Boa Technology Written Assignment Branding, Marketing Plan

Boa Technology Assignment

Please answer the two questions below. The answers for both must be completed in two pages or three pages (total), single-spaced, double space between paragraphs.

 

o   What are your recommendations for Garett Graubins’ 2015 U.S. marketing plan?

 

  • Be specific about which market (B2B, B2I, and/or B2I) you recommend and the 2-3 summits (product categories) deserving the most attention. Offer specific ideas about how to approach that market.  [You are expected to provide justification for your recommendation and implementation plan.]

 

  • Whether you recommend building a brand with consumers or not, use two creative idea generation techniques and generate five low-cost, grassroots ideas that would help Boa build a brand in one of its product categories.

 

 

  • o   Five low-cost, grassroots ideas that would help Boa build a brand in one of its product categories.

    08 Fall$

    Boa Technology – Marketing An Ingredient Joe Cannon, Professor of Marketing Colorado State University

    Colorado State University, College of Business, Multimedia Case Series #2014-01

     

     

    ! 2

    $ Boa$Technology:$Marketing$an$Ingredient1$

    Garett’Graubins,’Global’Marketing’Director’for’Boa’Technology’sat’ in’the’Front’Range’Conference’room’at’Boa’Technology'(referred’to’ most’frequently’as’simply’“Boa”).’He’was’preparing’to’meet’with’ his’sevenImember’marketing’team’to’discuss’Boa’s’marketing’ program’for’2015.’In’less’than’a’month’Graubins’would’have’to’pull’

    together’his’ recommendations.’ The’team’would’be’ debating’questions’ around’target’ markets’and’whether’ Boa’needed’to’more’ aggressively’promote’ the’Boa’brand’with’ endIusers.”

    Boa’began’in’the’late’ 1990s’with’an’ entrepreneur’seeking’ a’better’way’to’“lace’

    up”’snowboard’boots’and’hockey’skates.’In’business’for’nearly’15’ years,’Boa’has’grown’quickly’–’having’sold’more’than’70’million’of’ its’reel’and’wire’closure’systems’in’that’time’and’more’than’18’

    1 ‘This’case’was’prepared’by’Joe’Cannon,’Professor’of’Marketing’at’Colorado’State’ University’with’research’assistance’from’Conor’Blanchet.’Cale’Rogers’handled’ multimedia’production.’The’authors’thank’Garett’Graubins,’Mark’Soderberg,’Chuck’ Mason,’and’Ilya’Minkin’for’interviews’that’aided’in’case’development’and’Boa’ Technology’for’sharing’some’of’the’video’content.’The’case’was’developed’as’a’ basis’for’class’discussion,’not’as’an’illustration’of’effective’or’ineffective’ management’and’should’not’be’used’as’a’source’of’primary’data.’Some’data’in’the’ case’has’been’modified’for’reasons’of’confidentiality.’

    million’in’the’last’year.’The’Boa’Closure’System’is’an’ingredient’ used’in’other’products.’Boa’sells’its’closure’systems’to’more’than’ 150’leading’premium’brands’worldwide.’These’brand’partners’are’ mostly’in’various’footwear’categories.’For’example,’Burton,’ FootJoy,’and’Specialized’use’the’Boa’Closure’System’on’select’styles’ of’its’snowboard’boots,’golf’shoes,’and’cycling’shoes,’respectively,’ and’Boa’collaborates’with’these’brand’partners’to’help’each’ integrate’the’Boa’Closure’System’into’these’products’as’a’ replacement’for’shoe’laces,’buckles,’or’Velcro’straps.”

    In’the’U.S.,’almost’all’of’Boa’s’marketing’efforts’focus’on’building’ relationships’with’brand’partners.’Using’a’consultative’selling’ approach,’the’company’s’sales’force’helps’brand’partners’with’ designing’higher’quality’products.’Graubins’wonders’if’it’is’time’to’ build’the’Boa’brand’with’some’consumer’segments.’

    Graubins’and’his’team’have’long’admired’how’some’“ingredient’ brands”’have’built’strong’brand’equity’with’consumers.’Brands’like’ GoreITex'(waterproof’fabric),’Intel'(and’its’iconic’“Intel’Inside”’ campaign’for’computer’chips),’Shimano'(cycling’components),’and’ Nutrasweet'(artificial’sweetener)’are’well’known’by’consumers’II’ even’though’each’is’usually’purchased’as’a’component’in’another’ brand.’Many’consumers’know’and’trust’the’GoreITex’name’II’and’ seek’it’out’when’shopping’for’waterproof’jackets’or’shoes.’When’ buying’a’new’bike,’the’Shimano’name’on’a’derailleur'(used’in’ shifting’gears)’can’be’another’sign’of’quality.’That’kind’of’brand’ equity’helped’these’brands’stave’off’competition’and’offered’ power’in’negotiations’with’partners.’

    Two$Boa$Closure$System$dials$on$a$Louis$Garneau$cycling$shoe.$

     

     

    ! 3

    Boa’successfully’built’consumer’awareness’for’the’Boa’Closure’ System’among’hikers,’walkers,’and’golfers’in’a’few’select’Asian’ markets.’But’creating’similar’awareness’in’the’United’States’would’ be’expensive’–’and’risky.’Graubins’thought’a’strong’brand’at’the’ consumer’level’might’help’Boa’grow’faster’and’hold’off’ competition.’He’also’wondered’whether’it’might’be’a’better’idea’to’ concentrate’efforts’at’the’retail’level.’In’the’product’categories’ where’Boa’operated,’retailers’are’often’strong’influences’on’ consumer’choice.’Could’Boa’increase’its’training’of’retail’ salespeople’on’its’closure’systems?’Boa’might’develop’better’pointI ofIpurchase’materials’retailers’could’use’to’highlight’Boa’s’benefits.’ Or’was’it’too’soon’for’Boa’to’engage’in’this’type’of’strategy?’ Perhaps’the’best’option’would’be’to’continue’the’efforts’at’the’ brand’partner’and’trade’level.”

    As’Graubins’prepared’for’his’meeting’he’considered’how’the’Boa’ brand’had’evolved’in’the’last’decade,’he’reviewed’market’research,’ and’he’thought’about’how’Boa’s’CEO,’CFO,’and’VP’of’Sales’and’ Marketing’might’think’about’more’aggressively’targeting’ consumers.’He’knew’that’many’were’comfortable’with’the’current’ approach’I’it’was’working’and’the’company’was’growing’fast.’He’

    also’knew’that’some’in’the’company’wouldn’t’want’to’do’anything’ to’take’attention’away’from’potentially’large’emerging’ opportunities’in’the’medical’devices,’safety/utility’footwear,’and’ athletic’shoe’productImarkets.’

    The$“Boa$Lacing$System”$is$Born$$

    After’selling’a’successful’medical’device’company,’entrepreneur’ Gary’Hammerslag’moved’to’Steamboat’Springs,’Colorado’where’he’ enjoyed’snowboarding’and’watching’his’kids’play’hockey.’ Hammerslag’was’a’natural’inventor;’when’he’saw’a’problem’he’ tried’to’solve’it.’He’soon’recognized’that’shoelaces’were’a’poor’ solution’for’tightening’snowboard’boots’and’ice’hockey’skates.’ Laces’didn’t’stay’tight’and’often’came’undone’with’intense’physical’ activity.’ReItying’laces’required’stopping’the’activity’and’taking’off’ gloves’to’complete’the’task.’Problems’were’opportunities’for’ Hammerslag.’His’tinkering’eventually’lead’to’the’Boa’Lacing’System,’ a’novel’combination’of’steel’wire,’eyelets’and’small’reel’than’evenly’ tightens’the’wire’as’the’reel’turns.2’The’video’shows’how’it’works’ today’–’which’is’not’that’different’from’what’Hammerslag’ developed’almost’two’decades’ago.’

    2 ‘“The’Culture’of’Your’Business’Gary’Hammerslag’–’Boa’Technology,”’My#New# Enterprise,’retrieved’November’1,’2014.” https://mynewenterprise.com/bt_hammerslag_culture.php’

     

     

    ! 4

    ‘ ‘

    Hammerslag’founded’Boa’Technology’in’1998.”By’2001’Vans’and’ K2’snowboard’boots’featured’Boa.’In’2004,’Boa’could’be’found’on’ cycling’shoes’and’a’year’later’golf’shoes.’Boa’grew’from’there’to’ become’a’global’brand’with’sales’almost’evenly’split’among’Asia,’ Europe’and’the’United’States.’In’2011,’as’Boa’moved’into’markets’ beyond’footwear’–’including’medical’equipment’and’helmets’–’it’ changed’the’product’s’name’to’the’Boa’Closure’System.3′

    Boa$Technology$$

    From’humble’beginnings’in’a’oneIroom’office’above’a’liquor’store’ in’Steamboat’Springs,’Colorado,’Boa’Technology’has’grown’to’120′ employees’spread’between’global’headquarters’in’Denver,’ Colorado,’and’additional’offices’in’Japan,’Hong’Kong,’China,’and’ Austria.’Today’there’are’over’43’million’Boa’reels’and’20’million’ BoaIpowered’products’worldwide.”

    3 ‘“Boa’Technology’s’lacing’system’lands’big’investor,’grows’beyond’shoes,”’Denver# Post,#July’10,’2012,’retrieved’November’1,’2014,’ http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_21039899/boaItechnologysIlacingI systemIlandsIbigIinvestorIgrows”’

    As’a’small’company,’Boa’faces’some’challenges.’Its’fast’growth’ strains’financial’and’human’resources.’With’many’opportunities,’ Boa’has’to’be’selective’in’deciding’where’to’direct’these’resources.’ The’company’has’some’vulnerability’to’competitors’with’deep’ pockets’that’might’try’to’move’into’the’same’markets’with’a’similar’ alternative’closure’system.’While’Boa’found’it’relatively’easy’to’ enter’categories’like’cycling’and’snow’sports’where’its’employees’ are’also’customers’and’they’know’the’categories’well,’they’have’no’ such’advantage’in’new’markets’like’medical’devices’and’ safety/utility’footwear.”

    Boa’builds’on’its’strengths.’Most’Boa’Closure’Systems’can’be’found’ on’outdoor’and’athletic’footwear’–’and’Boa’has’attracted’an’active’ and’engaged’workforce.’It’helps’that’Boa’employees’know’and’use’ its’product’–’they’are’riders,’hikers,’runners,’golfers,’and’cyclists.’ Those’same’employees’are’known’for’their’tenacity’and’grit’in’ solving’customer’problems.’Boa’also’enjoys’some’patents’that’help’ protect’its’innovative’products.’The’small’company’has’also’been’ nimble’–’seizing’on’new’opportunities’as’they’arise’–’and’dedicated’ to’producing’a’high’quality’product.’The’company’s’strong’

     

     

    ! 5

    leadership’team’has’a’wealth’of’experience’in’both’the’sports’and’ technology’markets.”

    Boa#Technology#Leadership#Team##

    Mark’Soderberg’is’Boa’Technology’s’President’and’CEO.’Soderberg’ has’been’with’the’company’since’2002’after’working’for’more’than’ a’dozen’years’in’the’ski’industry.’He’served’as’president’for’10’years’ before’adding’CEO’to’his’title’when’Gary’Hammerslag’stepped’ down’in’2012.’Mark’s’background’is’in’engineering’and’he’uses’Boa’ when’he’mountain’bikes’–’and’also’on’a’medical’brace’when’he’ injures’himself’in’his’favorite’sport'(which’he’did’just’recently).”

    Merle’McCreery’is’Boa’Technology’s’Chief’Financial’Officer.’He’has’ been’with’Boa’for’three’years’after’working’for’many’years’in’high’ tech.’McCreery’is’part’of’the’approval’process’for’the’annual’ marketing’budget’and’he’expects’marketing’proposals’to’show’a’ positive’return.’Merle’wears’Boa’s’when’he’golfs.’

