Globalization As An Important Trend

Assignment 2: Discussion—Globalization as an Important Trend

Globalization is a trend that has been impacting business in a material way for the past 40 to 50 years. In recent years, this impact has been strengthening. Appreciating the impact of this trend and the driving forces is useful for today’s business professionals.

Research the topic using your textbook, Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet. Respond to the following:

  • Based on your experiences, would you characterize globalization as the most important trend in business today? Take a position for or against.
  • What do you believe is the single most important force driving globalization in business? Present an argument for your position, including reference to forces that you believe are less important.

Write your response in 300 words or less. Apply current APA standards for writing style to your work. All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

By Friday, January 11, 2013, submit your assignment to the appropriateDiscussion Area. Through Sunday, January 13, 2013, review and comment on at least two of your peers’ responses.

 

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_img.gifCourse Project Overview

 

http://myeclassonline.com/ec/courses/AUO_files/AU_spacer.gif

 

For the course project, you will select a country of interest and assess the international business potential of that country and compare its characteristics to the characteristics of the U.S. You will write a 15- to 20-page paper based on your research. Include the following sections in the paper:

  • Executive summary
  • Macroeconomic condition
  • Financial system
  • Political and cultural environment
  • Special legal and business issues
  • Overall recommendation and risk assessment for making business investments into this country

The following organizations gather and publish data relevant to your course project. Use these resources for research. You will find links to these resources in the Webliography.

  • United Nations
  • International Trade Center
  • World Bank
  • International Monetary Fund
  • European Union
  • Asian Development Bank
  • Central Intelligence Agency
  • Trade Information Center
  • Japanese External Trade Organization
  • Ernst & Young
  • Lexis-Nexis
  • DIALOG
  • Dow Jones

Your course project tasks are:

  • M1: Assignment 3, Task 1: Review of Web resources and available information; selection of the country for the course project
  • M2: Reminder: Macroeconomic characteristics of the selected country and comparison with the U.S., with statistical data
  • M4: Reminder: Financial system characteristics of the selected country and comparison with the U.S., with statistical data
  • M5: Reminder: Cultural and political characteristics of the selected country and comparison with the U.S., with statistical data
  • M6: Reminder: Add a discussion of special legal and business issues; first draft of the paper for facilitator feedback
  • M8: Assignment 1, Final Paper: Complete paper finalized for grading
  • M8: Assignment 2, Presentation: Presentation of highlights of the final paper1 Globalization

     A LOOK AT THIS CHAPTER

    This chapter defines the scope of international business and introduces us to some of its most important topics. We begin by presenting globalization—describing its influence on markets and production and the forces behind its growth. Each main argument in the debate over globalization is also analyzed in detail. We then identify the key players in international business today. This chapter closes with a model that depicts international business as occurring within an integrated global business environment.

     A LOOK AHEAD

    Part 2, encompassing Chapters 2, 3, and 4, introduces us to different national business environments. Chapter 2 describes important cultural differences among nations. Chapter 3 examines different political and legal systems. Chapter 4 presents the world’s various economic systems and issues surrounding economic development.

    YouTube’s Global Impact

    San mateo, California — YouTube (www.youtube.com) is the world’s most popular service for sharing video clips through Web sites, mobile devices, blogs, and e-mail. YouTube officially launched in December 2005, and less than a year later was purchased by Google for $1.65 billion! YouTube’s spectacular success illustrates the opportunities that globalization creates for entrepreneurs.

    Pictured at right in Paris, France, YouTube founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen introduce national versions of their service. YouTube localizes its service for 19 nations to capitalize on exploding global demand for user-created video content. “This is just the beginning,” says Chen. “If we had the resources, we would be launching in 140 countries.”

     

    Source: © Christoph Dernback/dpa/CORBIS. All Rights Reserved.

    Most people visit YouTube’s Web site to catch up on current events and find videos about their hobbies and interests. Wannabe pop stars and filmmakers also share their creative efforts with the world by uploading them to YouTube. And by creating CitizenNews (www.youtube.com/citizennews), YouTube has given a voice to citizen journalists and Vloggers (video bloggers) who report firsthand accounts of events where they live—whether their home is in Indiana or India.

    Freedom sparks the creativity of artists and journalists, but it also draws the attention of heavy-handed governments. Nations that have at times blocked access to YouTube include China, Iran, Pakistan, Tunisia, and Turkey. YouTube and local providers of similar services must then employ their entrepreneurial creativity to overcome this government censorship.

    As you read this chapter, consider how globalization is reshaping our personal lives and altering the activities of international companies. Also please visit this book’s YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/myibvideos) to watch specially selected videos on international business topics.1

    Globalization is reshaping our lives and leading us into uncharted territory. As new technologies drive down the cost of global communication and travel, we are increasingly exposed to the traits and practices of other cultures. As countries reduce barriers to trade and investment, globalization forces their industries to grow more competitive if they are to survive. And as multinationals from advanced countries and emerging markets seek out customers, competition intensifies on a global scale. These new realities of international business are altering our cultures and transforming the way companies do business.

