MKT 571; Social, Ethical, And Legal Implications PowerPoint Presentations

Please read the assignment, carefully… It is detailed and worth Final equivalence points…

 

Must meet all the Grading points addressed.

 

Non-plagiarized, Citated approparitely, References, APA style.

 

100% work need to have an A on this assignment ONLY!!!! If you cannot provide A and full point value work do not inquire about completing work, please…

I have posted:

 

– The Assignmnet this week (Week 6 Assignment, PowerPoint)

– Graded Week 1 Assignment (MUST read the instructors feedback)

– Graded Week 2 Assignment (MUST read the instructors feedback)

– Graded Week 3 Assignment (MUST read the instructors feedback)

– Graded Week 4 Assignment (MUST read the instructors feedback)

– NON- Graded Week 5 Assignment (MUST read the iInstructions to iunderstand wshat was expected…

Week 6 Assignment; MUST be a POWERPOINT with speaker notes, citations, references and read all the week’s assignments feedback, must be incorporated.

 

Special instructions about the Assignment listed below.

 

I have enclosed a copy of the week 6 assignment below for reference. To clarify and hopefully simplify the assignment, please review the following:

1. Both parts of the assignment should be done in PowerPoint slides, Section 1 and 2

2. Section 1 defined below Assess in a maximum of 700 words the ethical, legal, and social issues affecting your product or service in two markets: the United States and one international market.

– do not develop a word file response

– put section 1 (instead of paper) in the appendix of the slides from Section 2  using 4 to 6 slides

3. All slides, both section 1 and 2, should have speaker notes with “quoted” cited and referenced information from both peer-reviewed and chapter readings.

4. Slides have bullets should be only be phrases (no sentences as cited information goes in speaker notes).

5. Most slides have images such as tables, graphs, illustrations

6. Introductory slide with slide numbers

7. Conclusion slide

8. Domestic and International responses should be on same slide to compare the differences for the topic such as the pricing strategy.

9. Make changes per prior week feedback.

10. A reference slide

11. Spell checking slides and speaker notes.

 

Purpose of Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to help students think through the importance of social, legal, and ethical issues that may arise with their product or service and the implications of decisions made within those frameworks. It is designed to help the learners understand ethical and legal issues related to marketing practices. This knowledge helps to prevent such issues when developing the marketing strategies in their marketing plan. The executive overview of the marketing plan is not a summary and conclusion, but an overview of what the plan entails and what it does not address.

Section 1

Assignment Steps

Producing and marketing a product without regard to ethical, legal, and social considerations is detrimental to the overall success of any company.

Assess in a maximum of 700 words the ethical, legal, and social issues affecting your product or service in two markets: the United States and one international market. Domestic market generally means the market where the company headquarters are located. If you choose a domestic market that is not the U.S., then your other market is required to be the U.S. marketplace. This should added to the Target Market section of your Marketing Plan.

Include the following:

· Develop a process to monitor and control marketing performance. This process could be a flowchart but a flowchart is not required (flowcharts do not count towards your word count requirement).

Formulate a maximum 350-word executive summary including at a minimum the following elements:

· Required executive summary elements:

· Strategic Objectives

· Products or Services

· Optional executive summary elements:

· Resources Needed

· Projected Outcomes

Section 2

Integrate the previous weeks’ sections, and incorporate corrections and suggestions from the instructor’s weekly feedback. The marketing plan should be a minimum of 3,850 words or 25-30 PowerPoint slides. Your instructor will let you know which option students will use. The content for this task should include the following:

· Incorporate Understanding Target Markets (Week 2) and instructor feedback

· Incorporate Promotion and the Product Life Cycle (Week 3) and instructor feedback

· Incorporate Price and Channel Strategy (Week 4) and instructor feedback

· Incorporate Marketing Communication and Brand Strategy (Week 5) and instructor feedback

· Incorporate Executive Summary, Legal, Social and Ethical Considerations (Week 6) and instructor feedback

Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed references.

Include all peer-reviewed references from the previous weeks’ individual assignments in your marketing plan.

Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1 Slide For A Case SWOT Analysis

Lecturer Bill Fanning prepared this case study as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of

an administrative situation. Exhibits are authentic slides from the company, used with permission.

Copyright © 2014 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or

transmitted in any form or by any means without the express written permission of the Berkeley-Haas Case Series.

 

 

 

 

Date: March 3, 2014

 

 

B ILL FANN ING

Annie’s: Growing Organically

 

It was a grey day in February 2012 as the train pulled out of the Amtrak station in Berkeley, California

and headed east. John Foraker, CEO of Annie’s, Inc., a rapidly growing natural and organic food

company, sank into his seat and began to unwind from the stream of meetings and decisions that

consumed his day and moved into a part of the day that he anticipated—a chance to look out the

window and think about his business at a higher level. Big things were in the works for Annie’s and

there were key decisions to be made over the next few months in terms of entering a new category.

