first modern affirmers of sexuality
  • Studies in the Psychology of Sex (1897-1910)
  • Pointed out the relativity of sexual values
  • Appealed to case studies as well as studies in animal behavior, anthropology, and history
  • Challenged view that masturbation was abnormal
  • Documented existence of women’s sexual desires
  • Reevaluated homosexuality as a congenital condition

Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956)

  • The Kinsey Reports
  • Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948)
  • Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953)
  • Statistical documentation of American sexual behavior
  • Showed a significant discrepancy between public standards and actual standards of sexual behavior

Alfred Kinsey: Impact

    • Sexual Diversity and Variation
    • Extraordinary diversity in behaviors of subjects
    • Many subjects (e.g. 50% of men) had sexual experiences with members of the same-sex

 

  • Reevaluation of Masturbation
  • Important for women
  • Harmless
  • Pleasurable

Alfred Kinsey: Controversy

  • Same sex behavior
  • Labels of “heterosexual” and “homosexual” were inadequate ways of understanding sexual behavior
  • Devised the “Kinsey Scale”
  • Rejection of normal/abnormal dichotomy
  • Sexual differences are a matter of degree, not kind
  • Became an advocate of the tolerance
  • Decline of society

Kinsey’s Scale from 0 to 6

Alfred Kinsey: Criticisms

    • Statistical methodology: unrepresentative sampling
    • Emphasis on quantification of sexual behavior
    • Rejection of the psychological dimension (reducing behavior to genital activity)

 

William Masters (1915-2001) and Virginia Johnson (1925-)

    • Human Sexual Response (1966)
    • Detailed the sexual response cycles of hundreds of male and female research subjects
    • Combined clinical observation with direct measurement of genital arousal using electronic devices

 

Masters and Johnson: Outcomes

  • Similarity of male and female sexual responses
  • Women achieve orgasms via clitoral stimulation
  • Legitimized female masturbation

Masters and Johnson: Outcomes

  • Human Sexual Inadequacy (1970)
  • Argued that sexual problems were not the result of neuroses or personality disorders
  • Rather, lack of information, poor communication, or relationship conflict contributed
  • Used behavioral therapy to treat sexual problems with great success

Contemporary Research Studies

  • Several large, national, or multi-site sexuality related studies have recently been conducted
  • The National Health and Social Life Survey (1994)
  • The Youth Risk Behavior Survey (biannual)
  • The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (annual)
  • The National Survey of Family Growth (periodic)
  • College Alcohol Study (every few years)
  • Community Intervention Trial for Youth Project

Contemporary Research Studies

  • Large scale national sexuality related studies
  • Smaller scale studies
  • Difficulties due to political and social climate
  • Restricted funding

The National Health and Social Life Survey 1994

  • Americans are largely monogamous
  • On average, Americans have sex about once a week
  • Adultery is the exception, not the rule
  • Most Americans rank vaginal intercourse as most preferred activity

The National Health and Social Life Survey (cont.)

    • Homosexuality less prevalent than originally believed
    • Orgasms appear to be the rule for men and the exception for women
    • Forced sex and the misperception of it remain critical problems
    • 3% of Americans claim never to have had sex

 

The National Survey of Family Growth 2002

  • A majority of Americans report experiencing a great deal of diverse sexual activity
  • A small percentage of Americans report experiencing homosexual activity
  • American men report more partners then women
  • A large group of Americans do not report using condoms in the last year

The Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2003

  • Almost half report having had sexual intercourse
  • Few report having had sexual intercourse with four or more partners
  • Over half report using a condom during their last sexual intercourse
  • One fourth report of sexually active students report using alcohol or drugs during most recent sexual experience

National College Health Assessment 2005

  • Majority report a new sex partner in the last year
  • Half report experiencing oral sex within the last month
  • Half report experiencing vaginal sex within the last month
  • Students do not routinely use condoms
  • Birth control pills and condoms are the most commonly used contraceptive

Emerging Research Perspectives

  • Feminist scholarship
  • Focus on gender issues
  • Examines distribution of power in sexual relationships
  • Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender
  • Focus on personal experience
  • Examines social and psychological components

