NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

Page 1“Crazy About Cryptids!” by Matthew P. Rowe

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

Part I – Introduction Victoria adored her older brother Travis. She had good reason: their father had died when they were kids, leaving them and their younger twin sisters to be raised by their mother and grandmother. Growing up was tough; their mother’s salary as a social worker was meager, and their grandmother suff ered from a chronic medical condition that took much of the family’s income. As the oldest, Travis started working early to help support the family, a sacrifi ce not lost on Victoria and her sisters. Victoria so respected her brother that she couldn’t help comparing her high school and now her college suitors to Travis, and the admirers always fell short. Travis was kind, courageous, generous to a fault, and oh so smart—he even, while helping raise his siblings, put himself through law school and was now working as a public defender in Chicago. But he had a weakness that worried Victoria. Outside of the courtroom, Travis was gullible. He had a fondness for all things extraordinary—from ghosts to alien abductions to new-age therapies. His true passion, however, was cryptids. He was simply crazy about cryptids.

Victoria was majoring in Integrative Biology at Michigan State. Her training, including courses in ecology, wildlife biology, and the philosophy of science, made her appropriately skeptical of chupacabras, yetis, bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, and other storied beasts. Th e fact that her brother, a lawyer whose career depended on the critical examination of evidence, could be so credulous was unsettling to her. While sensitive to his feelings, she hoped she could use her growing understanding of science in general, and ecology in particular, to empower her brother. A “just touching base” phone call from Travis presented Victoria with an opportunity.

“Hi sis, how are classes?” Travis asked supportively when Victoria picked up the phone.

“Great,” she replied, “in my wildlife techniques course, we’re studying all the cool things you can learn about an animal just by analyzing a tiny drop of its feces, or a hair or two snagged on a scratching post. It’s pretty amazing.”

“Yeah,” Travis replied with unrestrained enthusiasm, “did you hear about the recent study of hair samples collected from a bunch of diff erent sites in the U.S. and Canada that proved the existence of bigfoot, and showed they were interbreeding with humans?”

Victoria, remembering one of the principles she learned in her philosophy course, responded: “Travis, science isn’t about ‘proving’ an idea or explanation, it’s about marshaling all of the evidence you can to determine which of various competing explanations is best supported.” She continued, “I don’t mean to sound scientifi cally snobbish or anything, but the study you mention by Melba Ketchum and her coauthors lacks credibility. A team led by Bryan Sykes published a more rigorous analysis of hair sent in by bigfoot and yeti enthusiasts from around the world; the results showed that the hair belonged to bears and raccoons and other mammals one would expect to be wandering around in the woods, not to bigfoot or a bigfoot-human hybrid.”

by Matthew P. Rowe Department of Integrative Biology Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Crazy About Cryptids! An Ecological Hunt for Nessie and Other Legendary Creatures

 

 

NATIONAL CENTER FOR CASE STUDY TEACHING IN SCIENCE

Page 2“Crazy About Cryptids!” by Matthew P. Rowe

“You’re breaking my heart here kiddo, you know I’m a true believer in Sasquatch,” Travis replied with feigned sadness. “Besides, isn’t it possible that a species of giant man-ape unknown to science exists somewhere on the planet?”

“Sure,” Victoria chimed encouragingly, “species unknown to science are occasionally discovered, like the mega-mouth shark or the saola. And creatures that scientists thought went extinct millions of years ago like the coelacanth are rediscovered. So I’m not saying that bigfoot doesn’t exist, only that the evidence presented so far is insuffi cient for me to accept that it does.”

After a short pause, Travis responded thoughtfully, “Ok, little sister, I think I see where you are coming from; in a jury trial, which is something I know about, the guilt or innocence of a suspect is determined by the preponderance of the evidence. Th e jury has to determine whether the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, not beyond any shadow of a doubt. Absolute certainty is unlikely. What matters is that the jurists, before reaching a verdict, carefully examine each of the explanations and all of the evidence off ered by both the prosecution and the defense. I guess it’s the same thing in science.”

Sensing an opening, Victoria slyly suggested, “Didn’t you say you wanted to see a Spartan football game? Well, homecoming is in two weeks; why don’t you come for a visit. We can catch the game, and then afterwards we’ll go hunting for the Loch Ness Monster.”

Nessie was Travis’s favorite cryptid, so his sister’s off er aroused his curiosity. “How can we go hunting for a population of aquatic monsters in Scotland from your apartment in the middle of Michigan?” Travis asked inquisitively.

“We’ll track her down using the science of ecology,” Victoria answered.

Questions 1. Two articles were mentioned in the story. Th e fi rst, titled “Novel North American Hominins, Next Generation

Sequencing of Th ree Whole Genomes and Associated Studies” by lead author Melba Ketchum and her co- authors, was published in the journal DeNovo. Th e second, titled “Genetic Analysis of Hair Samples Attributed To Yeti, Bigfoot, and Other Anomalous Primates” by Bryan Sykes and his team, was published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Th e two reports apply similar techniques using similarly obtained samples but reach diff erent conclusions. Summarize the main conclusions of each.

2. Credibility is an important concept both in science and in courts-of-law. Which of the two publications is more credible, and why?

3. Occam’s Razor, also known as the Principle of Parsimony, can be useful when trying to determine which explanation, among two or more, is most likely to be correct. What is the Principle of Parsimony? Apply the principle to the diff erent explanations off ered by Ketchum’s team and Syke’s team. Which of the competing explanations best passes the razor test, and why?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

He Baby’s Brain: Wider Than The Sky Full

ou may also like…

  • 1–4 of 4

The Teenage Brain: A World of Their Own

Video Title

The Child’s Brain: Syllable from Sound

Video Title

The Aging Brain: Through Many Lives

PBS

At age 95, the poet Stanley Kunitz was named U.S. poet laureate and was still writing new poems and reading to live audiences-an inspiring example of the brain’s vitality in the final years of life. This program presents recent discoveries in neuroscience that tell us how the brain ages, and how that aging process and intact mental functions aren’t mutually exclusive. The film demonstrates that older brains continue producing new neurons and possess unique characteristics that form the basis for wisdom. Alzheimer’s disease is also an important topic. Distributed by PBS Distribution. Part of the series The Secret Life of the Brain. (56 minutes)

The Aging Brain: Through Many Lives

Video Title

The Adult Brain: To Think by Feeling

Video Title

 

The Baby’s Brain: Wider Than the Sky Full Video (54:21)

