Discuss Data Analytics And Complete Google Analytics Tutorial

To keep the momentum going, I’d like you to complete two more group discussions at our meetings scheduled for this week. You can review these discussion topics in the attachment below. It is required that you respond to both of these topics as well.
As you discuss these topics, be sure you understand the following concepts related to data analytics:working with data,tracking and collecting data,key elements of web analytics, segmentation in web analytics
Also for this week, please complete the excellent Google Analytics for beginners tutorial that is available free online. I’m providing step-by-step access instructions for the tutorial in the attachments below (see How to Access Google Analytics for Beginners Tutorial).
To get some hands-on practice from what you learned in the tutorial, activate the Google Analytics demo account when you are done.

Discussion Topics:

Topic 3

There are three key elements to be considered in any web analytics study like the kind MCS is doing for CompanyOne. These elements are (1) behavior, (2) outcomes, and (3) user experience. A powerful technique to gauge user behavior is segmentation. Explain the concept of segmentation in relation to web analytics. Some common ways of segmenting your site visitors are by new users, returning users, paid search traffic, nonpaid search traffic, direct traffic, referral source, landing page, browser, and mobile traffic, among hundreds of possible options. Recommend any five ways of segmentation to CompanyOne, including some that are not listed here, and discuss the relative merits of each.

Topic 4

In Google Analytics (GA), a funnel is a navigation path (series of web pages) that you expect CompanyOne’s online customers to follow in order to achieve the business’s goals for their website. A funnel is made up of a goal page (or pages) and one or more funnel pages (also known as the funnel steps). CompanyOne needs to choose either the Goal Flow Report or the Funnel Visualization Report in Google Analytics. They come to you for advice. What questions will you ask in order to arrive at your recommendation for CompanyOne? Explain your reasoning.

————————————————————————————————–

The past few weeks have flown by. You have just completed the GA tutorial when you receive a memo from Ying (attached) marked CONFIDENTIAL. You scan the memo to find a list of client questions that have been assigned to you. You are expected to use Google Analytics to answer the 10 questions in the memo by the end of Week 7. The Google Analytics demo account will give you access to data from the Google Merchandise Store, which in this project represents CompanyOne’s data.
Review these instructions for How to Activate the Google Analytics Demo Account.
Submit your answers to each of the ten questions in the dropbox located in the final step of this project. Use this data analysis template to record your answers and their accompanying screenshots.

Course Resource

Memo from Ying

Corporate logo for Maryland Creative Solutions. A lightbulb with colors of state flag inside.

Sensitive information. Do not share.

MEMO

Subject: Confidential Memo—CompanyOne From: Ying Bao

Directions: Please review and answer the following questions, which have been assigned to you in the CompanyOne case. You will need to capture screenshots to complete these questions; if necessary, review these instructions on capturing screenshots. Question 1 Find the number of active users (1-day, 7-day, 14-day, and 28-day) for December 2018. Calculate the daily average number of active users for each of the four time periods. For example, the daily average for the 28-day period will be the number of active users reported by Google Analytics divided by 28. Based on your calculations, what conclusions can you derive? (Note: Active users refers to the number of users who visited the CompanyOne website within the last 1, 7, 14 or 28 days looking back from the last day of the period, which is December 31, 2018.) The metrics in the report are relative to the last day in the date range you are using for the report. Thus, your date range is December 1 to December 31:

· 1-day active users—the number of unique users who initiated sessions on your site or app on December 31 (the last day of your date range).

· 7-day active users—the number of unique users who initiated sessions on your site or app from December 25 through December 31 (the last 7 days of your date range).

· 14-day active users—the number of unique users who initiated sessions on your site or app from December 18 through December 31 (the last 14 days of your date range).

· 28-day active users—the number of unique users who initiated sessions on your site or app from December 4 through December 31 (the entire 28 days of your date range).

Question 2 Plot graphs of 1-day active users for the 31 days in December 2017 and in December 2018. Compare the number of active users for both periods from the two plots. What do you conclude about the change in marketing effectiveness, if any, from December 2017 to December 2018? Please provide a screenshot to support your analysis.