Feminist Scholarship Principles

  • Gender is significant
  • Female experience devalued
  • Power is critical in relationships
  • Different methodologies must be incorporated
  • Ethnic diversity must be addressed

Important GLBT researchers across time

 

  • Ulriches
  • Kertbeny
  • Hirschfeld
  • Hooker
  • Foucault

Critical Inclusions for Future Research

 

  • Expanded definitions of sexuality
  • Intervention based research
  • Accepting and positive representation of sexuality

Directions for Future Research

  • Global perspective
  • Inclusion of other fields of scientific study

Ethnicity and Sexuality

  • Researchers have begun to recognize differences among ethnic groups
  • Related factors: socioeconomic status, environment, methodology, researcher’s stereotypes

African Americans and Research

  • Sexual stereotypes
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Racism
  • Black subcultures

Latinos and Research

  • Sexual stereotypes
  • Traditional cultures
  • Catholicism
  • Acculturation

Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders

  • Increase in population
  • Collectivist culture
  • Immigration
  • Sexual stereotypes

Summary

  • Sex, advice columnists, and pop psychology
  • Methods of sex research
  • History of sex research
  • Challenges for the future
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Personal Diet And Nutrition Education Guide

Kaplan University School of Health Sciences

HW320 Unit 9: Final Project

Unit 9: Final Project

Course Outcomes addressed in this Assignment: HW320-1: Differentiate the current USDA’s dietary guidelines from previous versions.

HW320-2: Summarize the development and influence of farm and corporate food lobbies on governmental nutritional recommendations.

HW320-3: Compare selected diets currently being promoted.

HW320-4: Analyze the impact food-borne illnesses, genetic engineering and the organic food movements have on the global food markets.

HW320-5: Discuss the heterogeneous nature of food preferences and prohibitions in multi-cultural and multi-ethnic communities.

Instructions: You will need this Final Project Template to complete your Final Project. Replace the italicized text in the template with your own content. You will create a personal Diet and Nutrition Education Guide as a resource in your diet and nutrition career. This Diet and Nutrition Education Guide will cover materials from Units 1–9 in this course. The guide is a way to capture important information about contemporary diet and nutrition course content, resources, and tools used in the study and practice of nutrition. It will also illustrate your personal assessments related to diet and physical activity. The guide can serve as a handy reference as you continue your nutrition studies, or to use in your professional career. Requirements: Each chapter/unit of this Diet and Nutrition Education guide should contain the following information:

1. A 3–4 sentence description of three (3) key learning points from each unit covered in the course.

2. A list and short description of three (3) websites identified within the Web Resources/Webliography for each unit covered in the course.

3. A list and short description of one (1) book/article/essay/software related to each unit’s topic covered in the course.

 

 

 

 

Kaplan University School of Health Sciences

HW320 Unit 9: Final Project

Appendices:

A. Diet and Physical Activities Assessment: Includes your Unit 2 Assignment with screen shots and write-up of your physical activity and nutrition analysis.

B. Conduct an internet search on the dietary habits of a community in which you are interested. You can choose from the list below or select your own community. Prepare a 100–150 word summary of the information that you found on their cultural food preferences. You can use a search engine like Google or the Health Sciences Resource Room. Properly cite the website in your write-up.

 African American  Appalachian  Amish  Hmong  Mexican American  Middle Eastern  Puerto Rican  Vietnamese

References:

 Include a separate reference page(s) per APA guidelines. This project should follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Your writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics. Submitting your work: Submit your Assignment to the Dropbox. For instructions on submitting your work, view the Dropbox Guide located under Academic Tools at the top of your unit page. Please be sure to download the file “Writing Center Resources” from Doc Sharing to assist you with meeting APA expectations for written Assignments. To view your graded work, come back to the Dropbox or go to the Gradebook after your instructor has evaluated it. Make sure that you save a copy of your submitted work.

 

 

 

Kaplan University School of Health Sciences

HW320 Unit 9: Final Project

Final Project Grading Rubric = 170 points

Assignment Requirements Points possible Points earned by student

A 3–4 sentence description of three (3) key learning points from each unit.

45

A list and short description of three (3) websites identified within the Web Resources/Webliography for each unit.

