Service Time

Please READ and review the details of the ENTIRE assignment. The assignment must be written professionally, scholarly, APA format, and MUST include every detail the assignment asks to be completed.

Attached are the…The Assignment’s Rubric…and the Case Study Documentation to READ and COMPLETE the assignment…PLEASE RESEARCH THE DOCUMENTS….THEY PROVIDE INFORMATION NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT CORRECTLY AND PROPERLY

**Please do not rush the assignment….THERE IS plenty of time to Research, and properly complete the assignment**

***Assignment Details***

In this course, you will experience the next segment of a multi-year integrated case study that offers you the opportunity to apply the knowledge gained in the course to a real-world situation. The case study weaves together practical application with doctoral research by requiring that the business decisions made regarding the case study be supported by current or seminal research. In this assignment, you use research to develop three potential resolutions for the business case. Instructor feedback about your proposed resolutions will inform your Topic 5 assignment.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

· Refer to “DBA-835 Integrated Case Study” (Attached)

· Learners MUST review the RUBRIC prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

· Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. An abstract is not required.

· This assignment requires that at least three scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. Support for decisions should include appropriate current (within the last three years) or foundational, peer reviewed, and professional research.

Directions:

Review the information in “DBA-835 Integrated Case Study.” This includes narrative information as well as financial and supporting documentation.

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that suggests resolutions to the business case presented in “DBA-835 Integrated Business Case.” Include the following in your paper:

1. A one- or two-sentence summary of the sustainability issue presented in the case.

2. A summary of the management theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution. (Benchmarks C 1.1: Evaluate management theories.)

3. A summary of the leadership theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution. (Benchmarks C 1.2: Evaluate leadership theories.)

4. A research-supported discussion with rationales for at least two viable potential resolutions. What analyses would you include for each option? Why? (Benchmarks C1.3: Develop, extend, modify, or apply theories for use in business.)

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
DBA-835	DBA-835-O500	Benchmark – Case Study Potential Resolutions	230.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less Than Satisfactory (73.00%)	Satisfactory (82.00%)	Good (91.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	90.0%
Summary of the Sustainability Issue	10.0%	A summary of the sustainability issue is not presented.	A summary of the sustainability issue is included, but is inaccurate or incomplete.	A summary of the sustainability issue is presented, but does not focus on the financial concerns of the case.	A summary of the sustainability issue is presented and focuses on the financial concerns of the case.	A summary of the sustainability issue is thoroughly presented and strongly focuses on the financial concerns of the case offering rich detail.
Summary of the Management Theories Applicable to the Case and Its Potential Resolution Benchmarks C 1.1: Evaluate management theories.	20.0%	A summary of the management theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is not presented.	A summary of the management theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is included, but is inaccurate or incomplete.	A summary of the management theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is presented, but does not focus on the financial concerns of the case.	A summary of the management theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is presented and focuses on the financial concerns of the case.	A summary of the management theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is thoroughly presented and strongly focuses on the financial concerns of the case offering rich detail.
Summary of the Leadership Theories Applicable to the Case and Its Potential Resolution Benchmarks C 1.2: Evaluate leadership theories.	20.0%	A summary of the leadership theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is not presented.	A summary of the leadership theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is included, but is inaccurate or incomplete.	A summary of the leadership theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is presented, but does not focus on the financial concerns of the case.	A summary of the leadership theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is presented and focuses on the financial concerns of the case.	A summary of the leadership theories applicable to the case and its potential resolution is thoroughly presented and strongly focuses on the financial concerns of the case offering rich detail.
Discussion of and Rationales for at Least Two Potential Resolutions Benchmarks C1.3: Develop, extend, modify, or apply theories for use in business.	30.0%	A discussion of and rationales for at least two potential resolutions is not presented.	A discussion of and rationales for at least two potential resolutions is presented, but resolutions are ill-conceived and illogical. No research or financial analysis support is offered.	A discussion of and rationales for at least two potential resolutions is presented, but is cursory and lacking in depth. Resolutions may be viable, but appear hastily conceived and lack depth of thought. Research and financial analysis support is limited and from dated resources.	A discussion of and rationales for at least two potential resolutions is presented, is logical, and is thorough. Resolutions are viable, appear moderately well-conceived, and are logical. Research and financial analysis support is limited, but from current resources.	A discussion of and rationales for at least two potential resolutions is thoroughly presented with clear logic and rich detail. Resolutions are viable and well-conceived and display exceptional depth of thought. Research and financial analysis support is thorough and from current resources.
Synthesis and Argument	10.0%	No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources.	Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing, presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Format	10.0%
Mechanics of Writing	5.0%	Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
APA Format	5.0%	Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used.	Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used.	Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present.	Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"