Case Study 1.1 Transworld Minerals- International Business

/in /by

Please read Case Study 1.1 Transworld Minerals on pages 28-30 of the ebook.  This case discusses the expansion into Salaysia of Transworld Minerals Inc. Please consider the different ways to internationalize in this case while “keeping the peace” with the domestic Salaysian Coal Mining Company. 

 Please provide well- written and well-reasoned 2 – 5 page paper addressing and focusing on the two questions below.

 

Question 1:

GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

Page 1 of 4

 

CRITERIA FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

0

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

5

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

8

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

10

YOUR SCORE

ORGANIZATION

Clearly organized

introduction, body,

conclusion

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria;

Disorganized and the

reader can not follow

the paper at any

length

Disorganized, leaves reader wondering

what is being said;

abrupt ending

Paper has intro, body, and conclusion

but may take a re-

reading to understand

Easy to read, topic introduced, organization

clearly evident with

proper introduction,

body, conclusion

 

Does this paper address the prompt

or the topic?

The topic of the paper is not addressed at all;

Fails to stick to the

topic therefore fails to

meet the criteria

Student does not clearly identify his/her

reflections about the

topic; may veer from

topic

The entire paper’s content relates to the

prompt or topic; the

student explains his/her

reflections about the

topic but may take a re-

reading to

understand

The student’s reflection about the topic is

explained in clear

language; immediately

interesting and supported

with detail

 

Paragraph Organization and

Writing Style: Ideas

are clearly

connected and

make sense

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria

Paragraphs are disorganized; ideas are

included which do not

relate to the main idea;

ideas are not connected

and have little or no

supporting details; one

sentence paragraphs

Each paragraph has a central idea that is

supported with details;

ideas are connected and

important points make

sense

Each paragraph has a central idea; ideas are

connected and

paragraphs are

developed with details;

paper is easy to read and

“flows” naturally in an

organized pattern

 

 

 

GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

Page 2 of 4

CRITERIA FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

0

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

5

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

8

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

10

YOUR SCORE

ORGANIZATION

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria

Paper is shallow and does not present

detailed evaluation of

reflection about the

topic; little use of

business literature to

support thought

The paper shows that the student has

thought about the topic

although the written

presentation may

appear weak or lack

clarity; use of business

literature to support

thought

Paper provides evidence (through the use of

description, details, and

use of business

literature) that the

student has examined

his/her own belief

systems and related this

to their current views

about the topic; use of

business literature to

support thought

 

 

 

GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

Page 3 of 4

 

CRITERIA

FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

0

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

5

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

8

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

10

YOUR SCORE

GRAMMAR

Basic writing expectations:

mechanics,

spelling,

grammar, or

punctuation

errors

More than 8 grammatical ,

punctuation, or BWE

errors

4-7 grammatical, punctuation , or

BWE errors

Between 1-4 grammatical,

punctuation, or

BWE errors, but

they are minor and

do not detract from

the paper

No errors whatsoever!

Use of transitions to connect

sentences and

ideas

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria

Choppy; sentences do not connect or

transition well; ideas

do not connect

Paper expresses the ideas of the author;

sentences relate to

one another; may

take a re-reading to

understand

Paper is easy to read and makes sense the first

time it is read. It is

interesting and well

written; sentences

connect and flow.

 

Correct choice of verb tenses, words, Avoidance of wordy phrases, correct use of pronouns

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria

Improper use of language or slang;

wrong word choice;

appears “padded”

Occasional wrong word choice;

somewhat wordy

but not enough to

detract from the

summary; May

occasionally use the

wrong tense.

 

 

No wrong word choice or slang; uses correct

verb tense and pronouns.

Well written and use of

words convey meaning

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

Page 4 of 4

 

CRITERIA

FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

0

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

5

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

8

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

10

YOUR SCORE

FORMATTING

Follows APA professional

writing style of

using 12 point

Times New

Roman font,

1inch margins all

around, correct

APA headings

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria; 3 or more

errors

Meets the criteria with 2 errors

Meets the criteria with 1 error

Exceeds this by completely meeting all

of these requirements

with NO exception!

 

Correct format of title page

including

running head,

page numbers,

correct page

justification

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria; 3 or more

errors

Meets the criteria with 2 errors

Meets the criteria with 1 error

Perfect title page, running head, page

numbers, and page

justification!