45

A list and short description of one (1) books/articles/essays/software related to each unit’s topic.

30

Includes your Unit 2 Assignment with screen shots and write-up of your physical activity and nutrition analysis.

30

Prepare a 100–150 word summary of the information that you found on their cultural food preferences. Properly cite the website in your write-up.

20

Total (Sum of points earned) 170

The Proposal is written in the most current version of APA format with no grammatical, spelling, copyright, plagiarism, or proof-reading errors.

Points deducted for spelling, grammar, and/or APA errors.

 

Adjusted total points earned

Instructor Feedback*:

*Instructor may also leave feedback comments within Assignment submission.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

BCHS3201: Microarray Paper

BCHS3201: Microarray Paper

Background

You will be working with data generated using Affymetrix Arabidopsis thaliana (ATH1) full genome chips. Please watch the microarray lecture posted in Blackboard for information on how the chips are constructed and how they are used. Step-by-step instructions are provided here for managing the data. While I have provided details here, keep in mind that in a real research lab, you would have to decide for yourself how to organize the data and make sense of it.

Arabidopsis thaliana

Arabidopsis thaliana is a small, flowering plant found all over the world. It is commonly considered a weed in the United States and can be found in the Midwest (Texas is too hot; the plant likes temperatures around 68°F). Arabidopsis serves as a model plant because it has a number of characteristics that make it amenable to study. The plant is small, reaching only 30 cm in height when full grown. It grows well grows well in both soil and nutrient media making it easier to develop carefully controlled studies (Meyerowitz, 1989). It is easily grown indoors in a laboratory. Crop plants require much larger facilities and land to study. The life cycle of Arabidoposis is only 6 weeks from seed to seed-producing. This allows a much faster pace for experiments than most crop plants where only one generation of plants can be grown in a calendar year (unless your university is fortunate enough to have land on two hemispheres so you can get two growing seasons in). Arabidopsis plants produce thousands of seeds per plant and these seeds are tiny making them easy to store in microcentrifuge tubes in the freezer (Meyerowitz, 1989).

Arabidopsis has a haploid genome of 5 chromosomes consisting of approximately 125 megabases (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000). This is a very small genome compared to that of crop species. Maize, for example, is around 2,500 megabases in size (Adam, 2000). Most genes in Arabidopsis exist at a single locus in the genome. Crop plant genomes are large in part because their genomes contain large sections that are duplicated. This makes creating complete knock-outs of a particular gene difficult. Arabidopsis is amenable to genetic manipulations either through traditional cross-breeding techniques or more modern genetic modification techniques (mutation through T-DNA inserts, chemical agents, or CRISPR-CAS9). Studies conducted in Arabidopsis are often directly transferable to crop species as many of the genes have homologues in crop plants. Studying them first in Arabidopsis is easier, cheaper, and faster.

Sugar and Phytohormone Signaling Pathways

Sugars have a role in basic plant metabolism as a carbon source and also play a role as signaling molecules, contributing to the regulation of a number of pathways in plants. The expression of genes involved in mobilization of starch and lipid reserves is usually repressed by the presence of high sugar levels in the plant while genes involved in storage of carbohydrates are upregulated (Jang & Sheen, 1997; Yu, 1999). Soluble sugar levels in plants also play a role in a number of developmental processes including time to flowering (Bernier et al., 1993), shoot to root ratios (Wilson, 1988), and senescence (cells stop dividing and normal biological processes begin to deteriorate) (Dai et al., 1999). The DNA chip data you will be analyzing for class is part of a larger study to elucidate the full impact of sugar signaling in Arabidopsis and to identify potential components of signaling pathways for future study.

Phytohormones are involved in a wide array of plant responses. The plant phytohormones ethylene and abscisic acid are also intertwined with the sugar response signaling pathways.

Ethylene plays a role in a plant’s development as well as its response to environmental conditions. Ethylene has a role in shoot and root elongation, sex determination, petal senescence, and fruit ripening. It also is involved in the plant’s response to flooding and pathogens.