 

Annie’s had been enjoying strong and steady success in the marketplace with their healthy offerings in

shelf stable prepared foods across three product categories (Meals, Snacks, and Dressings), led by the

Meals category (macaroni & cheese), with Snacks (Cheddar Bunnies, Fruit Snacks, Pretzels, etc.), and

Dressings (condiments and dressings) following respectively. But the company was about to make

significant moves in terms of expanding into new categories.

 

Annie’s had strong investor support due to increasing sales and profits over the past few years (net

sales had increased from $76.8 million in fiscal 2008 to $141.3 million in fiscal 2012) and it was

likely they would be moving toward an IPO soon. They had also achieved a significant level of

success competing in non-traditional ways in very traditional CPG (consumer packaged goods)

categories. As a Berkeley-Haas School of Business graduate (MBA’94), this was particularly

satisfying to Foraker. Less certain was whether Annie’s could continue to achieve this level of

success in new categories while playing by their own set of rules.

 

As the team assessed expansion options, they kept two primary goals in mind. The first was to age up

the franchise—Annie’s had developed a strong following among younger kids and their moms. The

kids liked the taste and saw the products as fun, while the moms appreciated the fact that they could

provide healthy products for their kids that the kids actually liked. But there was an inherent

challenge with having such a strong, positive franchise with younger kids. At some point, they would

outgrow the brand.

 

The second goal was to broaden the target audience. Annie’s success to date had been driven largely

by a group they identified as “Core Consumers”. This group felt very strongly about making healthy

choices for their families, and was comfortable with the extra effort and money required to do so.

They were committed and loyal, but their attitudes were outside the mainstream. To grow the

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

B5801

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 2

 

business, the Annie’s team felt they needed to broaden their target and attract more mainstream

consumers to the brand. They set their sights on a group they called “Prime Prospects”, who valued

healthy alternatives to the extent they were available and convenient, but were more moderate in their

attitudes (Exhibit 1).

 

Background

Annie Withey and Andrew Martin started Smartfood in Boston in 1982 with their first and best known

product, a cheesy popcorn snack. They sold the company to PepsiCo in 1986 for $15 million. A few

years later, Withey took essentially that same cheese sauce and used it in Annie’s Homegrown Shells

and Cheddar, a stovetop macaroni & cheese dinner, and in 1989, Annie’s was born.

 

Over time, the company grew through new products as well as greater acceptance of its existing line.

Annie’s was able to appeal to consumers seeking healthy/natural/organic choices as well as more

mainstream food products, and felt they were in a sweet spot that allowed them to grow their healthy

food business by taking share from traditional CPG brands as well as the organic/natural sector. As

such, their product line and their growth efforts were focused on both areas (Exhibit 2).

 

Financially, the company was in good shape. In 2001, the same year Foraker joined Annie’s, Solera

Capital, a New York women’s private equity firm, acquired a major stake in Annie’s and that support

continued to fuel their growth. Sales and profits had been growing steadily as Annie’s was able to

maintain their price points even as they competed with larger, more heavily supported brands with

lower price points. Trends and projections were strong and investors remained bullish (Exhibit 3).

 

Annie’s Culture

Like many small companies, Annie’s was strongly driven by its culture during the early days. And

Annie’s was fiercely determined to preserve their culture as they grew. Annie’s was a company that

was passionate about food, people, and the planet, and their actions needed to reflect that orientation.

 

For example, the company was careful about the suppliers it worked with, preferring to seek out

smaller, local farmers whenever possible. They were also committed to non-GMO (genetically

modified organisms) products. Although Annie herself was removed from the business operations

and living on her certified organic farm in Connecticut, the Annie’s team made an effort to integrate

her persona into products and marketing efforts whenever possible. 1 And they also viewed corporate

social responsibility as something that needed to be integrated across all the company’s activities.

According to Foraker: “Social responsibility is part of the Annie’s brand DNA. We’ve always tried to

do things differently and set an example for the broader world.”

 

Growth

Annie’s had developed a core proposition that included four pillars: authenticity, social responsibility,

great taste, and simple, healthy ingredients (Exhibit 4) that positioned them well for growth over the

long haul. The Annie’s team felt that this core proposition could be effective in a number of areas in

the grocery store. It was a proposition that made sense in terms of broad consumer trends as well as

distribution patterns that would address those trends.

 

Annie’s management team was not content to rest on their successes and simply grow with the

category as consumers moved steadily toward healthier options, in particular organic. They felt that

 

1 http://www.annies.com/about-annies#Our-Roots.

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 3

 

Annie’s could lead that charge rather than sit back and simply ride the wave. To be sure, there were

also a number of offsetting factors that represented hurdles, mainly a still sluggish economy. Despite

the continuing slow recovery from the recession, which could affect the willingness of consumers to

purchase premium products, Foraker felt the time was right for growth. The core business was strong

and there was a window of opportunity in terms of available funding for the company so a few months

earlier they had decided to make their move.

 

Frozen Foods

For a variety of reasons, the Annie’s team felt that their next area for growth was in the frozen foods

category, a huge category of $12 billion in retail sales. And this was not just an attempt to get

placement for one particular product line, but an assault on the entire section of the supermarket.