 

Correct use of citations within

paper according

to APA; Correct

APA reference

page

Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

disregard for the

expectations stated in

the criteria; 3 or more

errors

Meets the criteria with 2 errors

Meets the criteria with 1 error

Perfect use of citations within paper per APA

format; Correct reference

pa

What additional incentives should Wright suggest to improve the attractiveness of Transworld’s proposal to the Industries Ministry.

Question 2:

What strategy should Transworld adopt to offset the political advantage enjoyed by the Salaysian Coal Mining Company?

 

All papers must be professional, well-reasoned, well-written, and free from profanity.  This paper assignment should reflect the fact that this is a written product for a graduate professional program.  All responses should be professional, and if you disagree with a point-of-view presented in the case, keep it professional.  Make any case solutions and suggestions constructive.  If ideas are not your own, please reference them with the appropriate internet link or written resource link.  Although I do not wish to restrict speech, I reserve the right to fail any student who engages in plagiarism and/or does not show proper respect for any international culture and ethnicity and/or is obscene and promotes discriminatory ideas.

Turn-it-in is enabled on all papers.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Strayer BUS309 Quiz 6 (ALL CORRECT)

/in /by

Question

Question 1

One truth about factory farms is

Answer

they rarely inflict any genuine suffering on animals.

most animals we eat are from them.

they are necessary to feed the world.

they are run by brutal people.

Question 2

“Pollution permits” are an example of which of the following methods of achieving our environmental goals?

Answer

pricing mechanisms

government subsidies

a laissez-faire approach

regulations

Question 3

The “tragedy of the commons” is

Answer

the lack of a commons—a common place where people can come together.

the failure to appreciate what we have in common with other species.

that cost-benefit analysis involves value judgments that we do not share in common.

that individual pursuit of self-interest can sometimes make everyone worse off.

Question 4

The philosopher Tom Regan

Answer

claims that no impartial morally sensitive person could approve of the treatment of animals in factory farms if he or she knew what was going on.

argues against the use of governmental regulations to control the actions of businesses.

 

believes that the FTC should be abolished.

denies that non-human animals have any moral rights.

Question 5

Which of the following is a drawback to the regulatory approach?

Answer

regulation can take away an industry’s incentive to do more than the minimum

regulation is an incentive to an industry to do more than the minimum

regulation does not apply to all equally

does not require polluters to use the strongest most feasible means of pollution control.

Question 6

The moral theorist William T. Blackstone claims that the right to a livable environment

Answer

would solve the problem of how to conserve resources.

prevents the use of government regulation to control the actions of business.

is a fundamental human right.

implies that non-human animals have no genuine moral rights.

Question 7

Concerning future generations,

Answer

all philosophers today reject the idea that future people have rights

utilitarianism dictates a radical reduction in population growth

future people have a right to be born

the social and environmental policies we adopt can affect who is born in the future

Question 8

According to the philosopher Joel Feinberg,

Answer

future generations of people have a right to be born.

future generations have no moral rights.

we have no duties to future generations.

the rights of future generations are contingent upon those people coming into existence.

Question 9

According to Shaw and Barry, utilitarians

Answer

focus on human well-being and ignore animal welfare.

oppose animal experimentation in principle.

should include nonhuman animal pleasures and pains in the overall utilitarian calculus.

are likely to favor factory farming.

Question 10

William F. Baxter addresses environmental ethics by noting

Answer

the best ethical position to adopt on environmental issues is a naturalistic position.

non-human animals have intrinsic value.

judgments about environmental problems ought to be people-oriented.

damage to geological “marvels” is inherently wrong and should be prevented.

Question 11

Animal manure

Answer

is not available in sufficient quantities to replenish agricultural land.

is a large source of pollution.

helps counteract the “greenhouse effect”.

is potentially more dangerous than nuclear power.

Question 12

According to Holmes Rolston III,

Answer

naturalistic ethics ought to be abandoned

some natural objects are morally considerable in their own right, apart from human interests

all moral rights are derived from the interests of human beings

nature has no value apart from human beings.

Question 13

A moral vegetarian

Answer

rejects eating meat based on moral grounds

only eats animal that were raised humanely

does not believe animals suffer

the pleasure we get from eating a hamburger justifies the price the animals pay.

Question 14

Business has considered the environment to be

Answer

a scarce commodity.

free and nearly limitless.

a limited supply.

costly

Question 15

An ecosystem

Answer

should never be tampered with.

can survive any human intervention.

can be upset by human behavior.

is independent of all other ecosystems.