Segments Transcript

FULL PROGRAM

The Baby’s Brain: Wider Than the Sky

SEGMENTS

  1. Human Brain: Ultimate Machine03:05
  2. Premature Infant Brain02:02
  3. Genetic Code Script01:27
  4. The Primitive Beginning of Thoughts and Feelings01:56
  5. Neuron Pathways02:20
  6. Neuron Migration01:50
  7. Genetic Blueprint03:25
  8. Coping Before the Brain is Ready01:52
  9. Learning Disabilities in Preemies01:33
  10. Shaping the Brain in Unintended Ways02:05
  11. Emulating the Womb03:21
  12. Nature vs. Nurture04:11
  13. Preemie Brain Development02:51
  14. Physical Change in Development of Brain Parameters02:59
  15. Negotiating a Complicated World01:57
  16. Critical Stimulation01:16
  17. Critical Images02:20
  18. Fighting for Cortical Connections03:12
  19. Maturing Without Visual Experience01:45
  20. Removing Cataracts in Time01:43
  21. Plastic Human Brain02:17

Hide Segments/Transcripts 

DESCRIPTION 

Only four weeks into human gestation, the brain’s first cells, the neurons, are already forming at an astonishing rate—250,000 every minute. This program illustrates that process and the more complex brain development that occurs during an infant’s life, both before and following birth. Viewers learn how vision and the visual cortex come into play; what happens when a baby is born with visual impairment, such as infant cataracts; and many more facts and insights regarding the early brain’s ability to shape itself in response to the demands of the world. Distributed by PBS Distribution. Part of the series The Secret Life of the Brain. (56 minutes)

Distributed by PBS Distribution.DETAILS Producer: PBSSeries: The Secret Life of the BrainDate Added: 12/12/2009Copyright Date: © 2001Item #: 41054Type: Documentary FilmRun Time: 54:21TAGSAnatomy Biological neural network Biology Brain Human brain Mind NeuropsychologyNeuroscience Neuroscience and intelligence

You may also like…

  • 1–4 of 4

The Teenage Brain: A World of Their Own

Video Title

The Child’s Brain: Syllable from Sound

Video Title

The Aging Brain: Through Many Lives

Video Title

The Adult Brain: To Think by Feeling

Video Title

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Bio Statistics Quiz

This quiz consists of 20 questions most appear to be similar but now really. I ned someone who is familiar with bio-statistics and math. The due date is tomorrow 4 pm PST. or (16:00). Please if you accept handshake you must do the work not get from previous papers or tell me you had emergency an hour before its due. This is important to me.

attached is the file just in case you need it in word format. Thank you in advance.

1.      The standard deviation of the diameter at breast height, or DBH, of the slash pine tree is less than one inch. Identify the Type I error. (Points : 1)

[removed] Fail to support the claim σ < 1 when σ < 1 is true.
[removed] Support the claim  Ό < 1 when Ό = 1 is true.
[removed] Support the claim σ < 1 when σ = 1 is true.
      [removed] Fail to support the claim Ό < 1 when Ό < 1 is true.

1a.  The EPA claims that fluoride in children’s drinking water should be at a mean level of less than 1.2 ppm, or parts per million, to reduce the number of dental cavities. Identify the Type I error. (Points : 1)

[removed] Fail to support the claim σ < 1.2 when σ < 1.2 is true.
[removed] Support the claim Ό < 1.2 when Ό = 1.2 is true.
[removed] Support the claim σ < 1.2 when σ = 1.2 is true.
[removed] Fail to support the claim Ό < 1.2 when Ό < 1.2 is true.

2.      Biologists are investigating if their efforts to prevent erosion on the bank of a stream have been statistically significant. For this stream, a narrow channel width is a good indicator that erosion is not occurring. Test the claim that the mean width of ten locations within the stream is greater than 3.7 meters. Assume that a simple random sample has been taken, the population standard deviation is not known, and the population is normally distributed. Use the following sample data:

3.3 3.3 3.5 4.9 3.5 4.1 4.1 5 7.3 6.2

What is the P-value associated with your test statistic? Report your answer with three decimals, e.g., .987 (Points : 1)

2a. Medical researchers studying two therapies for treating patients infected with Hepatitis C found the following data. Assume a .05 significance level for testing the claim that the proportions are not equal. Also, assume the two simple random samples are independent and that the conditions np ≄ 5 and nq ≄ 5 are satisfied.

  Therapy 1 Therapy 2
Number of patients 39 47
Eliminated Hepatitis 20 13
C infection    

Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the odds ratio of the odds for having Hepatitis C after Therapy 1 to the odds for having Hepatitis C after Therapy 2. Give your answer with two decimals, e.g., (12.34,56.78) (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

3. Researchers studying sleep loss followed the length of sleep, in hours, of 10 individuals with insomnia before and after cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Assume a .05 significance level to test the claim that there is a difference between the length of sleep of individuals before and after CBT. Also, assume the data consist of matched pairs, the samples are simple random samples, and the pairs of values are from a population having a distribution that is approximately normal.

Individual 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Before 6 5 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 2
CBT                    
After 8 8 7 6 7 6 6 5 7 5
CBT                    

Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean difference between the lengths of sleep. Give your answer with two decimals, e.g., (12.34,56.78) (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

3a. Scientists, researching large woody debris (LWD), surveyed the number of LWD pieces from aerial photos taken annually for the past 35 years at two different sites. Over the 35 years of photos examined, the first site had a mean number of LWD pieces per hectare per year (LWD/ha/yr) of 3.7 pieces with a standard deviation of 1.9. The second site had a mean number of LWD/ha/yr of 4.3 with a standard deviation of 2.4. Assume a .05 significance level for testing the claim that the mean LWD/ha at the first site had less than the mean LWD/ha/yr at the second site. Also, assume the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, but do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal.

Construct a 90% confidence interval for the difference between the two means. Give your answer with two decimals, e.g., (12.34,56.78) (Points : 0.5)

4.      The paired data consist of the cost of regionally advertising (in thousands of dollars) a certain pharmaceutical drug and the number of new prescriptions written (in thousands).

Cost 9 2 3 4 2 5 9 10
Number 85 52 55 68 67 86 83 73

Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Give your answer to three decimals, e.g., .987. (Points : 0.5)

4a. The paired data consist of the cost of regionally advertising (in thousands of dollars) a certain pharmaceutical drug and the number of new prescriptions written (in thousands).

Cost 9 2 3 4 2 5 9 10
Number 85 52 55 68 67 86 83 73

Find the predicted value of the number of new prescriptions written if $6000 is spent in regional advertising. Give your answer as an integer. (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

5.      Use a .05 significance level and the observed frequencies of 70 Neonatal deaths to test the claim that number of neonatal deaths on each day of the week is equally likely.

Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun
10 9 5 8 15 12 11

Determine the value of the χ2 test statistic. Give your answer to two decimals, e.g., 12.34 (Points : 0.5)

5a. Use a .05 significance level and the observed frequencies of 144 drowning at the beaches of a randomly selected coastal state to test the claim that the number of drowning for each month is equally likely.