They had a plan in place for a series of new product launches in frozen foods, and it began with frozen

pizza.

 

The decision to move into frozen was not an easy one. Natural/healthy/organic foods as a segment

was not well developed in the frozen section, due to a combination of factors, including:

 

 A general perception of frozen foods as less healthy  Strong consumer demand in the frozen section for desserts and snack items  A limited number of “doors” in the frozen section

 

In addition, Annie’s Core Consumers were not big users of frozen food items. But Foraker and his

team had an “aha moment” on this issue when they realized that their success in the frozen category

might also be good for their retail partners if they could convince more Core Consumers to shop the

frozen section, thus creating a “win-win” situation for both Annie’s and their partners.

 

Within the frozen category, multiple opportunities existed and the Annie’s team had a plan in place to

expand into each area, but they had to decide where to start. There were numerous areas that made

sense in terms of both potential volume and fit with Annie’s. For example, frozen entrees seemed like

an obvious fit based on their success in macaroni and cheese. However, frozen pizza was also

attractive, and represented some opportunities beyond the obvious, and the decision was made to start

there. Sarah Bird, Chief Mom Officer for Annie’s said: “We know that cooking a meal from scratch

can be a challenge for busy families. Annie’s frozen pizza was a convenient solution for parents who

wanted to provide great taste as well as better ingredients they can feel good about giving their

families.”

 

Frozen Pizza

Product

Once the decision had been made to move forward with frozen pizza, there were tough marketing mix

decisions to be made. The first was around the product itself. The initial product developed was an

all-organic product, which meant that 95 percent of the ingredients were certified organic. The USDA

had very strict definitions for products using any type of organic terminology, as well as restrictions

governing where on the package these claims could be made. But would enough consumers respond

to the idea of Annie’s offering frozen pizza, or would it be seen as too extreme in a category not

generally known for healthy offerings? And how would the channel react?

 

The alternative would be to come out with a “made with” option, meaning the product was made with

organic ingredients, such as the cheese, tomatoes, crust, etc. The “made with” organic option needed

to have 70 percent or more of total ingredients as organic.

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 4

 

 

Some within the team felt the “made with” organic was the better option. They felt it would still

allow for the positive imagery connected with organic products and remain consistent with the

Annie’s brand, but at the same time, this strategy would take the product line closer to the mainstream

and to their competitors in the frozen pizza section.

 

The product had been tested successfully in Whole Foods in the San Francisco market. The version

tested was organic and there were four flavors in test: Four Cheese, Supreme, Spinach & Mushroom,

and Pepperoni. Although discussion continued about whether this was the right mix, the plan was to

move forward with these same four flavors.

 

Distribution

Closely linked to the product decision were issues about distribution. Annie’s products were sold

through the natural foods channel in chains like Whole Foods, as well as mainstream supermarkets

such as Safeway and Dominick’s. Annie’s also enjoyed a strong relationship with Target, as well as

other mass merchandisers. Their current business was divided roughly equally across these three

channels (Exhibit 5).

 

If Annie’s decided to launch their frozen pizza product with the all-organic product, would it sell at

Safeway or Target? On the flip side, would a “made with” approach be right for natural retailers? A

bigger distribution question was whether Annie’s would even get distribution in Safeway. Although

mainstream supermarkets had begun to create separate areas in the frozen section for healthy

offerings, progress had been slow, and there was some question whether it was really an advantage to

be located in these sections and away from the rest of the category.

 

Restricting distribution to natural retailers did not seem to be an option, as it would not meet their

volume goals or their goal of engaging Prime Prospects. Grocery still did the lion’s share of business

in frozen pizza, but that percentage was declining and the growth was coming from the natural and

mass channels (Exhibit 6).

 

A longer-term issue was rattling around in the back of Foraker’s mind. As mentioned, Annie’s had

been successful in achieving a delicate balance amongst three different channels—mainstream

supermarkets (Safeway, Dominick’s), natural retailers (Whole Foods), and mass merchandisers

(Target). But as the company’s volume grew and covered more categories, would they be able to

maintain that balance?

 

Each channel had demands and expectations. Target in particular had a tendency to take brands under

their wing in the food section of their stores and often chose upstart independent brands like Annie’s

rather than those owned by major CPG companies. Although the Annie’s team had worked hard and

been effective to date in keeping all channels happy, this was clearly an area of sensitivity and had to

be monitored carefully going forward.

 

Annie’s also had a strong partnership with natural retailers that had been in place from the beginning.

And although traditional grocery relationships were newer and growth was slower in this channel, the

big volume over the long haul was still going to come from traditional grocery (Exhibit 7).

 

Pricing

The pricing decision was also tightly tied to the product and distribution issues. Annie’s products had

competed successfully in other categories at significant price premiums relative to the competition (Exhibit 8). Consumers had bought into Annie’s philosophy of simple, quality ingredients providing

a healthy option that kids liked, and were willing to pay more for it.