    International Business Involves Us All

    The dynamic nature of international business affects each of us personally. In our daily communications we encounter terms such as outsourcing, innovation, emerging markets, competitive advantage, and social responsibility. And each of us experiences the result of dozens of international transactions every day.

    The General Electric alarm clock/radio (www.ge.com) that woke you was likely made in China. The breaking news buzzing in your ears was produced by Britain’s BBC radio (www.bbc.co.uk). You slip on your Adidas sandals (www.adidas.com) made in Indonesia, Abercrombie & Fitch T-shirt (www.abercrombie.com) made in the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Eagle jeans (www.ae.com) made in Mexico. You pull the charger off your Nokia phone (www.nokia.com), which was designed in Finland and manufactured in the United States with parts from Taiwan, and head out the door. You hop into your Toyota (www.toyota.com) that was made in Kentucky, and pop in a CD performed by the English band Coldplay (www.coldplay.com). You swing by the local Starbucks (www.starbucks.com) to charge your own batteries with coffee brewed from a blend of beans harvested in Colombia and Ethiopia. Your day is just one hour old but in a way you’ve already taken a virtual round-the-world trip. A quick glance at the “Made in” tags on your jacket, backpack, watch, wallet, or other items with you right now will demonstrate the pervasiveness of international business transactions.

    International business is any commercial transaction that crosses the borders of two or more nations. You don’t have to set foot outside a small town to find evidence of international business. No matter where you live, you’ll be surrounded by imports —goods and services purchased abroad and brought into a country. Your counterparts around the world will undoubtedly spend some part of their day using your nation’s exports —goods and services sold abroad and sent out of a country. The total value of goods and services exported by all nations each year is a staggering $14,950,150,000,000 (nearly $15 trillion). That is nearly 40 times the annual revenue of the world’s largest company, Wal-Mart Stores (www.walmart.com).2

    international business

    Commercial transaction that crosses the borders of two or more nations.

    imports

    Goods and services purchased abroad and brought into a country.

    exports

    Goods and services sold abroad and sent out of a country.

    Technology Makes It Possible

    Technology is perhaps the most remarkable facilitator of societal and commercial changes today. Consumers use technology to reach out to the world on the Internet—gathering and sending information and purchasing all kinds of goods and services. Companies use technology to acquire materials and products from distant lands and to sell goods and services abroad.

    When businesses or consumers use technology to conduct transactions, they engage in e-business (e-commerce) —the use of computer networks to purchase, sell, or exchange products, service customers, and collaborate with partners. E-business is making it easier for companies to make their products abroad, not simply import and export finished goods.

    e-business (e-commerce)

    Use of computer networks to purchase, sell, or exchange products, service customers, and collaborate with partners.

    Consider how Hewlett-Packard (HP) (www.hp.com) designed and built a computer server for small businesses. Once HP identified the need for a new low-cost computer server, it seized the rewards of globalization. HP dispersed the design and production of its ProLiant ML150 server throughout a specialized manufacturing system across five Pacific Rim nations and India (see Figure 1.1). This helped the company minimize labor costs, taxes, and shipping delays yet maximize productivity when designing, building, and distributing its new product. Companies use such innovative production and distribution techniques to squeeze inefficiencies out of their international operations and boost their competitiveness.

    FIGURE 1.1 Global Production of an HP Server

    Source: Rebecca Buckman, “H-P Outsourcing: Beyond China,” Wall Street Journal, (www.wsj.com), February 23, 2004.

    Global Talent Makes It Happen

    Media companies today commonly engage in a practice best described as a global relay race. Fox and NBC Universal created Hulu (www.hulu.com) as a cool venue for fans to watch TV shows online. Hulu employs two technical teams—one in the United States and one in China—to manage its Web site. Members of the team in Santa Monica, California, work late into the night detailing code specifications that it sends to the team in Beijing, China. The Chinese team then writes the code and sends it back to Santa Monica before the U.S. team gets to work in the morning.3

    Some innovative companies use online competitions to tap global talent. InnoCentive (www.innocentive.com) connects companies and institutions seeking solutions to difficult problems using a global network of more than 145,000 creative thinkers. These engineers, scientists, inventors, and businesspeople with expertise in life sciences, engineering, chemistry, math, computer science, and entrepreneurship compete to solve some of the world’s toughest problems in return for significant financial awards. InnoCentive is open to anyone, is available in seven languages, and pays cash awards that range from as little as $2,000 to as much as $1,000,000.4

    This chapter begins by presenting globalization—we describe its powerful influence on markets and production and explain the forces behind its rapid expansion. Following coverage of each main point in the debate over globalization, we examine the key players in international business. We then explain why international business is special by presenting the dynamic, integrated global business environment. Finally, the appendix at the end of this chapter contains a world atlas to be used as a primer for this chapter’s discussion and as a reference throughout the remainder of the book.