    Boa’s’Vice’President’of’Sales’and’Marketing’is’Chuck’Mason.’He’has’ been’with’the’company’for’more’than’four’years.’He’began’his’ career’as’a’buyer’for’Christy’Sports,’a’regional’retailer’specializing’in’ ski’and’snowboard’equipment.’He’later’worked’in’sales’ management’for’major’snowboard’and’ski’brands’K2’and’Burton.’ Chuck’tightens’Boa’Closure’Systems’before’hiking,’cycling’and’ snowboarding.”

    Garett’Graubins,’Director’of’Global’Marketing,’has’been’with’Boa’ for’6’years.’He’leads’a’team’of’seven’in’the’marketing’department.’ Garett’previously’worked’at’The’Integer’Group'(a’DenverIbased’ad’ agency),’TrailRunner’Magazine,’and’The’North’Face.’Garett’recently’ finished’his’MBA’at’Colorado’State’University.’Garett’dials’in’his’Boa’ before’running’trails'(he’recently’completed’the’Hardrock’100IMile’

    Endurance’Run),’flying’down’mountains’on’his’snowboard,’or’ hopping’on’his’road’bike.”’

    Manufacturing#and#Supply#Chain#

    Boa’outsources’production’of’its’reels’to’a’Chinese’firm’that’ manufactures’to’Boa’s’rigid’specifications.’The’Boa’Closure’System’ comes’in’a’range’of’sizes,’colors,’and’torque/power’levels.’Boa’tries’ to’avoid’making’custom’products’for’each’application,’preferring’to’ find’the’component’in’its’product’line’that’best’meets’a’customer’s’ needs.’Adding’the’Boa’Closure’System’to’a’product’might’cost’from’ $1I$10′(cost’to’the’brand’partner:’the’multiplier’to’the’end’user’ may’be’as’high’as’4x’that’amount)’depending’on’size,’durability,’ torque/power’level,’and’the’length’of’the’wire’lace.’Greater’torque’ is’needed’to’close’snowboard’and’ski’boots’for’example,’as’ compared’to’hiking’shoes.”

    Boa’maintains’a’warehouse’in’Hong’Kong.’The’factories’producing’ Boa’brand’partners’’shoes,’boots,’or’other’products’order’directly’ from’Boa.’Boa’then’ships’the’order’directly’to’that’factory.”

    Competition$and$Competitive$Advantage$

    Boa’faces’competition’with’different’types’of’products’that’also’ perform’the’closure’function.’In’many’product’categories’traditional’ shoelaces,’buckles,’or’Velcro®’might’be’used’for’closure.’The’type’ of’competitor’varies’across’product’categories.’For’example,’many’ snowboard’and’ski’boots’use’buckles,’possibly’supplemented’by’ Velcro®’for’closure.’On’the’other’hand,’hiking’shoes/boots,’golf’ shoes,’and’safety’shoes’most’often’use’laces.”

    As’Boa’s’reel’system’has’gained’in’popularity,’products’from’ competitors’have’emerged.’While’Boa’s’patents’and’its’firstImover’ advantage’have’helped’it’slow’copycat’competition,’the’downside’

     

     

    ! 6

    of’Boa’s’success’is’the’attention’it’draws’from’competitors.’If’Boa’ continues’its’success,’competitors’will’work’around'(or’ignore)’ Boa’s’intellectual’property’and’patents.’In’the’cycling’market,’ Rocket’7’s’Freelock’includes’a’similar’system’–’although’this’brand’ produces’a’limited’number’of’highIend’custom’shoes.’

    Boa’s’policy’of’only’working’with’premium’brands’has’also’brought’ in’new’competition.’Boa’actively’seeks’premium#brands’that’it’feels’ are’the’best’fit’for’its’premium’closure’system’and’where’Boa’can’ add’the’most’value.’Boa’sometimes’refuses’to’work’with’brands’ that’it’believes’are’not’a’good’fit’for’its’brand’image.’This’happened’ in’South’Korea,’where’ATOP’Closure’Systems'(a’competitor’that’ also’sells’a’dialIbased’closure’system)’out’of’Taiwan’found’a’ beachhead’with’brands’Boa’was’unable’to’work’with.’In’South’ Korea,’more’than’half’of’all’hiking’boots/shoes’are’sold’with’a’BoaI like’dial’closure.’So’almost’every’brand’felt’it’had’to’have’at’least’ some’products’in’its’line’with’this’style’of’closure’system.’Most’ went’to’Boa’first,’but’when’Boa’refused’to’work’with’them,’they’ turned’to’ATOP.’ATOP’s’subsequent’quality’problems’and’Boa’s’ willingness’to’partner’with’brands’it’had’previously’declined’helped’ Boa’regain’most’of’this’market.’But’Boa’remains’concerned’that’ consumers’are’unable’to’distinguish’between’Boa’and’ATOP.’

    ‘ ‘

    Competitive#Advantages#of#the#Boa#Closure#System#

    As’compared’to’these’traditional’closure’systems,’the’Boa’Closure’ System’offers’a’range’of’features’and’benefits’including:’

    • GloveIlike’fit’–’precise’customer’comfort’fit’without’ pressure’points.’

    • MicroIadjustable’–’Boa’s’reels’can’be’finely’tuned’to’ maximize’comfort.’

    • Fast’–’the’easy’on,’easy’off’system’saves’time’–’a’big’ benefit’in’some’categories.”

    • OnItheIfly/oneIhanded’operation’–’With’easy’oneIhanded’ adjustment,’laces’can’be’adjusted’while’still’riding’a’bike’or’ without’removing’gloves’on’the’side’of’a’ski’slope.”

    • Powerful’closure’–’once’the’Boa’Closure’system’is’locked’in’ place,’laces’stay’tight.’

    • Durable’–’using’aircraft’grade’stainless’steel’cables,’Boa’ offers’a’lifetime’warranty’on’its’closures.’

    • Never’comes’untied’–’especially’valued’by’those’in’ competition.’

     

     

    ! 7

    • Lightweight’and’easy’to’clean’–’Boa’doesn’t’attract’mud’or’ ice,’cutting’weight’for’skiers’or’mountain’bikers.’

    Boa’s’main’competitive’disadvantage’is’the’closure’system’s’cost’ compared’to’laces’or’Velcro®.’Depending’on’the’size’and’ torque/power’required’for’closure,’footwear’products’using’one’of’ these’traditional’systems’may’cost’from’$20I$60’less’at’retail’as’ compared’to’a’similar’product’using’a’Boa’Closure’System.4’As’an’ example,’when’adidas’introduced’its’tour360’golf’shoe’in’late’2014,’ the’manufacturers’suggested’retail’price'(MSRP)’was’$180’with’a’ Boa’Closure’System’and’$140’without.5’Sometimes’a’brand’will’use’ the’unique’nature’to’enhance’margins’whereas’some’brands’may’ sacrifice’margin’in’order’to’move’more’product’and’better’establish’

    4 ‘Assume’the’average’Boa’Closure’System’sells’to’the’brand’partner’factory’for’ $3.90’per’unit'(per’dial)’and’provides’Boa’with’a’50%’contribution’margin.’95%’of’ all’systems’involved’two’units'(e.g.,’one’each’on’a’pair’of’shoes).’Larger’systems,’ like’those’used’in’snow’sports,’sell’for’almost’twice’that’amount’and’smaller’ systems’in’shoes’are’about’25%’lower.’Actual’data’disguised’for’confidentiality.” 5 ‘“Adidas’Golf’Introduces’tour360’x’golf’shoes,”’GolfWeek,’October’18,’2014,’ downloaded’on’November’2,’2014’at’ http://golfweek.com/news/2014/oct/18/adidasIgolfIshoesItourI360IxIboaIclosureI systemI/’

    their’position’with’the’Boa’Closure’System.’Many’customers’value’ the’benefits’Boa’s’closure’system’delivers.’Select’online’customer’ reviews’can’be’seen’in’the’case’appendix’Exhibit’1.”

    One’of’Boa’s’competitive’advantages’relative’to’other’reelI’and’dialI based’closure’systems’comes’from’its’strong’relationships’with’ brand’partners’through’collaboration’in’development’and’design.’ Boa’s’systems’are’also’of’higher’quality’and’include’a’lifetime’ warranty.’Boa’also’sells’at’a’10I40%’premium’over’competitive’reel’ systems’like’ATOP,’Freelock,’and’JogDial.”

    Boa’s$“Seven$Summits”$$$

    Boa’s’“Seven’Summits”’are’the’seven’product’categories’that’make’ up’90%’of’Boa’sales.’While’Boa’is’committed’to’climbing’all’of’these’ summits,’each’summit’varies’in’market’potential’and’Boa’s’current’ position’differs’as’well.’There’are’also’major’differences’across’ Boa’s’three’main’global’markets’–’the’U.S.,’Asia,’and’Europe.’Exhibit’ 2’in’the’case’appendix’provides’an’overview’of’the’seven’summits’ and’we’elaborate’below.”

    Snow#Sports#–#Snowboard#and#on’Ski#

    Snow’sports’were’Boa’s’first’market.’Skiing’and’snowboarding’have’ longer’wires’and’place’more’stress’a’closure’system’and’ consequently’rely’on’Boa’s’larger’and’higher’torque’models.’ Convenience,’quick’release,’and’the’ability’to’microIadjust’the’fit’ throughout’the’day’appeals’to’snow’sport’enthusiasts.’Most’major’ snowboard’boot’makers’now’sell’several’models’using’the’Boa’ Closure’System’and’almost’half’of’all’snowboard’boots’now’include’ one.’About’600,000’pairs’of’snowboots’are’sold’in’the’United’States’ annually.”

     

     

    ! 8

    The’retail’market’for’snowboard’equipment’and’apparel’is’highly’ fragmented’with’many’different’outlets.’The’market’includes’more’ than’1200’different’locations.’It’is’dominated’by’specialty’shops,’ which’in’2012’sold’about’57%’of’all’equipment’and’apparel'(down’ 11%’from’previous’year,’in’dollar’volume).’Online’sellers’account’ for’27%'(up’5%)’with’chain’stores’accounting’for’16%'(down’12%’in’ dollars).6”

    Cycling#

    Cycling’was’another’early’category’for’Boa.’Cyclists’like’the’ability’to’ reach’over’and’singleIhandedly’tighten’their’shoes’on’the’fly.’This’is’ one’of’the’company’s’best’markets’with’a’higher’market’share.’ More’recently’some’manufacturers’have’added’Boa’to’helmets’for’ improved’fit.”While’1.7’million’cycling’shoes’are’sold’annually,’only’ higher’end’shoes’are’a’good’candidate’for’a’Boa’Closure’System.’

    The’cycling’shoe’market’is’highly’fragmented’with’dozens’of’brands.’ The’shoes’are’often’sold’at’retail’bike’shops’II’another’fragmented’ market’dominated’by’independent’specialty’shops.’There’are’about’ 3700’independent’bike’shops,’almost’all’carrying’cycling’shoes,’but’ online’stores’from’Amazon’to’BikeShoes.com,’and’Zappos’also’sell’ the’shoes.’Total’dollar’sales’of’bicycle’shoes’have’shown’modest’ growth’in’recent’years.”

    Golf#

    The’Boa’Closure’System’can’be’found’on’different’styles’of’golf’ shoe’brands,’including’FootJoy,’Adidas,’and’Mizuno.’Golfers’ appreciate’the’precision,’durability,’convenience’and’comfort’the’ system’offers.’In’the’U.S.,’Boa’s’market’penetration’is’still’limited’to’ the’low’single’digits,’percentageIwise’–’but’the’real’size’of’the’ 6 ‘“Snowboard’Equipment’Market’Briefing”’TransWorld#Business,’June’3,’2013;’ http://business.transworld.net/131703/features/snowboardImarketIbriefing/”’

    opportunity’might’be’reflected’in’the’success’Boa’has’seen’in’Asia.’ It’is’estimated’that’more’than’50%’of’all’golf’shoes’sold’in’the’ Japanese’golf’market’in’2015’will’include’a’Boa’Closure’System.7’In’ the’United’States’about’3.4’million’golf’shoes’are’sold’annually.”

