solution
Synopsis
The founder of a heavy-duty construction equipment manufacturing company died and his wife, Jane, became the CEO. In direct contrast to Jim’s style, Jane’s management style communicated respect and her vision of the company excited the employees.
Two managers, Curtis and Morgan, who were holdovers from her husband’s leadership did not fit into the company’s new culture. However, their long service to the organization and their consistency in meeting all production goals and deadlines is impressive. They can push themselves and their crews relentlessly. Their leadership-through-intimidation style is apparent and not a fit to the new organizational culture. They encourage workers in their areas of the plants to ignore new cultural initiatives.
Should we fire Curtis and Morgan? Demote them? They have done nothing wrong. Their crews are meeting their production and quality targets. These two guys have been with the company for over 4 decades. A move to fire or demote them appears to create an age discrimination suit. Jane has to decide how to handle the situation.
Questions
1. What options do you think Jane and her management team should consider with regard to these two long-time supervisors? Discuss the positives and negatives of each option. Each option must be explained in 3-4 full sentences and should show evidence of critical thinking of the situation and option.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