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
1 3 2 7 14 20 37 33 16 6 2 3

Determine the value of the χ2 test statistic. Give your answer to two decimals, e.g., 12.34 . (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

6.      Using a .01 significance level, test the claim that the proportions of fear/do not fear responses are the same for male and female dental patients.

Gender

  Male Female
Fear Dentistry 48 70
Do Not Fear Dentistry 21 32

Do you reject the null hypothesis, at the .01 significance level? Enter Y for yes (reject), N for no (fail to reject). (Points : 0.5)

6a. Using a .01 significance level, test the claim that the proportions of fear/do not fear responses are the same for male and female dental patients.

Gender

 

  Male Female
Fear Dentistry 48 70
Do Not Fear Dentistry 21 32

Determine the value of the χ2 test statistic. Give your answer to three decimals, e.g., 12.345 . (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

 

7. The table represents results from an experiment with patients afflicted in both eyes with glaucoma. Each patient was treated in one eye with laser surgery and in the other eye was treated with eye drops. Using a .05 significance level, apply McNemar’s test to test the following claim: The proportion of patients with no improvement on the laser treated eye and an improvement on the drops treated eye is the same as the proportion of patients with an improvement on the laser treated eye and no improvement on the drops treated eye.

    Eye Drop Treatment

 

    Improvement No Improvement
       
Laser Surgery Improvement 15 10
Treatment No Improvement 50 25

Determine the value of the χ2 test statistic. Give your answer to two decimals, e.g., 12.34 . (Points : 0.5)

7a. The table represents results from an experiment with patients afflicted with eczema on both arms. Each patient was treated with an immune modulator cream on one arm and a topical steroid cream on the other arm. Using a .05 significance level, apply McNemar’s test to test the following claim: The proportion of patients with no cure on the immune modulator treated arm and a cure on the topical steroid treated arm is the same as the proportion of patients with a cure on the immune modulator treated arm and no cure on the topical steroid treated arm.

    Immune Modulator Cream

 

    Cure No Cure
Topical Steroid Cure 25 11
Cream No Cure 42 22

Do you reject the null hypothesis, at the .05 significance level? Enter Y for yes (reject), N for no (fail to reject). (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

8.For a study on Type 1 diabetes, medical graduate students subdivided the United States into four study regions (Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, and Northwest). The students randomly selected seven patients per region and recorded the number of times during a randomly selected month that each patient used insulin shots to regulate blood sugar levels. Use One-Way ANOVA at a .05 significance level to test the claim that the means from the different regions are not the same.

Mean number of times patients used insulin shots to regulate blood sugar levels

 Northeast Southeast Southwest Northwest
4 6 4 4
3 5 5 4
3 6 6 5
4 8 6 6
3 6 7 3
2 6 5 5
5 8 4 3
   
   
   

Do you reject the null hypothesis, at the .05 significance level? Enter Y for yes (reject), N for no (fail to reject). (Points : 0.5

8a. Geneticists studying carriers of genetic diseases followed subjects subdivided by race. Researchers randomly selected seven patients per race who had been identified as carrying a certain gene for a genetic disease; these patients were followed to determine the number of their siblings who also carried the gene for the genetic disease. Use a One-Way ANOVA at a .05 significance level to test the claim that the means from the different races are not all the same.

Caucasian African-American Other
2 0 0
3 0 1
3 1 2
3 2 2
4 2 2
5 2 3
5 4 4

Determine the value of the F test statistic. Give your answer to two decimals, e.g., 12.34 . (Points : 0.5)

[removed]

                            

9.      The reason we cannot use multiple t-tests to claim that four populations have the same mean is that we increase the likelihood of a type I error. (Points : 1)

[removed] True
[removed] False

9a.

If there is only one observation per cell in a Two-Way ANOVA, and it can be assumed there is not an interaction between factors, then we can proceed to interpret the results of the row and column effects. (Points : 1)

[removed] True
[removed] False

 

10.Use the following technology display from a Two-Way ANOVA to answer this question. Biologists studying habitat use in Lepidopteran moths measured the number of savannah moths found at three randomly selected prairie sites with two potential habitat interferences (expansion of row crops and grazing). Use a .05 significance level.

Source Df SS MS F P
Site 2 .1905 .0952 .0381 .9627
Habitat 1 304.0238 304.0238 121.6095 .0000
Site*Habitat 2 .1905 .0952 .0381 .9627

What is the value of the F test statistic for the site effect? (Points : 0.5)

10a. Use the following technology display from a Two-Way ANOVA to answer this question. Biologists studying habitat use in Lepidopteran moths measured the number of savannah moths found at three randomly selected prairie sites with two potential habitat interferences (expansion of row crops and grazing). Use a .05 significance level.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Practical manual Immunology

Immunology

From Immunology 5e, Goldsby et al.

Practical Program 2016

Prof. Peter Smooker

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

2

Coordinator:

Prof. Peter Smooker School of Applied Sciences Biotechnology and Environmental Biology RMIT-University Plenty Road, Bundoora Melbourne VIC 3083 (: 9925 7129 Fax: 9925 7110 :: peter.smooker@rmit.edu.au Practical Class Times: Friday: 12:00 – 5:00pm Practical Class Outline: Practical 1: Day 1 Preparation of Antigen – Sonication 19 August Protein Determination – Bradford method

Preparation for ELISA – coating antigen onto microtitre plate

Day 2 ELISA 26 August

SEMESTER BREAK (29/08/2016 – 02/09/2016)

Practical 2: Day 1 Invasion & Adherence Assay 09 September Day 2 Analysis of results 16 September

Practical 3: 23 September Immuno-bioinformatics

Depending on time constraints, some methods may be demonstrated to

you. Your demonstrators will advise.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

3

Laboratory Safety:

1. The teaching laboratories in Building 223 are PC2 laboratories and are subject to Australian Standards for Laboratories AS/NZS 2243.3:2010.

2. Long-sleeved laboratory gowns/coats are to be worn at all times in the laboratory. If you do not have a laboratory gown/coat one can be hired from the APS Preparation room after the hiring fee has been paid. These are stored in the plastic bag in a designated place in the laboratory.

3. Suitable footwear must be worn; open sandal or thongs are not acceptable. Long hair must be tied back securely as a protection from Bunsen burners and interference with work being carried out. When working with infectious material wear gloves to ensure no contamination of hands.

4. Keep your bench free of non-essential material at all times. Bags are not permitted near the laboratory benches and therefore must be stored in a designated storage area. Regard all bench tops and other surfaces as potential sources of contamination.