    Boa’recently’commissioned’market’research’to’learn’more’about’ the’U.S.’golf’market.’More’than’590’core’golfers'(defined’as’those’ playing’eight’or’more’rounds’per’year)’completed’an’online’survey.’ The’study’found’38%’aided’awareness’of’Boa’Closure’Systems,’ although’among’those’aware’only’13%'(so’5%’of’the’total’sample)’ indicated’they’were’extremely’or’very’familiar’with’Boa.”

    Golf’shoes’are’sold’through’a’wide’range’of’channels;’about’40%’ are’sold’in’offIcourse’specialty’stores'(e.g.,’Golf’Smith,’Golf’Galaxy),’ about’a’quarter’are’sold’online,’and’another’15%’each’through’onI course’channels'(pro’shops’at’golf’courses)’and’sporting’goods’ stores.’Golf’shoes’are’sold’through’an’estimated’9000’outlets’in’the’ U.S.”While’onIcourse’channels’do’not’sell’as’many’shoes,’presence’ in’these’channels’raises’customer’awareness’–’which’may’lead’to’ actual’sales’in’other’channels.”While’FootJoy’has’the’largest’market’ share,’Puma,’Adidas’Golf,’and’Ecco’are’the’shoe’brands’most’ associated’with’innovation,’style’and’performance.”

    Trail#and#Outdoor#

    Hiking’boots’and’lowItop’hiking’shoes’have’grown’in’popularity’–’ for’use’on’the’trail’and’around’the’town.’Hikers’appreciate’the’ durability’and’security’Boa’brings.’The’outdoor’market’is’finding’ nonIfootwear’uses’by’bringing’Boa’to’backpacks’for’waist’and’ lumbar’adjustment’and’hydration’packs'(Boa’adjusts’the’fit’and’can’

    7 ‘”Adidas’Golf’Introduces’tour360’x’golf’shoes,”’GolfWeek,’October’18,’2014,’ downloaded’on’November’2,’2014’at’ http://golfweek.com/news/2014/oct/18/adidasIgolfIshoesItourI360IxIboaIclosureI systemI/’

     

     

    ! 9

    reduce’water’“slosh”).’South’Korean’customers’particularly’favor’ Boa’–’with’about’half’of’their’hiking’shoes’and’boots’including’a’Boa’ Closure’System.’In’the’United’States’the’market’is’much’larger’ (estimated’at’3.1’million’shoes’and’boots’per’year)’but’market’ penetration’for’Boa’remains’modest'(less’than’1%).”

    Boa’recently’commissioned’a’study’of’the’hiking’market,’surveying’ 825’hikers'(who’reported’hiking’four’or’more’times’per’year).’In’the’ hiking’market,’aided’awareness’of’the’Boa’Closure’System’was’17%’ IIwith’only’12%’of’those’customers’indicating’extremely’or’very’ familiar’with’Boa.’Boa’seemed’to’show’appeal’to’this’market.’ Among’those’exposed’to’the’concept,’75%’of’shoe’buyers’and’85%’ of’boot’buyers’indicated’they’definitely’or’probably’would’try’Boa’ equipped’footwear.’These’numbers’are’well’beyond’the’normative’ range.’The’study’showed’that’Merrell’and’The’North’Face’were’ brands’perceived’as’having’higher’performance,’better’comfort/fit,’ and’more’innovative’and’aligned’well’with’Boa.”

    Hiking’shoes’were’primarily’sold’through’sporting’goods'(29%),’ outdoor’specialty'(25%),’athletic’specialty'(15%),’and’online'(11%)’ stores.’Most’of’the’11,000’shoe’stores’in’the’U.S.’sell’some’form’of’ hiking’shoe’or’boot.’As’compared’to’hiking’shoes,’the’channels’for’ hiking’boots’show’some’differences,’with’more’volume’going’ through’outdoor’specialty'(41%),’then’sporting’goods'(26%),’online’ (9%)’and’athletic’specialty'(8%).’The’hiking’shoe’market’includes’ dozens’of’brands,’but’just’six’have’more’than’5%’market’share’and’ the’leaders’are’well’known’in’athletic’footwear:’Nike'(20%),’Adidas’ (14%),’and’New’Balance'(14%)’are’market’leaders.’Hiking’boots’are’ dominated’by’brands’well’known’in’outdoor’apparel,’led’by’ Timberland'(22%),’Columbia'(13%),’and’The’North’Face'(12%).”

    #

    #

    Utility/Safety#

    Boa’sees’a’huge’opportunity’in’the’utility’and’safety’shoe’market.’ The’market’is’much’larger’overall’as’compared’to’some’of’the’ athletic’markets’–’and’Boa’s’Closure’System’offers’many’endIuser’ benefits.’Simply’getting’shoelaces’off’the’shoe'(and’the’floor)’ makes’it’safer’and’oneIhanded’closing’allows’workers’to’easily’ adjust’fit’–’a’big’benefit’to’workers’who’often’wear’gloves’on’the’ job.’

    The’European’market’is’especially’attractive.’Strict’regulations’ govern’worker’safety’in’Europe.’Many’employers’purchase’the’ shoes’for’employees,’leading’to’less’price’sensitivity.’One’of’the’ larger’makers’of’utility/safety’shoes’in’Europe’is’Bata’Industrials’ (see’video).’The’U.S.’market’still’offers’many’opportunities’–’ particularly’in’the’construction’and’manufacturing’sectors8’–’with’ an’estimated’300’million’pairs’of’utility’and’safety’shoes’sold’ annually.’

    8 ‘“Industrial’Protective’Footwear’Market’–’Global’Industry’Analysis,’Size,’Share’ 2013I2019,”’found’at’LinkedIn,’on’November’2,’2014’http://goo.gl/MpKnNF’

     

     

    ! 10

    While’the’U.S.’market’is’not’seen’as’quite’as’attractive’an’ opportunity’as’Europe,’many’of’the’same’benefits’carry’over.’On’ sheer’size’alone’the’utility/safety’market’is’much’larger’than’the’ summits’described’above’and’growth’is’predicted’to’continue.”

    Athletic#Shoes#

    Athletic’shoes,’running’shoes’in’particular,’are’another’large’ potential’market’where’Boa’has’yet’to’gain’a’foothold'(pun’ intended).’The’company’is’building’a’basecamp,’working’with’ specialty’brand’Zoot’Sports,’which’focuses’on’footwear’in’the’ triathlon’niche’and’this’might’be’the’market’segment’where’Boa’ finds’a’beachhead.’The’lightweight’and’fast’Boa’Closure’System’has’ high’value’for’these’customers.’Triathletes’that’must’change’ footwear’midIcompetition’see’benefits’from’Boa’s’quick’on/off’ performance.”’

    Boa’sees’a’huge’opportunity’if’its’closure’system’benefits’of’gloveI like,’precision’fit’and’light’weight’can’be’transferred’to’the’giant’ running’shoe’market.’High’top’basketball’shoes’along’with’football,’ baseball,’and’soccer’cleats’also’offer’big’opportunities.’Across’all’ athletic’shoes,’Boa’estimates’more’than’250’million’shoes’are’sold’ in’the’United’States’each’year.’Most’of’the’nation’s’11,000’shoe’ stores’sell’athletic’shoes,’with’1700’specialty’athletic’shoe’stores.”

    Medical#Devices##

    A’wide’range’of’medical’devices’can’operate’better’with’a’Boa’ Closure’System’than’they’do’with’hookIandIloop'(i.e.’Velcro®).’ Boa’s’microIadjustability,’and’oneIhanded’operation’offer’real’ benefits’on’braces’–’and’this’is’where’Boa’has’made’its’first’inroads.’ This’market’is’also’huge,’with’an’estimated’115’million’braces’and’ adjustment’prosthetics’sold’annually’in’the’United’States.’With’an’ aging’population’this’market’offers’potentially’high’growth.’This’

    market’is’a’bit’more’difficult’to’approach,’as’it’differs’significantly’ from’Boa’s’traditional’markets’and’lies’beyond’its’core’competency.”

    Boa’s’efforts’in’this’category’are’preliminary.’The’opportunity’is’ very’large.’But’uncertainty’around’the’effects’of’the’Affordable’Care’ Act’and’insurance’along’with’Boa’s’inexperience’working’with’this’ type’of’market’have’Boa’proceeding’with’caution’in’the’medical’ device’market.”’

    Selling$an$Ingredient$

    Boa’makes’an’“ingredient”’that’is’added’to’other’products’–’and’ the’total’package’delivers’greater’customer’value.’Exhibit’3’in’the’ case’appendix’provides’a’figure’that’shows’Boa’s’place’in’the’ customer’and’supply’chain.”

    1. Ryder.’The’beginning’of’this’chain’shows’Ryder,’the’Chinese’ manufacturer’that’produces’most’of’Boa’s’Closure’Systems’ which’it’ships’to…”

    2. !’Boa’s’Warehouse.’As’noted’earlier,’Boa’warehouses’ most’of’its’Boa’Closure’Systems’in’Hong’Kong’where’it’ awaits’orders’from…’

    3. !’brand’partner’factories.’The’brand’partner’factories’have’ no’control’over’the’closure’systems’they’use’–’these’are’ contract’manufacturers’that’produce’shoes,’boots,’or’ medical’devices’based’on’specifications’from…’

    4. !’Boa’s’premium’partner’brands.’The’premium’brands’ with’well’known’names’like’FootJoy,’Red’Wing,’adidas,’and’ Specialized’collaborate’with’Boa’on’development’and’ design’of’shoes’that’include’the’Boa’Closure’System.’Boa’s’ premium’partner’brands’almost’exclusively’rely’on…’

    5. !’retail’channels’of’distribution’–’often’specialty’shops’in’ these’categories’–’to’sell’to…’

     

     

    ! 11

    6. !’consumers’–’the’ultimate’purchaser’and’endIuser’of’a’ product’with’a’Boa’Closure’System.”

    Garett’Graubins’believes’that’Boa’has’three’broad’targets’that’ could’be’the’centerpiece’of’his’marketing’strategy’–’brand’partners,’ retailers,’and’consumers.’Currently’Boa’s’efforts’with’each’target’ vary’considerably.”

    The#B2B#(BusinessLtoLBusiness)#Strategy#–#Focus#on#Brand#Partners#

    Boa’s’current’strategy’in’almost’all’of’its’productImarkets’focuses’ on’building’and’maintaining’relationships’with’its’more’than’100′ premium’brand’partners.’Boa’carefully’cultivates’longIterm’ partnerships’with’a’select’group’of’brand’partners.’As’a’premium’ ingredient,’Boa’understands’that’its’reputation’is’tied’closely’to’the’ products’it’goes’into’–’so’it’will’not’work’with’every’brand’in’a’ market.’Boa’conducts’market’research’to’find’which’brands’in’a’ category’have’more’innovative’customers,’more’likely’to’try’ something’new’like’the’Boa’Closure’System.”

    Boa’works’closely’with’its’brand’partners’throughout’the’design,’ manufacturing,’and’marketing’process.’The’collaboration’is’ mutually’beneficial,’with’Boa’s’team’assuring’the’highest’quality’ products’and’applications’–’which’results’in’greater’sell’through’ that’benefits’Boa.’This’attention’to’quality’and’responsiveness’to’ warranty’claims’fosters’the’close’relationships.’Boa’s’brand’partners’ see’the’value’in’this’type’of’buyerIseller’relationship.’Doug’ Robinson,’VP’of’Product’Design’and’Development’with’premium’ brand’golf’partner,’FootJoy,’discusses’the’collaborative’partnership’ his’company’enjoys’with’Boa.”