 

 

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Graeter’s Grows Through Good Management

/in /by

1. Based on this case and the two previous Graeter’s cases, what are the company’s most important strengths? Can you identify any weaknesses that might affect its ability to grow?

 

2. How would you describe the departmentalization and the organizational structure at Graeter’s? Do you think Graeter’s is centralized or decentralized, and what are the implications for its plans for growth?

 

3. The newest Graeter’s plant can produce far more ice cream than is needed today. The company also makes ice cream at its original plant and at the plant formerly owned by a franchisee. What are the implications for Graeter’s strategy and for its operational planning?

1. Based on this case and the two previous Graeter’s cases, what are the company’s most important strengths? Can you identify any weaknesses that might affect its ability to grow?

 

2. How would you describe the departmentalization and the organizational structure at Graeter’s? Do you think Graeter’s is centralized or decentralized, and what are the implications for its plans for growth?

 

3. The newest Graeter’s plant can produce far more ice cream than is needed today. The company also makes ice cream at its original plant and at the plant formerly owned by a franchisee. What are the implications for Graeter’s strategy and for its operational planning?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The Expansion Of Nordstroms Into South Africa

/in /by

1. Project the incremental, annual, and cumulative cash benefits and outflows associated with the proposed expansion for the next seven to

10 years, using a spreadsheet or other relevant presentation vehicle to support your narrative. Be sure to justify your assumptions and

methodology based on sound microeconomic and financial principles. For example, what assumptions have you made about demand, price,

volume, capital purchase costs, incremental hiring, and so on?

2. Develop a consolidated financial projection of revenue, pretax income, and cash flow for the overall business, over that same number of

years, both with and without the proposed investment. Use a spreadsheet or other relevant presentation vehicle to support your narrative,

being sure to describe any relevant assumptions.

V. Financing: In this section, compare the proposed loan to alternative financing methods. Specifically:

A. Weigh the pros and cons of raising money using internal financing mechanisms versus seeking funding through global capital markets via loans,

commercial paper, bonds, or equity financing. Which might be viable alternatives should the loan not be approved? Support your answer with

appropriate research and evidence.

B. Assess the viability of a business combination as a mechanism for expanding into the new market. Is this a reasonable option for the company? Why

or why not? Support your answer with appropriate research and evidence.

VI. Track Record: Use this section to persuade the lender that you are credit-worthy. You must:

A. Convincingly argue that your organization is on solid financial footing, and thus at a low risk for default, supporting your argument with appropriate

financial statements, ratios, and other indicators of financial performance and health.

B. Convincingly argue for your organization’s trustworthiness, providing credible evidence of legal and ethical financial behavior. For example, this

might include recent audit results; credit history; absence of significant lawsuits, recalls, or regulatory judgments; or other evidence designed to

show that the company holds itself to the highest legal and ethical standards.

MBA 640 Final Project Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: The final project for this course is the creation of an external capital funding proposal. Most businesses face a landscape of uncertainty and a never-ending stream of risks and opportunities. Managers must continually project the likely financial impact of decisions, make recommendations, act on those decisions, determine how to pay for them, and evaluate the costs and effectiveness of what has been done. Many decisions are short-term, routine, and operational. Others are longer-term investment decisions that require substantial new resources, such as developing new services, expanding into new geographic markets, or undertaking business combinations or spin-offs. Each requires managers to forecast, plan, and make decisions based on a thorough understanding of both internal and external factors that can affect a company’s financial success. For the summative assessment in this course, you will bring your finance and economics knowledge to bear by preparing an external capital funding proposal for a major international investment at a publicly traded corporation. In order to secure the support of potential financial backers, your proposal will need to lay out what the proposed investment opportunity is, how it fits within the company’s broader mission and goals, its financial impact, and the amount being requested and why (including alternative funding mechanisms considered). In addition, it will also need to include information on the organization’s context, risk factors, and microeconomic assumptions that could affect the success of the investment. Prompt: Submit a short paper that addresses Section III, Part C; Section V; and Section VI of the final project. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

III. Justification:

C. Financial impact. This section should discuss the project’s most likely financial implications and the consolidated financial projection with and without the project. Be sure to:

1. Project the incremental, annual, and cumulative cash benefits and outflows associated with the proposed expansion for the next seven to 10 years, using a spreadsheet or other relevant presentation vehicle to support your narrative. Be sure to justify your assumptions and methodology based on sound microeconomic and financial principles. For example, what assumptions have you made about demand, price, volume, capital purchase costs, incremental hiring, and so on?