    Quick Study

    1. Define the term international business and explain how it affects each of us.

    2. What do we mean by the terms imports and exports ?

    3. Explain how e-business (e-commerce) is affecting international business.

    Globalization

    Although nations historically retained absolute control over the products, people, and capital crossing their borders, economies are becoming increasingly intertwined. Globalization is the trend toward greater economic, cultural, political, and technological interdependence among national institutions and economies. Globalization is a trend characterized by denationalization (national boundaries becoming less relevant) and is different from internationalization (entities cooperating across national boundaries). The greater interdependence that globalization is causing means an increasingly freer flow of goods, services, money, people, and ideas across national borders.

    globalization

    Trend toward greater economic, cultural, political, and technological interdependence among national institutions and economies.

    As its definition implies, globalization involves much more than the expansion of trade and investment among nations. Globalization embraces concepts and theories from political science, sociology, anthropology, and philosophy as well as economics. As such, it is not a term exclusively reserved for multinational corporations and international financial institutions. Nor is globalization the exclusive domain of those with only altruistic or moral intentions. In fact, globalization has been described as going “well beyond the links that bind corporations, traders, financiers, and central bankers. It provides a conduit not only for ideas but also for processes of coordination and cooperation used by terrorists, politicians, religious leaders, anti-globalization activists, and bureaucrats alike.”5

    For our purposes, this discussion focuses on the business implications of globalization. Two areas of business in which globalization is having profound effects are the globalization of markets and production.

    Globalization of Markets

    Globalization of markets refers to convergence in buyer preferences in markets around the world. This trend is occurring in many product categories, including consumer goods, industrial products, and business services. Clothing retailer L.L. Bean (www.llbean.com), shoe producer Nike (www.nike.com), and electronics maker Sony (www.sony.com) are just a few companies that sell global products —products marketed in all countries essentially without any changes. Global products and global competition characterize many industries and markets, including semiconductors (Intel, Philips), aircraft (Airbus, Boeing), construction equipment (Caterpillar, Mitsubishi), autos (Honda, Volkswagen), financial services (Citicorp, HSBC), air travel (Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines), accounting services (Ernst & Young, KPMG), consumer goods (Procter & Gamble, Unilever), and fast food (KFC, McDonald’s). The globalization of markets is important to international business because of the benefits it offers companies. Let’s now look briefly at each of these benefits.

    Reduces Marketing Costs

    Companies that sell global products can reduce costs by standardizing certain marketing activities. A company selling a global consumer good, such as shampoo, can make an identical product for the global market and then simply design different packaging to account for the language spoken in each market. Companies can achieve further cost savings by keeping an ad’s visual component the same for all markets, but dubbing TV ads and translating print ads into local languages.

    Creates New Market Opportunities

    A company that sells a global product can explore opportunities abroad if the home market is small or becomes saturated. For example, China holds enormous potential for e-business with more than 240 million Internet users, but this represents just 18 percent of China’s total population. By comparison, around 153 million people are online in the United States, about 70 percent of the population. So, the battle for market share in the Middle Kingdom is raging between the top two online search engines—Google (www.google.cn) and Yahoo! (www.cn.yahoo.com).6 Seeking sales growth abroad can be absolutely essential for an entrepreneur or small company that sells a global product but has a limited home market.

    An employee demonstrates the latest iPhone at a T-Mobile phone store in Cologne, Germany. The iPhone by Apple (www.apple.com) is a hugely successful global product that excites style-lovers the world over. The iPhone combines a music and video player, cell phone, and Web browser into a single handset. Apple standardized the iPhone to reduce production and marketing costs and to support the creation of a powerful global brand.

    Source: © Nvennenbernd/epa/CORBIS. All Rights Reserved.

    Levels Uneven Income Streams

    A company that sells a product with universal, but seasonal, appeal can use international sales to level its income stream. By supplementing domestic sales with international sales, the company can reduce or eliminate wide variations in sales between seasons and steady its cash flow. For example, a firm that produces suntan and sunblock lotions can match product distribution with the summer seasons in the northern and southern hemispheres in alternating fashion—thereby steadying its income from these global, yet highly seasonal, products.

    Yet Local Needs Are Important

    Despite the potential benefits of global markets, managers must constantly monitor the match between the firm’s products and markets to not overlook the needs of buyers. The benefit of serving customers with an adapted product may outweigh the benefit of a standardized one. For instance, soft drinks, fast food, and other consumer goods are global products that continue to penetrate markets around the world. But sometimes these products require small modifications to better suit local tastes. In southern Japan, Coca-Cola (www.cocacola.com) sweetens its traditional formula to compete with sweeter-tasting Pepsi (www.pepsi.com). In India, where cows are sacred and the consumption of beef is taboo, McDonald’s (www.mcdonalds.com) markets the “Maharaja Mac”—two all-mutton patties on a sesame-seed bun with all the usual toppings.