5. When working at the benches avoid all hand-to-mouth operations. Never smoke, eat/drink or put anything in your mouth while in the laboratory.

6. Report any accidents involving cuts, burns, broken glass or spilled cultures immediately to a demonstrator. Tissues and Sodium Hypochlorite disinfectant are provided in the event of a spill.

7. Never place contaminated pipette tips on the bench.

8. Where to discard contaminated and non-contaminated waste:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

4

9. Use of the Fume hood: All procedures involving dangerous chemicals will be performed in the fume hood. Students will be instructed in the session.

10. Procedures before leaving the laboratory: a. Replace all empty sterile tip boxes used. b. Empty out non-sterile tips and eppendorf tubes into their snap-lock bags

and return racks to designated trolley. c. Return all plastic racks, pipettes and bottles of reagents to the designated

trolley. d. Ensure all used contaminated material is stored/disposed of appropriately. e. Clean your bench area. f. Close lids of all Biohazard Sharps containers and place them in the

designated storage area. g. Put chairs neatly under your bench. h. Wash hands thoroughly with soap and water.

 

Important Safety Considerations:

‱ In immunology practical classes you are handling potentially dangerous bacterial cultures, please take care and adhere to good aseptic technique at all times.

‱ Any student who may be at increased risk of infection is urged to discuss the matter confidentially with their demonstrator.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

5

GUIDELINES FOR WRITTEN WORK IN ADVANCED IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL TECHNOLOGY:

For each of the three practicals within this subject there is a written component. Practical 1 (ELISA) and Practical 2 (Infection &Invasion) require a scientific report and Practical 3 (Bioinformatics) has an assignment sheet. All of the formal scientific reports must follow this set of guidelines in order to be passed. Please take note of the marking scheme for each report for detailed allocation of

marks for each section within the report. Word Count Limit: The upper limit for these reports is 750 words. Turnitin: All reports are to be submitted to Turnitin for similarities to other student’s reports and already published works. All reports must be written in Third Person/passive text (this means no personal pronouns- No; I saw/ we saw/ we did/ we showed). A correct example of passive writing is “The data shown represents
.”. All sections are to be written in PAST TENSE, except when mentioning a known fact, e.g. “It was shown that some cells stained
”

HEADINGS FOR THESE REPORTS INCLUDE:

1. Introduction & Aims

The introduction should include the necessary background information required to understand the topic (for this you will need to read current literature) and an aim/purpose of the practical. Be sure to correctly reference any information provided from a reliable source. This section is usually allocated the second most marks in a marking scheme.

2. Materials & Methods

The materials and methods section will contain all of the materials used in the practical and the procedures followed. As these are provided for you in detail you do not need to re-write these, however you must mention any changes made to a protocol and reference them accordingly.

 

3. Results

The results section should have your data organized and presented as clearly and precisely as possible. Avoid repeating results. Data presented in the results section must be the final result (either a graph or table); any raw data (All OD readings, individual group colony counts, calculations etc.) should be placed in an appendix and referred to in text.

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

6

In some cases you may be required to provide results from a calculation. In this case you may show written calculations for one example within the results section and provide the answers from the rest. All other calculations should be in an appendix and referred to in text. All presented data must have a legend (a statement describing what the data represents). For tables the legend is above the table (see Example 1) for figures the legend is below the figure (see Example 2). Example 1: How to include a table in your data

Table 1) Class average of colony counts of E.coli and Salmonella on LB agar E. coli

(Adherence) Salmonella (Adherence)

E. coli (Invasion)

Salmonella (Invasion)

QC Controls

10-2 10-3 10-2 10-3 10-1 10-2 10-1 10-2 10-1 10-2

132 14 85 7 0 0 22 2 0 0

Example 2: How to include a figure in your data

Figure 2) ELISA Detection of Salmonella Typhymurium 82/6915 H-antigen using anti-Salmonella H-antigen antibody and anti-Shigella antibody (negative control). 4. Discussion & Final Conclusions

The discussion section is where you “discuss” the results you saw and how it applies to current scientific research.

Any unexpected result should be discussed, i.e. if something gave a positive response and it was supposed to be negative. However don’t spend the entire discussion on the reasons why the experiment did/didn’t respond as expected. Any references mentioned in the introduction or in literature can be used as a

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1 4 16 64 256 1024

O D 4 50

Titre

ELISA for Detection of Salmonella H- antigen

1/400 anti-Salmonella

1/400 Anti-Shigella

 

Anti-Salmonella antibody

Anti-Shigella antibody

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

7

comparison to our experiments. Use this real knowledge to explain the relevancy of our model practical experiment. Finally there should be a sentence or two concluding statement that summarizing the findings of this report.

This section is usually allocated the most marks in a marking scheme. 5. References

The Referencing section is important part of any scientific communication. Any comment or result that is not your own must be referenced, unless it is widely accepted or known information (e.g., “Escherichia coli is a gram negative bacillus” does not need to be referenced).

Any information retrieved from a journal article or website on the Internet must be written in your own words and properly referenced. It is only acceptable to take material word-for-word from another source if you place in within a parenthesis. Direct quotations such as these are generally boring to read and should only be used if there is a special reason.

All reports must have in-text referencing as well as a reference list.

WIKIPEDIA and its constituent websites (anything with a Wiki attached or forum related references) are NOT suitable referencing material!!!

You also cannot reference spoken sources (like lecturers or demonstrators).

It is highly recommended that you use a Referencing Manager program (like Endnote/Procite/Refworks/Mendeley, etc.) to keep references properly managed. They will generate a reference list and will ensure the formatting of references automatically.

Failure to include references will result in a zero mark for the report.

6. Appendices

The appendix section includes any supplementary data or material that does not belong within the report. All raw data and calculations go in this section numbered separately.

Example:

Appendix 1: Raw calculations for the CFU/mL of E. coli and Salmonella for infection and

invasion assay.

OD600 (E.coli) = 2.65 (2.65 * 7.65) – 0.3 = 19.97 X 109 CFU/mL

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

8

BEFORE SUBMITTING:

‱ Keep your report concise. DON’T WAFFLE.

‱ To get the highest possible marks, follow the individual marking scheme and these guidelines for each practical.

‱ Make sure the in text citations match the references list.

‱ We understand that you all come from different backgrounds, so to ensure your report follows correct spelling, language and formatting it would be beneficial if you proof-read your assignment and perhaps get someone else to proof-read it to make sure any spelling/grammatical errors are not overlooked.

‱ Ensure all bacterial names are italicised and written out in full once before you start using abbreviations, e.g. “Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a gram-negative rod shaped bacteria. E. coli is a commonly studied organism.”

