BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 1 of 9

Task 01 (Written Report): Review performance

and sustainability

Submission details

The Assessment Task is due on the date specified by your trainer. Any variations to this arrangement

must be approved in writing by your trainer.

Submit this document with any required evidence attached. See specifications below

for details.

You must submit both printed copy and soft copy of your answers.

Submit printed copy of required evidences (your answers) to your Trainer with the “Assessment

Cover Sheet” (Filled out and signed appropriately) attached on top of your answers.

Upload the softcopy on the eLearning site with appropriate header and footer (Your name,

student id, unit/subject name, assessment no, page no, etc.)

The Trainer/Assessor may further prompt and question in order to receive answers of appropriate

quality or if further clarification required and to validate authenticity of your submitted work.

Assessment description

Based on the case study provided, you will write a report in which you outline a performance and

sustainability review strategy, evaluate the strategy, analyse performance reports and trends, and

describe how you would seek advice from specialists to identify technological solutions.

Procedure

1. Read the case study ‘AC Gilbert’ in Appendix 1.

2. Analyse the information provided and prepare a report addressing the following six (6) points.

1. Describe the key systems and processes used by AC Gilbert:

a. Supply chain

b. Operational systems

c. Product/service delivery.

2. Analyse the three key systems and processes and develop the elements of your

review strategy: applying your knowledge of quality management and continuous

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 2 of 9

improvement theory, develop performance and sustainability measures,

assessment tools and techniques that you would use to evaluate the effectiveness

of the three key systems and processes.

In your report, include if applicable:

a. Lists of key result areas (KRAs)

b. Lists of key performance indicators (KPIs)

c. A description of performance review processes

d. A sample service level agreement.

3. Using the data provided for results up to 1966, for each of the three key systems,

describe how each of your measures, assessment tools and techniques would

monitor performance. Include specific examples or hypothetical cases to test the

effectiveness of the elements of your review strategy. Write an evaluation of the

effectiveness of your review strategy. Suggest improvements to your strategy.

Refer to quality management and continuous improvement theory.

4. Using the data provided for results up to 1966, analyse the variances from plans

and targets for the key result areas (KRAs). Include discussion on performance with

regards to:

a. quality – design/manufacturing

b. sales

c. profit

d. supply chain performance (delivery)

e. business growth – staff and management performance and/or turnover.

5. Discuss trends relevant to the organisation. What trends did AC Gilbert fail to

identify in the late 1950s?

Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the AC Gilbert Company prior to 1960.

Discuss the following in your report:

a. market share

b. reputation

c. stability

d. profit

e. sales

f. ability to adapt to change

g. customer service standards

h. innovation

i. employee performance

j. production and manufacturing.

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 3 of 9

Apply creativity skills to identify missed opportunities to improve business

performance. Describe at least one missed opportunity in detail. Include an action

plan for implementing the improvement in your report.

6. Imagine the company did not close in 1967 and has somehow managed to

continue operations until today. Discuss the possible use of advice from specialists.

What specialists could be consulted to advise on and identify new technology or

electronic commerce opportunities? Consider:

a. Internal – engineers, production staff, manufacturing staff, sales personnel,

human resources personnel.

b. External – marketing consultants, advertising experts, engineers or

designers, IT consultants.

3. Submit your report to your assessor as per the specifications below. Ensure you keep a copy of all

work submitted for your records

Task Specifications

You must provide:

● a written report submitted within agreed timeframe.

Your assessor will be looking for:

● reference to, and application of, quality management and continuous improvement theories in

review strategy

● reference to and application of sustainability practices in review strategy

● analytical skills to identify improvement opportunities

● demonstration of creativity skills to think laterally and identify improvement opportunities.

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 4 of 9

Appendix 1 – A. C. Gilbert

History 1909–1961

Alfred Carlton Gilbert was an inventor and a toy manufacturer who invented the Erector engineering set.

His original company, The Mysto Manufacturing Company, was founded in 1909 to manufacture the

Erector set. In 1916, Mysto became the A. C. Gilbert Company and gained a reputation for producing

quality toys.

By the 1950s, A. C. Gilbert was one of the leading toymakers in the United States with annual sales

regularly topping $17 million. This was an outstanding achievement for a relatively small company.

In 1961, A. C. Gilbert senior died, leaving the company in the hands of his son, A. C. Junior. At the time

A. C. Junior took over the firm, the company was established as a traditional, reliable and profitable

manufacturer of educational toys.

Product lines and rationale

A. C. Gilbert produced train sets but their most popular lines were chemistry sets, microscopes and their

best seller, the Meccano-like Erector engineering sets that had been popular with children for more

than 50 years.

A. C. Gilbert toys were not cheap. They were high quality, solidly crafted and made to endure. Parts and

packaging were designed to last for many years, with the Erector set packaged in long-lasting metal

boxes. The focus was on educational toys, primarily aimed at boys rather than girls. The company had a

limited range but what they did manufacture was top quality and highly regarded.

Systems and processes

A. C. Gilbert was a small company. The following model demonstrates the systems and processes in

place.

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 5 of 9

 

Design

Toys are designed by a small group of designers who develop the concepts for the products.

Planning

The planning department translates the concepts into designs and determines resource requirements, including raw materials. Planning also projects sales and develops production plans for each product, timeframes for production runs and scheduling of production runs.

Purchasing

Information gained from planning stage used to purchase raw materials for products and packaging from suppliers.

Manufacturing

Produces and packages toys for distribution.

Distribution

Delivers packaged toys to the warehouse for storage.

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 6 of 9

 

Note: These flowcharts have been included for assessment purposes only, and may not accurately reflect the

actual processes in place at A. C. Gilbert.

History 1961–1967

As the 1950s moved into the 1960s, there were huge cultural changes across the world. The fifties

were a very traditional era of family values and morals, conservative and staid. Then came the ‘swinging

sixties’. The sixties were a time of rapid change both technologically and culturally. Old fashioned values

gave way to new moral freedoms.

Where the fifties represented solidarity and familiarity, the sixties embraced change. Everything was

bolder, brighter and more daring. A new young president and rising social activism by youth saw

changes in clothing, music and interests. Young people rebelled against the values of their parents and

embraced a more fast paced, exciting and riskier lifestyle.

Changes to the toy industry

Cultural changes had a huge impact in western toy markets. Barbie and Action Man became ‘must

have’ toys. Girls moved away from baby dolls and cots and wanted dolls that were more grown up,

modern and trendy. They wanted dolls they could dress in the latest fashions and who had exciting

‘careers’, boyfriends and cars of their own. Boys were moving away from the traditional train sets

towards exciting new slot-car racing sets and action figures from popular movies and television shows.

Traditionally, toy advertising had been done via magazine promotions but the sixties brought in a new

phenomenon: television advertising. A hugely powerful medium, TV advertising became increasingly

‘hard sell’, with toys heavily promoted, especially in the lead up to Christmas. Children wanted the latest

and greatest toys that they saw in these advertisements and put pressure on their parents to buy, which

they did.

Retailing of toys during this period reflected a shift in retailing in general. Small, specialty retailers with

experienced and knowledgeable staff were going out of business, replaced by large discount stores

catering for the mass market. The goal of this type of retailer was to turnover stock. Heavily advertised

lines were in demand and that is what they would stock. Cheap was in and giant retailers were after a

quick profit from easily saleable, inexpensive products. They weren’t interested in catering to a niche

market by stocking more expensive, harder to shift lines.

Packaging was bright and colourful in order to attract children growing up in a world of colour TV,

hypercolor clothing and visual stimulation provided by the swinging sixties.

Sales Team

• Take orders

from

customers

Distribution

• Arrange for

delivery of

goods to

purchaser

using contract

transport

Retailers

• Sell the toys

directly to end

user

 

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 7 of 9

Affects on A. C. Gilbert

As a small, traditional company, A. C. Gilbert was slow to react to these changes. It may have been that

they were not aware of the changes or were overly confident that their good name and reputation was

sufficient to continue trading as before. The consequences of this short sightedness soon became

apparent.

1961 (figures approximate)

L/Y Sales Actual sales Difference Profit

$12.6 million $11.5 million ($1.1 million) $20,011.00

This drop in sales was also reflected in a fall in the share price of the company.

Outcomes

As a result of the falling profits and share price, the company became attractive to an opportunistic

businessman, Jack Wrather. Jack Wrather was an independent television producer who had made his

money producing the popular programs ‘Lassie’ and ‘The Lone Ranger’. Jack Wrather wanted to

purchase a successful business and felt that in A. C. Gilbert, he had the opportunity to use his

knowledge of popular entertainment and apply it to the production of toys. He purchased 52% of A. C.

Gilbert for $4 million and immediately set about making his mark on the company. A. C. Junior stayed

on as Chairman but his influence was minimal.

Actions taken by Jack Wrather

● Set a goal to achieve sales of $20 million in 1963.

● Replaced the top A. C. Gilbert executives with his own people.

● Initiated a massive advertising campaign.

● Increased sales staff by 50%.

● Instructed sales staff to adopt an aggressive sales approach.

● Introduced 50 new toy lines, raising the line to 307.

● Changed the focus from traditional boys toys to ranges for pre-school children, dolls and other

toys aimed at girls between the ages of 6 and 14.

● Spent $1 million on changing the packaging for all lines to brighter, more colourful boxes.