    Globalization of Production

    Many production activities are also becoming global. Globalization of production refers to the dispersal of production activities to locations that help a company achieve its cost-minimization or quality-maximization objectives for a good or service. This includes the sourcing of key production inputs (such as raw materials or products for assembly) as well as the international outsourcing of services. Let’s now explore the benefits companies obtain from the globalization of production.

    Access Lower-Cost Workers

    Global production activities allow companies to reduce overall production costs through access to low-cost labor. For decades, companies located their factories in low-wage nations to churn out all kinds of goods, including toys, small appliances, inexpensive electronics, and textiles. Yet whereas moving production to low-cost locales traditionally meant production of goods almost exclusively, it increasingly applies to the production of services such as accounting and research. Although most services must be produced where they are consumed, some services can be performed at remote locations where labor costs are lower. Many European and U.S. businesses have moved their customer service and other nonessential operations to places as far away as India to slash costs by as much as 60 percent.

    Access Technical Expertise

    Companies also produce goods and services abroad to benefit from technical know-how. Film Roman (www.filmroman.com) produces the TV series, The Simpsons, but it provides key poses and step-by-step frame directions to AKOM Production Company (www.akomkorea.com) in Seoul, South Korea. AKOM then fills in the remaining poses and links them into an animated whole. But there are bumps along the way, says animation director Mark Kirkland. In one middle-of-the-night phone call, Kirkland was explaining to the Koreans how to draw a shooting gun. “They don’t allow guns in Korea; it’s against the law,” says Kirkland. “So they were calling me [asking]: ‘How does a gun work?’” Kirkland and others put up with such cultural differences and phone calls at odd hours to tap a highly qualified pool of South Korean animators.7

    Access Production Inputs

    Globalization of production allows companies to access resources that are unavailable or more costly at home. The quest for natural resources draws many companies into international markets. Japan, for example, is a small, densely populated island nation with very few natural resources of its own—especially forests. But Japan’s largest paper company, Nippon Seishi, does more than simply import wood pulp. The company owns huge forests and corresponding processing facilities in Australia, Canada, and the United States. This gives the firm not only access to an essential resource, but control over earlier stages in the papermaking process. As a result, the company is guaranteed a steady flow of its key ingredient (wood pulp) that is less subject to swings in prices and supply associated with buying pulp on the open market. Likewise, to access cheaper energy resources used in manufacturing, a variety of Japanese firms are relocating production to China, Mexico, and Vietnam where energy costs are lower.

    Despite its benefits, globalization also creates new risks and accentuates old ones for companies. To read about several key risks that globalization heightens and how companies can better manage them, see this chapter’s Global Challenges feature titled, “Investing in Security Pays Dividends.”

    Quick Study

    1. Define globalization . How does denationalization differ from internationalization?

    2. List each benefit a company might obtain from the globalization of markets.

    3. How might a company benefit from the globalization of production?

    Forces Driving Globalization

    Two main forces underlie the globalization of markets and production: falling barriers to trade and investment and technological innovation. These two features, more than anything else, are increasing competition among nations by leveling the global business playing field; what author Thomas Friedman refers to in his book titled, The World Is Flat.8 Greater competition is simultaneously driving companies worldwide into more direct confrontation and cooperation. Local industries once isolated by time and distance are increasingly accessible to large international companies based many thousands of miles away. Some small and medium sized local firms are compelled to cooperate with one another or with larger international firms to remain competitive. Other local businesses revitalize themselves in a bold attempt to survive the competitive onslaught. And on a global scale, consolidation is occurring in many industries as former competitors link-up to challenge others on a worldwide basis. Let’s now explore in greater detail the pivotal roles of the two forces driving globalization.

    GLOBAL CHALLENGES: Investing in Security Pays Dividends

    The globalization of markets and production creates new challenges for companies around the world. As well as the need to secure lengthier supply lines and distribution channels, companies must pay increased attention to their facilities, information systems, and reputations.

    ■ A Simple Plan. Careful planning and a vulnerability assessment of facilities (around $12,000 for a midsized company; $1 million for a large firm) can be well worth the cost. For example, Wall Street firms with well-executed disaster plans had their employees working from hotel rooms, rented offices, and their homes the day after terrorists attacked New York City on September 11, 2001.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

MARKETING MANAGEMENT INDIVIDUAL PROJECT (MMIP) ASSIGNMENT

THE TOPIC SELECTED IS: AMAZON PRIME VIDEO

The student will compile the 5 project installments into 1 cohesive document. This document must be in paragraph format with question numbers removed. It must have a coherent flow, and is not simply a cut and paste of the answers to the questions used to create it. In addition, the student will add scriptural integration throughout the paper, citing relevant scripture verses as appropriate. There must be a minimum of 10 relevant scriptural citations found throughout the document, with their relevance to the topic at hand explained.