Question 3 Plot a graph of the bounce rate for the 31 days in December 2018 and compare it with the same time period in December 2017. What do you conclude? Please provide screenshots to support your analysis.. Question 4 If you focus on the demographics of younger users (18–24 and 25–34), what do you observe? Has the number of younger users as a proportion of total users changed from 2017 to 2018? (Note: January 1 and December 31 are the start and end dates for a whole year comparison.) How about changes in the proportions of older users during the same time period? Please provide screenshots to support your answer.

Question 5 CompanyOne’s objective was to attract a larger proportion of female visitors (displayed as a percentage in the pie chart) to the online store in 2018 as compared to 2017. Was that objective met? Please provide a screenshot to support your answer.

Question 6 CompanyOne needs to analyze gender differences in more depth, especially in the new user segment. Did CompanyOne attract more or fewer new users in 2018 as compared with 2017, irrespective of gender? What about new male users? What about new female users? Please provide screenshots to support your answer.

Question 7 As you have confirmed, CompanyOne was not successful in attracting a larger number of new female visitors to its website in 2018 as compared with the previous year. When parsing the category of new female users, by age group, was CompanyOne more successful in certain age group(s) of female users in 2018 as compared with 2017? Please provide a screenshot to support your answer. Question 8 CompanyOne wishes to target high-value users in future marketing campaigns. These are user groups with the highest e-commerce conversion rate or average order value. Which age group generated the highest revenue for CompanyOne in 2018 in dollars? How much was the revenue from this age group? Which age group generated the least revenue? Which age group had the highest average order value? Which age group had the highest e-commerce conversion rate? Based on these observations, which age group or groups should be the focus of CompanyOne’s marketing efforts during 2019? In other words, which age group is likely to provide the most bang for the buck? Provide a screenshot to support your answer.

Question 9 CompanyOne wishes to understand its site visitors better in order to fine-tune its future marketing efforts. Understanding audience composition in terms of gender, age, and interests will allow CompanyOne to develop the right creative content and decide the media buys to make.

Google Analytics has the following ten default affinity categories:

· shoppers / value shoppers

· lifestyles and hobbies / business professionals

· sports and fitness / health and fitness buffs

· technology / technophiles

· banking and finance / avid investors

· travel / travel buffs

· travel / business travelers

· media and entertainment / movie lovers

· lifestyles and hobbies / art and theater aficionados

· media and entertainment / music lovers

Identify the top three affinity categories for CompanyOne among males and among females for 2018 in terms of the revenue from each affinity category. Please provide a screenshot to support your answer.

Question 10 The two groups every online business like CompanyOne cares about are users who convert (purchase a product) and users who don’t. Understanding the users who convert (converters) will help CompanyOne refine the successful aspects of their marketing and show them where they can improve their efforts to reach users who demonstrate untapped potential (non-converters). Developing insights into why certain users aren’t converting lets them address the weak spots in how they approach these users.

For the purpose of this analysis, CompanyOne wishes to focus on the back-to-school shopping season (July 15, 2018 to September 15, 2018). CompanyOne wishes to obtain statistics of users, sessions, page views, pages per session, average session duration, and bounce rate for these two segments (converters and non-converters). Provide screenshots to support your analysis.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Marketing Analysis Case Study Windham Case 10

Marketing Analysis

Case Study Windham Case 10

Read Case 10: Wyndham Worldwide Adopts a Stakeholder Orientation Marketing Strategy found in textbook Appendix and answer the following questions.

Write an analysis paper on Windham where you consider the following elements:

  1. How does Wyndham’s stakeholder orientation create a strategic marketing advantage?
  2. How do Wyndham’s diverse brands contribute to customer satisfaction and marketing performance?
  3. Do the awards and recognition that Wyndham has received for social responsibility and ethics contribute to its financial performance? If so, how?

The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:

  • Write between 500 – 750 words (approximately 2 – 3 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
  • Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
  • Include cover page and reference page.
  • At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
  • No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
  • Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
  • Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.

References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1 Slide For A Case SWOT Analysis

Lecturer Bill Fanning prepared this case study as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of

an administrative situation. Exhibits are authentic slides from the company, used with permission.

Copyright © 2014 by The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, or

transmitted in any form or by any means without the express written permission of the Berkeley-Haas Case Series.