    ‘ In’its’early’years,’Boa’typically’granted’the’first’brand’in’a’new’ product’category’one’year’of’exclusive’rights’in’that’category.’This’ means’that’Boa’would’not’sell’to’other’brands’in’the’category’for’ the’protected’time’period.’The’exclusive’arrangement’rewarded’ and’incentivized’a’brand’for’the’pioneering’work’it’did’to’make’its’ customers’aware’of’the’unique’benefits’of’the’Boa’Closure’System.’ Boa’no’longer’finds’it’necessary’to’grant’exclusive’arrangements.”

    Boa’thought’that’brand’partners’would’continue’to’promote’the’ Boa’Closure’System’–’even’after’exclusive’arrangements’had’ expired.’Boa’figured’it’could’save’marketing’dollars’having’its’brand’ partners’build’the’Boa’name’as’these’partners’touted’the’benefits’ of’the’Boa’Closure’System’on’their’products.’That’worked’well’ when’new’partners’came’on’board’–’when’partners’were’excited’ about’the’benefits’the’new’feature’brought’to’their’shoes’and’ boots.’But’after’a’year’or’two,’brand’partners’typically’promoted’ the’newest’product’features’–’and’the’Boa’closure’became’“old’ news.”’Boa’realized’that’building’the’Boa’brand’was’going’to’need’ to’be’left’to’Boa.’Mark’Soderberg,’CEO’of’Boa’Technology’discusses’ this’in’the’video’below.’Boa’discovered’that’if’it’wanted’to’build’ brand’equity’at’the’consumer’level,’it’was’unlikely’to’get’the’ sustained’support’it’would’take’from’its’brand’partners.”

     

     

    ! 12

    #

    B2I#(BusinessLtoLInfluencer)#Strategy#–#Focusing#on#Retailers#

    In’most’of’major’categories’where’Boa’operates,’retailers,’the’retail’ environment,’and’retail’salespeople’work’with’consumers.’Retail’ salespeople’typically’assist’in’the’purchase’of’athletic’shoes’as’well’ as’with’hiking,’snowboard,’and’ski’boots.’Retail’salespeople’help’ customers’with’decisions’about’styles’and’fit.’Customers’will’usually’ pick’up’a’product’and’see’how’it’works.’Online’stores’have’ mimicked’this’type’of’interaction’with’information,’photos,’and’ often’videos.’Many’final’choices’in’these’categories’are’made’in’a’ store’following’these’kinds’of’interactions.’Retail’can’have’an’ influence’on’consumer’choice’–’and’Boa’could’increase’its’ marketing’at’this’influencer’stage.”

    “Taste’of’Boa”’is’one’program’Boa’has’used’to’influence’the’ influencers.’Boa’s’top’management’team’universally’points’to’Taste’ of’Boa’as’one’of’Boa’s’most’successful’marketing’efforts.’Taste’of’ Boa’allows’nearly’any’lowIcut’shoe’to’be’retrofitted’with’a’Boa’ Closure’System.’The’program’has’been’used’at’the’past’three’

    Outdoor’Retail’tradeshows’–’a’show’that’attracts’media,’industry’ influencers,’potential’brand’partners,’and’retailers’that’sell’Boa’s’ brand’partner’s’products.’Visitors’to’the’tradeshow’can’drop’off’ their’shoes’and’have’their’shoelaces’replaced’with’a’Boa’Closure’ System.’As’Graubins’says,’“Once’people’try’Boa,’they’love’Boa.’This’ retrofit’project’is’designed’to’give’people’a’taste’of’Boa’so’that’they’ can’learn’what’tens’of’millions’of’people’know’already’–’that’Boa’is’ better.”’The’program’is’not’inexpensive’for’Boa.’Taking’Taste’of’Boa’ to’a’trade’show’adds’travel’cost’to’labor’and’parts’–’eventually’ running’$70I90’to’retrofit’a’pair’of’shoes.’Over’the’course’of’a’fourI day’trade’show’Boa’can’retrofit’500’pairs’of’shoes’–’and’has’ demand’for’many’more.’While’costly,’the’program’lets’an’ influencer’try’Boa’on’a’pair’of’shoes’they’already’know’and’like,’and’ it’costs’less’than’offering’a’partner’brand’s’shoes’on’a’ complimentary’basis.’Click’on’the’video’to’hear’Boa’s’Vice’President’ of’Sales’and’Marketing’Chuck’Mason’talk’about’Taste’of’Boa.”

    ‘ ‘ There’are’other’ways’that’Boa’might’educate’the’retail’influencer.’ While’Boa’exhibits'(sets’up’a’booth)’at’a’few’trade’shows’per’year9,’

    9 ‘In’2014,’Boa’was’an’exhibitor’at’the’two’Outdoor’Retailer’shows’and’The’Running’ Event.”

     

     

    ! 13

    key’marketing’and’senior’management’personnel’typically’attend’a’ dozen’or’more’trade’shows’each’year.”Trade’shows’offer’an’ opportunity’for’Boa’to’connect’and’network’with’current’and’ potential’brand’partners’and’retailers.”

    Boa’might’be’able’to’increase’its’influence’on’consumer’decisions’ through’retail’in’different’ways.’Boa’might’increase’pointIofI purchase’displays’to’demonstrate’the’benefits.’Boa’could’create’ video’“reviews”’that’online’retailers’could’post.’The’company’might’ also’seek’to’educate’retail’salespeople’on’the’benefits’of’the’Boa’ Closure’System’through’training.’Boa’might’offer’a’program’to’ encourage’customers’to’buy’a’BoaIpowered’product’at’a’discount.’ Until’now,’Boa’s’focus’on’retail’has’been’limited,’but’Graubins’ wonders’if’now’is’the’time’to’ramp’up’efforts’at’this’level.”’

    2C#(BusinessLtoLConsumer)#Strategy#–#Building#Ingredient#Brand# Equity#with#Consumers#

    The’last’strategic’option’was’to’invest’in’consumer’branding’–’to’ build’awareness’and’preference’for’the’Boa’Closure’System’at’the’ consumer’level.’Graubins’thought’growth’could’be’accelerated’with’ more’consumer’awareness.’Customers’that’tried’Boa,’liked’Boa’–’a’ lot.’If’Boa’could’speak’directly’to’consumers,’it’could’control’the’ messaging’about’the’benefits’of’the’closure’system.’Boa’was’also’ concerned’about’the’possibility’of’new’entrants’that’could’offer’ similar’style’closure’devices.’If’customers’failed’to’see’differences’ between’closure’systems,’a’price’war’might’break’out’with’brand’ partners’playing’suppliers’off’one’another’for’lower’prices.’ Customer’awareness’of’and’preference’for’Boa’might’help’fend’off’ this’type’of’competition.”

    On’the’other’hand,’Graubins’wondered’if’a’strong’Boa’brand’might’ alienate’its’brand’partners’and’harm’carefully’developed’ collaborative’relationships.’A’brand’partner’does’not’want’to’hear’

    that’customers’are’coming’in’asking’for’“golf’shoes’with’that’Boa’ Closure’System”’instead’of’“those’new’adidas’golf’shoes.”’It’would’ be’prohibitively’expensive’to’build’brand’awareness’across’all’of’ Boa’s’categories’–’but’he’might’be’able’to’build’a’case’in’selected’ product’categories’or’with’specific’target’markets.”

    While’such’efforts’have’not’been’used’in’the’U.S.,’Boa’has’had’ some’success’in’the’Asian’market.’As’noted’earlier,’competition’in’ the’South’Korean’hiking’ shoe/boot’market’ forced’Boa’to’expand’ its’roster’of’partners’ there.’Boa’also’fought’ off’competition’with’a’ print,’public’relations,’ and’social’media’ advertising’campaign’ directed’at’South’ Korean’hikers.’At’the’ same’time,’Boa’also’ increased’its’ investment’in’ supporting’its’South’ Korean’brand’partners’’ marketing’efforts.’A’ sample’of’the’“Dialed’ In”’campaign’is’shown’ here.10”’When’the’ campaign’started’Boa’ had’about’10%’share’of’ the’hiking’market,’but’ after’adding’more’

    10 ‘In’South’Korea’it’is’not’unusual’for’ads’–’like’this’one’–’to’include’both’written’

    English’and’Korean.”

     

     

    ! 14

    brands’and’building’consumer’preference,’almost’half’of’all’new’ hiking’shoes/boots’are’now’equipped’with’a’Boa’Closure’System.’ Boa’has’also’used’advertising’and’other’consumerIdirected’ promotional’efforts’targeting’the’Japanese’golfer’–’and’about’half’ of’all’golf’shoes’in’Japan’sold’today’are’BoaIpowered.’These’efforts’ have’helped’revive’Boa’s’growth’in’snowboarding’in’Japan’and’ spark’an’opportunity’in’casual’footwear.’Graubins’wondered’if’ similar’results’could’be’achieved’in’the’much’larger’U.S.’market.”

    Influenced’by’Geoffrey’Moore’s’Crossing#the#Chasm,’Graubins’ thought’the’mainstream’U.S.’market’may’not’be’ready’for’new’shoe’ closure’technology.’Crossing’the’Chasm’referred’to’the’diffusion’of’ new’technological’innovations’to’a’broader’market.’Moore’ suggested’that’innovators’and’early’adopters’sought’technology’ and’performance’–’while’latter’adopters’would’buy’a’solution’and’ convenience.’This’suggested’that’categories’most’ripe’for’branding’ might’be’those’further’along’the’product’adoption’curve'(see’ Technology’Adoption’Lifecycle’graphic’below).”

    $

     

     

    ! 15

    If’Graubins’were’to’propose’consumerIdirected’marketing,’he’ would’also’have’to’figure’out’how’to’develop’that’branding.’To’this’ point,’most’of’Boa’s’marketing’communications’have’emphasized’ features’and’benefits.’They’wonder’whether’they’might’be’able’to’ build’an’image’around’the’brand.’Graubins’expands’on’these’ideas’ in’this’video.”

    $ Planning$for$2015$’

    Graubins’reviewed’his’options’for’2015.’He’knew’that’that’he’must’ decide’how’to’allocate’his’resources’across’brand’partners'(B2B),’ retailers'(B2I),’and’consumers'(B2C).’In’the’U.S.’market,’marketing’ resources’were’allocated’about’90%’toward’brand’partners’and’ 10%’toward’retailers.’Graubins’pondered’if’this’should’change.’No’ matter’which’direction’he’went,’he’also’knew’he’had’to’decide’ which’categories’would’receive’the’most’attention.’No’matter’the’ allocation’of’resources,’Graubins’needed’to’identify’which’2I3’of’ the’7’summits’would’get’the’lion’s’share’of’resources’in’2015.’An’ even’allocation’across’all’7’would’not’give’any’one’summit’enough’ punch’to’move’them’further’up’the’long’climb.’Garett’also’knew’

    that’Soderberg’and’McCreery’would’expect’financial’justification’for’ any’plan’he’put’forward.”

    The’Boa’headquarters’golden’Lab,’Emma,’nuzzled’at’Graubins’’arm.’ After’patting’Emma’on’the’head,’he’went’through’his’notes’again.’ Graubins’was’eager’to’meet’with’his’team’and’get’their’input’on’ the’budget.’Together’they’would’have’to’prepare’a’set’of’ recommendations’in’time’for’next’month’s’budget’meeting.’

     

     

    ! 16

    Discussion$Questions$$

    For’this’case,’you’have’the’option’of’going’beyond’the’case.’Unlike’other’case’studies,’you’are’welcome’to’add’your’own’ experiences’or’do’online/offline’research’to’enhance’your’recommendations.”

    1. What’is’the’value’of’a’brand’for’a’consumer?’A’manufacturer?’An’ingredient?” 2. Why’would’an’ingredient’want’to’develop’a’consumer’brand?” 3. If’Boa’develops’a’higher’profile’with’consumers,’what’are’the’upsides’for’Boa’s’premium’partner’brands?’What’

    are’the’downsides/risks?’ 4. What’are’your’recommendations’for’Garett’Graubins’’2015’U.S.’marketing’plan?’Be’specific’about’which’market’

    (B2B,’B2I,’and/or’B2I)’you’recommend’and’the’2I3’summits'(product’categories)’deserving’the’most’attention.’ Offer’specific’ideas’about’how’to’approach’that’market.”