‱ Ensure all Chemical names are written out in full once before you start using abbreviations, e.g. Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)

‱ Any report submitted without one of abovementioned sections (with the possible exception of an appendix) will be marked down.

‱ Any report submitted after the assigned due date (without prior extension or confirmation from Prof. Peter Smooker) will receive a penalty as per the course guide.

‱ Reports submitted to Turnitin must be the same report as the one submitted for marking. Any report that has is found to be plagiarised from another student or published works will receive a mark of zero

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

9

PRACTICAL 1

ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA) Background (ELISA) Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, flagellated, facultative anaerobic bacterium. It is a member of the genus Salmonella. Many of the pathogenic serovars of the S. enterica species are in this subspecies. Salmonella are found worldwide in cold and warm-blooded animals (including humans), and in the environment. They are commonly the cause illnesses such as typhoid fever, paratyphoid fever, and foodborne illness(1). Serotyping is the process by which the Salmonella genus is classified into further serovar subtypes is due to immunogenic surface marker variation in the O-polysaccharide (O-Antigen) and the flagellin protein (H-antigen). Fritz Kauffmann and P. Bruce White initially proposed serotyping in 1934 as a classification scheme for Salmonella (2). In this practical, we will determine the presence of a specific antigen in lysates of Salmonella and E. coli. We will be using the Bradford Assay for the determination of protein concentration, and an Enzyme-Linked-Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) in order to determine the presence of H-antigen of Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915. E. coli DH5α will be used as a negative control as it does not express the same H-antigen as Salmonella. Day 1: A. Isolation of antigen by sonication B. Determination of protein concentration using the Bradford assay C. Coating antigen onto microtitre plate Day 2: D. Indirect ELISA References: 1. HERIKSTAD, H., Y. MOTARJEMI, R. TAUXE, nbsp, and V. 2002. Salmonella

surveillance: a global survey of public health serotyping. Epidemiology & Infection 129:1-8.

2. McQuiston, J. R., R. J. Waters, B. A. Dinsmore, M. L. Mikoleit, and P. I. Fields. 2011. Molecular Determination of H Antigens of Salmonella by Use of a Microsphere- Based Liquid Array. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49:565-573.

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

10

Day 1 A. ISOLATION OF ANTIGEN BY SONICATION Background Sonication can be defined as the disruption of cells by high frequency sound waves. This technique is commonly used to isolate bacterial proteins and involves harvesting and washing of the bacterial cells, followed by sonication on ice (see method below). The cell lysate is then centrifuged at high speed to recover the bacterial proteins, which are found in the supernatant. These proteins can then be used as soluble antigens in the Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). In this practical we are using a strain of Salmonella Typhimurium, which expresses flagella protein (H-antigen). When a lysate is made, it will contain this antigen, in addition to all the other bacterial proteins. As a (negative) control, we use a strain that does not express the antigen (E coli DH5α). Reagents and Equipment – E coli DH5α / Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915 cultures – 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 – 10 ml centrifuge tubes – Benchtop centrifuge – Sonicator – Esky + ice – Pipettes and tips (non sterile) – Eppendorf tubes (non sterile)

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

11

Procedure 1. A 10 ml overnight culture of E. coli DH5α or Salmonella Typhimurium

82/6915 is used to inoculate 150 ml LB and is grown to an OD of 0.3- 0.6. The bacteria from ten millilitre samples of these are collected by centrifugation at 5,500 rpm, and the pellets stored frozen.

This step has been done for you. Students start here: Label your tubes with your group initials 2. Re-suspend the cell pellet in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 and

centrifuge at 5,500 rpm for 2 minutes. Remove the supernatant and then repeat the re-suspension and centrifugation steps.

3. Resuspend cells in a final volume of 2 ml of 10mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 and place tubes on ice for sonication.

The demonstrators will combine the cultures of E. coli DH5α and Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915, as a larger volume of culture is required to assist in

sonication. N.B Ear muffs must be worn at all times during sonication of the cells 4. Sonicate cells (as demonstrated) using the following programme:

 

Pulse – 30 secs.

6 times Rest – 30 secs.

Demonstrators will aliquot sonicated samples back into Eppendorf tubes and return to students. Label your tubes. 5. Transfer the cell lysate to Eppendorf tubes and centrifuge at 14,000 rpm

for 5 minutes. Transfer the supernatant to a clean Eppendorf tube.

This part will be demonstrated to you. Your demonstrators will advise.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

12

B. PROTEIN DETERMINATION: BRADFORD METHOD Background The Bradford method utilises the ability of a dye, for example Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent, to bind to proteins (specifically arginine, histidine and the aromatic amino acids). Binding of the dye to different amounts of a standard protein, usually Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) is quantitated by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm and used to generate a standard curve. This can then be used to quantify the unknown protein(s). Reagents and Equipment

– Eppendorf tubes (non sterile) – 96-well microtitre plates – Pipettes and tips

– Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Binding Reagent:

This reagent is commercially purchased as a concentrate o Dilute 1 part Dye Binding Reagent Concentrate in 4 parts Distilled,

Deionised (DDI) Water. Then filter through 0.45 ”m filter, store at 4°C, filter required amount again before use.

– BSA standard: Standard Albumin solution: 1 mg/ml – 0.15 M NaCl

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

13

Procedure 1. Label tubes as follows:

Blank S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8

2. Set up the standards as follows:

”L Blank S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8

BSA (1 mg/ml) 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21

0.15 M NaCl 100 100 97 94 91 88 85 82 79

Final protein amount (”g) 0 0 3 —- —- —- —- —- —-

Fill in the blanks as how much protein is in each tube (”g)

3. For test samples, aliquot 10 ”L into an Eppendorf tube, then add 90 ”L of 0.15 M NaCl (This makes a 1/10 dilution).

4. Add 900 ”L Dye Binding Reagent to each tube, mix thoroughly, stand for 2

minutes at room temperature.

5. Aliquot 2 x 200 ”L to 96-well microtitre plates as shown below and read on ELISA reader at 595 nm. Pipette standards and test samples as follows:

Make sure that there are no air bubbles present as this can alter the reading.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A B B B B B S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 C S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 D T1 T2 E T1 T2 F G H

B – Blank S1 to S8 – Standards T1 & T2 – Samples

KEEP YOUR SAMPLE as it will be used in the next step!

Sample

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

14

Calculations to determine your protein sample: Students will be provided an excel spreadsheet containing Raw data (OD595 readings) from the Bradford Assay. From these results students will create a standard curve showing the absorbance versus protein amount (”g) for the standards and this can be used to determine the protein content of your cell lysate. Creating the Standard Curve In Excel:

Use these instructions in conjunction with Bradford calculations tutorial given in class.

