Human Pathophysiology Current Events Week 5

/in /by

Events

Overview

Pathophysiology is a field that is ever-changing due to technical advances and new research. The writing assignments that you will complete review some of the newest research on diseases and disorders. This assignment should include all proper APA (7th ed.) rules.

Instructions

  1. Using a news website, such as Google News (Links to an external site.), search for an article related to any of the topics in this module. It is recommended that you also utilize the LIRN Library when conducting research for this activity. You can access the LIRN Library in your Canvas navigation bar. The article you select should include information about topics such as research on the chosen topic, new treatments, new technology, and/or diagnostic tools. It should be a current article (i.e., published within the last two years).
  2. Complete a 300-word summary of the article.
  3. Please refer to the APA 7th edition style guide and template provided for this assignment download.
  4. Use at least one source/article; however, you are welcome to add additional sources to include introductory information, if needed.
  5. Do not use quotes from the article unless completely necessary. Instead, paraphrase because quotes will not be included in your word count.

Submission and Assessment Guidelines

  • Submit (300 words) response via Turnitin.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

“Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument”

/in /by

1. PHI 210 Week 5 Discussion Top of Form

“Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument”

OPTION A: Find an online article (news, magazine, journal, etc.) on any subject that interests you that uses statistics to make its conclusion. Share a link in this thread.

Now answer these questions about that article:

  • What is the premise and      conclusion of the argument based on statistics?
  • Determine whether or not the      argument uses any deceptive statistics.
  • Give your opinion on whether      or not the argument has persuaded you. Explain why or why not.

OPTION B: Explain the primary ways in which statistics or authority are used in your current work position in developing persuasive arguments and provide examples here.

==========================================================================

2. PHI 210 Week 6 Discussion Top of Form

“Identifying Truth or Fiction”

The video clip, “The Baloney Detection Kit,” this week discusses the ways an effective critical thinker assesses claims made by others.

  • Examine some key reasons why      people might seem attracted to pseudoscience-type claims.
  • Describe at least two (2) such      claims that you have heard people make and analyze the main reasons why      such claims do or do not meet rigorous scientific methodology standards.
  • Determine at least two (2) ways in which the      material discussed this week has changed your own thinking.

===================================================================

3. Precalculus Discussion Question

“Exponential Functions” Please respond to the following:

Explain how exponential functions can model both phenomena that grow and phenomena that decay. Note the main similarities and differences in the form of the function in each case.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assignment: Acceleration Physiology Article Review

/in /by

submitted, follow these  guidelines:

  • Your review should be be two pages in length, double spaced, and  include proper current APA citations and references (with the references  listed on a second page).
  • Document is grammatically sound, and free from spelling errors.
  • A good critique involves an organized paper that demonstrates a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
  • The first paragraph summarizes the research and the conclusions.
  • One or two paragraphs that analyze and evaluate the conclusions  based upon what you have learned about ergonomics in this module and  about human factors in the preceding modules. The summary is on topic  and provides a well-written compilation of important points form the  article, and are presented coherently with supporting details.
  • A final paragraph or two that draw conclusions regarding the  relative validity of the research in regard to its ability to contribute  a positive impact on human performance and to reduce human error based  on a creative application of that analysis and evaluation. The writing  indicates effectiveness in reflective thinking and the description of  how information relates to other ideas, courses, educational and  professional experiences.

In this activity you will read, review, and summarize the key findings  of the journal article linked below. After you read the article, provide  a one page summary of the key findings that are related to acceleration  physiology. Also include how ALOC differs from GLOC. Please provide sound evidence for your summary by supporting it with information from the National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Final Report and your new found knowledge of spatial disorientation.
SEE ATTACHMENTS

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assignment: Hypoxia

/in /by

Please watch this short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UN3W4d-5RPo

Now that you are an expert in hypoxia your last assignment for this  module is to watch one more video. After watching this video, identify  at least three symptoms associated with hypoxia. Next, ask yourself if  the hypoxic individual in the video took appropriate corrective actions  to treat him in a timely fashion. Lastly, what does this video tell you  about the dangers associated with hypoxia?

 

Assignment Activities

As per the course syllabus, your understanding of the topics and  theories explored in this course will be assessed through discussion  activities, case analysis, assignments, and a wiki.

You will  complete several assignments by critiquing an article or multimedia. To  ensure a solid critique is submitted, follow these guidelines:

  • Your review should be be two pages in length, double spaced, and  include proper current APA citations and references (with the references  listed on a second page).
  • Document is grammatically sound, and free from spelling errors.
  • A good critique involves an organized paper that demonstrates a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
  • The first paragraph summarizes the research and the conclusions.
  • One or two paragraphs that analyze and evaluate the conclusions  based upon what you have learned about ergonomics in this module and  about human factors in the preceding modules. The summary is on topic  and provides a well-written compilation of important points form the  article, and are presented coherently with supporting details.
  • A final paragraph or two that draw conclusions regarding the  relative validity of the research in regard to its ability to contribute  a positive impact on human performance and to reduce human error based  on a creative application of that analysis and evaluation. The writing  indicates effectiveness in reflective thinking and the description of  how information relates to other ideas, courses, educational and  professional experiences.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"