    5. Whether’you’recommend’building’a’brand’with’consumers’or’not,’use’two’creative’idea’generation’techniques’ and’generate’five’lowIcost,’grassroots’ideas’that’would’help’Boa’build’a’brand’in’one’of’its’product’categories.”’

    [Note:’questions’4’and’5’must’be’turned’in’as’a’written’assignment’and’completed’in’two’pages’or’less’single’ spaced,’doubleIspace’between’paragraphs.]

     

     

    ! 17

    Appendix$

    Exhibit#1#–#Sample#of#Online#Customer#Reviews#

    Golf’Shoes'(from’Amazon.com)’

    Work’boots'(from’Red’Wing’Shoes’–’redwingshoes.com)’

    Continued’on’the’following’page.’

     

     

    ! 18

    Cycling’shoes'(from’Specialized.com)’

    #

     

     

    ! 19

    Exhibit#2:#Summary#Data#for#Boa’s#Seven#Summits#

    Summit’ Primary$benefits’ Key$Brand$Partners’

    2015$U.S.$ Market$$$

    ($$millions/$000s$ units$)11′

    Boa’s$U.S.$ market$ share**’

    Market$ Growth$ (2015V20)’ Notes’

    Snowboard’ boots’

    Precision’fit,’one’handed,’ powerful’closure’

    Burton,’K2,’Ride,’Flow,’ DC,’Salomon’

    $60′ (600)’

    43%’ Slow’ Boa’is’wellIknown,’ established’

    Cycling’shoes’ adjust’on’the’fly,’oneI handed,”

    Scott,’Lake,’Specialized’ $125′ (1700)’

    14%’ Slow/’ moderate’

    Dialed’closures”becoming’ the’standard’

    Golf’shoes’ microIadjustable,’precise’ and’customizable’fit’

    Footjoy,’Adidas,’Izuna’ $53′ (3400)’

    <1%'(50%’in’ Asia)’

    Slow’ Can’Asian’success’translate’ to’U.S.?’

    Trail’&’ Outdoor’shoes’ &’boots’

    Secure,’microIadjustable,’ precision’fit’

    The’North’Face,’Treksta,’ Viking,’K2’Korea’

    $310′ (3100)’

    <1%’ (~’50%’in’

    South’Korea)’

    Moderate’ Can’South’Korean’success’ translate’to’U.S.?’

    Utility/’Safety’ shoes’

    durable,’setIitIandIforgetI it,’oneI’handed’

    Red’Wing,’Elten,’Bata,’ Sievi’

    $1,500′ (300,000)’

    <1%'(stronger’ in’Europe)’

    Moderate” New’market,’Boa’s’fastest’ growing’segment’by’%’

    Athletic’ footwear’

    MicroIadjustable,’adjust’ on’the’fly’

    Hayabusa,’Zoot,’Topo’ Athletic’

    $49812′ (250,000)’

    <.001%’ Moderate’ No’foothold’

    Medical/’ bracing’and’ adjustment’ prosthetics’

    MicroIadjustable,’ precision’fit’

    DeRoyal,’Exos,’ Futuro/ACE'(3M)’

    $565′ (115,570)’

    <.1%’new’ market’

    Uncertain’ Uncertainty’around’ Affordable’Care’Act,’maze’ of’regulations’and’ reimbursement’policies.”

    ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘

    11 ‘Dollar’estimates’from’internal’and’secondary’sources’and’include’some’informed’estimates.’These’values’should’not’be’used’for’secondary’research.’Dollar’values’are’total’

    market’size,’not’sales’potential’for’Boa.’The’premium’nature’of’Boa’s’product’suggests’that’not’all’of’these’sales’are’candidates’for’the’Boa’Closure’System.”

    12 ‘Dollar’value’from’running’shoes’only,’source:’http://www.runningusa.org/2014IstateIofItheIsportIpartIiiIrunningIindustryIreport;’Boa’estimates’that’more’than’734’million’pairs’

    of’all’athletic’footwear'(including’general’cross’training,’running,’basketball,’soccer,’baseball,’football,’and’more)’are’sold’globally’each’year.”

     

     

     

    ! 20

    Exhibit#3:#Marketing#an#Ingredient#–#Boa’s#Customer#Chain#

    #

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Quantitative Analysis Word And Excel

Instructions

All information required for this assignment is provided below:

Read the Cash Is King case study and complete the following requirements.

Quantitative Analysis: 

  1. Using the data input provided (Exhibit 1), prepare LAF’s master budgets in Excel. Do not hard-code numbers into the spreadsheet, except where permitted in the financing section of the cash budget.

Qualitative Analysis: 

In a 2 page report, based on the results of your quantitative analysis:

  1. Determine a credit recommendation for Kent Bank, to lend or not. Justify your credit decision.
  2. Explain why the cash budget is more important to a bank than the accounting net income when determining a credit decision.

Deliverables

  • Quantitative Analysis (Excel Required): You are required to use the provided Excel workbook to complete the quantitative analysis for this assignment.
  • Qualitative Analysis (Word Required): Prepare a 2-page summary addressing the required qualitative analysis, as noted in the Student Workbook.  Your paper is required to be formatted according to APA requirements.  Be sure to incorporate key concepts from this unit’s readings and properly cite your references according to APA requirements.  Do NOT embed the results of your quantitative analysis in your Word document.  You should only reference parts of your quantitative analysis in your written analysis.  Your written responses to the qualitative prompts should not be presented in a question and answer format.

    Case Study

    Data

    Cash Is King
    Exhibit 1. Excel Data Input Section
    Input Data (all currency in US$)
    Budgeted Sales Expected
    April (units) 2,500
    May (units) 6,000
    June (units) 3,000
    July (units) 2,500
    August (units) 2,000
    Selling Price/Unit $120.00
    Cash Collection Pattern
    Month of sale 40%
    Following month 55%
    Uncollectible 5%
    Cash Payments for Materials
    Month of purchase 40%
    Following month 60%
    Production Requirements
    Raw material per unit (lb.) 5
    Raw material cost per lb. $7.00
    Direct labor hours per unit 0.5
    Direct labor rate per hour $40.00
    Variable MOHD per direct labor hour $10.00
    Fixed MOHD per month $57,950
    Depreciation in fixed MOHD $20,000
    Selling & Administrative (S&A) Costs
    Variable S&A cost per unit sold $1.25
    Fixed S&A cost per month $63,000
    Depreciation in fixed S&A cost $10,000
    Other Cash Outflows
    Cash dividends paid each month $15,000
    Equipment purchases May $47,820
    Equipment purchases June $154,600
    Desired Ending Inventory
    Finished goods 20%
    Raw materials 40%
    Cash $30,000
    Beginning Account Balances as of March 31
    Cash $37,745
    Accounts receivable $132,000
    Finished goods inventory $30,750
    Finished goods cost per unit $75.00
    Finished goods inventory (units) 410
    Raw materials inventory $32,200
    Raw materials (lb.) 4,600
    Accounts payable $55,000
    Land $520,000
    Buildings and equipment $1,800,000
    Accumulated depreciation ($750,000)
    Common stock $500,000
    Retained earnings $1,247,695
    Exhibit 2. Sales at Different Levels
    Decreased by
    Budgeted Sales Expected 2% 5% 10%
    April (units) 2,500 2,450 2,375 2,250
    May (units) 6,000 5,880 5,700 5,400
    June (units) 3,000 2,940 2,850 2,700
    July (units) 2,500 2,450 2,375 2,250
    August (units) 2,000 1,960 1,900 1,800

    Student Template

    Yellow – You may only use cell references to data & formulas. NO HARD-KEYING! Little Annin Flagmakers
    Blue – you may hard-key numbers in these cells Sales Budget (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Budgeted sales (units)
    Selling price per unit
    Total Sales
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Schedule of Expected Cash Collections (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Accounts receivable
    Beginning balance
    April sales
    May sales
    June sales
    Total Cash Collections
    Accounts Receivable as of June 30
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Production Budget
    April May June Quarter July August
    Budgeted sales
    Add: Desired ending inventory
    Total needs
    Less: Beginning inventory
    Required Production
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Direct Materials Budget (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Required production in units
    Raw materials per unit (lbs.)
    Production needs (lbs.)
    Add: Desired ending inventory
    Total needs
    Less: Beginning inventory
    Raw materials to be purchased
    Cost of raw materials
    Total Cost of Raw Materials
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Schedule of Expected Cash Disbursements for Material (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Accounts payable
    Beginning balance
    April purchases
    May purchases
    June purchases
    Total Cash Disbursements for Materials
    Accounts Payable as of June 30
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Direct Labor Budget (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Units to be produced
    Direct labor hours per unit
    Total direct labor hours needed
    Direct labor cost per hour
    Total Direct Labor Cost
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Manufacturing Overhead Budget (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Budgeted direct labor hours
    Variable MOHD rate
    Total variable MOHD
    Fixed MOHD expense
    Total MOHD expense
    Less: Depreciation
    Cash Disbursements for MOHD
    MOHD rate /direct labor hour
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Unit Product Cost (US$)
    Absorption cost per unit Quantity Cost Cost/unit
    Direct materials
    Direct labor
    Manufacturing overhead
    Unit Product Cost
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Cost of Goods Sold Budget (USD)
    Cost of Goods Sold (FIFO) Units Cost/unit Total Cost
    Beginning finished goods inventory
    Add: Cost of goods manufactured
    Good available for sale
    Less: Ending finished goods inventory
    Cost of Good Sold
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Selling and Administrative Expense Budget (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Budgeted sales in units
    Variable S&A per unit
    Total variable S&A
    Total fixed S&A
    Total S&A expense
    Less: Depreciation
    Cash Disbursements for S&A
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Cash Budget (US$)
    April May June Quarter
    Beginning Cash Balance
    Add: Receipts
    Cash collections
    Total Cash Available
    Less disbursements
    Direct materials
    Direct labor
    Manufacturing overhead
    Selling and administrative
    Dividends
    Equipment purchases
    Total Disbursements
    Excess (deficiency) of cash available
    Financing
    Borrowing
    Repayments
    Interest
    Total Financing
    Ending Cash Balance
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Budgeted Income Statement (US$)
    Quarter Ending June 30
    Net sales
    Less: Cost of goods sold
    Gross margin
    Less: S&A expenses
    Net operating income
    Less: Interest expense
    Net income
    Computation of Net Sales
    Sales
    Less uncollectible amounts
    Net Sales
    Little Annin Flagmakers
    Budgeted Balance Sheet (US$)
    Ending March 31 Ending June 30
    Current assets
    Cash
    Accounts receivable
    Raw materials inventory
    Finished goods inventory
    Plant and equipment
    Land
    Buildings and equipment
    Accumulated depreciation
    Total Assets
    Liabilities
    Accounts payable
    Stockholder’s equity
    Common stock
    Retained earnings
    Total Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity

     

    Adapted from IMA

    IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 11, NO. 4, ART. 4, DECEMBER 2018 ISSN 1940-204X

    Cash Is King: Master Budgets to Inform a Credit Decision

    Anne M.A. Sergeant, CMA, PhD Seidman College of Business Grand Valley State University Grand Rapids, MI Neal VandenBerg, CPA, PhD Seidman College of Business Grand Valley State University Grand Rapids, MI

    MANUFACTURING AND SG&A COSTS

    The flags are made in one plant, which has a capacity of 6,200 units per month. LAF budgets have 20% of next month’s sales in finished goods inventory at the end of each month. There is plenty of storage space for finished goods.