Performance report

Year Sales Difference from

previous year

Profit

1961 $11.5 million ($1.1 million) $20,011.00

1962 $10.9 million ($600,000.00) ($281,000.00)

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 8 of 9

1963 $10.7 million ($200.000.00) ($5.7 million)

1964 $11.4 million $700,000.00 ($2.6 million)

1965 $14.9 million $3.5 million ($2.9 million)

1966 $12.9 million ($2 million) ($12,872,000.00)

1967 A. C. Gilbert closed 1909–1967

Key milestones

1962:

● Jack Wrather purchased 52% of A. C. Gilbert.

● Replaced existing executives with his own people.

● Increased sales staff by 50%.

● Implemented extensive television advertising.

● Set an organisational goal to achieve sales of $20 million for 1963.

● Company recorded a loss of $281,000.00.

● Introduced 50 new lines in less than 12 months, using existing engineers and production

departments who lacked training and experience in the new product range.

● Repackaged existing lines at a cost of $1 million.

1963:

● Sales and profits down on previous year.

● Anticipated drop in profits due to expansion and cost of establishing new lines.

● Sales fell short of expectations.

● Decline in quality of toys – feedback indicated products poorly made and designed (dolls did not

even come with a change of clothing).

● New range perceived by customers as poor quality and over-priced – not value for money nor

attractive to the target market.

1964:

● Jack Wrather fired most of the top management team he hired two years previously.

● Crisis management lead to multiple changes and dramatic measures being taken and then

changed – often one measure contradicting the previous.

● Jack Wrather hires new CEO – Isaacson.

● Isaacson fires the entire sales team.

● Isaacson makes huge cutbacks in spending.

 

 

 

BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement Assessment Task 1

Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 9 of 9

● Sales are channelled through independent manufacturer’s reps, which was cheaper than

maintaining an in-house sales force.

● Long-standing relationships soured as the independent reps worked on commission and pushed

sales, with no interest in maintaining or building relationships with customers.

● A. C. Gilbert had built its success on personal service and building relationships – that was

destroyed within 12 months.

● A. C. Gilbert Junior dies and is replaced as Chairman by Jack Wrather. Isaacson assumes the role

of President.

● Prior to Christmas, many of the previous year’s failed products were deleted and 20 new items

introduced.

● Reduced the price of core lines such as the Erector set from $75 to $20 but quality also impacted

– cardboard box instead of metal boxes, and brittle parts instead of sturdy long-lasting parts.

● Sales increased and there was some degree of optimism.

1965:

● Sought to capitalise on popular crazes such as James Bond and The Man from Uncle by

introducing action figures for Christmas.

● Due to internal strife and staff cutbacks, the new lines were not delivered to the stores until after

Christmas.

● Operating on a skeleton workforce.

● Due to lack of staff, A. C. Gilbert is unable to implement changes or introduce new lines quickly

enough to capitalise on trends.

1966

● Increased advertising spending to $3 million.

● Introduced point of purchase display products supplied to dealers free of charge.

● Borrowed $6.25 million, granted on the event that the company made a profit in 1996.

● Company made a loss of $12,872,000.00.

1967

● February – A. C. Gilbert closed its doors after 58 years.

Note: This case study is a true story. You may wish to read more about this organisation or to conduct

additional research online.

Reference material

● Tibballs, G., 1999, Business blunders, ‘A. C. Gilbert: Toy Story’, Robinson Publishing Ltd, pp. 43.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Case Problem Investment Strategy

Case Problem Investment Strategy

J. D. Williams, Inc. is an investment advisory firm that manages more than $120 million in funds for its numerous clients. The company uses an asset allocation model that recommends the portion of each client’s portfolio to be invested in a growth stock fund, an income fund and a money market fund. To maintain diversity in each client’s portfolio, the firm places limits on the percentage of each portfolio that may be invested in each of the three funds. General guidelines indicate that the amount invested in the growth fund must be between 20% to 40% of the total portfolio value. Similar percentages for the other two funds stipulate that between 20% to 50% of the total portfolio must be in the income fund and at least 30% of the total portfolio value must be in the money market fund.

 

In addition, the company attempts to assess the risk tolerance of each client and adjust the portfolio to meet the needs of the individual investor. For example, Williams just contracted with a new client who has $800,000 to invest. Based on an evaluation of the client’s risk tolerance, Williams assigned a maximum risk index of 0.05 for the client. The firm’s risk indicators show the risk of the growth fund at 0.10, the income fund at 0.07 and the money market fund at 0.01. An overall portfolio risk index is computed as a weighted average of the risk rating for the three funds where the weights are the fraction of the client’s portfolio invested in each of the funds.

Additionally, William’s is currently forecasting annual yields of 18% for the growth fund, 12.5% for the income fund and 7.5% fir the money market fund. Based on the information provided, how should the new client be advised to allocate $800,000 among the growth, income and money market funds? Develop a linear programming model that will provide the maximum yield for the portfolio. Use your model to develop a managerial report.

 

Managerial Report:

a.Recommend how much of the $800,000 should be invested in each of the three funds. What is the annual yield you anticipate for the investment recommendation change?

b.Assume that the client’s risk index could be increased to 0.055. How much would the yield increase and how would the investment recommendation change?

c.Refer again to the original situation where the client’s risk index was assessed to be 0.05. How would your investment recommendation change if the annual yield for the growth fund were revised downward to 16% or even to 14%?

d.Assume that the client expressed some concern about having too much money in the growth fund. How would the original recommendation change if the amount invested in the growth fund is not allowed to exceed the amount invested in the income fund?

e.The asset allocation model you developed may be useful in modifying the portfolios for all the firm’s clients whenever the anticipated yields for the three funds are periodically revised. What is your recommendation as to whether use of this model is possible?

 

 

 

 

ANSWERS

 

J.D. Williams Inc.

Part I. 

J.D. Williams is an investment advisory firm that manages $120 million in funds for its clients. The company utilizes several financial approaches in advising their clients how to achieve optimal portfolio returns. They are as follows:

· An Asset Allocation Model – An asset allocation model, which provides individual clients with an investment strategy in order to obtain optimal investment combinations.

· Percentage Limitations – The Company strongly recommends investment diversity as a protection of the investors’ assets.

· A Risk Tolerance Analysis – The Company conducts an analysis of the individual investor’s risk tolerance and adjusts their portfolios accordingly.

 

J.D. Williams has recently contracted with a new client and would like to determine the best way to allocate the client’s $800,000 in available funds for optimal growth. The subsequent sections of this report provide an outline of the investment recommendation provided to the client.

II.Model Formulation

a. Decision Variables

GF =        $ amount of investment in growth stock fund

IF = $ amount of investment in income fund

MMF $ amount of investment in money market fund

b. Objective Function Definition

Maximize the total return of the portfolio Max 0.18GF + 0.125 +0.075MMF

3. Constraint Definition

s.t.1GF + 1IF + 1MMF    <= 800,000 $ amount available to invest

.80GF -.20IF -.20MMF >= 0

 

 

$ amount invested in the growth fund should be at least 20% of total portfolio.

.60GF -.40IF -.40MMF <= 0 $ amount invested in the growth fund

should be at most 40% of total portfolio

-.20GF +.80IF -.20MMF > 0$ amount invested in the income fund should be at least 20% of total portfolio

-.50&F +.50IF -.50MMF <= 0$ amount invested in the income fund should be at most 50% of total portfolio

-.30GF -.30IF +.70MMF >= 0$ amount invested in the money market fund that should be least 30% of total portfolio

.05GF +.021F -.04MMF <= 0 Investor’s risk tolerance index

III. Key Assumptions

The following table provides information that stipulates the key assumptions taken into consideration in the development of the investment recommendation.

PortfolioRisk IndicatorsForecasted Annual Yields

Growth Stock Fund0.100.18

Income Fund0.070.125

Money Market Fund0.010.075

This means that, we assume that the risk indicators and forecasted yields are given as true above. We also assume that the client does not want to consider other investment options. A maximum risk index of 0.05 has been assigned for the new client.

Therefore;

Part 1

The optimal portfolio allocation J.D. Williams recommends is as follows:

Growth Fund           =    $248,889

Income Fund            =       $160,000

Money Market Fund =       $391,111

Total =        $800,000

The anticipated annual yield is:

 

Growth Fund          = $248,889 x 0.18 = $44,800

Income Fund           = $160,000 x 0.125= $20,000

Money Market Fund = $391,111 x .075= $29,333

Total = $94,133

Total Anticipated Annual Yield$ 94,133 = 11.77%

$800,000

 

 

Part 2 

In regards to risk tolerance index, if the client’s index were raised by one half of a percentage point, from .05 to .055, the annual yield on investment consequently would increase by $4,667, from $94,133 to $98,800.

The modified asset allocation recommendation and its corresponding projected annual return are as follows:

 

Fund Allocation                                      Projected Annual Yield

Growth Fund     =$ 293,333               Growth Fund = $293,333 x 0.18 = $52,800

Income Fund     =$ 160,000                Income Fund = $160,000 x 0.125    = $20,000

M Market Fund =$ 346,667                M Market Fund=$346,667 x 0.075 =$26,000

                Total   =$ 800,000                                                         Total = $98,800

 

Total Anticipated Annual Yield = $ 98,800/$800,000 = 12.35%

 

Part 3 

I would not propose a change in the investment recommendation if the annual yield is revised downward to 16% as it is within the Range of Optimality. However, if it were to change to 14%, it will be outside the lower limit. As such, the value will change from $94,133. to $85,067, therefore, we would not recommend going below 15%.