1. The first thing to be done is to average all of your blank wells, e.g., Average Blank =Average(A1:A4).

2. Then you must average all of your standards in duplicates E.g., S1 (average) =Average(C1:D1), S2 (average) =Average(C2:D2) and so on.

3. Finally you must do the same for all of your samples. 4. Once you have done this, you must then normalise against background. In order to do

this you take all OD readings and minus the Average Blank. 5. Once all of the readings are normalised, you can create the standard curve using the BSA

standard protein concentration (calculated page 13, step 2) as the X-axis, and the Standard OD readings (minus blank) as the Y-axis. To do this fill in the standard concentrations in a column next to standard OD readings and highlight both columns, then go to Chart and select Scatter plot (Marked Scatter).

6. Once you have a graph on the page (ensuring Protein Concentration is X-axis and OD readings is Y-axis) Right click on one of the points and select “Add trend line”. Once this opens up select “Linear” and ensure the intercept = 0, and make the equation and R2 value visible on the graph.

7. From the equation you can determine your total protein concentration. Calculating your protein concentration: Once you have your standard curve you can calculate the protein concentration (”g/”l) of your original sample (obtained in part A of this practical). You will need to take into account the dilution factor and the volume of your diluted sample (from step 3 of this procedure).

This is an example of the calculations required for determining your protein

concentration. Use these to assist your own calculations

but do not use the values included.

If your equation is

y=0.0246x and your Average OD (minus blank) is 0.13338, substitute y for

your OD value: y=0.0246x

0.13338=0.0246x

1. Then you solve for x (your protein concentration) y=0.0246x 0.13338=0.0246x

x=0.13338/0.0246 x= 5.422”g (in 10 ”L)

= 5.422”g/10

= 0.5422 ”g/”L this is your final concentration!!!

(This is the volume we added to the assay, so to determine ”g/”L (final)

concentration you must divide by 10).

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

15

B. COATING ANTIGEN ONTO MICROTITRE PLATE Reagents and Equipment – Antigen (from last week’s practical) – Coating buffer (0.016 M Na2CO3, 0.034 M NaHCO3, pH 9.6) – 96-well flat bottom ELISA plate – Yellow tips ProcedureS Note that some wells are treated differently to others- carefully follow the protocol below (particularly note the underlined points). 1. Use Bradford assay results to estimate total protein content in the

samples, and dilute protein samples to 0.005 ”g/”L in Coating buffer (which has been provided).

 

 

 

 

Use C1V1=C2V2 calculation to determine dilution of antigen:

Example:

If my lysate concentration is 0.5422 ”g/”L then the volume I need to add is:

C1V1=C2V2 V1= C2 x V2 = 0.005 ”g/”L X 3000 ”L = 27.665 ”L

C1 0.5422 ”g/”L

Now try it for yourself: If your lysate concentration is ”g/”L then the volume needed is: C1V1=C2V2 V1= C2 x V2 = 0.005 ”g/”L X 3000 ”L = ”L

C1 ”g/”L

2. Coat the wells with 100 ”L of diluted samples (equivalent to 0.5”g of antigen per well) to all wells.

3. Incubate the plate at 40C overnight.

C1= your sample lysate concentration (”g/”L) V1= what we are trying to find out (”L) C2=0.005 ”g/”L (final concentration) V2= 3 mL= 3000”L (total volume required to coat a 96-well plate)

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

16

Day 2

B. INDIRECT ELISA Background The indirect ELISA is used for the screening of antisera for specific antibodies and utilises semi-purified or purified antigen. Q: What does a direct ELISA identify? Antibodies are detected by coating the wells of microtitre plates with antigen, incubating the coated plates with test solutions containing specific antibodies, and washing away unbound antibodies. A solution containing a secondary antibody (against the test antibodies) conjugated to an enzyme such as horseradish peroxidase is then added to the plate. After incubation, unbound conjugate is washed away and substrate solution is added. After incubation, the amount of substrate hydrolysed is assessed by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm, using an ELISA plate reader. The measured amount is proportional to the amount of specific antibody in the test solution. Figure 3. Indirect ELISA to detect specific antibodies. Ag = antigen, Ab =

antibody, E = enzyme.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

17

Reagents and Equipment – 96-well flat bottom ELISA plate coated with antigen (prepared previously) – Yellow tips – Wash bottles – 1x PBS – PBS/Tween (1x PBS with 0.05% Tween 20) – Distilled water – Blotto (5% skim milk in PBS with 0.05% Tween 20) – Diluent (1% skim milk in PBS with 0.05% Tween 20) – Anti-Salmonella H-antigen polyclonal antibody – Anti-Shigella polyclonal antibody – Goat anti rabbit IgG – HRP conjugate – TMB substrate – 2 M H2SO4 – ELISA plate reader

Note that some wells are treated differently to others- carefully follow the protocol below (particularly note the underlined points).

1-3 done by staff)

Table 1) Template for ELISA assay.

 

 

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

18

Procedure 1. Wash plate with 1X PBS/Tween once, and add 200 ”L of Blotto solution

(to all wells except A3, add 100 ”L PBS to A3) incubate for 1 hour at 370C with gentle shaking.

2. Discard Blotto solution, and wash wells with 3 times with PBS/Tween.

3. Add 100 ”L of diluent into well A1& A3, C2-12 and E2-12.

4. Add 200 ”L of Salmonella antiserum into well C1, and 200 ”L of Shigella antiserum into well E1. In well A2 & A3 add 100 ”L of Salmonella antiserum.

5. Make a serial dilution from C1 to C12 as following:

 

 

 

 

6. Repeat this process for Row E exactly as you have done for C.

 

 

 

7. Incubate the plate at 37oC for 1 hour with gentle shaking.

8. Discard primary antibody and wash wells 3 times with PBS/Tween.

9. Add 100 ”L of 1/5000 diluted Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP conjugate to all wells, except A2. Add 100 ”L of diluent in well A2.

10. Incubate the plate at 37oC for 1 hour with gentle shaking.

11. Discard antibody solution and wash 3 times with PBS/Tween, and once with distilled water.

Perform Step 12 & 13 to be completed in the Fume hood:

12. Add 100 ”L of TMB (tetramethylbenzidine) substrate to all wells (Blue colour will develop). Incubate the plates in dark for up to 30min (your demonstrator will define the length of incubation required).