Abscisic acid is involved in preventing pre-mature germination of seeds, root elongation, and stomatal closure. Stomata are pores in the leaf epidermis which control the rate of gas exchange. The pore is surrounded by two bean-shaped guard cells that regulate the size of the pore opening. Abscisic acid plays a critical role in the closure of the guard cells. Plants with mutations in the abscisic acid biosynthesis pathway have a “wilty” phenotype because they are unable to close their stomata during the day when loss of water to evaporative processes is high. The mutant, aba2, has been found to allelic to the glucose insensitive 1 (gin1) mutant (meaning the mutation for both aba2 and gin1 lie in the same gene).

Signaling pathways often work together to fine-tune plant development and responses. Seed germination, for example is finely controlled by antagonist interactions between sugar and abscisic acid which inhibit germination and gibberellin and ethylene which promote germination (figure 1).

Figure 1. Seed germination is controlled by a combination of signals from sugar levels, abscisic acid, gibberellin, and ethylene.

The sugar-insensitive 6 (sis6) mutant is slightly resistant to the inhibitory effects of abscisic acid on germination (Pattison, 2004). When seeds are grown in a petri plate with nutrient medium supplemented with abscisic acid, germination is delayed in wild-type plants. The sugar-insensitive 3 (sis3) mutant is slightly resistant to the effect of abscisic acid in comparison to wild-type (Columbia ecotype) seeds. The abscisic acid insensitive 4-1 (abi4-1) mutant displays precocious seed germination in the presence of abscisic acid, germinating despite the presence of exogenous ABA which should significantly delay germination (figure 2).

 

 

Figure 2. The sis6 mutant is insensitive to the inhibitory effects of ABA on germination. Seeds were sown on the indicated media and grown in continuous white fluorescent light. Germination was scored every 12 hours for four days and then every 24 hours thereafter. Error bar represent the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). This experiment was conducted three times with similar results. From Pattison, 2004.

 

How the Data was Collected for this set of Experiments

In order to conduct a chip experiment, RNA must be collected from the samples. In our experiments, Arabidopsis seeds were surface sterilized, cold treated at 4° C in the dark for three days and then plated on Nytex mesh screens placed in petri dishes containing minimal nutrient media. After 20 hour under continuous light at 21° the nytex meshes were transferred to plates containing either minimal media, or minimal media supplemented with 100 mM sorbitol, 100 mM glucose, 10 ”M abscisic acid or 50 ”M ACC (ethylene pre-cursor). Seeds were grown on the new media for 12.5 hours and then frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was extracted using a phenol/chloroform extraction (Verwoerd et al., 1989). RNA samples were sent to the Molecular Genomics Core Facility at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston for processing.

Part 1. Selecting your experimental conditions

To begin your work on the microarray project, you need to select your topic of study. You need to decide what you would like to examine and then select the appropriate control condition. Your options are in Table 1 below.

Options Topic Control Experimental Developmental Stage
1 Osmotic stress WT minimum WT sorbitol Germinating seeds
2 Osmotic stress WT sorbitol sis 6 sorbitol Germinating seeds
3 Glucose signaling WT sorbitol WT glucose Germinating seeds
4 Glucose signaling WT glucose ein2-1 glucose Germinating seeds
5 Abscisic acid signaling WT minimum WT on ABA Germinating seeds
6 Abscisic acid signaling WT glucose sis4-1 (aba2) glucose Germinating seeds
7 Abscisic acid signaling WT glucose sis5 (abi4) glucose Germinating seeds
8 Ethylene signaling WT minimal media WT ACC (ethylene) Germinating seeds

Table 1. Select your topic of study for the microarray project. Choose one option. Each row represents one possible option. Because the control must be appropriately matched to the experimental condition, you may not mix and match between rows.

Part 2. Identifying differences in gene regulation between control and experimental conditions.

1. Download the spreadsheet corresponding to your selected control and experimental conditions to your computer.

2. Take a few minutes to familiarize yourself with the spreadsheet layout.

Column A: AGI#. AGI stands for Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Every gene in the Arabidopsis

was assigned a unique identifier during the genome sequencing project. The Affymetrix DNA

chip contains over 22,000 genes representing nearly every known gene in the genome of Arabidopsis.