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 5

 

 

Certainly, Foraker and his team’s intent was to carry that philosophy forward into frozen pizza and

other categories in the future, as it was a philosophy that not only worked with consumers, but also

with the bottom line. But frozen pizza was new territory, and had a very different competitive

landscape. There were many competitors—strong national brands, smaller national brands, and

regional competitors (see next section). The price points for these competitors were all over the map.

 

More importantly, the category was heavily deal driven, and the reality was that new product trial

appeared to occur primarily as a result of a promotional offer. “I’m really excited about that product.

I’ll try it the next time I see a coupon” was a typical response from consumers talking about new

products in the category (based on focus groups conducted in early 2012) 2 .

 

Competition

As mentioned earlier, a competitive landscape that was fragmented, aggressive, and price-driven was

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Proctor And Gamble Case Study

1. Using segmentation strategies, what are the target market(s) for P&G? How does this relate to the company’s brand management strategies?

2. Who are the top three competitors of P&G, and what are their advantages/disadvantages with respect to their competitive product/service strategies?

3. P&G’s impressive portfolio includes some of the strongest brand names in the world. What are some of the challenges associated with being the market leader in so many different categories?

4. With social media becoming increasingly important and with fewer people watching traditional commercials on television, what does P&G need to do to maintain its strong brand images?

5. What risks will P&G face in the future?

Marketing Excellence Procter & Gamble

 

Procter & Gamble (P&G) began in 1837 when brothers-in-law William Procter and James Gamble formed a small candle and soap company. Over the next 150 years, P&G innovated and launched scores of revolutionary products with superior quality and value, including Ivory soap in 1882, Tide laundry detergent in 1946, Crest toothpaste with fluoride in 1955, and Pampers disposable diapers in 1961. The company also opened the door to new product categories by acquiring a number of companies, including Richardson-Vicks (makers of personal care products like Pantene, Olay, and Vicks), Norwich Eaton Pharmaceuticals (makers of Pepto-Bismol), Gillette, Noxell (makers of Noxzema), Shulton’s Old Spice, Max Factor, and the Iams pet food company.

Today, Procter & Gamble is one of the most skillful marketers of consumer-packaged goods in the world and holds one of the most powerful portfolios of trusted brands. The company employs 121,000 people in about 80 countries worldwide, has 25 billion-dollar global brands, spends more than $2 billion annually on R&D, and has total worldwide sales in excess of $84 billion a year. Its sustained market leadership rests on a number of different capabilities and philosophies. These include:

Customer knowledge: P&G studies its customers—both the end consumers and its trade partners—through continuous marketing research and intelligence gathering. It spends more than $100 million annually on more than 10,000 formal consumer research projects and generates more than 3 million consumer contacts via its e-mail and phone center. The company also encourages its marketers and researchers to be out in the field, interacting with consumers and retailers in their home environment.

Long-term outlook: P&G takes the time to analyze each opportunity carefully before acting. Once committed, the company develops the best product possible and executes it with the determination to make it a success. For example, it struggled with Pringles potato chips for almost a decade before achieving market success. Recently, P&G has increased its presence in developing markets by focusing on affordability, brand awareness, and distribution through e-commerce and high-frequency stores.

Product innovation: P&G is an active product innovator. The company employs 1,000 science PhDs, more than Harvard, Berkeley, and MIT combined, and applies for roughly 3,800 patents each year. Part of its innovation process is to develop brands that offer new consumer benefits. Recent innovations that created entirely new categories include Febreze, an odor-eliminating fabric spray; Dryel, a product that helps “dry-clean” clothes at home in the dryer; and Swiffer, a cleaning system that effectively removes dust, dirt, and hair from floors. Larry Huston, former innovation officer at P&G, stated, “P&G is largely a branded science company.”

Quality strategy : P&G designs products of above-average quality and continuously improves and reformulates them. When the company says “new and improved,” it means it. Recent examples include Tide Pods, a compact laundry detergent tablet; Pampers Rash Guard, a diaper that treats and prevents diaper rash; and improved two-in-one shampoo and conditioner products Pantene, Vidal Sassoon, and Pert Plus.

Brand extension strategy : P&G produces its brands in several sizes and forms. This strategy gains more shelf space and prevents competitors from moving in to satisfy unmet market needs. P&G also uses its strong brand names to launch new products with instant recognition and much less advertising outlay. The Mr. Clean brand has been extended from household cleaner to bathroom cleaner and even to a carwash system. Old Spice extended its brand from men’s fragrances to deodorant. Often, P&G will leverage the technologies already in place to create a brand extension. For example, when Crest successfully extended its brand into a new tooth-whitening system called Crest Whitestrips, the company used bleaching methods from P&G’s laundry division, film technology from the food wrap division, and glue techniques from the paper division.