 

 

 

 

Date: March 3, 2014

 

 

B ILL FANN ING

Annie’s: Growing Organically

 

It was a grey day in February 2012 as the train pulled out of the Amtrak station in Berkeley, California

and headed east. John Foraker, CEO of Annie’s, Inc., a rapidly growing natural and organic food

company, sank into his seat and began to unwind from the stream of meetings and decisions that

consumed his day and moved into a part of the day that he anticipated—a chance to look out the

window and think about his business at a higher level. Big things were in the works for Annie’s and

there were key decisions to be made over the next few months in terms of entering a new category.

 

Annie’s had been enjoying strong and steady success in the marketplace with their healthy offerings in

shelf stable prepared foods across three product categories (Meals, Snacks, and Dressings), led by the

Meals category (macaroni & cheese), with Snacks (Cheddar Bunnies, Fruit Snacks, Pretzels, etc.), and

Dressings (condiments and dressings) following respectively. But the company was about to make

significant moves in terms of expanding into new categories.

 

Annie’s had strong investor support due to increasing sales and profits over the past few years (net

sales had increased from $76.8 million in fiscal 2008 to $141.3 million in fiscal 2012) and it was

likely they would be moving toward an IPO soon. They had also achieved a significant level of

success competing in non-traditional ways in very traditional CPG (consumer packaged goods)

categories. As a Berkeley-Haas School of Business graduate (MBA’94), this was particularly

satisfying to Foraker. Less certain was whether Annie’s could continue to achieve this level of

success in new categories while playing by their own set of rules.

 

As the team assessed expansion options, they kept two primary goals in mind. The first was to age up

the franchise—Annie’s had developed a strong following among younger kids and their moms. The

kids liked the taste and saw the products as fun, while the moms appreciated the fact that they could

provide healthy products for their kids that the kids actually liked. But there was an inherent

challenge with having such a strong, positive franchise with younger kids. At some point, they would

outgrow the brand.

 

The second goal was to broaden the target audience. Annie’s success to date had been driven largely

by a group they identified as “Core Consumers”. This group felt very strongly about making healthy

choices for their families, and was comfortable with the extra effort and money required to do so.

They were committed and loyal, but their attitudes were outside the mainstream. To grow the

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

B5801

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 2

 

business, the Annie’s team felt they needed to broaden their target and attract more mainstream

consumers to the brand. They set their sights on a group they called “Prime Prospects”, who valued

healthy alternatives to the extent they were available and convenient, but were more moderate in their

attitudes (Exhibit 1).

 

Background

Annie Withey and Andrew Martin started Smartfood in Boston in 1982 with their first and best known

product, a cheesy popcorn snack. They sold the company to PepsiCo in 1986 for $15 million. A few

years later, Withey took essentially that same cheese sauce and used it in Annie’s Homegrown Shells

and Cheddar, a stovetop macaroni & cheese dinner, and in 1989, Annie’s was born.

 

Over time, the company grew through new products as well as greater acceptance of its existing line.

Annie’s was able to appeal to consumers seeking healthy/natural/organic choices as well as more

mainstream food products, and felt they were in a sweet spot that allowed them to grow their healthy

food business by taking share from traditional CPG brands as well as the organic/natural sector. As

such, their product line and their growth efforts were focused on both areas (Exhibit 2).

 

Financially, the company was in good shape. In 2001, the same year Foraker joined Annie’s, Solera

Capital, a New York women’s private equity firm, acquired a major stake in Annie’s and that support

continued to fuel their growth. Sales and profits had been growing steadily as Annie’s was able to

maintain their price points even as they competed with larger, more heavily supported brands with

lower price points. Trends and projections were strong and investors remained bullish (Exhibit 3).

 

Annie’s Culture

Like many small companies, Annie’s was strongly driven by its culture during the early days. And

Annie’s was fiercely determined to preserve their culture as they grew. Annie’s was a company that

was passionate about food, people, and the planet, and their actions needed to reflect that orientation.

 

For example, the company was careful about the suppliers it worked with, preferring to seek out

smaller, local farmers whenever possible. They were also committed to non-GMO (genetically

modified organisms) products. Although Annie herself was removed from the business operations

and living on her certified organic farm in Connecticut, the Annie’s team made an effort to integrate

her persona into products and marketing efforts whenever possible. 1 And they also viewed corporate

social responsibility as something that needed to be integrated across all the company’s activities.