Any lower index values that fall outside the growth fund’s range of optimality under the origins recommendation would warrant a new investment strategy for the client, because these values results in a change of the original projected total annual yield value.

However, the present recommendation of investment allocation in the growth fund is based on the fund’s given range of optimality, which measures from 15% to an infinite number of annual yield values. This range indicates that any possible index increase of this fund, i.e., 16% and higher, would not have an impact in the portfolio’s optimal asset allocation yetit would positively affect the objective function’s total annual yield value from the original projected value of $94,133.

Conversely, potential downward fluctuations, falling below the growth fund’s annual yield lower limit index of 15%, would constitute a deviation from the originally recommended asset allocation and it’s corresponding projected value of $94,133, as the new value falls outside the fund’s range of optimality.

Part 4 

Financial portfolio theory stresses obtaining a proper balance between risk and return. Choosing the appropriate constraints is an effective method that ensures this balance.

 

Given the risk indexes of .10 and .07 of the growth fund and income fund, respectively, the client may opt to choose a less aggressive approach by limiting the growth fund’s investment amount to equal, yet not surpass, the amount invested in the income fund This change in investment strategy, however, would generate a lower annual yield of $85,067, than the projected annual return of $94,133 by the original, more risky recommendation.

Part 5  

J. D. Williams would recommend the use of this model only when the model potential new clients meet the present outlined criteria. The company’s mission, however, is to the professional, financial advice that best meets the individual investors’ needs. The company would therefore, not recommend the use of this asset allocation model as a general guide to financial investment.

 

Please provide formulas and excel sheets including functions.

 

Can you please explain how to get these following six values if they are correct:

248,889

160,000

391,111

293,333

160,000

346,667

 

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Strategic Management: Case Analysis.

I had a writer that screwed me over and scammed me and I got a refund. I don’t want the same thing to happen to me again. if you know how to do the paper do if not please don’t be money hungry and ruin someone’s future.

Strategic Management: Case analysis.

4 pages Internal/ External analysis using material discussed in textbook.

Documents uploaded:

1- Paper instructions.

2- A sample graded paper from a fellow student to know how the paper will be graded.

3- Textbook

4- The case

This paper requires reading the chapters and heavily relate to the chapter material in your analysis.

CONNECT FEATURES

Interactive Applications Interactive Applications offer a variety of automatically graded exercises that require student to apply key concepts. Whether the assignment includes a click & drag, video case, or decision generator, these applications provide instant

feedback and progress tracking for students and detailed results for the instructor.

Case Exercises The Connect® Platform also includes case exercises for 12 of the 35 cases in this edition that require students to

work through questions based on both favorable and unfavorable Key Symptoms as well as the Underlying Causes

that affect Key Symptoms as they are observed in the case. Each multiple choice and short answer question number

under Key Symptoms corresponds to the same question number under Underlying Causes (e.g., Question 3 under

Key Symptoms corresponds to Question 3 under Underlying Causes). There is also a fi nal general question on

solutions that should address the causes.

Intelligent Response Technology Intelligent Response Technology (IRT) is a redesigned student interface for the Financial Analyses that accompany

the Case Exercises. In addition to a streamlined interface, IRT provides improved answer acceptance to reduce

students’ frustration with formatting issues (such as rounding), and, for select questions, provides a tabular format

that guides students through the process of case analysis. Additional questions have been added to test students’

mastery of the content more fully.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd ides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd i 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

Learning Management System Integration McGraw-Hill Campus is a one-stop teaching and learning experience available to use of any learning management system. Campus provides single sign-on to faculty and students for all McGraw-Hill material and technology from within the school website. McGraw-Hill Campus also allows instructors instant access to all supplements and teaching materials for all McGraw-Hill products.

Blackboard users also benefi t from McGraw-Hill’s industry-leading integration, providing single sign-on to access all Connect assignments and automatic feeding of assignment results to the Blackboard grade book.

EASY TO USE

POWERFUL REPORTING

Secure

Simple

Seamless

Get Connected Today! www.connect.mcgraw-hill.com

Connect generates comprehensive reports and graphs that provide instructors with an instant view of the performance of individual students, a specifi c section, or multiple sections. Since all content is mapped to learning outcomes, Connect reporting is ideal for accreditation or other administrative documentation.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd iides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd ii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

Gregory G. Dess University of Texas at Dallas

G. T. Lumpkin Syracuse University

Alan B. Eisner Pace University

Gerry McNamara Michigan State University

SEVENTH EDITION

strategic management

creating competitive advantages

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd iiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd iii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: CREATING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES, SEVENTH EDITION Published by McGraw-Hill Education, 2 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10121. Copyright © 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Previous editions © 2012, 2010, and 2008. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education, including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning.

Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States.

This book is printed on acid-free paper.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOW/DOW 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3

ISBN 978-0-07-763608-1 MHID 0-07-763608-2

Senior Vice President, Products & Markets: Kurt L. Strand Vice President, Content Production & Technology Services: Kimberly Meriwether David Managing Director: Paul Ducham Executive Brand Manager: Michael Ablassmeir Executive Director of Development: Ann Torbert Senior development editor: Laura Griffin Editorial Coordinator: Claire Wood Marketing Manager : Elizabeth Trepkowski Lead Project Manager: Harvey Yep Senior Buyer: Michael R. McCormick Design: Matt Diamond Cover Image: Getty Images Senior Content Licensing Specialist: Jeremy Cheshareck Senior Media Project Manager: Susan Lombardi Typeface: 10/12 Times Roman Compositor: Laserwords Private Limited Printer: R. R. Donnelley

All credits appearing on page or at the end of the book are considered to be an extension of the copyright page.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Dess, Gregory G. Strategic management : creating competitive advantages / Gregory G. Dess, University of Texas at Dallas, G. T. Lumpkin, Syracuse University, Alan B. Eisner, Pace University, Gerry McNamara, Michigan State University.—seventh edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-07-763608-1 (alk. paper)—ISBN 0-07-763608-2 (alk. paper) 1. Strategic planning. I. Title. HD30.28.D4746 2014 658.4’012—dc23 2013029305

The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of publication. The inclusion of a website does not indicate an endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill Education, and McGraw-Hill Education does not guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at these sites.

www.mhhe.com

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd ivdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd iv 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

v

To my family, Margie and Taylor; my parents, Bill and Mary Dess; and Walter Descovich

–Greg

To my lovely wife, Vicki, and my students and colleagues

–Tom

To my family, Helaine, Rachel, and Jacob

–Alan

To my wonderful wife, Gaelen; my children, Megan and AJ; and my parents, Gene and Jane

–Gerry

DEDICATION

dedication

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd vdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd v 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

vi

Gregory G. Dess is the Andrew R. Cecil Endowed Chair in Management at the University of Texas at Dallas. His primary research interests are in strategic management, organization–environment relationships, and knowledge management. He has published numerous articles on these subjects in both academic and practitioner- oriented journals. He also serves on the editorial boards of a wide range of practitioner-oriented and academic journals. In August 2000, he was inducted into the Academy of Management Journal ’s Hall of Fame as one of its charter members. Professor Dess has conducted executive programs in the United States, Europe, Africa, Hong Kong, and Australia. During 1994 he was a Fulbright Scholar in Oporto, Portugal. In 2009, he received an honorary doctorate from the University of Bern (Switzerland). He received his PhD in Business Administration from the University of Washington (Seattle) and a BIE degree from Georgia Tech.

G. T. (Tom) Lumpkin is the Chris J. Witting Chair and Professor of Entrepreneurship at Syracuse University in New York. Prior to joining the faculty at Syracuse, Tom was the Kent Hance Regents Endowed Chair and Professor of Entrepreneurship at Texas Tech University. His research interests include entrepreneurial orientation, opportunity recognition, strategy-making processes, social entrepreneurship, and innovative forms of organizing work. He has published numerous research articles in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Business Venturing, and Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. He is a member of the editorial review boards of Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, and the Journal of Business Venturing. He received his PhD in management from the University of Texas at Arlington and MBA from the University of Southern California.

about the authors

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd vides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd vi 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

vii

Alan B. Eisner is Professor of Management and Department Chair, Management and Management Science Department, at the Lubin School of Business, Pace University. He received his PhD in management from the Stern School of Business, New York University. His primary research interests are in strategic management, technology management, organizational learning, and managerial decision making. He has published research articles and cases in journals such as Advances in Strategic Management, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, International Journal of Technology Management, American Business Review, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, and Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies. He is the former Associate Editor of the Case Association’s peer reviewed journal, The CASE Journal.

Gerry McNamara is a Professor of Management at Michigan State University. He received his PhD from the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota. His research focuses on strategic decision making, organizational risk taking, and mergers and acquisitions. His research has been published in numerous journals, including the Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Journal of Management, and Journal of International Business Studies. His research on mergers and acquisitions has been abstracted in the New York Times, Bloomberg Businessweek, The Economist, and Financial Week. He is currently an Associate Editor for the Academy of Management Journal

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd viides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd vii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

viii

preface

Welcome to the Seventh Edition of Strategic Management: Creating Competitive Advantages! We are all very pleased with the positive market response to our previous edi- tion. Below is some of the encouraging feedback we have received from our reviewers:

The text is thorough and all-inclusive. I don’t need to refer to another book as a back-up. It addresses all aspects of strategic management from the initial inspiration of a vision to the nuts and bolts of putting the plan to work. It is well structured; it is clear how each chapter not only builds on the previous ones, but also how analysis, formulation, and implementation are interrelated.