Multibrand strategy: P&G markets several brands in the same product category, such as Luvs and Pampers diapers and Oral-B and Crest toothbrushes. Each brand meets a different consumer want and competes against specific competitors’ brands. At the same time, the company is careful not to sell too many brands and recently reduced its vast array of products, sizes, flavors, and varieties to assemble a stronger brand portfolio.

Strong sales force: P&G’s sales force has been named one of the top 25 sales forces by Sales & Marketing Management magazine. A key to its success is the close tie its sales force forms with retailers, notably Walmart. The 150-person team that serves the retail giant works closely with Walmart to improve both the products that go to the stores and the process by which they get there.

Manufacturing efficiency and cost cutting: P&G’s reputation as a great marketing company is matched by its excellence as a manufacturing company. The company has successfully developed and continually improves its production operations, which keep costs among the lowest in the industry. As a result, it is able to offer reduced prices for its premium products.

Brand-management system: P&G originated the brand-management system, in which one executive is responsible for each brand. The system has been copied by many competitors but not often with P&G’s success. Recently, P&G modified its general management structure so that a category manager runs each brand category and has volume and profit responsibility. Although this new organization does not replace the brand-management system, it helps to sharpen strategic focus on key consumer needs and competition in the category.

P&G’s accomplishments over the past 177 years have come from successfully managing the numerous factors that contribute to market leadership. Today, the company’s wide range of products are used by 4.8 billion people around the world in 180 different countries.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Environment Analysis, Consumer Segmentation, Market Research

Semester 1, 2019

 

MKT10007 Fundamentals of Marketing

 

Assignment 3: Environment Analysis, Consumer Segmentation, Market Research;

Task Description + Template + Rubric

 

Marks; 30% Due date: Sunday 5th May, 2019 @ 11:59pm AEST.

Word limit: 2,600 (+/- 10% = 2,340 to 2,860 words). If you find that your draft is over the word limit then move extra material into appendices. Then, in the body of the Assignment, you can briefly summarize the key points of that extra material and refer the reader to the appendix concerned for further details. Remember; Charts, Pictures, Tables and Diagrams are not included Word Count.

This assignment will help you to achieve these Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs);

1. Demonstrate a broad understanding of the major conceptual and theoretical principles upon which the practice of marketing is based.

2. Demonstrate a general understanding of marketing management tasks and of how marketing fits into the organisational environment and interacts with diverse environments.

3. Identify and evaluate secondary research from a variety of sources. As a reflective and critical thinker, use this research information to apply marketing concepts and principles to propose ethical, creative solutions to a range of marketing related problems that arise in business contexts.

4. Work effectively as an individual or a team member to communicate effectively whether orally or in writing.

 

Assessment overview

 

Write your report as the same group of independent consultants who worked on Assignment 2. Here, in Assignment 3 you are presenting an Environment Analysis, Consumer Segmentation and Marketing Research recommendations to your clients; the Marketing Managers of your Brand + Sub-Brand.

 

 

Assignment 3
This is a hypothetical situation. You do not need to buy your product.
You will use marketing theories and concepts appropriately.
You will find sources of information to justify the points you make.
Therefore, you will cite your References* and include a List of References as the last pages of your report. * in-text referencing

 

 

 

 

Overview of Structure

 

1. Executive Summary (approx. 200 words) NOT INCLUDED IN WORD COUNT

 

a. the report’s major purpose,

b. the analytical processes used,

c. the findings, and

d. Your recommendations.

2. Table of Contents

 

3. Introduction (approx. 150 words) Three parts are required here: –

 

a. The authorization and purpose of the report tells the reader who it was who commissioned the work and why it is being produced.

b. Limitations you encountered in relation to data collection, availability or access to information and information that might be confidential in nature.

c. The scope of the report summarizes what the report covers, how information will be presented, where the information comes from and how it was gathered.

 

Section 1: The marketplace and influencing factors (approx. 1,000 words)

 

In this section you will be considering the marketing environment in which the company operates, and you will analyse the factors which might influence the Brand + Sub-Brand.

 

 

The Micro-environment; (SIP-CCC; these players are often called “stakeholders”.)

 

4. What industry are we in? (approx. 400 words) (Refer to Tutorials 4 & 7 (finding data) and Lecture 3.)

At the beginning of any business report, state the scope of the report, before presenting the analysis.

 

· Identify the industry within which the company and the Brand + Sub-Brand compete.

· Include an illustration of how the company and Brand + Sub-Brand fits within the industry; for example, include a tree diagram.

 

5. Competitors Analysis (“C” for Competitors in SIP-CCC) (approx. 200 words) (Refer to Lecture 3.)

Identify at least two key competitors from the Strategic Group and include a Product Comparison Table of the type shown below:-

 

 

 

 

#

 

P Our Brand + Sub-Brand Strategic Group Competitor 1 Strategic Group Competitor 2
Brand + Sub-Brand      
Brand Positioning      
Product Specifications      
Place      
Price      
Promotion      
Advantages & Disadv c/w our Brand and Sub-Brand      
Other factors important to prospective buyers      
Data was current as of (insert date/s).

Sources; (insert sources).