According to Foraker: “Social responsibility is part of the Annie’s brand DNA. We’ve always tried to

do things differently and set an example for the broader world.”

 

Growth

Annie’s had developed a core proposition that included four pillars: authenticity, social responsibility,

great taste, and simple, healthy ingredients (Exhibit 4) that positioned them well for growth over the

long haul. The Annie’s team felt that this core proposition could be effective in a number of areas in

the grocery store. It was a proposition that made sense in terms of broad consumer trends as well as

distribution patterns that would address those trends.

 

Annie’s management team was not content to rest on their successes and simply grow with the

category as consumers moved steadily toward healthier options, in particular organic. They felt that

 

1 http://www.annies.com/about-annies#Our-Roots.

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 3

 

Annie’s could lead that charge rather than sit back and simply ride the wave. To be sure, there were

also a number of offsetting factors that represented hurdles, mainly a still sluggish economy. Despite

the continuing slow recovery from the recession, which could affect the willingness of consumers to

purchase premium products, Foraker felt the time was right for growth. The core business was strong

and there was a window of opportunity in terms of available funding for the company so a few months

earlier they had decided to make their move.

 

Frozen Foods

For a variety of reasons, the Annie’s team felt that their next area for growth was in the frozen foods

category, a huge category of $12 billion in retail sales. And this was not just an attempt to get

placement for one particular product line, but an assault on the entire section of the supermarket.

They had a plan in place for a series of new product launches in frozen foods, and it began with frozen

pizza.

 

The decision to move into frozen was not an easy one. Natural/healthy/organic foods as a segment

was not well developed in the frozen section, due to a combination of factors, including:

 

 A general perception of frozen foods as less healthy  Strong consumer demand in the frozen section for desserts and snack items  A limited number of “doors” in the frozen section

 

In addition, Annie’s Core Consumers were not big users of frozen food items. But Foraker and his

team had an “aha moment” on this issue when they realized that their success in the frozen category

might also be good for their retail partners if they could convince more Core Consumers to shop the

frozen section, thus creating a “win-win” situation for both Annie’s and their partners.

 

Within the frozen category, multiple opportunities existed and the Annie’s team had a plan in place to

expand into each area, but they had to decide where to start. There were numerous areas that made

sense in terms of both potential volume and fit with Annie’s. For example, frozen entrees seemed like

an obvious fit based on their success in macaroni and cheese. However, frozen pizza was also

attractive, and represented some opportunities beyond the obvious, and the decision was made to start

there. Sarah Bird, Chief Mom Officer for Annie’s said: “We know that cooking a meal from scratch

can be a challenge for busy families. Annie’s frozen pizza was a convenient solution for parents who

wanted to provide great taste as well as better ingredients they can feel good about giving their

families.”

 

Frozen Pizza

Product

Once the decision had been made to move forward with frozen pizza, there were tough marketing mix

decisions to be made. The first was around the product itself. The initial product developed was an

all-organic product, which meant that 95 percent of the ingredients were certified organic. The USDA

had very strict definitions for products using any type of organic terminology, as well as restrictions

governing where on the package these claims could be made. But would enough consumers respond

to the idea of Annie’s offering frozen pizza, or would it be seen as too extreme in a category not

generally known for healthy offerings? And how would the channel react?

 

The alternative would be to come out with a “made with” option, meaning the product was made with

organic ingredients, such as the cheese, tomatoes, crust, etc. The “made with” organic option needed

to have 70 percent or more of total ingredients as organic.

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 4

 

 

Some within the team felt the “made with” organic was the better option. They felt it would still

allow for the positive imagery connected with organic products and remain consistent with the

Annie’s brand, but at the same time, this strategy would take the product line closer to the mainstream

and to their competitors in the frozen pizza section.

 

The product had been tested successfully in Whole Foods in the San Francisco market. The version

tested was organic and there were four flavors in test: Four Cheese, Supreme, Spinach & Mushroom,

and Pepperoni. Although discussion continued about whether this was the right mix, the plan was to

move forward with these same four flavors.

 

Distribution

Closely linked to the product decision were issues about distribution. Annie’s products were sold

through the natural foods channel in chains like Whole Foods, as well as mainstream supermarkets

such as Safeway and Dominick’s. Annie’s also enjoyed a strong relationship with Target, as well as

other mass merchandisers. Their current business was divided roughly equally across these three

channels (Exhibit 5).