Lois Shelton, California State University, Northridge

I use Strategic Management in a capstone course required of all business majors, and students appreciate the book because it synergizes all their business education into a meaningful and understandable whole. My students enjoy the book’s readability and tight organization, as well as the contemporary examples, case studies, discussion questions and exercises.

William Sannwald, San Diego State University

It is very easy for students to read because it presents strategy concepts in a simple but comprehensive manner. It covers important developments in the strategic management field that are usually ignored by other textbooks (e.g., concepts like social networks and social capital, the balanced scorecard, and new forms of organizational structure).

Moses Acquaah, University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Content is current and easy for students to grasp; good graphs and charts to illustrate important points in the chapter. Book is well organized around the AFI framework.

Lise Anne D. Slatten, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

It is the best written textbook for the undergraduate course that I have come across. Application materials tie concepts to real-world practice.

Justin L. Davis, University of West Florida

The Dess text takes a practical/easy approach to explain very difficult subject matter. It integrates a number of real-life scenarios to aid the student in their comprehension of key concepts. The standout of the text is the Reflecting on Career Implications. These end-of-chapter questions aid the student in applying their learning to their workplace in a manner that promotes career success.

Amy Patrick, Wilmington University

The Dess book overcomes many of the limitations of the last book I used in many ways: (a) presents content in a very interesting and engrossing manner without compromising the depth and comprehensiveness, (b) inclusion of timely and interesting illustrative examples, and (c) EOC exercises do an excellent job of complementing the chapter content.

Sucheta Nadkami, Drexel University

We are always striving to improve our work, and we are most appreciative of the extensive and constructive feedback that many strategy professionals have graciously given us. As always,

PREFACE

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd viiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd viii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

ix

we have worked hard to incorporate their ideas into the Seventh Edition—and we acknowledge them by name later in the Preface.

We believe we have made valuable improvements throughout our many revised editions of Strategic Management. At the same time, we strive to be consistent and “true” to our original overriding objective: a book that satisfies three R’s: relevant, rigorous, and readable. That is, our tagline (paraphrasing the well-known Secret deodorant commercial) is: “Strong enough for the professor; made for the student.” And we are pleased that we have received feedback (such as the comments on the previous page) that is consistent with what we are trying to accomplish.

To continue to earn the support of strategy instructors (and students!) we try to use an engaging writing style that minimizes unnecessary jargon and covers all of the traditional bases. We also integrate some central themes throughout the book—such as globalization, technology, ethics, environmental sustainability, and entrepreneurship—that are vital in understanding strategic management in today’s global economy. We draw on short examples from business practice to bring concepts to life by providing 85 Strategy Spotlights (more detailed examples in sidebars).

Unlike other strategy texts, we provide three separate chapters that address timely topics about which business students should have a solid understanding. These are the role of intellectual assets in value creation (Chapter 4), entrepreneurial strategy and competitive dynamics (Chapter 8), and fostering entrepreneurship in established organizations (Chapter 12). We also provide an excellent and thorough chapter on how to analyze strategic management cases.

In developing Strategic Management: Creating Competitive Advantage, we certainly didn’t forget the instructors. As we all know, you have a most challenging (but rewarding) job. We did our best to help you. We provide a variety of supplementary materials that should help you in class preparation and delivery. For example, our chapter notes do not simply summarize the material in the text. Rather (and consistent with the concept of strategy!), we ask ourselves: “How can we add value?” Thus, for each chapter, we provide numerous questions to pose to help guide class discussion, at least 12 boxed examples to supplement chapter material, and three detailed “teaching tips” to further engage students. Also, the author team completed the chapter notes—along with the entire test bank—ourselves. That is, unlike many of our rivals, we didn’t simply farm the work out to others. Instead, we felt that such efforts help to enhance quality and consistency—as well as demonstrate our personal commitment to provide a top- quality total package to strategy instructors. With the seventh edition, we also benefited from valued input by our strategy colleagues to further improve our work.

Let’s now address some of the key substantive changes in the Seventh Edition. Then we will cover some of the major features that we have had in previous editions.

What’s New? Highlights of the Seventh Edition We have endeavored to add new material to the chapters that reflects both the feedback that we have received from our reviewers as well as the challenges that face today’s managers. Thus, we all invested an extensive amount of time carefully reviewing a wide variety of books, academic and practitioner journals, and the business press.

We also worked hard to develop more concise and tightly written chapters. Based on feedback from some of the reviewers, we have tightened our writing style, tried to eliminate redundant examples, and focused more directly on what we feel is the most important content in each chapter for our audience. The overall result is that we were able to update our material, add valuable new content, and—at the same time—shorten the length of the chapters.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd ixdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd ix 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

x

PREFACE

Here are some of the major changes and improvements in the Seventh Edition:

• All of the 12 opening “Learning from Mistakes” vignettes that lead off each chapter at totally new. Unique to this text, they are all examples of what can go wrong, and they serve as an excellent vehicle for clarifying and reinforcing strategy concepts. After all, what can be learned if one simply admires perfection!

• Well over half of our “Strategy Spotlights” (sidebar examples) are brand new, and many of the others have been thoroughly updated. Although we have reduced the number of Spotlights from the previous edition to conserve space, we still have a total of 85—by far the most in the strategy market. We focus on bringing the most important strategy concepts to life in a concise and highly readable manner. And we work hard to eliminate unnecessary detail that detracts from the main point we are trying to make. Also, consistent with our previous edition, many of the Spotlights focus on three “hot” issues that are critical in leading today’s organizations: ethics, environmental sustainability, and crowdsourcing.

• We have added a new feature—Issue for Dcbate—at the end of each chapter. We have pretested these situations and find that students become very engaged (and often animated!) in discussing an issue that has viable alternative points of view. It is an exciting way to drive home key strategy concepts. For example, in Chapter 1, Seventh Generation is faced with a situation that confronts their values, and they must decide whether or not to provide their products to some of their largest customers. In Chapter 3, some interesting tradeoffs arose when The World Triathlon Corporation expanded their exclusive branding of Ironman to products that didn’t reflect the “spirit” of the brand. And, in Chapter 6, Delta Airlines’ diversification into the oil business via their acquisition of an oil refinery poses an issue for some interesting alternative points of view.

• Throughout the chapters, we provide many excerpts from interviews with top executives from Adam Bryant’s The Corner Office. Such viewpoints provide valuable perspectives from leading executives and help to drive home the value and purpose of key strategy concepts. For example, we include the perspectives of Tim Brown (CEO of IDEO) on employee empowerment, John Stumpf (CEO of Wells Fargo) on strategy implementation, and Gordon Bethune (former CEO of Continental Airlines) on the importance of incentive systems.

• We have completely rewritten the “Reflecting on Career Implications . . .” feature that we introduced in the Sixth Edition of Strategic Management. Based on reviewer feedback, we directed our attention to providing insights that are closely aligned with and directed to three distinct issues faced by our readers: prepare them for a job interview (e.g., industry analysis), help them with current employers or their career in general, or help them find potential employers and decide where to work. We feel this feature is significantly improved and should be of more value to students’ professional development.

Key content changes for the chapters include:

• Chapter 1 makes a strong business case for environmental sustainability and draws on Porter’s concept of “shared value” that was initially introduced in the Sixth Edition. Such issues advance the notion that firms should go far beyond a narrow focus on shareholder returns. Further, shared value promotes practices that enhance the competitiveness of the company while simultaneously advancing the social and economic conditions in which it operates.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd x 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xi

• Chapter 2 makes the distinction between “hard trends” and “soft trends” that was articulated by Dan Burrus in his recent book Flash Foresight. This distinction is important in determing the importance of current trends and their evolution over time. Soft trends are something that might happen and a probability with which it might happen can be assigned. In contrast, hard trends are based on measurable facts, events, or objects—they are something that will happen. We provide the example of how the identification of hard trends (in technology) led the renowned Mayo Clinic to develop a CD to help customers to access useful medical information. This initiative provided the Mayo Clinic with significant financial and nonfinancial benefits!

• Chapter 4 addresses two issues that are important to not only developing human capital in organizations but also for students entering—or enhancing their success in—an organization: mentorship versus sponsorship and the “trap” of ineffective networks. Knowing the distinction between mentors and sponsors has valuable implications for one’s career. Mentors may provide coaching and advice, and prepare one for the next position. Sponsors, on the other hand, are typically somebody in a senior position who can advocate and facilitate career moves. We also draw on research that suggests three types of “network traps” that professionals should work hard to avoid: the wrong structure, the wrong relationship, and the wrong behavior.

• Chapter 6 discusses when actions taken to change the scope of businesses in which a corporation competes lead to positive outcomes for the firm. We highlight the characteristics of both acquisitions and divestitures that lead to positive outcomes. With acquisitions, we focus on how the characteristics of the acquiring firm as well as the acquisition itself lead to positive reactions by the stock market to the announcement of the deal. With divestitures, we draw on the work by the Boston Consulting Group to highlight seven principles for effective divestitures.

• Chapter 7 looks into the hidden costs of offshoring. In recent years, many firms have moved parts of their operations to lower wage countries. In many cases, they have found that the expected cost savings were illusory. We discuss seven reasons why firms would not achieve the anticipated savings through offshoring and provide examples of firms that have benefited by bringing their operations back home.