Column B: Affy Probe Index #. The Affymetrix probe index # refers to the probe array that corresponds to each gene. Each probe array contains 11 pairs of probe to the same gene. One probe in each pair is a perfect match to the gene and the other contains a mismatch in the center of the probe. The software uses the data from the perfect match sets and the mismatch sets to subtract out signal that may have arisen from near (but not quite perfect) matches. The names of the probe sets are based on what was known about the gene sequence at the time the chip was created.

Names ending in means

_at all probes match one known transcript

_a all probes match alternate transcripts from the same gene

_s all probes match transcripts from different genes

_x some probes match transcripts from different genes

 

Notice that rows 2 through 65 do not have AGI#’s and the Probe Index #’s all begin with AFFX. These are the quality control probe arrays for the chip. They are included so that researchers know that there were not technical issues with the chip or samples. A mix of probes that will result in positive and absent calls are included.

 

Signal Columns: Each experiment in this data set was conducted between 3 and 6 times. The

columns that contain the word “Signal” in the header represent the value for the signal reads.

 

Detection Columns: The column to the right of each signal column is the Detection Column.

P= present

A=absent

M=marginal

 

Present means the gene was expressed in the sample, resulting in a measurable signal above a

minimal detection threshold. Absent means the gene was not expressed under the experimental conditions. Marginal means the expression was very near the detection threshold. Marginal calls require further investigation and experimentation to confirm.

 

Converted Detection Columns: The column to the right of each Detection Column is the Converted Detection Column. The PMA calls are converted to a numeric value which allows the researcher to average the detection calls and decide whether or not to include a particular gene in the data set.

P=2

A=0

M=1

 

Descriptions: what was known about the gene at the gene identity or function at the time the Chip was created.

 

3. Open a new Excel file and name it as follows: Lastname_firstname_microarray.

 

 

4. Change the name of Sheet 1 to “control” by right clicking on the tab and selecting “rename” from the pop up menu. Copy and paste all the data from your control sheet into the “control tab”.

 

5. Click the “+” sign to add another tab at the bottom of the Excel sheet. Rename the new sheet “experimental”. Copy and paste all the data from your experimental sheet into the “experimental tab”.

 

6. For both experimental and control conditions, delete the rows containing the controls. These will be the rows at the top (that lack an AGI#).

 

7. Scroll to the right. Skip a column after the “Descriptions” column. Label the next column to the right “AVG control PMA” or “AVG experimental PMA”. Calculate the average PMA call for each gene using the converted detection column values for each condition. For example, if converted PMA detection calls are located in cells E2, I2, M2, an Q2, the formula you enter into the cell would be “=(E2+I2+M2+Q2)/4”. Do this for both your control and experimental sheets. Enter the formula and copy/paste it down the column. The row numbers will change automatically.

 

 

8. Click the “+” sign to add another tab to the bottom of the Excel sheet. Rename the new sheet “combined”.

 

9. Copy the following columns into the “combined” data sheet. You will need to paste “values” for any columns containing formulas. It’s under paste options.

a. AGI#

b. Signal columns for the control

c. Leave a blank column

c. Signal columns for the experimental

d. Leave a blank column

d. AVG control PMA column

e. AVG experimental PMA column

 

10. In the combined data sheet, add another column to the right of your AVG control PMA and AVG Experimental PMA columns.. Label this one “final PMA call”. Type in the formula “=MAX(XX2:XY2) where XX is the column labeled “AVG control PMA” and XY is the column labeled “AVG exp PMA” (substitute your actual column letters for XX and XY). This formula will transfer the maximum value for the two columns to the new “final PMA call column”. The point of doing this is to preserve genes in the data set where there was signal in one of the two conditions. For example, you would not want to delete a gene from the data set because it had an absent call in the control but was upregulated 15 fold in the experimental conditions. By looking at the results using the final column, we can eliminate genes where the signal was not detected in BOTH conditions.

 

11. In the combined spreadsheet, highlight your entire data set. Make sure you pick up all the cells with data. Click “Sort & Filter” in the toolbar. Click custom sort. Check the box on the right in pop-up box that says “My data has headers”. Sort by the “final PMA call” column from smallest to largest. Delete all rows that have a value of zero for final PMA call. This will eliminate all genes that were not expressed in either the control or experimental condition from the data set.