The final document must include a title page, a brief introduction delineating the purpose of the project, a separate section (with heading) for each content component, and a 2-page recommendations and conclusions section. This section must offer suggestions for strategic or operational changes based on the research that has been conducted. The total length (not including title page and references) must be between 5,000–7,250 words. At least 15 scholarly resources (in addition to the Bible) must be used. The final project document must be submitted to SafeAssign to check for plagiarism issues (3 draft checks are available).

BUSI 520

Module 5: Week 5—Develop the Value Offering—the Product Experience (Chapters 8-10)

MMIP Questions

Q1. Explain your product planning efforts. (Ch. 8)

Q2. Explain the product’s/service’s current life cycle stage (introduction, growth, maturity or decline). Select one stage to discuss and omit the others. (Ch.8)

Q3. Discuss your techniques of building the equity of your brand. (Ch.9)

Q4. Discuss several branding decisions recently made or appropriate to make. (Ch.9)

Q5. Describe the support services and post-sale service arrangements provided by the firm and required by buyers. (Ch.10)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

AUTOLATINA:

AUTOLATINA: An International Partnership that ended up in a Divorce: Ford – Volkswagen Joint Venture in Brazil Autolatina, a joint venture of Ford and Volkswagen (VW), was created in 1987 in Brazil. The partners created the new company in order to serve the highly protected car markets of Brazil and Argentina from within. In addition, their goal was to create a giant theoretically invincible in the Latin American market. The partners’ strategy was to share the risk of operating in a volatile market and support a wide model range. Soon after the fusion, Autolatina market share reached 60% in the Brazilian market and 30% in Argentina. Of German origin, Volkswagen was originally founded in 1937, with the goal of offering the “popular cars” that anyone could afford. This was best reflected by the Volkswagen Beetle which, at one time, was the world’s best selling car. Early on, the Beetle became a mascot of Brazil’s economic miracle, accounting for nearly half of Brazilian car sales. Volkswagen launched VW Gol in 1980 please substitute the VW Beetle. It was assembled at Volkswagen do Brazil, which employed more than 45,000 people and was the largest industrial corporation in Latin America. VW Gol has been the best-selling car or in Brazil since VW Beetle. Ford was the first automotive company to assemble in Brazil, and prior to 1939, it dominated passenger car sales. In the 1950s, Ford resisted Brazilian government plans to establish complete automotive operations, including assembly and full manufacturing. Reluctant to share the same vision with the Brazilian government, Ford allowed Volkswagen to capture the Brazilian market. Ford reentered the market in the 1970s and became the second largest automobile producer after VW. Brazil’s car industry, coddled by years of high tariff barriers and other forms of protectionism, has been scrambling to modernize. For decades, imported cars were banned or made prohibitively expensive and foreign parts were not allowed to be fitted to locally made cars. A symbol of the “Brazilian miracle” of the 1970s, the auto industry became emblematic of Latin America’s “lost decade” of the 1980s. A ban on imports meant that the auto industry did not keep up with technological innovations, and consumers had no choice but to accept the manufacturers’ complacency. Brazil was, at the time, a new potential market for U.S. subcompacts. Autolatina: A Perfect Marriage Ford and VW’s strategy to combine operations reflected the partners’ will to overcome obstacles in the Brazilian market. By the 1980s, Ford and Volkswagen had a total of 15 vehicle, engine, and parts plants in Brazil and Argentina, employing 75,000 people. Their combined annual production capacity was 900,000 cars and trucks, distributed through 1,500 dealerships. Their automotive and credit operations reported sales totaling US$ 4 billion. In a market protected from external competition, Autolatina became highly successful. It offered inexpensive models, including the Escort XR3, Sierra, VW’s Gol, Beetle, and aging midsized Ford Falcons. Autolatina spent $35 million refitting a plant to build Beetles. The growth in this market segment relied exclusively on tax incentives from the Brazilian government. The products were adapted for a smaller engine. The goal was to manufacture car models at lowest possible cost. Plant operations were organized by size of vehicles. Ford had been relying on VW to build small cars while Ford was supplying the larger Escort and a line of pickup trucks. The two partners even produced shared products. For instance, Volkswagen was producing Ford Versailles (derived from VW Santana), and for those producing VW Logus (derived from Ford Escort). Marketing and sales staff were unified. Specialists and consultants were hired to accommodate the two different company cultures. Production of Autolatina cars rose substantially over time. In 1994, it seemed both companies had succeeded in identifying the key factors contributing to Autolatina’s success: inexpensive, non-competing models, a growing Brazilian market, and sharing