(Hint; you should expect to see that the Marketing Mix 4Ps for the competitors are very similar to those for your Brand + Sub-Brand. This will demonstrate that these competitors are indeed in your Strategic Group, because they will have the same or similar strategies to our Brand + Sub-Brand. Therefore, also try to identify those things that differentiate the competitors.)

6. Analysis of other Micro-Environment players (approx. 150 words) (Refer to Lecture 3 slides.) (“S, I, P and C for Company” in SIP-CCC).

 

Identify one key player of importance to your product. This will be from amongst Suppliers, Intermediaries, the Publics or internal Company factors. You will;

· Describe them and outline the role they play in relation to your company/ Brand + Sub-brand.

· Describe how they work with your company/ Brand + Sub-brand.

· Identify the key risks if the relationship between your company/ Brand + Sub-brand and this player broke down.

· Identify a way this player could be leveraged to provide your company/ Brand + Sub-brand with an additional opportunity.

 

7. The Macro-environment; Other environmental factors influencing the company (approx. 250 words*) (Refer to Lecture 3.)

 

DENT-PC; provide an analysis of the three* macro-environment factors which you consider to be the most important ones impacting upon your Brand + Sub-Brand. You need to cover the following:

· Describe any recent trends in these three areas that might impact your company/Brand and Sub-Brand.

· Identify risks and opportunities these trends present for your Brand + Sub-brand.

 

· Recommend changes in strategy that counter the risks and take advantage of the opportunities presented by these trends.

· Include a Table of the type presented in Lecture 3 slide 15.

· *” three” means three out of D, E, N, T, P, and C. WITHIN each of these three you might mention several trends; for example, within “E” for Economic there might be several relevant factors; such as growing employment = more potential customers and rising discretionary income = ability to spend more on your product category and/or spend more on more expensive alternatives within your category

 

 

 

 

 

Section 2 Consumer segmentation (approx. 400 words)

Refer to Lecture 4 and Tutorials 4 and 7.

In this section, you will present your consumer segmentation analysis – how the consumers could be split into smaller segments for the purposes of marketing. This will NOT be what the company is doing now – it will be YOUR consumer segmentation analysis.

 

In your report, you will provide the following information:

 

 

· You will select ONE-only segmentation base and at least three profile elements that you believe will be important things to know about the current and potential consumers in this product category.

· Explain why you have chosen these bases and profile elements. Why are they useful for this particular product category? Justify using the Criteria (Lecture 4 slides.)

· ONE Table,

· ONE Segmentation base,

· At least THREE Segments and THREE Profiling elements

 

· Include a Segmentation table containing at least three segments

and at least three profiling elements. For example, at least;

Segments Profiling element 1 Profiling element 2 Profiling element 3
Segment 1      
Segment 2      
Segment 3      

 

Section 3 Assess the attractiveness of each consumer segment (approx. 300 words)

You will assess the attractiveness of each consumer segment for your Brand + Sub-Brand. “Attractiveness” refers to the likelihood that a consumer segment will provide profitable sales for your Brand + Sub-Brand. You will be measuring “How attractive is the segment as a market for the Brand-and-Sub-brand?” – This is where you apply the Three Criteria – see below and Lecture 4 slides.

· NOT “How attractive (as a product to buy) is the Brand-and-Sub-brand from the point-of-view of the consumers in this segment?”

Attractiveness is based upon the three factors;

1. Size and growth – a large, fast-growing, low-margin segment might be a good match to a strong brand with abundant resources that can afford to target a low margin segment. On the other hand, a small brand with limited resources and the need to make profits in the short term would be better-matched with a smaller, high-margin segment.

2. Structural attractiveness – Can we communicate with the consumers in this segment and deliver the product to them? Does this segment already have strong, entrenched competitors?

3. The degree to which the segment matches the Brand + Sub-Brand’s resources and objectives – Does the brand have substantial resources and very high sales and share objectives? If so then big, fast-growing segments would be a good match. Or is it vice-versa?

 

Section 4 Recommendations for additional research (approx. 500 words)

Refer to Lecture 5 and Tutorial 8.

After reviewing the information you collected in section 2, you will decide on what additional information you would like to know to fill gaps in your knowledge about consumers.

What key questions do want answered:

 

· What information do you want to find out? What are the 3 – 4 key questions you most want to answer.

· How would this information help you to make decisions regarding marketing strategy. Be specific in describing these decisions and explaining how this information would help with the decision-making.

 

How would go about gathering information for ONE of your key questions using marketing research techniques.

 

· Propose one research methodology that you could use to gather this information. MUST be Primary Research (that is, research to gather new data to answer your question).

 

· Explain why this research methodology will get you the information you need. You can choose any Primary research method you like but you must justify your choice with relevant references.

 

· Explain the main advantages and disadvantages of your proposed methodology.

 

· Research design; Describe research method specifics such as questionnaire design, focus group assemblage and conduct, sample size, sampling method and/or other specifics.