 

If Annie’s decided to launch their frozen pizza product with the all-organic product, would it sell at

Safeway or Target? On the flip side, would a “made with” approach be right for natural retailers? A

bigger distribution question was whether Annie’s would even get distribution in Safeway. Although

mainstream supermarkets had begun to create separate areas in the frozen section for healthy

offerings, progress had been slow, and there was some question whether it was really an advantage to

be located in these sections and away from the rest of the category.

 

Restricting distribution to natural retailers did not seem to be an option, as it would not meet their

volume goals or their goal of engaging Prime Prospects. Grocery still did the lion’s share of business

in frozen pizza, but that percentage was declining and the growth was coming from the natural and

mass channels (Exhibit 6).

 

A longer-term issue was rattling around in the back of Foraker’s mind. As mentioned, Annie’s had

been successful in achieving a delicate balance amongst three different channels—mainstream

supermarkets (Safeway, Dominick’s), natural retailers (Whole Foods), and mass merchandisers

(Target). But as the company’s volume grew and covered more categories, would they be able to

maintain that balance?

 

Each channel had demands and expectations. Target in particular had a tendency to take brands under

their wing in the food section of their stores and often chose upstart independent brands like Annie’s

rather than those owned by major CPG companies. Although the Annie’s team had worked hard and

been effective to date in keeping all channels happy, this was clearly an area of sensitivity and had to

be monitored carefully going forward.

 

Annie’s also had a strong partnership with natural retailers that had been in place from the beginning.

And although traditional grocery relationships were newer and growth was slower in this channel, the

big volume over the long haul was still going to come from traditional grocery (Exhibit 7).

 

Pricing

The pricing decision was also tightly tied to the product and distribution issues. Annie’s products had

competed successfully in other categories at significant price premiums relative to the competition (Exhibit 8). Consumers had bought into Annie’s philosophy of simple, quality ingredients providing

a healthy option that kids liked, and were willing to pay more for it.

Copyrighted Material. For permission to distribute, please contact [email protected]

For the exclusive use of N. Bardawil, 2017.

This document is authorized for use only by Natalia Bardawil in Marketing Management taught by Kristin Houser, HE OTHER from August 2017 to December 2017.

 

 

ANNIE’S 5

 

 

Certainly, Foraker and his team’s intent was to carry that philosophy forward into frozen pizza and

other categories in the future, as it was a philosophy that not only worked with consumers, but also

with the bottom line. But frozen pizza was new territory, and had a very different competitive

landscape. There were many competitors—strong national brands, smaller national brands, and

regional competitors (see next section). The price points for these competitors were all over the map.

 

More importantly, the category was heavily deal driven, and the reality was that new product trial

appeared to occur primarily as a result of a promotional offer. “I’m really excited about that product.

I’ll try it the next time I see a coupon” was a typical response from consumers talking about new

products in the category (based on focus groups conducted in early 2012) 2 .

 

Competition

As mentioned earlier, a competitive landscape that was fragmented, aggressive, and price-driven was

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Proctor And Gamble Case Study

1. Using segmentation strategies, what are the target market(s) for P&G? How does this relate to the company’s brand management strategies?

2. Who are the top three competitors of P&G, and what are their advantages/disadvantages with respect to their competitive product/service strategies?

3. P&G’s impressive portfolio includes some of the strongest brand names in the world. What are some of the challenges associated with being the market leader in so many different categories?

4. With social media becoming increasingly important and with fewer people watching traditional commercials on television, what does P&G need to do to maintain its strong brand images?

5. What risks will P&G face in the future?

Marketing Excellence Procter & Gamble

 

Procter & Gamble (P&G) began in 1837 when brothers-in-law William Procter and James Gamble formed a small candle and soap company. Over the next 150 years, P&G innovated and launched scores of revolutionary products with superior quality and value, including Ivory soap in 1882, Tide laundry detergent in 1946, Crest toothpaste with fluoride in 1955, and Pampers disposable diapers in 1961. The company also opened the door to new product categories by acquiring a number of companies, including Richardson-Vicks (makers of personal care products like Pantene, Olay, and Vicks), Norwich Eaton Pharmaceuticals (makers of Pepto-Bismol), Gillette, Noxell (makers of Noxzema), Shulton’s Old Spice, Max Factor, and the Iams pet food company.