    Fabric is the only direct material and each flag requires five pounds of fabric at US$7 per pound. LAF plans to have 40% of next month’s fabric needs on hand at the end of the month. Fabric is purchased on credit with 40% paid in the month of purchase and 60% paid the next month. The standard direct labor hours to manufacture one flag is 0.50 hours at US$40 per hour. For simplicity, direct labor costs are budgeted as if they were paid when incurred. Manufacturing overhead rates are computed quarterly and applied based on direct labor hours. Fixed manufacturing overhead costs are estimated to be US$57,950 per month, of which US$20,000 is property, plant, and equipment (PPE) depreciation. Variable manufacturing overhead, including indirect materials, indirect labor, and other costs, is estimated at US$10 per direct labor hour.

    The selling and administrative expenses include variable selling costs (primarily

    shipping) of US$1.25 per unit and fixed costs of US$63,000 per month, of which US$10,000 is depreciation of the administrative office building and equipment.

    FINANCIAL STATEMENT DETAILS AND CASH PLANNING

    LAF uses first in, first out (FIFO) inventory valuation. As of March 31, the expected finished goods inventory is 410 units, valued at US$75 per unit. The company expects to have 4,600 pounds of fabric on hand, valued at US$7 per pound. Other expected account balances include accounts payable at US$55,000, accounts receivable at 132,000, cash at US$37,745, land at US$520,000, and building and equipment at US$1,800,000 with accumulated depreciation of US$750,000. LAF has no long-term debt; common stock is valued at US$500,000 and is not expected to change during the quarter; expected retained earnings as of March 31 are US$1,247,695.

    LAF budgets for US$30,000 ending cash balance each month and is requesting a line of credit that will allow it to adjust for its cash needs. The dividends of US$15,000 are paid each month. During the quarter, LAF planned to purchase equipment in May and June for US$47,820 and US$154,600, respectively. This equipment is being

     

     

    purchased to increase capacity and is not expected to come on line until after the quarter, thus not affecting the manufacturing overhead costs.

    LOAN DETAILS

    LAF has requested a line of credit of US$60,000 to cover production costs during the seasonal increase in business. Kent Bank uses the following terms on its lines of credit. All borrowing is done at the beginning of the month in whole dollar increments. All repayments are made at the end of the month in whole dollar increments. The full line of credit is expected to be paid off by the end of the quarter with all the interest repaid at the end of the quarter. The interest rate on this loan is 16% per year.

     

    ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS:

    1. Quantitative Analysis: a. Using the data input provided (Exhibit 1), prepare LAF’s master budgets in

    Excel. Do not hard-code numbers into the spreadsheet, except where permitted in the financing section of the cash budget.

    2. Qualitative Analysis:

    In a 2-3 page report, based on the results of your quantitative analysis: a. Determine a credit recommendation for Kent Bank, to lend or not. Justify

    your credit decision. b. Explain why the cash budget is more important to a bank than the

    accounting net income when determining a credit decision.

     

     

    Cash Is King

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Branding Audit

Deliverable 1 – Answer Questions & Reference Page – Due first

Deliverable 2 – Branding Audit Due second

—————————————-

 

Branding is a very important element of marketing. As you work on this project, it is imperative that you stay focused on the consumer. Remember that a company’s customers do not buy features; they buy benefits, both tangible and intangible. It is also critical to understand customers and how the brand influences their buying decisions.

Review Slate Case File (attached)

 

Primarily, we want you to examine the branding strategies  of our competitors, as well as any brand extensions and their branding packaging decisions.

This report will function as a brand audit that allows us to examine our competitors’ strengths, weaknesses, customer expectations, and our own relative position in the market.

These details form the basis of the main branding elements. I met with our CEO, Shanice Watts, and she wanted me to emphasize the following eight categories we would like you to analyze in your report about our two biggest competitors:

 

1. brand personality

2. brand image

3. brand identity

4. brand differentiation

5. brand positioning

6. brand communication

7. brand loyalty

8. brand equity (including financial equity)

 

Slate’s executive teams are really looking forward to your report. Thanks for helping us with this.

 

To carry out this assignment, you need to understand Slate’s competitors’ brand strategies, their consumers, how to acquire market knowledge through primary and secondary research, and how to use that knowledge to build and support a brand.

To start your research, visit the websites of Slate’s two biggest competitors and review both scholarly and reliable nonscholarly sources to explore their branding decisions. Your research of the two companies should focus on the branding elements discussed in the previous step.

Consult a minimum of two scholarly sources and eight reliable nonscholarly sources (10 total). Make sure that you use reliable, nonscholarly sources such as Reuters, Bloomberg, Yahoo! Finance, Barrons.com, Morningstar.com, MoneyForbesFortuneFinancial Times, theWall Street Journal, and the Harvard Business Review, as well as the UMUC Library databases such as Hoover’s and ABI/INFORM.

In addition, explore the following branding websites for relevant content:

 

· www.adage.com

· www.adweek.com

· www.brandchannel.com

· www.ama.org

· www.cmo.com

· www.marketingprofs.com

 

As you are researching Slate’s competitors, Carlos asks you to participate in a meeting on the importance of branding (attached) with his team.

 

I know that you’re deep into your analysis of the Slate, Inc. case, but I wanted to preview your work and check in on the sources of information you are using to develop your report. Slate has asked to examine the sources of secondary research that we are using in our report to ensure their quality and originality. Accordingly, I want you to share the list of references you have been using to research Slate’s competitors.

Deliverable: Provide a reference list derived from your research that has a minimum of two scholarly and eight reliable, nonscholarly sources (10 in all).

I suggest using reliable nonscholarly sources, such as Reuters, Bloomberg, Yahoo! Finance, Barrons.com, Morningstar.com, MoneyForbesFortunethe Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Harvard Business Review, as well as UMUC Library databases, such as Hoover’s and ABI-Inform. All sources should be referenced using APA formatting.

 

Deliverable: Based on your research of the two companies’ brands, write an eight-page report (four pages on each company) that addresses the following branding elements:

 

1. brand personality

2. brand image

3. brand identity

4. brand differentiation

5. brand positioning

6. brand communication

7. brand loyalty

8. brand equity (including financial equity)

 

As you examine these branding elements, your report should also answer the following questions:

1. How strong are the companies’ brands in the market?

2. What are the factors contributing to their strengths and weaknesses?

3. How are these two brands competing against each other? How strong is their global performance?

4. How do consumers perceive their brands?

5. Are there any sub-brands? Are there any brand extensions?

Your report should contain a one-page executive summary (following the cover page) that highlights the most important findings of your analysis. Also include a one-page table in an appendix at the end of the paper that compares the brand elements for the two brands.

Support your work with course readings, scholarly sources, and reliable nonscholarly sources, such as Reuters, Bloomberg, Yahoo! Finance, Barrons.com, Morningstar.com, MoneyForbesFortune,  the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Harvard Business Review, as well as UMUC Library databases, such as Hoover’s and ABI-Inform. All sources have to be cited using APA formatting, both within the text and in the reference list.

Your final report to Carlos should be eight to nine pages, excluding cover page, executive summary, the reference list, and appendices. Any graphs, tables, and figures should be included as appendices. Your report should have one-inch margins and be double spaced in size-12 Times New Roman font. The report should be organized using headings and subheadings to improve its readability.

Submit your report to the dropbox located in the final step of this project.

Course Resource

Meeting on the Importance of Branding

Carlos Chance, the head of branding at Slate, Inc. soon hosts a kickoff web meeting asking for the case team’s insights into the company’s logic on brand strategy.

“Over time, products may become generic showing very little differentiation, like cereals,” Carlos says. “That’s why branding is crucial in differentiating products. Even utilitarian product choices are influenced by branding, and the driving force is competition.

“When competition is intense, all products soon offer functional advantages: me-too products or follow-the-leader strategies. Accordingly, the only sustainable advantage is brand image, which you might recall from Johansson’s work in his book, Global Marketing (2009). That’s why a continuous marketing effort is needed to support the brand or product. Remember Levitt’s (1983) argument that anything can be branded—even something as plain as pasta, like Barilla and Buitoni.

“Do you agree or disagree with Levitt’s statement, and why? Will Levitt’s argument impact your analysis of Slate’s competitors’ branding strategies?”

Contribute your thoughts in the Slate, Inc.’s project team discussion area, and discuss your ideas with your team members.

References

Johansson, J. K. (2009). Global marketing (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92–102. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1983/05/the-globalization-of-markets

Brand Identity

Brand identity refers to the distinct and relatively lasting characteristics of a brand. A brand tends to have an appealing and solid identity when consumers perceive its identity as more distinct and prestigious (Bhattacharya & Sen, 2003).

Creating a company’s brand identity involves more than designing its logo. A brand identity is both emotional and visual and communicates trustworthiness and relevance. Building an effective brand identity takes many years of perpetual tweaking and hard work; however, it is crucial to the success of the company. When it comes to creating and maintaining a brand identity, every small detail counts. It is a delicate task of following the company’s core values, while simultaneously being able to adapt to changing market forces and trends. This task is difficult for even big multinational companies (Jansen, 2018a). Remember how Kodak failed to adapt to changing market conditions?

A strong brand identity can help a company succeed (e.g., Apple and Amazon). This success requires a strong focus and strict brand guidelines to maintain the company’s brand and keep it elevated in the face of the changing market forces. In order to do this, companies are advised to heed the following guidelines (Jansen, 2018b):

· Keep things simple and focus on their core values.

· Be flexible and adapt to changing market trends.

· Follow data, but do not ignore emotion.

· Do not jump on market trends without thinking of the bigger picture.

· Do not wait too long to rebrand themselves.

· Do not ignore market trends.

Brand Differentiation

Building a strong brand is crucial to success in today’s business world, and strong differentiation is necessary to build a compelling and powerful brand. Brand differentiation is the means by which a company’s brand is set apart from its competition, by associating a superior performing aspect of its brand with multiple consumer benefits (Carter, 2014).

Brand differentiation is related to a company’s corporate reputation. There are several elements of reputation, including a good customer service, packaging, prompt response to problems, and product-specific comments, that consumers seek when buying. These elements not only provide a basis on which the company can improve its reputation, but also help it differentiate itself from the competition. Corporate reputation may be enhanced by different activities that are closely related to the vertical differentiation of a product, such as technological innovation and a strong brand image. On the other hand, a solid corporate reputation may also help to differentiate a brand. Companies are increasingly recognizing consumers as their most important asset in building an estimable corporate reputation (Vahabzadeh et al., 2017).

In this era of globalization and hypercompetition, companies need to rethink the way that they manage their customer portfolio, as well as how they interact with their customers. Fader (2012) stresses that customers are an asset (customer equity) that should have a place on a company’s balance sheet. The author defines customer equity as “the sum of the customer lifetime values across a firm’s entire customer base” (p. 62). Since every company’s objective is to maximize its overall equity and since customers are perceived as an asset (customer equity) that is an integral part of the company’s overall equity, the company should dedicate the necessary resources to maximize its customer equity (Fader, 2012).

Employees are another crucial factor in enhancing a company’s reputation. They may help differentiate the company from the competition, as consumers evaluate the corporate reputation that is behind the product and brand presented to them. Accordingly, many companies use their corporate reputation as a vital resource in developing their strategic value. Reputation includes corporate social responsibility, innovativeness, and honest communication, which customers subconsciously convert into brand differentiation of the company’s products (Vahabzadeh et al., 2017).

Brand Positioning

Brand positioning is the designing of a company’s offering and image to occupy a distinct place in the mind of the target customers (Kotler & Keller, 2015). Brand positioning is the sum of all the marketing activities that position the brand in the target customers’ minds relative to the competition. Positioning does not create something new or different, but rather manipulates the mindset (Ries & Trout, 2001).