 

Conclusion (approx. 150 words)

Concisely summarize all four sections of the report. Then write a section which answers these questions: –

1. What do the findings mean?

2. Was the purpose of the report fulfilled?

3. Have the specified sources of information been used?

4. Have the areas stated been adequately tackled?

 

Recommendations (100 words) You will include here a brief summary of your recommended actions. In this Report your recommendations will be about your suggested strategies from your analysis of the Marketing Environment, Consumer Segment Attractiveness and Marketing Research.

 

Referencing – You will be penalized (marks reduced) if you do not provide references. You need to provide both citations (in-text references) and List of References.

For your Group as a whole, you should aim to reference a MINIMUM* of at least 2 Academic References and at least 15 Business References for Credit grade – see Rubric > more than 30 to get top marks for Referencing. References will be about your industry, product category, your brand and sub brand and the competitors, the marketing environment and marketing research including recent trends and consumer behavior.

· “Where to get information” – refer to Tutorials 4 and 7.

· “How to reference” – refer to Tutorial 4.

· How to Demonstrate the Application of Theory – Refer to Tutorial 5.

Handy Hint worth 15 easy marks; arrange for one member of your Group to review the final draft of the Assignment against the Rubric and check off that all sections have been completed. In particular; Conclusion (5 marks) for including the four components. Likewise, Presentation, Format and Attention to detail (5 marks) and Referencing (5 marks) for extensive in-text citation plus List of References.

 

 

D and HD assignments will also include substantial amounts of Data – How to present data.

· Charts and tables and other data visualisation methods make it much easier to effectively communicate numerical data.

· Data is much more meaningful when a trend over an extended time period is presented. Preferably three or up to five years of data is preferred.

· You need to include the source reference, and the terms and units and time period of the data. For example, terms could be 000’s or millions, units could be Australian dollars or square metres or tonnes, and time period could be a particular calendar-year or financial-year or some other time period.

· Data needs to be consistently presented throughout your report. For example, if in one part of the report you state that ABC holds 6.5% market share then it is absolutely essential that anywhere else in the report where you mention ABC’s share you must use the same number; 6.5%.

· Pricing data from retail outlets; Always state the name and location of the store, and the date of purchase or data collection.

· Comparison data; If comparing prices, make sure that the prices are presented for the same package size, or in standard units (e.g. cents per millilitre), in the same terms (litres, tonnes etc.) or as an Index where your brand = 100.

 

Page 6 of 10

 

 

 

[Type here]

 

How to get higher grades; See what you have to do better, and what extra things you have to do to get higher grades. White-on-Blue = extra to get a Credit over a Pass, Grey BOLD = extra to get a D compared with a C, Yellow BOLD Italic underlined = extra to get an HD compared with a D

 

Criteria

 

Fail

Pass

50-59%

Credit

60-69%

Distinction

70-79%

 

High Distinction

80-100%

Executive Summary (5%) Not all elements included. Passable summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations. Adequate summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations. Reasonably comprehensive and concise summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations. Comprehensive and concise summary of the report’s major purpose, the analytical processes, the findings and the recommendations.
Introduction (5%) Purpose missing or unclear. Scope unclear or absent. Purpose stated but lacks clarity, Scope indicated; elements missing or lack clarity. Purpose clearly stated. Scope clearly stated. Purpose and scope clearly stated with professional level of detail Authorization included. Purpose clearly stated. Scope clearly stated with specific detail appropriate to this report. Limitations included.
Environmental analysis

(25%)

Did not provide description of most environ-mental aspects. Aspects missing or inaccurate/inadequate description Basic description of most environmental trends that impact the company (Must include all four areas; the industry, key competitors, other players in the marketplace and other factors that impact the company). Clear and relevant description of environmental trends that impact the company. (Must include all four areas; the industry, key competitors (at least two), trends in micro- and macro-environment that impact the company).

 

Clear and relevant description of macro-environmental trends that impact the company. Recommends strategy changes in response to trends.

Predicts competitors’ future strategies, assessment of threat, recommends strategies in response.

Micro-environment player; key risks if relationship with player breaks down, identifies way this player could be leveraged

Substantial amounts of Data – see pg. 6

 

 

 

 

Clear, relevant and insightful description of environmental trends. At least three competitors; Sophisticated analysis of predicted competitor strategies and threats, recommends strategies in response showing insightful understanding of marketing strategy, supported by data.

Micro-environment player; key risks if relationship with player breaks down, identifies way this player could be leveraged

Substantial amounts of Data, presented in correct form, demonstrates sophisticated insightful selection of, and analysis of the most important environmental trends.

Strategic recommendations flow logically from the foregoing analysis; we judge them very likely to succeed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer segmentation

(25%)

 

Did not meet criteria.

Basic description of characteristics of consumer base, characteristics are useful for the product category and how the consumer base could be divided into segments.

At least two segments listed.

Profiles demonstrate attempt to define purchase behaviours and preferences of each segment.

Some analysis of Segment Attractiveness.