Today, Procter & Gamble is one of the most skillful marketers of consumer-packaged goods in the world and holds one of the most powerful portfolios of trusted brands. The company employs 121,000 people in about 80 countries worldwide, has 25 billion-dollar global brands, spends more than $2 billion annually on R&D, and has total worldwide sales in excess of $84 billion a year. Its sustained market leadership rests on a number of different capabilities and philosophies. These include:

Customer knowledge: P&G studies its customers—both the end consumers and its trade partners—through continuous marketing research and intelligence gathering. It spends more than $100 million annually on more than 10,000 formal consumer research projects and generates more than 3 million consumer contacts via its e-mail and phone center. The company also encourages its marketers and researchers to be out in the field, interacting with consumers and retailers in their home environment.

Long-term outlook: P&G takes the time to analyze each opportunity carefully before acting. Once committed, the company develops the best product possible and executes it with the determination to make it a success. For example, it struggled with Pringles potato chips for almost a decade before achieving market success. Recently, P&G has increased its presence in developing markets by focusing on affordability, brand awareness, and distribution through e-commerce and high-frequency stores.

Product innovation: P&G is an active product innovator. The company employs 1,000 science PhDs, more than Harvard, Berkeley, and MIT combined, and applies for roughly 3,800 patents each year. Part of its innovation process is to develop brands that offer new consumer benefits. Recent innovations that created entirely new categories include Febreze, an odor-eliminating fabric spray; Dryel, a product that helps “dry-clean” clothes at home in the dryer; and Swiffer, a cleaning system that effectively removes dust, dirt, and hair from floors. Larry Huston, former innovation officer at P&G, stated, “P&G is largely a branded science company.”

Quality strategy : P&G designs products of above-average quality and continuously improves and reformulates them. When the company says “new and improved,” it means it. Recent examples include Tide Pods, a compact laundry detergent tablet; Pampers Rash Guard, a diaper that treats and prevents diaper rash; and improved two-in-one shampoo and conditioner products Pantene, Vidal Sassoon, and Pert Plus.

Brand extension strategy : P&G produces its brands in several sizes and forms. This strategy gains more shelf space and prevents competitors from moving in to satisfy unmet market needs. P&G also uses its strong brand names to launch new products with instant recognition and much less advertising outlay. The Mr. Clean brand has been extended from household cleaner to bathroom cleaner and even to a carwash system. Old Spice extended its brand from men’s fragrances to deodorant. Often, P&G will leverage the technologies already in place to create a brand extension. For example, when Crest successfully extended its brand into a new tooth-whitening system called Crest Whitestrips, the company used bleaching methods from P&G’s laundry division, film technology from the food wrap division, and glue techniques from the paper division.

Multibrand strategy: P&G markets several brands in the same product category, such as Luvs and Pampers diapers and Oral-B and Crest toothbrushes. Each brand meets a different consumer want and competes against specific competitors’ brands. At the same time, the company is careful not to sell too many brands and recently reduced its vast array of products, sizes, flavors, and varieties to assemble a stronger brand portfolio.

Strong sales force: P&G’s sales force has been named one of the top 25 sales forces by Sales & Marketing Management magazine. A key to its success is the close tie its sales force forms with retailers, notably Walmart. The 150-person team that serves the retail giant works closely with Walmart to improve both the products that go to the stores and the process by which they get there.

Manufacturing efficiency and cost cutting: P&G’s reputation as a great marketing company is matched by its excellence as a manufacturing company. The company has successfully developed and continually improves its production operations, which keep costs among the lowest in the industry. As a result, it is able to offer reduced prices for its premium products.

Brand-management system: P&G originated the brand-management system, in which one executive is responsible for each brand. The system has been copied by many competitors but not often with P&G’s success. Recently, P&G modified its general management structure so that a category manager runs each brand category and has volume and profit responsibility. Although this new organization does not replace the brand-management system, it helps to sharpen strategic focus on key consumer needs and competition in the category.

P&G’s accomplishments over the past 177 years have come from successfully managing the numerous factors that contribute to market leadership. Today, the company’s wide range of products are used by 4.8 billion people around the world in 180 different countries.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"