Positioning is a crucial stage in a brand management strategy. A good brand positioning strategy helps in the development of new products, communication, market expansion, pricing, and the selection of the distribution channels (Fayvichenko, 2018). Brand positioning is a process of creating the brand’s own image, values, positive associations, and distinctive properties in the customers’ minds in order to create a sustainable brand image and ensure consumers’ attachment to that brand (Fayvichenko, 2016). Today, brand positioning is perceived as a process that begins with the design of a trademark position; however, it is “difficult to specify the essence of positioning when its ultimate goal is not clearly understood” (Fayvichenko, 2018, p. 245). To understand the essence of brand positioning, it is crucial to determine the ideal position of the brand. A clear representation of the ideal position of a brand is a “prerequisite for researching positioning as a target process and developing a system for evaluating its effectiveness” (p. 245).

Ideally, a brand will be positioned so that the customer has positive associations with a brand, is convinced of its unique advantages over other brands, and considers the brand to be of high value or a necessity. This brand-supporting customer is convinced that people who buy other brands are making the wrong choice, considers it a duty to recommend this brand to other consumers, and feels a spiritual unity with consumers who have chosen this brand (Kendukhov, 2008).

Accordingly, Kendukhov (2008) perceives brand positioning as a process of managing the perception of a brand by a customer. The purpose of this process is “persuasion of the consumer in the unique advantages of this trademark over other brands; formation of the consumer’s exclusive affiliates with this trademark; formation of the consumer’s sense of the indispensability and vital necessity of the brand; formation of fanatical devotion to the brand; raising a sense of duty to recommend this brand to other consumers; forming a sense of spiritual unity with consumers who chose this brand; forming a belief in the consumer that other consumers who buy goods under other brands make the wrong choice” (Fayvichenko, 2018, p. 246).

Brand Communication

The value of a company’s brand may rise or fall with its brand communication. Even strong brands must communicate their values and core benefits to the customers in order to sell. Successful brand communication involves satisfied employees and enthusiastic customers. Companies used to communicate their brands using PR and advertising. Nowadays, customers and company employees define the reputation and reality of a brand. They discuss their experience with the company and its products around the clock using social media. Trust plays a crucial role here, and is only built up when the customers receive a consistent and credible brand experience. Employees help a company earn its customers’ trust if they credibly communicate the brand’s values and positioning (BrandTrust, 2018).

Social media provides an array of constantly changing brand communication tools in the corporate world, which play a crucial role in how customers research and share information, and learn about their brands. Similarly, companies use social media networks for the advertising and sponsorship of their products and services brands in order to develop trust and create sustaining relationships with their customers (Khadim, Hanan, Arshad, Saleem, & Khadim, 2018).

Social media comprises well-built platforms that have a significant and substantial impact on brand loyalty. Customers use social media as a tool to communicate and respond quickly to each other at any time (that information moves much faster on social media compared to traditional media). In addition, social media allows a company to send its brand messages to multiple audiences and collect their recommendations. This feature is crucial, as markets and customer preferences, needs, and wants change quickly, especially in this era of globalization. Social media allows a company to judge how its customers think about its brand and what they want from it. It also enables the company to make improvements to its brand and think forward to anticipate changes in customer needs and preferences (Khadim et al., 2018).

Brand Loyalty

Consumers usually benefit from branding, and trademarks may help them shop more efficiently, as they avoid brands that they dislike, while buying the brands that they like most. Brand loyalty is a favorable perception of, and the consistent buying of, a certain brand over time. The marketplace has been dramatically changing in the past decade thanks to advanced and cheaper communications technologies, which enable consumers to make better choices and share their buying experiences with others, worldwide. Consumers are now increasingly dependent on the internet to acquire information and compare brands before buying. Consumers can easily shift brands if they believe that they have not been treated fairly by a certain company (Kotler & Keller, 2015).

Brand Equity

AMA (n.d.-a) defines brand equity as “the value of a brand. From a consumer perspective, brand equity is based on consumer attitudes about positive brand attributes and favorable consequences of brand use.”

According to Johansson (2009) brand equity is “the value of the positive associations that consumers have with a product’s brand name. These associations often involve emotional attachments, affinity, positive brand image, and brand identity. They also involve cognitive factors such as familiarity, knowledge and perceived quality, as well as social factors including peer-group acceptance. When these associations turn negative (as in antiglobalization sentiments against global brands) the brand equity can go down very quickly.”

Brand equity is basically the added value that a brand gives to a product beyond the functional benefits that it provides. Brand equity provides competitive advantages; for example, Mercedes Benz implies quality. A second advantage is that consumers are willing to pay more for a product with a brand equity. Here, brand equity is represented by the premium that a consumer is willing to pay for a certain brand over another when both brands provide similar functional benefits. Acura, Infinity, and Lexus cars enjoy a price premium that arises from their brand equity (Kerin & Hartley, 2017).

Brand equity takes time to develop and is carefully crafted and nurtured by marketers who forge unique, strong, and favorable experiences and associations with the brand. Brand equity resides in the consumers’ minds, and results from what they have seen, heard, felt, and learned about the brand over time. Brand equity is not quickly or easily achieved (Kerin & Hartley, 2017).

Financial Brand Equity

Financial brand equity is the monetary value of a brand in terms of net revenues the brand is expected to generate over time, across all country markets. The set of assets linked to a brand name include the following (Johansson, 2009):

· brand name awareness

· brand loyalty

· perceived quality

· brand associations (in the consumer’s mind)

Financially lucrative brand licensing agreements may arise from brand equity. Successful brand licensing needs a thorough marketing analysis to ensure compatibility between the licensor’s brand and the licensee’s products. Companies such as Ralph Lauren, Disney, and Luxottica eyewear earn millions every year from licensing their brand names to others (Kerin & Hartley, 2017).

Global Brands

Why are global brands often the most valuable assets of a global company? Global brands are important because product differentiation is difficult to sustain. Accordingly, global brands become the most sustainable competitive advantage. Global brands have become more important because financial brand equity is strongly correlated with global reach (Johansson, 2009).

References

AMA (n.d.-a). Brand equity. Retrieved from https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B

AMA (n.d.-b). Brand image. Retrieved from https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Dictionary.aspx?dLetter=B

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 7688. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.1860

BrandTrust (2018). Brand communication. Retrieved from https://www.brand-trust.de/en/glossary/brand-communication.php

Carter, L. (2014). Brand differentiation: 30 ways to differentiate your brand. Persona Design [Web log]. Retrieved from https://www.personadesign.ie/brand-differentiation-30-ways-to-differentiate-your-brand/

Fader, P. (2012). Customer centricity (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.

Fayvichenko D. (2016) The concept of brand positioning. Mignarodnii naukovo-praktuchniy gurnal «Tovaru I runki», 1(21), 25–32.

Fayvishenko, D. (2018). Formation of brand positioning strategy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(2), 245–248.

ImagiBrand (2017). The 5 key dimensions of brand personality. Retrieved from http://imagibrand.com/5-key-dimensions-brand-personality/

Jansen, K. (2018, a). The dos and don’ts of building a brand identity (Part 1). Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2018/03/05/the-dos-and-donts-of-building-a-brand-identity-part-1/#7287b18a61bc

Jansen, K. (2018, b). The dos and don’ts of building a brand identity (Part 2). Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2018/04/02/the-dos-and-donts-of-building-a-brand-identity-part-2/#1f763498644a

Johansson, J. (2009). Global marketing (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Kendyuhov V. (2008) Effectivnist vucorustannya marochnogo capital [Effectiveness of using branded capital]. Donetsk: Institute economy promislovist, 96–103.

Kerin, R. & Hartley, S. (2017). Marketing (13th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Khadim, R. A., Hanan, M. A., Arshad, A., Saleem, N., & Khadim, N. A. (2018). Revisiting antecedents of brand loyalty: impact of perceived social media communication with brand trust and brand equity as mediators. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 1–13.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. (2015). Marketing management (15th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Pearson.

Vahabzadeh, A., Vatanpour, H., Dinarvand, R., Rajabzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, J., & Mohammadzadeh, M. (2017). Impact of corporate reputation on brand differentiation: An empirical study from Iranian pharmaceutical companies. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 16(4), 1658–1670.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Why Gerber Been Successful In International Marketing

Case Study: Gerber Baby Food

Global Business Strategies

August 7, 2006

Case Study: Gerber Baby Food

Store bought baby food is considered a necessity for many individuals around the world. Prepackaged baby food is a convenience that few would give up and a product that helps individuals properly feed their infants. Most people, when buying or feeding a jar of baby food to their infant, do not think of the company and all the intricate details being a baby food maker entails. Gerber baby foods is the top seller of baby food products in the world, and just like any other global corporation, Gerber baby foods has the endless responsibility of running a successful corporation; it is not just about purГ©ed fruits and vegetables. The following is a case study of Gerber baby foods and the company’s other non-food products (Gerber website, History, 2006).

Background and History

The world of store bought baby food began in Michigan, 1927 at the home of Daniel and Dorothy Gerber. Little did they know that by trying to find an easier method for hand-straining solid food for their seven-month old daughter Sally and Dorothy’s suggestion of doing the chore at the local cannery, the Fremont Canning Company where the family produced a line of fruits and vegetables, they would create a baby food empire. Mr. Gerber took the advice of his wife and found that her idea of canning their daughter’s baby food at the factory was an ingenious idea. Mr. Gerber continued experimenting and his daughter became company’s first baby food analyst. Workers in the plant thought the idea was great and began requesting samples for their babies, and by late 1928 Gerber baby food was ready for the market (Gerber Website, History, 2006).

Gerber’s experience in marketing was interesting as the company came around the time when national distribution was nearly unheard of, and most products were only available in a few stores in every area of the country. Gerber had to do something to gain national attention so that the company could survive. Gerber devised an ingenious marketing campaign for the company. Gerber offered a coupon including a picture of the Gerber baby in many publications, which encouraged previously skeptical grocers to place orders by the dozens. Six months later, Gerber baby foods were on grocery stores’ shelve across the nation (Gerber Website, History, 2006).

Since Gerber’s debut in 1928, The company has continued to grow into the leading baby food global corporation that has nearly 190 food products; is labeled in 16 languages; is distributed to 80 different countries; and has maintained one of the world’s largest privet research facilities dedicated to infant nutrition. In 1994, Gerber merged with Sandoz, Ltd. The company then became part of the Novartis group of companies formed in 1996 by the merger of Ciba-Geigy and Sandoz. Gerber is headquartered in Fremont, Michigan(Gerber Website, History, 2006).

Products

Gerber began with only offering five products. The first flavors, introduced in late 1928, were strained peas, prunes, carrots, spinach, and beef vegetable soup. Gerber eventually went on to develop three age appropriate categories each containing a multitude of meats, vegetable, and fruits. Each category offer foods, consistency, and textures appropriate for different for the ages separated by the categories. Over the years Gerber has added other food products such as cereals, juices, finger foods, an organic line of food products, cultural flavor lines, and a line of food products for toddlers. In addition to the food products Gerber has also incorporated other non-food products such as bottle and breastfeeding products, other feeding products like utensils, cups, and dishware, Pacifiers and teething products, healthcare products, bath time and skincare products, clothing, and child insurance (Gerber Website, History, 2006).

Internal Company Strategic and Operational Challenges to Going Global

Like any other global corporation Gerber has challenges in the global market. Mr. Butterick, director of ruman Resources for the Latin America, discussed some challenges that affect Gerber’s global operations and the changing environment in global business. He emphasized that due to the changing tariffs, regulations, and fast-paces technological advancements, including e-Commerce and EDI (Electronic Data Interface), global trade and operations of multinational companies will not be the same in the future (Michigan State University, 2000, para. 1). In order to handle global challenges Gerber must access new markets and develop the right combination of a product portfolio looking at eating habits, governmental regulations, pricing, sales potential, and climate (Michigan State University, 2000, para. 1). Gerber foods typically uses a country and market segment concentration strategy (FAO, 2006, heading ownership).