 

12. Add a column to the right of the “Final PMA call” column labeled “AVG control signal” in your combined spreadsheet. Average the values for the signal columns in your control data set. Use the formula =AVERAGE(X2:Y2) where X is the first column with the control signal data and Y is the last column of control signal data. Copy and paste the formula from row 2 all the way down the column. The row numbers will automatically change in the formula.

 

 

 

13. Add a column to the right of the “AVG control signal” column labeled “AVG experimental signal” in your combined spreadsheet. Average the values for the signal columns in your experimental data set. Use the formula =AVERAGE(X2:Y2) where X is the first column with the control signal data and Y is the last column of control signal data. Copy and paste the formula from row 2 all the way down the column. The row numbers will automatically change in the formula.

 

14. Add a column to the right labeled of the “AVG experimental signal” column labeled “AVG control/AVG experimental”. You will divide the average control signal value by the average experimental value using the formula “=XX2/XY2” [where XX is your AVG control signal column (row 2) and XY is your AVG experimental signal column (row2)]. Copy the formula down the column.

 

15. Add a column to the right of the “AVG control/AVG experimental” column labeled T-test. You will calculate whether there is a statistically significant difference between the two conditions. The syntax for this formula is T.Test(array1,array2, tails, type). Array 1 will be the cells containing the signal values for the control. Array 2 will be the cells containing the signal values for the experimental samples. These are NOT the averaged signals but the original values on the left-hand side of your spreadsheet. We will use a 2-tailed T-test. The type will be a two-sample equal variance test which Excel designates as “2”. For example, if the control signal columns were B, C, D and the experimental signal columns were E, F, and G, then the formula to set up in row 2 for the T-Test would be “=TTEST(B2:D2, E2:G2,2,2). Copy the formula down the row to calculate the p-values for the T-Test for each gene.

 

16. Click the “+” sign to add another tab to the bottom of the Excel sheet. Rename the new sheet “final”. Copy all the data from the “combined” spreadsheet into your “final” spreadsheet using the copy and paste value option. This will allow you to go back to the combined sheet to relax the stringency of your data selection if you find you end up with no genes at all in your data set when you complete the following steps.

 

17. Highlight your entire spreadsheet. Click “Sort & Filter” in the toolbox. Click custom sort. Click the “my data has headers” box on the right of the pop-up box. Sort by T-test value from largest to smallest. Delete all genes that have a p-value greater than 0.05. The expression of these genes is not significantly different between the control and experimental conditions and can be eliminated from the data set.

 

18. Highlight your entire spreadsheet again. Click “Sort & Filter” in the toolbox. Click custom sort. Click the “my data has headers” box on the right in the pop-up box. Sort by AVG control/AVG experimental from smallest to largest. Delete all genes that have a fold change between 1.99999 and 0.499999. What you are looking for are genes where the change in expression is two-fold above or below the level for the control condition. You want to keep genes in the data set where the AVG control/AVG experimental value is below 0.5 or lower. These are genes that are UPREGULATED in the experimental compared to the control. The larger number is in your denominator so the numbers are less than 1. You also want to keep genes in the data set where the AVG control/AVG experimental value is 2 or higher. In this case, the genes are DOWNREGULATED in the experimental condition compared to the control condition. Since the larger number is in the numerator, the value is greater than 1. If you do not have any genes with at least a two-fold difference in expression, between control and experimental, relax your conditions and select genes with fold changes between 1.5 and 0.66.

 

19. Change the font color for all of the down-regulated genes to red [AVG control/AVG experimental values above 2 (or 1.5 if you relaxed the conditions)].

 

20. Change the font color for all of the up-regulated genes to green [AVG control/AVG experimental values below 0.5 (or 0.66 if you relaxed the conditions)].

 

21. Determine how many genes were up-regulated and how many were down-regulated.

 

Part 3. Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process

1. Copy the first column with the AGI#’s into a new Excel sheet. Do not copy the column header. Save the file as a comma delimited file (CSV).