Demonstrates application of consumer segmentation theory to identify characteristics of consumer base, usefulness of characteristics to product category and how the consumer base could be divided into segments.

At least three segments listed.

At least three Profile elements demonstrate attempt to define purchase behaviours and preferences of each segment.

Segment Attractiveness assessed according to the Three Segment Attractiveness Criteria.

Demonstrates application of relevant consumer segmentation theory to identify characteristics of a consumer base, why the characteristics are useful for the selected product category and how the consumer base could be divided into segments.

Justification of choice of segmentation base uses criteria.

Three to five segments listed.

Three or four Profile elements show that the purchase behaviours and preferences of each segment are clearly defined.

Segment Attractiveness assessed by rigourous application of the Three Segment Attractiveness Criteria, presenting the results of extensive secondary research in a Table.

Demonstrates insightful application of relevant consumer segmentation theory to identify characteristics of a consumer base, why the characteristics are useful for the selected product category and how the consumer base could be divided into segments.

Justification of choice of segmentation base uses the Criteria in a manner that shows a sophisticated understanding of segmentation supported by cited data.

Four or five segments listed.

Four or five Profile elements professionally define the purchase behaviours and preferences of each segment in a believable way making clear what strategies will be successful in appealing to each, supported by data. Segment Attractiveness assessed by rigorous application of the Three Segment Attractiveness Criteria, presenting the results of extensive secondary research in a Table. Additional attractiveness concerns are also discussed showing a sophisticated synthesis of factors leading to a comprehensive assessment of Attractiveness.

 

Market

research

(25%)

 

Did not meet criteria.

 

Proposes additional research that could help inform marketing strategy.

 

Provides clear recommendations for additional research that could help inform marketing strategy.

Recommendations broadly justified.

Research methodology to gather information is recommended.

 

Provides clear and relevant recommendations for additional research. Makes clear how this information would help marketing managers make specifically-described decisions regarding marketing strategy.

Recommendations are justified.

Research methodology to gather information is recommended.

Main advantages and disadvantages of the proposed methodology are explained.

Research design; some description of research method specifics such as questionnaire design, focus group assemblage and conduct, sample size, sampling method and/or other specifics.

 

Clearly defined, relevant, professionally formulated recommendations for additional research. Makes clear how this information would help marketing managers to make specifically-described decisions regarding marketing strategy.

Recommendations are justified, making a clear link between the research proposed and the decisions to be made.

Research methodology to gather information is recommended.

Analysis of possible advantages and disadvantages of proposed methodology explained. Justification for preferred option included.

Research design; Integrated and comprehensive description of research method specifics such as questionnaire design, focus group assemblage and conduct, sample size, sampling method and/or other specifics.

 

 

Conclusion and Recommendations (5%)

 

Did not meet criterion.

 

Adequate summary of most aspects of all four sections of the report. Aspects of all four of the following questions are answered to some extent; What do the findings mean? Was the purpose of the report fulfilled? Were the specified sources of information used? Have the areas stated been adequately tackled?

Recommendations included.

 

 

Effective summary of all four sections of the report. All four of the following questions are answered reasonably comprehensively; What do the findings mean? Was the purpose of the report fulfilled? Were the specified sources of information used? Have the areas stated been adequately tackled?

Recommendations included are drawn from suggested strategies from analysis of the Marketing Environment and Marketing Research.

 

Comprehensive summary of all four sections of the report. All aspects of all four of the following questions are answered; What do the findings mean? Was the purpose of the report fulfilled? Were the specified sources of information used? Have the areas stated been adequately tackled?

All Key recommendations are included. They are your suggested strategies from your analysis of the Marketing Environment and Marketing Research.

 

Concisely and comprehensively summarises all four sections of the report. The following questions are answered; What do the findings mean? Was the purpose of the report fulfilled? Were the specified sources of information used? Have the areas stated been adequately tackled?

All Key recommendations are included. They are your suggested strategies from your analysis of the Marketing Environment, Consumer Segmentation and Marketing Research. The recommendations flow logically from the foregoing, are persuasively presented and are judged very likely to succeed.

 

Presentation, format & attention to detail

(5%)

Did not meet criterion. Report is reasonably well organised.

Acceptable standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Report is well organised and clearly communicates ideas.

Good standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Organisation controls and enhances message. Communicates ideas effectively.

High standard of attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Professional aesthetic and organization act to control and enhance the reader’s understanding of the content. Communicates ideas effectively.

Excellent attention to detail (grammar, spelling, expression).

Referencing

(5%)

Did not meet criterion. Harvard style referencing evident in the report, minor errors and inconsistencies evident.

At least 10 References cited.

Harvard style referencing applied consistently throughout the report, with minor slips evident. At least 2 Academic References and at least 15 Business References. Correct referencing for Harvard style applied throughout the report.

At least 2 Academic References and More than 20 Business References cited

Perfect Harvard style applied throughout the whole report

At least 3 Academic References and More than 30 Business References cited

 

MKT10007 Assignment 3 Template + Rubric S1,18.docx

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"