Gerber has a global responsibility to the company’s customers to produce the highest quality products, and the company must overcome this challenge even when being a global company makes it a more difficult task. As stated by Mr. Butterick, “Babies are the most important human beings for mothers all over the world, and all mothers want to provide the best that they can afford” (Michigan State University, 2000, pare. 3). To ensure that this challenge is met, Gerber must monitor the quality of its products in every step of the supply chain from the selection of the fruits and vegetables to the storage of finished products on retailer’s shelves, while continually looking towards emerging markets and keeping sales and margins high (Michigan State University, 2000, para. 4).

One way Gerber is monitoring quality is through a computer software program developed by the software company SAS. Using the SAS software Gerber’s quality engineers developed a system that extracts daily complaint records from the corporate warehouse and links that data with manufacturing and process-related information. The software is able to categorize information by the products complaints are made about by the criticality of the complaint. The Consumer Response System (CRS) informs executives of product quality levels and alerts plant supervisors of possible concerns in the manufacturing process. Executives use to have to wait for weekly reports then try to evaluate and try to relate that data back to distinct departments or manufacturing processes. Now executives can to query and analyze quality data on their own. They can get their data and create their own reports, and the information is all up-to-date within a 24-hour period. Executives can react to complaints faster than they could before (SAS Website, 2006). Gerber understands that quality is related distribution as well. Gerber has a global distribution network that assures grocery distributors will receive the quantities of products in the designated time frame. (Gerber Ingredients website, 2006).

Decision to Operate Globally

At the time Gerber began making baby food the concept was new and revolutionary as people generally made homemade baby food. Gerber did not go global for quite sometime as the idea was not conceivable until later. In the 1960’s Gerber started to sell the baby food in Europe. After marketing in Europe, Gerber began looking for other markets. Some markets have not taken so well to store bought baby food as some mothers in other countries like Brazil believe homemade baby food is more nutritious. There have also been dumping issues with Canada so Gerber stopped selling to Canada. Gerber is trying to make a market in Guatemala, but due to government regulations they have had some trouble fully entering the market. While some markets have not done so well, Gerber has thrived in other countries and sells to 80 countries, and Gerber continues to fond new markets to enter.

Successes and Failures in global operations

Overall Gerber has achieved success. As previously stated Gerber is sold in 80 different countries and controls 70% of the baby food market. On a small scale Gerber has had some troubles and small failures. Some failures were resolved and others are still on going.

Political Problems

Gerber has run in to issues with Canada. The baby food company was accused of dumping in Canada and was found guilty. In 1998 Gerber could no long sell baby food in Canada (CBSA, updated, 2004). The company was able to sell other non-food products, but the baby food market was, basically, handed over to Heinz. In 2003; however, the band was lifted, but Gerber has made no move to return as of yet (Mills. 2003).

In Guatemala Gerber had issues with complying with the regulations that the Guatemalan government established. The Guatemalan government enforces its own regulations and the regulations of the World Health Organization. Gerber flatly refused to follow the regulations established and the Guatemalan government tried to ban the company till the company was in compliance. Gerber threatened to go the World Trade Organization and the Guatemalan government became scared that a battle would occur and the cost would be too great. Guatemala was pushed into relenting stating that since Gerber was not a domestic company in Guatemala, it did not have to follow the stated rules; thus, Gerber was allow to disregard the Guatemalan regulations (Carson, 1999).

Economic Situations

As with most Global corporations economic situations are commons issues that must be handled. When Gerber tried to establish a market in Poland, Gerber found economically that most young parents could ill afford buying baby food; in fact, most did not see the need. Due to the Polish economic situation, processed baby food is a luxury for young Polish mothers. Most employees, from university professors to factory workers, take home $100 to $200 a month (Rothwell, 1993). Rent and transportation are expensive, leaving little disposable income for the average young family (Rothwell, 1993). Gerber also came to realize during the socialist period, agriculture was not collectivized, so Poland was able to feed itself. Non-processed food is cheap and plentiful in Poland making homemade baby food very affordable. Gerber did not give up; however, and wanted to stay in the market because as the country is slowly doing economically better, Gerber believes there will be a time when baby food is marketable. Gerber has chosen to stay in the polish market by pushing the company’s other non-food products, and the strategy is working.

Another economic situation presented itself to the baby food industry and affect Gerber was the negative reception of using bio-engineered food in the company’s baby food products. There are advocates for the use of bio-engineered fruits and vegetables, and so far the reports are all positive. The idea is that bio-engineered foods are safer because they have less mold toxin issues and growers have to use less pesticide, which in turn makes the food safer for children to eat; however, others are concern with another issue. Some individuals are concerned with gene mutation and possible mutations causing an epidemic (Rothwell, 1993).

This issue has not been proven to be a fact; yet, organizations such as Greenpeace have been loud enough to create a scare in Europe causing massive amounts of baby food to be recalled and thrown away. Greenpeace threatened Gerber that it would begin talks in America. Gerber feared that the outcome of the scare in Europe would be the same thing the Unite States, so the company voluntarily stopped using any bio-engineered food. Shortly after the situation Gerber started the company’s Organic food line (Miller and Gregory, 2006).

Gerber still may not be past the bio issue as now there is a higher threat of children being affected by the issues that bio-engineering is trying to solve. Unfortunately, either choice Gerber makes the company may have an economic issue to handle, but for now the threat of Greenpeace has control over the company’s decision, so Gerber chooses to focus on helping to control pesticides and toxins (Miller and Gregory, 2006).

Despite the bio issues Gerber’s pesticide use reduction efforts are especially noteworthy because its primary consumers may be especially vulnerable to toxic chemicals. The ultimate goal of Gerber Products Co is to have no detectable pesticide residue in the company’s baby food. Gerber has implemented a comprehensive pesticide reduction program, beginning in the farm field and ending in baby food preparation. Programs that Gerber supports to help achieve this goal include IPM (Integrated Pest Management) research, educating contract growers with respect to economic-based models of IPM and working with crop consultants and scouts, full pesticide use reporting, and extensive testing for residues (Liroff, 2005). The most important and core focus of these programs is the IPM, which supports research in 16 universities on nutrient and pest management strategies for fruit and vegetable production. Gerber also has strict pest management practices that require supply growers to adhere to strict pest management practices that substantially reduce pesticide use, especially for pesticides that cannot be removed in processing. Gerber also has sponsored and sometimes subsidized new agricultural techniques, even if they are more expensive, and diffuses the practices among its growers so the company can help growers bear the risk of testing new approaches (Liroff, 2005).

Gerber does have strict measures when it comes to the company’s baby food products, but Gerber may have an economic issue of a different matter if continues to be allowed to disregard Guatemalan’s regulations and does not consider the affects of disregarding the regulations (Carson, 1999). Gerber does not mark on the company’s powder formula that breastfeeding is best. (Mokhiber, 1997). The company also uses their “fat happy” baby emblem on the powdered milk products (Mokhiber, 1997). Gerber also gives out free samples to families with young children and newborns. In many counties this practice is very common and not considered wrong; however, the Guatemalan government is concerned about the water that must be used with powdered products.

Guatemalan water is not always health and clean to drink. Guatemalan mothers others are encouraged to breastfeed so infants are not exposed to the dangers from the water, which could lead to severe illness and death in young children. The Guatemalan government worries that in not following the regulations, Guatemalan mothers will see the health “fat” Gerber baby and think the powdered formula is more nutritious and encourage them to buy the powdered formula (Mokhiber, 1997).. If this becomes a trend then more infants might die because or the water health issues. If the Guatemalan Government’s fears are realized Gerber will have an epidemic they will be partly responsible for and more than likely will receive the full blame. Gerber continues to market as it wants and does not seem to be threatened by the controversy, and one day Gerber may be sorry (Carson, 1999)

Cultural

Gerber has had success in being accepted by most cultures. The company’s products are mostly universally accepted without having to provide any modifications. However, Gerber has seen the value of creating baby food flavors that reflect different cultures. Gerber’s latest line of baby food products has flavors that reflect Latin cultural flavors.

Culturally Gerber once had an issue with Brazilian mothers. Brazilian Mothers have always made their children’s baby food and the process is a cultural tradition. Brazilian Mothers believe that the homemade food is the best. Gerber has found difficulty in trying to compete where the issue is not of an economic problem but a cultural one. Gerber still continues to try to win the Brazilian market but has not seen near the success as in other countries (Marist College Website, 2006).

Gerber has also had to handle issues where in some cultures women have low literacy rates such as Africa and the Middle East. The women in these cultures generally use pictures to tell them what food they are buying. When Gerber started selling their product in these countries the women saw the picture of the baby and believed that there was a or part of one baby in the jar (Williams, 2004). When the products did not sell well in these countries the quickly realized the mistake and soon fixed the problem.

Present Status

To date, Gerber is an extremely successful global corporation capturing 70% of the baby food market in the United States. Gerber has successfully markets and distributes almost 200 food products in the United States and has penetrated 80 counties and is always open to new opportunities. Gerber is committed to quality and continues to satisfy consumers and it has a low rate of complaints, which are immediately handled and usually resolved quickly.

Future projections of global operations

Gerber will continue to focus on further growth in the company’s existing markets. The company’s main focus is to keep providing new products to differentiate the company’s products from competitors, focusing on branding, and making further advancements in children’s health and nutrition products and research. Gerber also looks to furthering their strategic internationalization plan with expansion in Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Far East (Novartis Website, 2006).

References

Canada Boarder Service Agency, (CBSA), (2004), Final determination of dumping baby food (Gerber). Retrieved August 14, 2006 from:

http://cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/sima/anti-dumping/ad1180f-e.html

Carson, Rachel, (1999). Environment & health news, Corporate rights vs. human need. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from: http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/pdf/Rachels_Environment_Health_News_16 46.pdf

Ehrbar, Al, (2005) Fortune, Break away brands. Retrieved August 15, 2006 from: http://www.gerber.com/content/usa/bin/pdf/78513_E_PRINT.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), (2006). Market Entry Strategies, Retrieved August 14, 2006 from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/W5973E/w5973e0b.htm

Gerber Website, (2006). History. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from: http://www.gerber.com/history

Gerber Ingredients website, (2006). Responsiveness and distribution. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from: http://www.gerberingredients.com/wg_main.html

Liroff, Richard A. Ph.D, (2005). Benchmarking corporate governance of chemicals in products, Protecting public health, increasing profits and promoting innovation. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from: http://www.rosefdn.org/liroffreport.pdf#search=%22%20use%20reduction %20noteworthy%20because%20its%20primary%20consumers%20may% 20be%20especially%20vulnerable%20to%20toxic%20chemicals.%22

Marist College Website, (2006). Western Europe: Marketing challenges and strategic alternatives. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from:

http://foxweb.marist.edu/users/prema.nakra/westerneurope.html

Michigan State University Ciber News Website, (2000). December international business forum presentation emphasizes gerber’s global strategies. Retrieved August 14, from: http://ciber.msu.edu/events/CIBERNews/vxn3/gerber.htm

Miller, Henry I. and Conko Gregory, (2006). Policy review, Scary Food. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from: http://www.policyreview.org/137/miller.html

Mills, Don, (2003). National post, New chance for Gerber in battle of the babies:; [National Edition]. Ont.: May 1, 2003. p. FP.1.Fr. Retrieved August 15, 2006 from: Proquest.

Mokhiber, Russell, (1997). Albion Monitor Online Newspaper, Multinational Monsters. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from:

http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9703a/tenworst.html

Novartis Website, (2006). Investor relations, Operations Report. Retreved August 15, 2006 from: http://www.novartis.com/downloads/oprevn97.pdf

Rothwell, Geoffrey, (1993). New York times, Poles Can’t Afford Baby Food in Jars. Retrieved August 14, 2006 from:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE0DF163FF934A257 52C:1A965958260

SAS Website, (2006) Gerber Customer success. Retrieved August 15, 2006 from: http://www.sas.com/success/gerber.html

Williams, Mitch, (2004) Sema International, Going worldwide, Marketing the entire globe. May 2004. Retrieved Agust 16, 2006 from: http://www.sema.org/images/pdf/32870.pdf

Biography:

Student at UOP received

a perfect score on this paper.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"