2. Go to https://www.arabidopsis.org/ . Click Search and select Gene Ontology annotations from the drop down menu.

 

3. Click Choose file. Select your CSV file. Click Functional Categorization.

 

4. Click Draw next to “Annotation Pie Chart”. This will generate 3 pie charts: GO Cellular Component, GO Biological Process, and GO Molecular Function. You will include the GO Biological Process chart in your paper. Copy and paste that into your Word file for your paper. When you write your paper, you should discuss anything that stands out to you as particularly interesting given your chosen topic. You do not need to discuss every single category of information appearing in these charts. You may include the other two charts in your paper if there is something in particular that you wish to highlight or tie into your discussion section of the paper but you are not required to do so.

 

Part 4.

Selecting a gene of interest for detailed study.

Information is continuously being added to our knowledge base. Many genes have been identified since the data in this particular data set was first collected. If you want to see if more information is available for a particular gene that has a particularly striking fold change, you can check TAIR, the Arabidopisis Information Resource at https://www.arabidopsis.org/.

Click Search:

 

Click Microarray Element from the dropdown box. Enter your locus identifier in the box (example: At5g01810). Make sure Affymetrix ATH1 is selected (this is the type of chip our data set is from) and click “Get Microarray Elements”.

 

To get detailed information on a gene of interest.

In this example, information about the gene can be found under the annotation.

 

 

You will want to select a gene that from your dataset that is strongly up or down-regulated (a fold change of 3 is preferred but you may go as low as 1.5-fold if necessary for the purpose of this assignment). You need to select a gene that has been studied in the past. Skip ones that are listed as unknown function in both our data set and when you look it up in the search above.

Next, click the search box in the top left corner again and this time select “Genes”. Enter your locus ID (example At5g01810) in the “starts with” box under the Search by Name or Phenotype section. Scroll to the bottom of the page and hit “Submit Query”. Select your locus from the list by clicking on the blue locus identifier.

 

. 

If the gene has been previously studied, a wealth of information will be available on the next page. Information to include in your paper:

1. Gene locus

2. Other names for the gene:

3. Biological Processes in which the gene plays a role (GO Biological Process)

4. The cellular component in which the protein product is expressed (GO Cellular Component)

5. Growth and developmental stages when the gene is expressed

6. The plant structures where the protein product of the gene is expressed

Take a look at the BAR eFP (The Bio-Analytic Resource for Plant Biology electronic fluorescent pictograph) data. This is a browser engine that “paints” data from genomic data sets, such as microarrays, ont pictographs that repsent the experimental samples used to generat the data set. The purpose of the tool is to help researchers develop testable hypothesis based on the enormous amount of data generated by genomics projects. If you click the Data source you have options you can select that will provide you with information on experimental work others have conducted to study this gene. The informationwill be in a nicely illustrated summary form. The original reference will be included on the page as well.

Another example for the same gene:

 

This is a great place to look for information on your gene to use in your narrative. You should cite the original papers if you use the information in this section. You may need to go back to the original paper for details or clarity.

 

 

 

 

Under the Protein Data section, you will find the following information to include in your paper:

1. Protein Length

2. Molecular weight

3. Isoelectric point

4. List of InterPro domains: Create a table of the domains and their function (if the function is known). Click on the links. This will take you out to the InterPro site where you will find info on the domain. The information in the description might provide some useful information to include in your manuscript. In the table, you should indicate a very BRIEF description of whatever you think is most relevant about this particular domain (think about what your microarray experiment was to help you decide what might be the most useful information to include in the table) and the biological process, molecular function or cellular component that is applicable to the domain (see under GO terms). If no information is available, record “none” in your table. Example:

 

 

Domain Brief Description Biological Process Molecular Function Cellular Component
NAF/FISL_domain: IPR018451 Serine-threonine protein kinase that itneracts with calcineurin B-like calsium sensor proteins Signal transduction None none

 

Table 1. Domain ontology from http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/entry/InterPro/IPR018451/.

 

 

All the way at the bottom of the TAIR page, you will find a list of publications related to the gene. Use these publications as references for your paper.

 

Part 4. Write your microarray paper.

Your microarray paper should contain the following components:

1. Title: The title should contain the species name of the organism (Arabadosis thaliana), your topic of experimentation, and a statement about what you were looking for or what data you were generating.