• Chapter 8 includes an examination of crowdfunding, a rapidly growing means to finance entrepreneurial ventures. Crowdfunding involves drawing relatively small amounts of funding from a wide net of investors to provide potentially large pools of capital for entrepreneurial ventures. We discuss both the tremendous potential as well as the pitfalls of crowdfunding for entrepreneurs. Knowing that some of our students may want to be investors in these ventures, we also discuss issues that crowdfunding investors should consider when looking into these investment opportunities.

• Chapter 9 addresses how firms can build effective boards of directors. We identify how firms need to go beyond standard categories, such as insider versus outsider board members, to develop favorable board dynamics. We also discuss how the structure of boards has changed over the past 25 years.

• Chapter 10 examines the costs and benefits of nurturing strong relationships to ensure cooperation and achieve high levels of performance. Over the past 30 years, many scholars have argued that relational systems, where decisions regarding how to

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xi 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xii

facilitate control and coordination are driven by relationships rather than bureaucratic systems and contracts, are superior to more traditional control systems. We examine this issue and discuss how relational systems have both advantages and disadvantages. We conclude with a brief discussion of when managers may want to rely more on relationship systems and when they may want to rely more on formal structure and reward systems.

• Chapter 11 introduces the concept of “competency conipanions,” an important idea for managers to consider in developing their leadership ability. The idea is that leaders can benefit most by identifying and developing complementary strengths instead of continually working on already great qualities that they may possess. For example, a leader who has a strong competence in developing innovative ideas can extend that competency by developing strong communication skills.

• Chapter 13 updates our Appendix: Sources of Company and Industry Information. Here, we owe a big debt to Ruthie Brock and Carol Byrne, library professionals at the University of Texas at Arlington. These ladies have graciously provided us with comprehensive and updated information that is organized in a range of issues. These include competitive intelligence, annual report collections, company rankings, business websites, and strategic and competitive analysis. Such information is invaluable in analyzing companies and industries.

What Remains the Same: Key Features of Earlier Editions Let’s now briefly address some of the exciting features that remain from the earlier editions.

• Traditional organizing framework with three other chapters on timely topics. Crisply written chapters cover all of the strategy bases and address contemporary topics. First, the chapters are divided logically into the traditional sequence: strategy analysis, strategy formulation, and strategy implementation. Second, we include three chapters on such timely topics as intellectual capital/knowledge management, entrepreneurial strategy and competitive dynamics, and fostering corporate entrepreneurship and new ventures.

• “Learning from Mistakes” chapter-opening cases. To enhance student interest, we begin each chapter with a case that depicts an organization that has suffered a dramatic performance drop, or outright failure, by failing to adhere to sound strategic management concepts and principles. We believe that this feature serves to underpin the value of the concepts in the course and that it is a preferred teaching approach to merely providing examples of outstanding companies that always seem to get it right! After all, isn’t it better (and more challenging) to diagnose problems than admire perfection? As Dartmouth’s Sydney Finkelstein, author of Why Smart Executives Fail, notes: “We live in a world where success is revered, and failure is quickly pushed to the side. However, some of the greatest opportunities to learn—both for individuals and organizations—come from studying what goes wrong.” * We’ll see how, for example, Borders went from enjoying enormous success as an innovative firm—with revenues of nearly $4 billion in 2005—to bankruptcy six years later. We will also explore why Daimler’s “ultra-urban” Smart car—despite its initial acclaim—has cost the firm $5.3 billion in cumulative losses over the years. And we’ll explore why

PREFACE

*Personal communication, June 20, 2005.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xiii

Cisco’s eagerness to enter the digital video market via its acquisition of Pure Digital Technologies didn’t pan out.

• Consistent chapter format and features to reinforce learning. We have included several features in each chapter to add value and create an enhanced learning experience. First, each chapter begins with an overview and a set of bullets pointing to key learning objectives. Second, as previously noted, the opening case describes a situation in which a company’s performance eroded because of a lack of proper application of strategy concepts. Third, at the end of each chapter there are four different types of questions/exercises that should help students assess their understanding and application of material:

1. Summary review questions. 2. Experiential exercises. 3. Application questions and exercises. 4. Ethics questions

Given the centrality of online systems to business today, each chapter contains at least one exercise that allows students to explore the use of the Web in implementing a firm’s strategy.

• “Reflecting on Career Implications” for each chapter. This feature—at the end of each chapter—will help instructors drive home the immediate relevance/value of strategy concepts. It focuses on how an understanding of key concepts helps business students early in their careers.

• Key Terms. Approximately a dozen key terms for each chapter are identified in the margins of the pages. This addition was made in response to reviewer feedback and improves students’ understanding of core strategy concepts.

• Clear articulation and illustration of key concepts. Key strategy concepts are introduced in a clear and concise manner and are followed by timely and interesting examples from business practice. Such concepts include value-chain analysis, the resource-based view of the firm, Porter’s five-forces model, competitive advantage, boundaryless organizational designs, digital strategies, corporate governance, ethics, and entrepreneurship.

• Extensive use of sidebars. We include 85 sidebars (or about seven per chapter) called “Strategy Spotlights.” The Strategy Spotlights not only illustrate key points but also increase the readability and excitement of new strategy concepts.

• Integrative themes. The text provides a solid grounding in ethics, globalization, environmental substainability, and technology. These topics are central themes throughout the book and form the basis for many of the Strategy Spotlights.

• Implications of concepts for small businesses. Many of the key concepts are applied to start-up firms and smaller businesses, which is particularly important since many students have professional plans to work in such firms.

• Not just a textbook but an entire package. Strategic Management features the best chapter teaching notes available today. Rather than merely summarizing the key points in each chapter, we focus on value-added material to enhance the teaching (and learning) experience. Each chapter includes dozens of questions to spur discussion, teaching tips, in-class group exercises, and about a dozen detailed examples from business practice to provide further illustrations of key concepts.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xiiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xiii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xiv

PREFACE

Student Support Materials Online Learning Center (OLC) The following resources are available to students via the publisher’s OLC at www.mhhe. com/dess7e :

• Chapter quizzes students can take to gauge their understanding of material covered in each chapter.

• A selection of PowerPoint slides for each chapter. • Links to strategy simulations the Business Strategy Game & GLO-BUS. Both provide

a powerful and constructive way of connecting students to the subject matter of the course with a competition among classmates on campus and around the world.

Instructor Support Materials Instructor’s Manual (IM) Prepared by the textbook authors, along with valued input from our strategy colleagues, the accompanying IM contains summary/objectives, lecture/discussion outlines, discussion questions, extra examples not included in the text, teaching tips, reflecting on career implications, experiential exercises, and more.

Test Bank Revised by Christine Pence of the University of California–Riverside, the test bank contains more than 1,000 true/false, multiple-choice, and essay questions. It has now been tagged with learning objectives as well as Bloom’s Taxonomy and AACSB criteria.

• Assurance of Learning Ready. Assurance of Learning is an important element of many accreditation standards. Dess 7e is designed specifically to support your Assurance of Learning initiatives. Each chapter in the book begins with a list of numbered learning objectives that appear throughout the chapter, as well as in the end-of-chapter questions and exercises. Every test bank question is also linked to one of these objectives, in addition to level of difficulty, topic area, Bloom’s Taxonomy level, and AACSB skill area. EZ Test, McGraw-Hill’s easy-to-use test bank software, can search the test bank by these and other categories, providing an engine for targeted Assurance of Learning analysis and assessment.

• AACSB Statement. The McGraw-Hill Companies is a proud corporate member of AACSB International. Understanding the importance and value of AACSB accreditation, Dess 7e has sought to recognize the curricula guidelines detailed in the AACSB standards for business accreditation by connecting selected questions in Dess 7e and the test bank to the general knowledge and skill guidelines found in the AACSB standards. The statements contained in Dess 7e are provided only as a guide for the users of this text. The AACSB leaves content coverage and assessment within the purview of individual schools, the mission of the school, and the faculty. While Dess 7e and the teaching package make no claim of any specific AACSB qualification or evaluation, we have labeled selected questions within Dess 7e according to the six general knowledge and skills areas.

• Computerized Test Bank Online. A comprehensive bank of test questions is provided within a computerized test bank powered by McGraw-Hill’s flexible electronic testing program, EZ Test Online ( www.eztestonline.com ). EZ Test Online

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xivdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xiv 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xv

allows you to create paper and online tests or quizzes in this easy-to-use program! Imagine being able to create and access your test or quiz anywhere, at any time without installing the testing software. Now, with EZ Test Online, instructors can select questions from multiple McGraw-Hill test banks or author their own, and then either print the test for paper distribution or give it online.

• Test Creation. • Author/edit questions online using the 14 different question type templates. • Create printed tests or deliver online to get instant scoring and feedback. • Create questions pools to offer multiple versions online – great for practice. • Export your tests for use in WebCT, Blackboard, PageOut, and Apple’s iQuiz. • Compatible with EZ Test Desktop tests you’ve already created. • Sharing tests with colleagues, adjuncts, TAs is easy.

• Online Test Management. • Set availability dates and time limits for your quiz or test. • Control how your test will be presented. • Assign points by question or question type with drop-down menu. • Provide immediate feedback to students or delay until all finish the test. • Create practice tests online to enable student mastery. • Your roster can be uploaded to enable student self-registration.