of manufacturing and profits. Autolatina enabled both companies to serve an important country from within, and reduced operational costs for both partners. Developments: New Competition and the Emergence of MERCOSUR During the 1990s, conditions shifted in Brazil, and Autolatina was caught unprepared by renewed economic growth. In addition to the popular car policy, Brazil reduced tariffs on car imports. Over the course of five years, import tariffs fell from 85 percent to as low as 20 percent. In 1991, MERCOSUR (Mercado Comun del Sur, or free trade area of the Southern Cone) went into effect. The creation of the MERCOSUR free-trade area boosted Brazil’s exports to Argentina. Originally a free trade agreement between Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, MERCOSUR was extended in 1996 to include Chile and, in 1997, Bolivia. With 150 million of MERCOSUR’s 200 million inhabitants, Brazil was ready to become the region’s car-making center. The formation of MERCOSUR, falling tariffs, and the Autolatina’s success, provoked rivals into action. GM and Fiat moved into Argentina and Brazil in a big way, and began producing cars to compete with Autolatina. Brazil became the world’s tenth-largest producer of automobiles. Economic conditions vary widely among the MERCOSUR member states. Despite these asymmetries, the members agreed to strive for economic stability through political, fiscal and monetary policies, a wider opening of the economy to global competition, and modernization of the economies through deregulation and privatization. The implementation of economic reforms (that stabilized and liberalized the Brazilian and Argentinean economies) and specific governmental policies, such as commercial agreements, were the political and economic bases for a new structure in the supply chain of the automobile sector. These measures contributed to new environmental factors such as the increase in domestic demand and the industrial modernization of both countries. The new scenario in MERCOSUR favored the activities of automotive assemblers in the region. Business executives in the MERCOSUR countries had to adapt distribution channels, consider a broader market, learn about new consumers and take into account the complementarities of their MERCOSUR partners. The reduction of tariffs among the member countries opened new opportunities for multinationals. MERCOSUR allowed Argentina to increase its exports, and Brazil to engage in international trade at an accelerated rate. The emergence of MERCOSUR led to a substantial increase in foreign investment in Brazil from major multinational car makers. Major new players in the Brazilian market includes GM, Fiat, Renault, Mercedes Benz and Toyota, all with their own manufacturing plants. In addition, other major players began direct investment in Brazil and Argentina, or announced that they would locate in these countries: Asia Motors Inc., Audi AG, Honda Motor Co., Hyundai, Toyota and Mercedes-Benz. Meanwhile, the products of Autolatina, built for a protected market, fell out of step. Brazilian consumers began to show a preference for lower-cost small cars, and pricing competition intensified as a result of the abundance of competing small cars. Both GM and Fiat launched popular cars for less than $7,000 (Corsa and Uno). The table below presents the variety of offerings by four leading companies. Although Autolatina had succeeded in reviving the VW Beetle, customers deserted “the bug” in droves for lower-priced competing brands. With increased competition, customer’s choices were expanded beyond low cost, increasing the pressure on manufacturers to improve quality and offerings. Company Market Segment Products Volkswagen Small Mid-sized Large Beetle, Gol Logus, Pointer, Voyage Santana Ford Mid-sized Large Escort, Verona Versailles General Motors Small Mid-sized Large Corsa Kadett, Monza, Vectra Omega Fiat Small Large Uno Tempra Conflicts between the Partners In addition to dynamic changes in the market, conflicts arose in the strategies of Ford and VW. Ford dealers in Brazil had been begging for smaller cars that are better suited to Latin American consumers. But Ford avoided the erosion of Autolatina’s profits by competing with VW’s Gol (from which it was receiving half the profits). Volkswagen management, on the other hand, was reluctant to share its subcompact design with Ford so that Ford could use it in other markets. Mutual Willingness to share technological knowledge and other key competences with each other declined over time. Differences in the organizational cultures of the two partners also contributed to deteriorating relationships between Ford and Volkswagen. The German and the U.S. organizations had different histories and origins, as well as different management styles. Within the boundaries of the Autolatina, VW and Ford were reasonably well integrated operationally, even exchanging model fabrication. However, external to the relationship, suppliers continued to serve the two companies independently, as well as the dealerships. Autolatina was not fully integrated with suppliers or the dealers, leading to inefficiencies in the supply chain. For example, the dealerships were not consolidated, a potential for reducing administrative costs. Furthermore, the partners could have consolidated their supply base, gaining scale economies. The suppliers