2. Develop a consolidated financial projection of revenue, pretax income, and cash flow for the overall business, over that same number of years, both with and without the proposed investment. Use a spreadsheet or other relevant presentation vehicle to support your narrative, being sure to describe any relevant assumptions.

 

 

 

 

V. Financing: In this section, compare the proposed loan to alternative financing methods. Specifically: A. Weigh the pros and cons of raising money using internal financing mechanisms versus seeking funding through global capital markets via loans,

commercial paper, bonds, or equity financing. Which might be viable alternatives should the loan not be approved? Support your answer with appropriate research and evidence.

B. Assess the viability of a business combination as a mechanism for expanding into the new market. Is this a reasonable option for the company? Why or why not? Support your answer with appropriate research and evidence.

VI. Track Record: Use this section to persuade the lender that you are credit-worthy. You must: A. Convincingly argue that your organization is on solid financial footing, and thus at a low risk for default, supporting your argument with appropriate

financial statements, ratios, and other indicators of financial performance and health. B. Convincingly argue for your organization’s trustworthiness, providing credible evidence of legal and ethical financial behavior. For example, this

might include recent audit results; credit history; absence of significant lawsuits, recalls, or regulatory judgments; or other evidence designed to show that the company holds itself to the highest legal and ethical standards.

 

 

 

 

 

Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your investment project and justification paper should be approximately 8–10 pages in length (excluding spreadsheets, other exhibits, and list of references as necessary). It should be double-spaced with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins, and should use APA format for references and citations.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Justification: Financial Impact:

Expansion

Projects expansion’s incremental, annual, and cumulative cash benefits and outflows over specified time period, using relevant presentation vehicle to support narrative and justifying assumptions and methodology based on sound microeconomic and financial principles

Projects cash benefits and outflows over specified time period, using relevant presentation vehicle and justifying assumptions and methodology, but response contains inaccuracies, omits key details, or is poorly grounded in microeconomic and financial principles

Does not project expansion’s incremental, annual, and cumulative cash benefits and outflows over specified time period

15

Justification: Financial Impact:

Consolidated

Develops consolidated financial projection for overall business with and without the proposed investment over specified time period, using relevant presentation vehicle to support narrative and describing relevant assumptions

Develops consolidated financial projection for overall business with and without the proposed investment over specified time period, using relevant presentation vehicle and describing assumptions, but response contains inaccuracies or omits key details

Does not develop consolidated financial projection for overall business with and without the proposed investment over specified time period

15

Financing: Global Capital

Markets

Weighs pros and cons of raising money using internal financing versus global capital market mechanisms, identifying viable alternatives based on appropriate research and evidence

Weighs pros and cons of internal financing versus global capital market mechanisms, identifying viable alternatives based on research and evidence, but response contains inaccuracies, omits key details, or research and evidence are not relevant or cursory

Does not weigh pros and cons of raising money using internal financing versus global capital market mechanisms

15

 

 

 

Financing: Business

Combination

Assesses the viability of a business combination as a mechanism for expanding into the new market, supported by appropriate research and evidence

Assesses the viability of a business combination as a mechanism for expanding, supported by research and evidence, but response is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or research and evidence are not appropriate

Does not assess viability of a business combination as a mechanism for expanding into the new market

15

Track Record: Financial

Performance

Convincingly argues that organization is on solid financial footing, supported by appropriate financial statements, ratios, and other indicators of financial performance and health

Argues that organization is on solid financial footing, supported by financial statements, ratios, and other indicators of financial performance and health, but argument is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or supporting evidence is not credible, appropriate, or convincing for lenders

Does not argue that organization is on solid financial footing

15

Track Record: Legal and Ethical

Convincingly argues for organization’s trustworthiness, providing credible evidence of legal and ethical financial behavior

Argues for organization’s trustworthiness, providing evidence of legal and ethical financial behavior, but argument is cursory, contains inaccuracies, or evidence is not credible or convincing to lenders

Does not argue for organization’s trustworthiness, providing evidence of legal and ethical financial behavior

15

Articulation of Response

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas

10

Total 100%

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"