• Online Scoring and Reporting. • Automated scoring for most of EZ Test ’s numerous question types. • Allows manual scoring for essay and other open response questions. • Manual rescoring and feedback is also available. • EZ Test ’s grade book is designed to easily export to your grade book. • View basic statistical reports.

• Support and Help. • User’s guide and built-in page-specific help. • Flash tutorials for getting started on the support site. • Support website: www.mhhe.com/eztest. • Product specialist available at 1-800-331-5094. • Online Training: http://auth.mhhe.com/mpss/workshops/.

PowerPoint Presentation Prepared by Pauline Assenza of Western Connecticut State University, it consists of more than 400 slides incorporating an outline for the chapters tied to learning objectives. Also included are instructor notes, multiple-choice questions that can be used as Classroom Performance System (CPS) questions, and additional examples outside of the text to promote class discussion.

McGraw-Hill Connect™ Management Less Managing. More Teaching. Greater Learning. McGraw-Hill Connect Management is an online assignment and assessment solution that connects students with the tools and resources thev’ll need to achieve success.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xvdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xv 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

PREFACE

xvi

• McGraw-Hill Connect Management Features. Connect Management offers a number of powerful tools and features to make managing assignments easier, so faculty can spend more time teaching. With Connect Management, students can engage with their coursework anytime and anywhere, making the learning process more accessible and efficient. Connect Management offers you the features described below.

• There are chapter quizzes for the 12 chapters, consisting of 15–25 multiple- choice questions, testing students’ overall comprehension of concepts presented in the chapter.

• There are 2 specially crafted interactives for each of the 12 chapters that drill students in the use and application of the concepts and tools of strategic analysis.

• The majority of the Connect exercises are automatically graded, thereby simplifying the task of evaluating each class member’s performance and monitoring the learning outcomes.

• Student Progress Tracking. Connect Management keeps instructors informed about how each student, section, and class is performing, allowing for more productive use of lecture and office hours. The progress-tracking function enables you to

• View scored work immediately and track individual or group performance with assignment and grade reports.

• Access an instant view of student or class performance relative to learning objectives.

• Collect data and generate reports required by many accreditation organizations, such as AACSB.

• Smart Grading. When it comes to studying, time is precious. Connect Management helps students learn more efficiently by providing feedback and practice material when they need it, where they need it. When it comes to teaching, your time also is precious. The grading function enables you to

• Have assignments scored automatically, giving students immediate feedback on their work and side-by-side comparisons with correct answers.

• Access and review each response, manually change grades, or leave comments for students to review.

• Reinforce classroom concepts with practice tests and instant quizzes.

• Simple Assignment Management. With Connect Management, creating assignments is easier than ever, so you can spend more time teaching and less time managing. The assignment management function enables you to

• Create and deliver assignments easily with selectable test bank items.

• Streamline lesson planning, student progress reporting, and assignment grading to make classroom management more efficient than ever.

• Go paperless with online submission and grading of student assignments.

• Instructor Library. The Connect Management Instructor Library is your repository for additional resources to improve student engagement in and out of class. You can select and use any asset that enhances your lecture. The Connect Management Instructor Library includes

• Instructor Manual

• PowerPoint ® files

• Test Bank

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xvides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xvi 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xvii

Videos A set of videos related to chapters can be found on the Online Learning Center (OLC) or Connect to support your classroom or student lab, or for home viewing. These thought- provoking video clips are available upon adoption of this text.

Online Learning Center (OLC) The instructor section of www.mhhe.com/dess7e also includes the Instructor’s Manual, PowerPoint Presentations, as well as additional resources.

The Business Strategy Game and GLO-BUS Online Simulations Both allow teams of students to manage companies in a head-to-head contest for global market leadership. These simulations give students the immediate opportunity to experiment with various strategy options and to gain proficiency in applying the concepts and tools they have been reading about in the chapters. To find out more or to register, please visit www.mhhe.com/thompsonsims.

Additional Resources Create Craft your teaching resources to match the way you teach! With McGraw-Hill Create, www.mcgrawhillcreate.com, you can easily rearrange chapters, combine material from other content sources, and quickly upload content you have written, like your course syllabus or teaching notes. Find the content you need in Create by searching through thousands of leading McGraw-Hill textbooks. Arrange your book to fit your teaching style. Create even allows you to personalize your book’s appearance by selecting the cover and adding your name, school, and course information. Order a Create book and you’ll receive a complimentary print review copy in three to five business days or a complimentary electronic review copy (eComp) via email in about one hour. Go to www.mcgrawhillcreate. com today and register. Experience how McGraw-Hill Create empowers you to teach your students your way.

e-book Options e-books are an innovative way for students to save money and to “go-green”, McGraw-Hill’s e-books are typically 40% of bookstore price. Students have the choice between an online and a downloadable CourseSmart e-book.

Through CourseSmart, students have the flexibility to access an exact replica of their textbook from any computer that has internet service without plug-ins or special software via the version, or create a library of books on their harddrive via the downloadable version. Access to the CourseSmart e-books is one year.

Features: CourseSmart e-books allow students to highlight, take notes, organize notes, and share the notes with other CourseSmart users. Students can also search terms across all e-books in their purchased CourseSmart library. CourseSmart e-books can be printed (5 pages at a time).

More info and purchase: Please visit www.coursesmart.com for more information and to purchase access to our e-books. CourseSmart allows students to try one chapter of the e-book, free of charge, before purchase.

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xviides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xvii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

PREFACE

xviii

McGraw-Hill Higher Education and Blackboard McGraw-Hill Higher Education and Blackboard have teamed up. What does this mean for you?

1. Your life, simplified. Now you and your students can access McGraw-Hill’s Connect ™ and Create ™ right from within your Blackboard course—all with one single sign-on. Say goodbye to the days of logging in to multiple applications.

2. Deep integration of content and tools. Not only do you get single sign-on with Connect and Create, you also get deep integration of McGraw-Hill content and content engines right in Blackboard. Whether you’re choosing a book for your course or building Connect assignments, all the tools you need are right where you want them—inside of Blackboard.

3. Seamless gradebooks. Are you tired of keeping multiple gradebooks and manually synchronizing grades into Blackboard? We thought so. When a student completes an integrated Connect assignment, the grade for that assignment automatically (and instantly) feeds your Blackboard grade center.

4. A solution for everyone. Whether your institution is already using Blackboard or you just want to try Blackboard on your own, we have a solution for you. McGraw-Hill and Blackboard can now offer you easy access to industry-leading technology and content, whether your campus hosts it or we do. Be sure to ask your local McGraw-Hill representative for details.

McGraw-Hill Customer Care Contact Information At McGraw-Hill, we understand that getting the most from new technology can be challenging. That’s why our services don’t stop after you purchase our products. You can e-mail our product specialists 24 hours a day to get product training online. Or you can search our knowledge bank of Frequently Asked Questions on our support website, For customer support, call 800-331-5094, email [email protected], or visit www.mhhe.com/support. One of our technical support analysts will be able to assist you in a timely fashion.

Acknowledgments Strategic Management represents far more than just the joint efforts of the four co-authors. Rather, it is the product of the collaborative input of many people. Some of these individuals are academic colleagues, others are the outstanding team of professionals at McGraw-Hill/ Irwin, and still others are those who are closest to us—our families. It is time to express our sincere gratitude.

First, we’d like to acknowledge the dedicated instructors who have graciously provided their insights since the inception of the text. Their input has been very helpful in both pointing out errors in the manuscript and suggesting areas that needed further development as additional top- ics. We sincerely believe that the incorporation of their ideas has been critical to improving the fi nal product. These professionals and their affi liations are:

The Reviewer Hall of Fame

Moses Acquaah, University of North Carolina–Greensboro

Todd Alessandri, Northeastern University

Larry Alexander, Virginia Polytechnic Institute

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xviiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xviii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xix

Brent B. Allred, College of William & Mary

Allen C. Amason, University of Georgia

Kathy Anders, Arizona State University

Lise Anne D. Slatten, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Peter H. Antoniou, California State University, San Marcos

Dave Arnott, Dallas Baptist University

Marne L. Arthaud-Day, Kansas State University

Jay Azriel, York University of Pennsylvania Jeffrey J. Bailey, University of Idaho

Dennis R. Balch, University of North Alabama

Bruce Barringer, University of Central Florida

Barbara R. Bartkus, Old Dominion University

Barry Bayon, Bryant University Brent D. Beal, Louisiana State University

Joyce Beggs, University of North Carolina–Charlotte

Michael Behnam, Suffolk University

Kristen Bell DeTienne, Brigham Young University

Eldon Bernstein, Lynn University

David Blair, University of Nebraska at Omaha

Daniela Blettner, Tilburg University

Dusty Bodie, Boise State University

William Bogner, Georgia State University

Scott Browne, Chapman University

Jon Bryan, Bridgewater State College

Charles M. Byles, Virginia Commonwealth University

Mikelle A. Calhoun, Valparaiso University

Thomas J. Callahan, University of Michigan, Dearborn

Samuel D. Cappel, Southeastern Louisiana State University

Gary Carini, Baylor University

Shawn M. Carraher, University of Texas, Dallas

Tim Carroll, University of South Carolina

Don Caruth, Amberton University

Maureen Casile, Bowling Green State University

Gary J. Castrogiovanni, Florida Atlantic University

Radha Chaganti, Rider University

Erick PC Chang, Arkansas State University

Theresa Cho, Rutgers University

Bruce Clemens, Western New England College

Betty S. Coffey, Appalachian State University

Wade Coggins, Webster University, Fort Smith Metro Campus

Susan Cohen, University of Pittsburgh

George S. Cole, Shippensburg University

Joseph Coombs, Texas A & M University

Christine Cope Pence, University of California, Riverside James J. Cordeiro, SUNY Brockport