13. Stop the reaction by addition of 100 ”L of 2M H2SO4 per well (TMB substrate will turn yellow).

14. The ELISA plates will be read at 450nm.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

19

PRACTICAL 2

ADHERENCE and INVASION ASSAYS

Background Most pathogenic bacteria causing infection require virulence determinants that enhance their ability to adhere to sites of infection and invade through the membrane. Humans possess several physical and chemical barriers to infectious agents, which are the same in all individuals. The similarity of these barriers has enabled microbial evolution that use mechanisms based on a similar theme. Adherence is the first and most important microbial mechanism for initiating the infectious disease process. Attachment or adhesion requires the involvement of a receptor on the host and a molecule on the surface of the microbe called an adhesin. Generally host receptors are carbohydrates while adhesins are usually proteins. For example, strains of E. coli possess one type of pilus, referred to as type 1 pili that bind to receptors containing the sugar mannose. Pili are adhesins found in many Gram-negative species. Gram-positive organisms, such as Streptococcus pyogenes, adhere to epithelial cells of the skin and nasopharynx. Epithelial cells are covered with the plasma glycoprotein fibronectin. Fibronectin acts as a receptor for the lipoteichoic acid adhesin of S. pyogenes. Some microbes do not remain on the epithelial surface but instead penetrate to subepithelial layers. The ability to penetrate below the epithelium is referred to as invasiveness. Salmonella Typhimurium is capable of invading the human intestinal epithelium. Salmonella, and some enteropathogenic E. coli strains, use a terminally differentiated epithelial cell, the M cell of the Peyer’s patch in the terminal ileum and in other gut-associated lymphoid tissue, as a portal of entry into the host. The M cells found in Peyer’s patches are thought to internalise luminal contents for delivery to underlying antigen-presenting cells. M cells possess fewer lysosomes and a sparse mucus layer that makes them a prime target for invasive bacterial pathogens. In this experiment, the invasiveness of Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915 will be determined. E. coli DH5α is used as a control (this strain of E. coli is not invasive). References:

1. Boyd, Robert F., Basic medical microbiology. 5th ed. 1995. Little Brown & Company (Inc.)

2. Neidhardt, Frederick C., Escherichia coli and Salmonella. 2nd ed. 1996.

ASM Press.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

20

Figure 4. Electron Micrograph of E. coli adhering to the intestinal epithelium (From H. W. Moon, B. Naggy, and R. E. Isaacson, J. Infect. Dis. 136[Suppl.]:124, 1977)

Cancer Cells in Culture Both normal cells and cancer cells can be cultured in vitro in the laboratory. However, they behave quite differently. Normal cells pass through a limited number of cell divisions (50 is about the limit) before they decline in vigor and die. This is probably caused by their inability to synthesize telomerase. Cancer cells may be immortal; that is, proliferate indefinitely in culture. For example INT407 cells are cultured in laboratories around the world. They are all descended from cells removed from the human embryonic intestinal epithelium. Cancer cells in culture produce telomerase.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

21

Day 1 Materials

– DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) – Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915 culture – E. coli DH5α culture – 24-well plate (12 wells seeded with INT407 cells) – PBS (phosphate buffered saline) – Gentamycin (200 ”g/mL) – Triton X-100 (0.1%) – LB agar plates – Sterile spreaders – Sterile Eppendorf tubes – Plastic dropper – Incubator (37°C, 5% CO2)

Procedure Note: Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915 is a non-attenuated wild type strain and hence, is virulent and infectious. Wear gloves at all times during the experiment. 1. Each pair is provided with Salmonella Typhimurium 82/6915 and

Escherichia coli DH5α. Determine the cell count for both bacterial cultures. You are given the optical density reading of the cell growth at 600 nm. Using the following formula, dilute your bacteria to 5 x 107 CFU in a total volume of 1 mL in 1 x DMEM.

(OD600 x 7.65) – 0.3 =? X 109 CFU/mL

2. You are supplied with a 24 well plate, which has 12 wells containing a

monolayer of INT407 cells. The cells have been seeded out at 105 cells per well. Wash the monolayer in each well gently with PBS 3 times (500 ”l of PBS each time).

Growing INT407 cells are adherent – that means, they stick to the bottom of the well and multiply. Hence, you can discard growth medium/PBS by carefully tipping the medium off.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

22

3. Label the plate with columns 1-3 and rows a-d (Figure 5).

 

 

Blank = 1 x DMEM Column 1 – Control (blank – DO NOT ADD ANY BACTERIA) Column 2 – Adhesion and invasion (Stripes) Column 3 – Invasion only (Spots) 4. Add 200 ”L of 1 x DMEM to all wells in column 1. 5. Add 200 ”L of 5 x 107/mL bacteria (in DMEM) according to the diagram

shown above. This will equate to 1 x 107 bacteria per well.

6. Incubate at 37 °C in CO2 incubator for 1.5 hour.

During this incubation both E. coli and Salmonella will adhere to the INT407 cells. Only Salmonella will invade the INT407 cells, as E. coli DH5α is incapable of invading host cells. During this incubation period, label the tubes you will need for subsequent steps as outlined on page 23.

7. Wash the monolayer gently with PBS three times (500 ”l of PBS each time).

8. To columns 1 and 3 add 200 ”L of 200 ”g/mL gentamycin. To column 2 add 400 ”L/well of 0.1% Triton X-100.

A

B

C

D

3 1 2

Blank SALMONELLA E. COLI

FIGURE 5

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

23

Note: Gentamycin kills the bacteria that have adhered but not those that have invaded. Triton X-100 lyses INT407 cells releasing any bacterial cells that have invaded the INT407 cells.

9. Incubate at 37°C in CO2 incubator for 15 minutes.

10. Remove 20 ”L from wells A2 – D2 (mix the well with a pipette first).

Immediately return the plate to the incubator.

11. Make serial dilutions (in 1X PBS) of the samples from the 4 wells of

column 2 and plate out 100 ”L of 10-2 and 10-3 dilutions onto LB agar. Label these plates adhesion (E. coli or Salmonella).

 

12. Incubate column 1 and 3 for a further 45 minutes at 37°C in CO2 incubator.

13. Wash the monolayer three times with PBS.

14. Add 400 ”L of 0.1% Triton X-100 to columns 1 and 3 and incubate at

37°C in CO2 incubator for 15 minutes. 15. Make serial dilutions (in 1X PBS) of the 4 wells of column 3 and only A1

from column 1 plate out 100 ”L of 10-1 and 10-2 dilutions onto LB agar. Label plates from column 3 invasion (E. coli or Salmonella) and that from A1 control

 

 

16. Incubate LB agar plates at 37°C overnight.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

24

Table 2. Labelling instructions for Eppendorf tubes for dilutions in steps 11-15.

 

Step Well Sample Dilutions req. for plating

Tube labels No.

Tubes req.