2. Introduction: Be sure to state the purpose of the study, why the experiment was conducted, review previous works of others in the field (integrated seamlessly, not one reference after another). How a microarray works is not needed here. Assume your reader is familiar with this now long-standing, common-place technique. Focus on your topic (osmotic signaling, sugar signaling, phytohormone signaling, or the interplay between sugar and phytohormone signaling).

3. Results:

a. Report the # of genes upregulated and downregulated by 2-fold or higher.

b. Include a table of top ten most highly genes up-regulated and the top ten most highly down-

regulated genes in your experimental condition compared to to control (use your combined

spreadsheet). Also include any genes that you want to discuss in your discussion section. You

may highlight genes in the discussion that show a change in regulation in your experiment

but didn’t make the top 10. Example:

 

Example:

 

AGI # Affymetrix Probe # Fold change p-value in Student’s T-Test Description
At1g20340 255886_at -4.11044 3.33E-03 Plastocyanin, putative
At1g79040 264092_at -4.02826 6.66E-04 Photosystem II polypeptide, putative
At1g32900 261191_at +3.324657 1.19E-05 Starch synthase, putative

 

 

c. Gene ontology data

 

d. All data collected from Part B about your selected gene for deeper study.

 

e. All figures should be labeled and be accompanied by figure legends. The figure should be

referenced in the text (see figure 1).

 

f. Text (in addition to the figure legends) should be present to inform the reader what you did

and to summarize the results collected. No interpretation of the data is included here. Save

that for the discussion.

 

4. Discussion:

a. Recap you results. Take a look at the descriptions for the genes that are up or down regulated. Now look at the review of literature you selected for homework. Are there genes on the list that you would expect to see based on the literature? Looking at the descriptions, are there genes that make sense to see? If you are looking at sugar, are there genes that are obviously part of sugar metabolic pathways or involved in photosynthesis? If you are looking at phytohormones, do the receptors to your chosen phytohormone appear on the list? You might want to pull up journal articles on some of the genes appearing on the list to explain why they might be appearing on your list. Include a few suggestions for future experiments that could be conducted to expand our understanding of your topic based on your results.

5. References: You should no fewer than 6 journal articles (literature review or primary literature) cited.

6. Appendix: You will upload your Excel spreadsheet separately to the Google Drive. Be sure to drop it in the folder for your TA.

General Information:

· Your paper should be in Times Roman or Calibri font, size 12. Paper margin should be 1 inch. Please double-space the paper. The paper should not contain figures or images from any published work. In order to include previously published images, not only must you cite the source, you must also seek permission from both the original authors and the publisher. Unless you are prepared to submit the documentation for these permissions, do not include figures or images that you did not generate using the TAIR page or create yourself.

· The grading rubric is in Blackboard.

 

References:

Adam, D. (2000). Now for the hard ones. Nature 408, 792-793.

The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815.

Bernier, G., Havelange, A., Houssa, c., Petitjean, A., and Lejeune. P. (1993). Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell. 5, 1147-1155.

Dai, N., Schaffer, A., Petreikov, M., Shahak, Y., Giller, Y., Ratner, K, Levine, A., and Granot, D. (1999). Overexpression of Arabidopsis hexokinase in tomato plants inhibits growth, reduces photo synthesis, and induces rapid senescence. Palnt Cell 11, 1253-1266.

Jang, J.-C., and Sheen, J. (1997). Sugar sensing in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2, 208-214.

Meyerowitz, E.M. (1989). Arabidopsis, a useful weed. Cell 56, 263-269.

Pattison, D. (2004) Characterization of sugar-insensitive mutants and analysis of sugar-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. [Doctoral dissertation, Rice University]. Rice University Graduate Electronic Theses and Dissertations.https://scholarship.rice.edu/handle/1911/18679

Verwoerd, T.C., Dekker, B.M. M., and Hoekema, A. (1989). A small-scale procedure for the rapid isolation of plant RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 2362.

Wilson, J. B. (1988). A Review of evidence on the control of shoot: root ration, in relation to models. Annals of Botany. 61 (4) 433-449.

Yu, S.-M. (1999). Cellular and genetic responses of plants to sugar starvation. Plant Physiol. 121, 687-693.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"