Stephen E. Courter, University of Texas at Austin

Jeffrey Covin, Indiana University

Keith Credo, Auburn University

Deepak Datta, University of Texas at Arlington

James Davis, Utah State University

Justin L. Davis, University of West Florida

David Dawley, West Virginia University

Helen Deresky, State University of New York, Plattsburgh

Rocki-Lee DeWitt, University of Vermont

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xixdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xix 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xx

PREFACE

Jay Dial, Ohio State University

Michael E. Dobbs, Arkansas State University

Jonathan Doh, Villanova University

Tom Douglas, Clemson University

Meredith Downes, Illinois State University

Jon Down, Oregon State University

Alan E. Ellstrand, University of Arkansas

Dean S. Elmuti, Eastern Illinois University

Clare Engle, Concordia University

Mehmet Erdem Genc, Baruch College, CUNY

Tracy Ethridge, Tri-County Technical College

William A. Evans, Troy State University, Dothan

Frances H. Fabian, University of Memphis

Angelo Fanelli, Warrington College of Business

Michael Fathi, Georgia Southwestern University

Carolyn J. Fausnaugh, Florida Institute of Technology

Tamela D. Ferguson, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

David Flanagan, Western Michigan University

Dave Foster, Montana State University

Isaac Fox, University of Minnesota

Deborah Francis, Brevard College

Steven A. Frankforter, Winthrop University

Vance Fried, Oklahoma State University

Karen Froelich, North Dakota State University

Naomi A. Gardberg, CNNY Baruch College

J. Michael Geringer, California Polytechnic State University

Diana L. Gilbertson, California State University, Fresno

Matt Gilley, St. Mary’s University

Debbie Gilliard, Metropolitan State College–Denver

Yezdi H. Godiwalla, University of Wisconsin–Whitewater

Sanjay Goel, University of Minnesota, Duluth

Sandy Gough, Boise State University

Allen Harmon, University of Minnesota, Duluth

Niran Harrison, University of Oregon

Paula Harveston, Berry College

Ahmad Hassan, Morehead State University

Donald Hatfield, Virginia Polytechnic Institute

Kim Hester, Arkansas State University

Scott Hicks, Liberty University

John Hironaka, California State University, Sacramento

Alan Hoffman, Bentley College

Gordon Holbein, University of Kentucky

Stephen V. Horner, Pittsburg State University

Jill Hough, University of Tulsa

John Humphreys, Eastern New Mexico University

James G. Ibe, Morris College

Jay J. Janney, University of Dayton

Lawrence Jauch, University of Louisiana–Monroe

Dana M. Johnson, Michigan Technical University

Homer Johnson, Loyola University, Chicago

James Katzenstein, California State University, Dominguez Hills

Joseph Kavanaugh, Sam Houston State University

Franz Kellermanns, University of Tennessee

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxdes36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xx 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xxi

Craig Kelley, California State University, Sacramento

Donna Kelley, Babson College

Dave Ketchen, Auburn University

John A. Kilpatrick, Idaho State University

Helaine J. Korn, Baruch College,CUNY

Stan Kowalczyk, San Francisco State University

Daniel Kraska, North Central State College

Donald E. Kreps, Kutztown University

Jim Kroeger, Cleveland State University

Subdoh P. Kulkarni, Howard University

Ron Lambert, Faulkner University

Theresa Lant, New York University

Ted Legatski, Texas Christian University

David J. Lemak, Washington State University–Tri-Cities

Cynthia Lengnick-Hall, University of Texas at San Antonio

Donald L. Lester, Arkansas State University

Wanda Lester, North Carolina A&T State University

Benyamin Lichtenstein, University of Massachusetts at Boston

Jun Lin, SUNY at New Paltz

Zhiang (John) Lin, University of Texas at Dallas

Dan Lockhart, University of Kentucky

John Logan, University of South Carolina

Franz T. Lohrke, Samford University

Kevin Lowe, University of North Carolina, Greensboro

Leyland M. Lucas, Morgan State University

Doug Lyon, Fort Lewis College

Rickey Madden, Ph.D., Presbyterian College

James Maddox, Friends University

Ravi Madhavan, University of Pittsburgh

Paul Mallette, Colorado State University

Santo D. Marabella, Moravian College

Catherine Maritan, Syracuse University

Daniel Marrone, Farmingdale State College, SUNY

Sarah Marsh, Northern Illinois University

John R. Massaua, University of Southern Maine

Hao Ma, Bryant College

Larry McDaniel, Alabama A&M University

Jean McGuire, Louisiana State University

Abagail McWilliams, University of Illinois, Chicago

Ofer Meilich, California State University–San Marcos

John E. Merchant, California State University, Sacramento

John M. Mezias, University of Miami

Michael Michalisin, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale

Doug Moesel, University of Missouri–Columbia

Fatma Mohamed, Morehead State University

Mike Montalbano, Bentley University

Debra Moody, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Gregory A. Moore, Middle Tennessee State University

James R. Morgan, Dominican University and UC Berkeley Extension

Sara A. Morris, Old Dominion University

Carolyn Mu, Baylor University

Stephen Mueller, Northern Kentucky University

John Mullane, Middle Tennessee State University

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxi 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xxii

Chandran Mylvaganam, Northwood University

Sucheta Nadkarni, Drexel University

Anil Nair, Old Dominion University V.K. Narayanan, Drexel University

Maria L. Nathan, Lynchburg College

Louise Nemanich, Arizona State University

Charles Newman, University of Maryland, University College

Stephanie Newport, Austin Peay State University

Gerry Nkombo Muuka, Murray State University

Bill Norton, University of Louisville

Yusuf A. Nur, SUNY Brockport

Jeffrey R. Nystrom, University of Colorado

William Ross O’Brien, Dallas Baptist University

d.t. ogilvie, Rutgers University

Floyd Ormsbee, Clarkson University

Karen L. Page, University of Wyoming

Jacquelyn W. Palmer, University of Cincinnati

Julie Palmer, University of Missouri, Columbia

Gerald Parker, Saint Louis University

Daewoo Park, Xavier University

Ralph Parrish, University of Central Oklahoma

Amy Patrick, Wilmington University

Douglas K. Peterson, Indiana State University

Edward Petkus, Mary Baldwin College

Michael C. Pickett, National University

Peter Ping Li, California State University, Stanislaus

Michael W. Pitts, Virginia Commonwealth University

Laura Poppo, Virginia Tech

Steve Porth, Saint Joseph’s University

Jodi A. Potter, Robert Morris University

Scott A. Quatro, Grand Canyon University

Nandini Rajagopalan, University of Southern California

Annette L. Ranft, Florida State University

Abdul Rasheed, University of Texas at Arlington

Devaki Rau, Northern Illinois University

George Redmond, Franklin University

Kira Reed, Syracuse University

Clint Relyea, Arkansas State University

Barbara Ribbens, Western Illinois University

Maurice Rice, University of Washington

Violina P. Rindova, University of Texas, Austin

Ron Rivas, Canisius College

David Robinson, Indiana State University– Terre Haute

Kenneth Robinson, Kennesaw State University

Simon Rodan, San Jose State University

Patrick R. Rogers, North Carolina A&T State University

John K. Ross III, Texas State University, San Marcos

Robert Rottman, Kentucky State University

Matthew R. Rutherford, Gonzaga University

Carol M. Sanchez, Grand Valley State University

William W. Sannwald, San Diego State University

Yolanda Sarason, Colorado State University

Marguerite Schneider, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Roger R. Schnorbus, University of Richmond

Terry Sebora, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

PREFACE

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

xxiii

John Seeger, Bentley College

Jamal Shamsie, Michigan State University

Mark Shanley, University of Illinois at Chicago

Lois Shelton, California State University, Northridge

Herbert Sherman, Long Island University

Weilei Shi, Baruch College–CUNY

Chris Shook, Auburn University

Jeremy Short, University of Oklahoma

Mark Simon, Oakland University, Michigan

Rob Singh, Morgan State University

Bruce Skaggs, University of Massachusetts

Wayne Smeltz, Rider University

Anne Smith, University of Tennessee

Andrew Spicer, University of South Carolina

James D. Spina, University of Maryland

John Stanbury, George Mason University & Inter-University Institute of Macau, SAR China

Timothy Stearns, California State University, Fresno

Elton Stephen, Austin State University

Charles E. Stevens, University of Wyoming

Alice Stewart, Ohio State University

Ram Subramanian, Grand Valley State University

Roy Suddaby, University of Iowa

Michael Sullivan, UC Berkeley Extension

Marta Szabo White, Georgia State University

Stephen Takach, University of Texas at San Antonio

Justin Tan, York University, Canada

Qingju Tao, Lehigh University

Linda Teagarden, Virginia Tech

Bing-Sheng Teng, George Washington University

Alan Theriault, University of California–Riverside

Tracy Thompson, University of Washington, Tacoma

Karen Torres, Angelo State University

Robert Trumble, Virginia Commonwealth University

Francis D. (Doug) Tuggle, Chapman University

K.J. Tullis, University of Central Oklahoma

Craig A. Turner, Ph.D., East Tennessee State University

Beverly Tyler, North Carolina State University

Rajaram Veliyath, Kennesaw State University

S. Stephen Vitucci, Tarleton State University– Central Texas

Jay A. Vora, St. Cloud State University

Bruce Walters, Louisiana Tech University

Jorge Walter, Portland State University

Edward Ward, St. Cloud State University

N. Wasilewski, Pepperdine University

Andrew Watson, Northeastern University

Larry Watts, Stephen F. Austin University

Paula S. Weber, St. Cloud State University

Kenneth E. A. Wendeln, Indiana University

Robert R. Wharton, Western Kentucky University

Laura Whitcomb, California State University– Los Angeles

Scott Williams, Wright State University

Diana Wong, Bowling Green State University

des36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxiiides36082_fm_i-xxxvi.indd xxiii 8/17/13 2:43 AM8/17/13 2:43 AM

Final PDF to printer

 

 

PREFACE

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Ford Pinto Case Study Using Ethics-5 Page Paper.