continued to serve Autolatina independently of the two partner companies. In addition, VW and Ford continued to compete with each other in the worldwide market, making it really difficult to share any technical knowledge, jeopardizing internal collaboration. Outside of the Autolatina collaboration, the partners were even competing against each other by launching new cars in the same category. The End of Autolatina In 1995, Ford and VW decided to end their alliance. The parting was so amicable that the employees were allowed to choose the company they wanted to continue to work for. Because the sale of subcompact vehicles, known as “popular cars” in South America, took off rapidly, Volkswagen’s smaller cars benefited from the demise of the joint venture. VW held a third of the regional market and on a $ 2.5 billion investment plan, expanding capacity by a third (up to 2,500 vehicles a day), and launching a line of new engines and a new truck plant. Ford specialized in midsized cars and was unable to respond to the regional demand for small cars. Eventually Ford’s image was damaged, and it was seen as the company producing cars that few wanted to buy. Ford began a $1.1 billion investment on its own to produce Fiestas in Brazil and Escorts in Argentina. Ford then controlled 11 percent of auto sales in Brazil, while VW, Fiat, and GM held market shares of 35.6 percent, 27 percent, and 23.2 percent, respectively. After the break-up of Autolatina, Ford launched a series of new models in Latin America to rebuild its image. The Fiesta has, despite its rocky start, bolstered Ford’s position. Ford also launched the late version of the Escort in Argentina, and Ford had big hopes for the Ranger pickup and for the Ka. Future The removal of trade barriers within the MERCOSUR contributed to intensified competition in Latin America. However, much uncertainty remained as to how government policies would evolve over time regarding regional free trade blocs. After decades of high inflation and ineffective government, Brazilian businesses are becoming more entrepreneurial, and the labor force is more productive. Managers at Brazilian firms have become more sophisticated, putting more emphasis on long-term profits and strategic planning. Competition has increased substantially. In the new competitive environment triggered by MERCOSUR, managers increasingly understand that improving goods, service quality, and lowering prices are the best ways to maintain long-term domestic competitiveness. But both Brazil and Argentina continue to experience periods of instability. QUESTIONS (1) What strengths did Ford and VW bring to the Autolatina venture? Did these firms have any weaknesses? Please elaborate. (2) Did Ford commit any blunders in its Latin American operations? Please specify. What can be learned from Ford’s experience in Latin America? What should Ford do now? (3) What types of opportunities does a trade bloc present to the firms that do business within it? What opportunities and threats should management at Ford and VW anticipate within the evolving MERCOSUR trade bloc? (4) What strategies can you recommend for Ford and VW to follow in order to maximize their prospects for success in the MERCOSUR bloc? (5) Using GlobalEDGE ™ (globaledge.msu.edu) and other online portals, please research the current status of MERCOSUR? In light of your findings, what should foreign automakers do if they want to participate and succeed in the evolving trade bloc? This case was prepared by doctoral candidate Alexandre M. Rodrigues and MBA student Elvin Zung under the direction of Professor S. Tamer Cavusgil. SOURCES: Economist (1993), “The Bugs from Brazil”, Aug 21; Economist (1994), “Brazil’s Car Industry: Party Time”, Sep 17; Berry, B.H. (1987), “Volkswagen Steps up Imports from Latin America”, Iron Age, pp. 230-249; Blumenstein, Rebecca (1997), “Head of Ford Unit In Brazil Expects A Narrower Loss”, Wall Street Journal, May 14; Bradsher, K. (1997), “Messy Latin Divorce Splits Ford and VW” International Herald Tribune. May 18; Cavusgil, S. T. (1998), “International Partnering: a Systematic Framework for Collaborating with Foreign Business Partners”, Journal of International Marketing, 6 (1); Corcoran, E. (1987) “Special Report- The global automobile: Cooperating to Compete”, IEEE Spectrum, 24 (53); Guiles, Melinda G. and Roger Cohen (1986), “Ford, Volkswagen Plan Joint Venture To Oversee Units in Argentina, Brazil”, Wall Street Journal, Nov 25; Kamm, Thomas (1993), “ Beetles Could Give Power to the People Of Brazil Once Again – President Wants Autolatina To Revive the VW Bug, But Price Won’t Be Retro”, Wall Street Journal, Feb 1; Kamm, Thomas (1994), “Pedal to the Metal: Brazil Swiftly Becomes Major Auto Producer As Trade Policy Shifts — VW, Ford, GM Are Building New Low-Priced Models For an Eager Populace – How Hyperinflation Helps”, Wall Street Journal, Apr 20; Katz I., Smith G., and Mandel-Campbell A., “Brazil’s Neighbors are Very Nervous” Business Week: 138, November 17; Kotabe, M. “Mercosur and Beyond” Center for International Business Education and Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX; Moffett M. (1996) “Bruised in Brazil: Ford Slips as Market Blooms”. Wall Street Journal. December 13; Shapiro, H. (1991), “Determinants of Firm Entry into the Brazilian Automobile Manufacturing Industry”, Business History Review. 65, p. 876