11 Adhesion and Invasion

A2 E. coli 10-2, 10-3 A2 E -2 and A2 E -3 3

B2 E. coli “ B2 E -2 and B2 E -3 3

C2 S. Typhimurium “ C2 S -2 and C2 S -3 3

D2 S. Typhimurium “ D2 S -2 and D2 S -3 3

TOTAL (step 9) 12 tubes

 

15 Invasion only

A3 E. coli 10-1, 10-2 A3 E -1 and A3 E -2 2

B3 E. coli “ B3 E -1 and B3 E -2 2

C3 S. Typhimurium “ C3 S -1 and C3 S -2 2

D3 S. Typhimurium “ D3 S -1 and D3 S -2 2

 

A1 Blank 10-1, 10-2 A1 B -1 and A1 B -2 2

TOTAL (step 11) 10 tubes

Total for assay 22 tubes

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

25

Day 2 Count colonies on plates and record all results as a group. Use following table to record group results. You will have duplicate plates for the same sample at the same dilution. Record your average colony count in the table.

Group

ADHERENCE INVASION QC

BLANK E. coli Salmonella E. coli Salmonella

10-2 10-3 10-2 10-3 10-1 10-2 10-1 10-2 10-1 10-2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Check for any colonies on control plates and record all results.

Results are expressed as a percentage of the total number of colonies adhered or invaded divided by the inoculum.

Total %

Adhered Bacteria Total %

Invaded Bacteria Further, calculate % of bacterial cells invaded compared to those that adhered

using the total number of cells adhered.

% Invasion compared to

adhesion

 

= Number of colonies adhered X dilution factor X 100 Original inoculum

=

= Number of colonies invaded X dilution factor X 100 Number of colonies adhered =

= Number of colonies invaded X dilution factor X 100 Original inoculum =

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

26

PRACTICAL 3

Immunology Prac 3. Bioinformatics

For your write-up of this practical, give an introduction on computational methods of epitope prediction (approx half a page), noting both T and B cell, and the differences. Answer the questions posed below in bold, with reasoning. 1. Use the following sequence: >gi|45384056|ref|NP_990483.1| ovalbumin [Gallus gallus] MGSIGAASMEFCFDVFKELKVHHANENIFYCPIAIMSALAMVYLGAKDSTRT QINKVVRFDKLPGFGDSIEAQCGTSVNVHSSLRDILNQITKPNDVYSFSLASR LYAEERYPILPEYLQCVKELYRGGLEPINFQTAADQARELINSWVESQTNGII RNVLQPSSVDSQTAMVLVNAIVFKGLWEKTFKDEDTQAMPFRVTEQESKPV QMMYQIGLFRVASMASEKMKILELPFASGTMSMLVLLPDEVSGLEQLESIINF EKLTEWTSSNVMEERKIKVYLPRMKMEEKYNLTSVLMAMGITDVFSSSANLS GISSAESLKISQAVHAAHAEINEAGREVVGSAEAGVDAASVSEEFRADHPFL FCIKHIATNAVLFFGRCVSP Using http://www.syfpeithi.de/home.htm , determine which is the dominant CD8 epitope in mice. Use H2-kb, and search for octomers. Try human HLA-B*08, again octomers. Is the same peptide dominant? Is it predicted that HLA-B*08 can present this peptide? This peptide is widely used in antigen presentation assays in immunology. Does BIMAS http://www-bimas.cit.nih.gov/molbio/hla_bind/ also predict this as the dominant peptide? Using the Hopp-Woods tool at http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/molkit/hydropathy/index.html find the most hydrophilic region of the protein. Where is it? Why might it be important to know this? 2. If you were going to design a peptide vaccine to (A) induce CTL’s, or (B) induce antibodies from the following sequence, which regions would you choose? Assume you will test in H2-Db mice. LPKSFDARVEWPHCPSISEIRDQSSCGSCWAFGAVEAMSDRICIKSKGKHK PFLSAENLVSCCSSCGMGCNGGFPHSAWLYWKNQGIVTGDLYNTTNGCQP YEFPPCEHHVIGPLPSCDGDVETPSCKTNCQPGYNIPYEKD 3. Using PAProc, http://www.paproc.de/ predict the proteolytic products from ovalbumin after processing by the human wild-type 1 proteosome.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

27

Is the dominant H2-kb epitope in mice available for loading onto human MHC? Around what proportion of the protein would be available for presentation? 4. B cell epitope prediction. These are much more complex, as often epitopes represented by antibody are not linear, and therefore are derived from different regions of the polypeptide chain. If detailed knowledge of the protein structure is known, then prediction may be easier. Generally, prediction revolves around the prediction of surface regions. Go to http://tools.immuneepitope.org/tools/bcell/iedb_input Input the ovalbumin sequence. Use each of the algorithms to see the output. What does each predict for the ovalbumin sequence, and why is this important? Are any of the peptides predicted by more than one method?

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

28

APPENDIX: Material Safety Data Sheet for Tetramethyl Benzidine (TMB)

EMERGENCY OVERVIEW NON-CARCINOGENIC ANALOG OF BENZEDINE, MILD OXIDIZING AGENT

PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION Form: liquid Colour: Colourless to light yellow Boiling point: approx. 100 °C Solubility in water: miscible: Stability: The product is stable for a minimum of 1 year at 2°-25°C. Protect from direct UV light. Avoid elevated temperatures.

Incompatibility: Strong oxidizing agents and metals.

 

HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION Primary routes of Exposure: Routes of exposure: may be absorbed by ingestion. Inhalation: Inhalation of vapours is unlikely at normal temperature. Skin: skin contact may cause irritation. Eyes: Splashes may cause irritation. Ingestion: May cause irritation. Accidental exposure/spillage information: Personal precautions: Use personal protection. Ventilate area of leak or spill. Methods for cleaning up/collecting: absorb spillage with an inert material and place spillage in a suitable container for disposal.

 

PRECAUTIONS FOR USE Personal protective equipment: respiratory protection: none with normal use. Skin protection: use gloves of rubber or plastic. Eye protection: wear tight fitting safety goggles when risk of splashing.

 

 

Practical manual Immunology

29

First Aid: Inhalation: Remove to fresh air. Keep at rest. If needed: get medical attention. Skin contact: Remove contaminated clothing and wash with soap and water. Eye contact: Immediately flush with water or physiological salt water, holding eye lips open, remember to remove contact lenses, if any. If needed: get medical attention.

Ingestion: Rinse mouth and drink plenty of water. Keep under surveillance. If needed get medical attention.

Information: show this Safety Data Sheet to doctor or emergency ward. SAFE HANDLING INFORMATION Flammability: Not flammable. Personal precautions: Use personal protection. Ventilate area of leak or spill. Methods for cleaning up/collecting: absorb spillage with an inert material and place spillage in a suitable container for disposal.

Safe storage: in a well closed container. Storage is recommended at 2 to 25°C. Disposal: Do not empty large amounts into water or drains.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"