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

FINA 6750 Urgent

Black-Scholes-Merton & Binomial

Inputs: Black-Scholes-Merton Model Binomial Model
Asset price (S0) 699.49 European European Steps: 100
Exercise price (X) 695 Call Put European European
Time to expiration (T) 0.1288 Price 18.8015 9.9471 Call Put
Standard deviation (s) 14.00% Delta (D) 0.6098 -0.3902 Price 13.5523 12.0788
Risk-free rate (r or rc) 4.89% Gamma (G) 0.0109 0.0109 Delta (D) 0.5700 -0.4300
Dividends: 0.00% Theta (Q) -72.3091 -38.5218 Gamma (G) 0.0121 0.0121
continuous yield (dc) or discrete dividends below: Vega 96.3225 96.3225 Theta (Q) -68.9155 -63.3643
Rho 52.5009 -36.4301 American Call American
Call Put
d1 0.2787 Price 13.5523 12.1121
d2 0.2285 Delta (D) 0.5700 -0.4316
N(d1) 0.6098 Gamma (G) 0.0121 0.0121
N(d2) 0.5904 Theta (Q) -68.9155 -63.7694
PV of divs 0.0000
PV of strike 690.6356
Dividend # Dividend Time to ex date Present Value S – PV divs 699.4900
1 0.0000
2 0.0000
3 0.0000
4 0.0000
5 0.0000
6 0.0000
7 0.0000
8 0.0000
9 0.0000
10 0.0000
11 0.0000
12 0.0000
13 0.0000
14 0.0000
15 0.0000
16 0.0000
17 0.0000
18 0.0000
19 0.0000
20 0.0000
21 0.0000
22 0.0000
23 0.0000
24 0.0000
25 0.0000
26 0.0000
27 0.0000
28 0.0000
29 0.0000
30 0.0000
31 0.0000
32 0.0000
33 0.0000
34 0.0000
35 0.0000
36 0.0000
37 0.0000
38 0.0000
39 0.0000
40 0.0000
41 0.0000
42 0.0000
43 0.0000
44 0.0000
45 0.0000
46 0.0000
47 0.0000
48 0.0000
49 0.0000
50 0.0000
51 0.0000
52 0.0000
53 0.0000
54 0.0000
55 0.0000
56 0.0000
57 0.0000
58 0.0000
59 0.0000
60 0.0000
61 0.0000
62 0.0000
63 0.0000
64 0.0000
65 0.0000
66 0.0000
67 0.0000
68 0.0000
69 0.0000
70 0.0000
71 0.0000
72 0.0000
73 0.0000
74 0.0000
75 0.0000
76 0.0000
77 0.0000
78 0.0000
79 0.0000
80 0.0000
81 0.0000
82 0.0000
83 0.0000
84 0.0000
85 0.0000
86 0.0000
87 0.0000
88 0.0000
89 0.0000
90 0.0000
91 0.0000
92 0.0000
93 0.0000
94 0.0000
95 0.0000
96 0.0000
97 0.0000
98 0.0000
99 0.0000
100 0.0000
= = = =
Sum 0.0000
Do not change the items below******************************
discrete 2 continuous risk-free rate
continuous

BLACK-SCHOLES & BINOMIAL OPTION PRICING MODELS bsbin3.xls

In lieu of a continuously compounded yield, place below up to one hundred discrete dividends and the time in years to each ex-dividend date. Leave all unused cells blank. Set the yield above to zero. If yield is not set to zero, all discrete dividends are disregarded.

Black-Scholes-Merton and Binomial Option Pricing 10e

Run Binomial Model

Instructions

Instructions: Insert values in highlighted cells. Risk-free rate, standard deviation and yield can be entered as decimal or percentage (e.g., .052 or 5.2 for 5.2 %). Select form (discrete or continuous) for risk-free rate. Black-Scholes values automatically recalculate. Click on “Run Binomial Option Pricing Model” button to recalculate binomial values. Input cells have double borders. Output cells have single borders. Up to 5,000 time steps can be used in the binomial model. Input a continuous dividend yield or up to 0 discrete dividends. Do not enter both or the discrete dividends will be ignored. This spreadsheet can be used to calculate options on forwards or futures using the Black variation of the Black-Scholes model. Input the forward or futures price instead of the asset price and input the risk-free rate as both the risk-free rate and the dividend yield. Do not enter discrete dividends. To price foreign currency options, input the spot rate as the asset price, the domestic interest rate as the risk-free rate and the foreign interest rate as the dividend yield. Do not enter discrete dividends.

About

Written by Don M. Chance and Robert Brooks For use with An Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management, 10th ed. (Mason, Ohio: Cengage, 2015) Date: 7/09 Last updated: 3/18/14 © 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

s

s

s

=

=

++

=

=

012

201

‘2

0

1

21

()-()

(1-())-(1-())

ln(/)(/2)

c

c

rT

rT

c

BlackScholesMerton

cSNdXeNd

pXeNdSNd

where

SXrT

d

T

ddT

ïłïłïłï€œï€œï€«ï€«ï€œï€œ-‘012-‘201’20121–()-()(1-())-(1-())ln(/)(/2)-ccrTrTcBlackScholesMertoncSNdXeNdpXeNdSNdwhereSXrTdTddT

+-

=

+

+-

=

(1)

1

1

ud

Binomial

pcpc

c

r

rd

p

ud

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"