This is a ethics and decision making in leadership class. I have attached the case study and the question. I also included the grading rubric. Please if you can use Ethical and moral terms. Also relate ethics to business Ethics. Thank You. Due by 1pm  February 17, 2018

  • Ford Pinto Case Study

     

    On August 10, 1978, three teenage girls died horribly in an automobile accident. Driving a 1973 Ford Pinto to their church volleyball practice in Goshen, Indiana, they were struck from behind by a Chevrolet van. The Pinto’s fuel tank ruptured and the car exploded in flames. Two passengers, Lynn Marie Ulrich, 16, and her cousin, Donna Ulrich, 18, were trapped inside the inferno and burned to death. After three attempts, Lynn Marie’s sister, 18-year-old Judy Ann, was dragged out alive from the driver’s seat, but died in agony hours later in the hospital.

     

    They were merely the latest in a long list of people to burn to death in accidents involving the Pinto, which Ford had begun selling in 1970. By the time of the accident, the car had been the subject of a great deal of public outcry and debate about its safety, especially its susceptibility to fire in low-speed rear-end collisions. This particular accident, however, resulted in more media attention than any other auto accident in U.S. history. Why? Because it led to an unprecedented court case in which the prosecution brought charges of reckless homicide against the Ford Motor Co.—the first time that a corporation had been charged with criminal conduct, and the charge was not negligence but murder. At stake was much more than the maximum penalty of $30,000 in fines. Of immediate concern, a guilty verdict could have affected 40 pending civil cases nationwide and resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in punitive damage awards. Of perhaps greater concern, however, were larger issues involving corporate social responsibility, ethical decision making by individuals within corporations, and ultimately, the proper conduct of business in the modern era. How did Ford get into this situation? The chronology begins in early 1968 when the decision was made to battle the foreign competition in the small car market, specifically the Germans, but also the growing threat from the Japanese. This decision came after a hard-fought, two-year internal struggle between then-president Semon “Bunkie” Knudsen and Lee Iacocca, who had risen quickly within the company because of his success with the Mustang. Iacocca strongly supported fighting the competition at their own game, while Knudsen argued instead for letting them have the small car market so Ford could concentrate on the more profitable medium and large models. The final decision ultimately was in the hands of then-CEO Henry Ford II, who not only agreed with Iacocca but also promoted him to president after Knudsen’s subsequent forced resignation. Iacocca wanted the Pinto in the showrooms by the 1971 model introductions, which would require the shortest production planning period in automotive history to that time. The typical time span from conception to production of a new car was more than three and a half years; Iacocca, however, wanted to launch the Pinto in just over two years. Under normal conditions, chassis design, styling, product planning, advance engineering, component testing, and so on were all either completed or nearly completed prior to tooling of the production factories. Yet, because tooling had a fixed time frame of about 18 months, some of these other processes were done more or less concurrently. As a consequence, when it was discovered through crash testing that the Pinto’s fuel tank often ruptured during a rear-end impact, it was too late (in other words, too costly) to do much about it in terms of redesign. A closer look at the crash-test reports reveals that Ford was aware of the faulty fuel tank design. Eleven Pintos were subjected to rear-end collisions with a barrier at average speeds of 31 miles per hour to determine whether any fuel would be lost after impact. All eight of the Pintos equipped with the standard fuel tank failed. The three remaining cars, however, survived the test because special measures had been taken to prevent tank rupture or fuel leakage. These measures included a plastic baffle placed between the axle housing and the gas tank, a steel plate between the tank and the rear bumper, and a rubber lining in the gas tank.

     

    It should be noted that these tests were done under guidelines established by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 301, which was proposed in 1968 by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), but not officially adopted until the 1977 model year. Therefore, at the time of the tests, the Pinto met the required standards. Standard 301 had been strenuously opposed by the auto industry, and specifically Ford Motor Co. In fact, the lobbying efforts were so strong that negotiations continued until 1976, despite studies showing that hundreds of thousands of cars burned every year, taking 3,000 lives annually; the adoption of the standard was projected to reduce the death rate by 40 percent. Upon approval of Standard 301 in 1977, all Pintos were provided with a rupture-proof fuel tank design. But for the Pinto’s 1971 debut, Ford decided to go with its original gas tank design despite the crash-test results. Because the typical Pinto buyer was assumed to be extremely price conscious, Iacocca set an important goal known as “the limits of 2,000”: the Pinto could not cost more than $2,000 and could not weigh more than 2,000 pounds. Thus, to be competitive with foreign manufacturers, Ford felt it could not spend any money on improving the gas tank. Besides, during the late 1960s and early 1970s, American consumers demonstrated little concern for safety, so it was not considered good business sense to promote it. Iacocca echoed these sentiments when he said time and time again “Safety doesn’t sell,” a lesson he had learned after a failed attempt to add costly safety features to 1950s Fords. Ford had experimented with placing the gas tank in different locations, but all alternatives reduced usable trunk space. A design similar to that of the Ford Capri was successful in many crash tests at speeds over 50 miles per hour, but Ford felt that lost trunk space would hurt sales too much. One Ford engineer, when asked about the dangerous gas tank said, “Safety isn’t the issue, trunk space is. You have no idea how stiff the competition is over trunk space. Do you realize that if we put a Capri-type tank in the Pinto, you could only get one set of golf clubs in the trunk?” The last of Ford’s reasons for not making adjustments to the fuel tank design, however, was unquestionably the most controversial. After strong lobbying efforts, Ford and the auto industry in general convinced NHTSA regulators that a cost-benefit analysis would be an appropriate basis for determining the feasibility of safety design standards. Such an analysis, however, required the assignment of a value for a human life. A prior study had concluded that every time someone died in an auto accident there was an estimated “cost to society” of $200,725 (detailed in Table 2.1: What’s Your Life Worth?). 27 Having this value in hand, Ford calculated the cost of adding an $11 gas tank improvement versus the benefits of the projected 180 lives that would be saved (via an internal memo entitled “Fatalities Associated with Crash-Induced Fuel Leakage and Fires”). This is presented in Table 2.2: The Cost of Dying in a Pinto. 28 As is demonstrated, the costs outweigh the benefits by almost three times. Thus, the cost-benefit analysis indicated that no improvements to the gas tanks were warranted. Ford decided to go ahead with normal production plans, but the Pinto’s problems soon surfaced. By early 1973, Ford’s recall coordinator received field reports suggesting that Pintos were susceptible to “exploding” in rear-end collisions at very low speeds (under 25 miles per hour). Reports continued to indicate a similar trend in subsequent years, but no recall was initiated despite the mounting evidence. At every internal review, those responsible decided not to recall the Pinto. Prior to the Indiana accident, the most publicized case concerning the Pinto’s gas tank was that of Richard Grimshaw. In 1972, Richard, then 13, was riding with a decide? neighbor on a road near San Bernardino, California, when they were hit from the rear. The Pinto’s gas tank ruptured, causing the car to burst into flames. The neighbor was burned to death in a crash that would have been survivable if there had been no fire. Richard suffered third-degree burns over 90 percent of his body and subsequently underwent more than 60 operations, with only limited success. A civil suit was settled in February 1978, when a jury awarded a judgment of over $125 million against Ford, most of which consisted of punitive damages (later reduced to $6 million by a judge who nonetheless accused Ford of “callous indifference to human life”). This judgment was based on convincing evidence that Ford chose not to spend the $11 per car to correct the faults in the Pinto gas tanks that its own crash testing had revealed. The Pinto sold well until the media called special attention to the Pinto fuel tank story. As a consequence, in June 1978, in the face of pressure from the media, the government, pending court cases, and the potential loss of future sales, Ford ordered a complete recall of all 1.5 million Pintos built between 1970 and 1976. During the 1980 Indiana trial that resulted from the fatal accident of 1978, differing views continued to be expressed about the Pinto fires case. Ford representatives argued that companies must make cost-benefit decisions all the time. They claimed that it is an essential part of business, and even though everyone knows that some people will die in auto accidents, buyers want costs held down; therefore, people implicitly accept risks when buying cars. In a scathing article accusing Ford of criminally mismanaging the Pinto problem, investigative reporter Mark Dowie framed the case in a different and rather more sensational way, with this often-quoted speculation: “One wonders how long the Ford Motor Company would continue to market lethal cars were Henry Ford II and Lee Iacocca serving twenty-year terms in Leavenworth for consumer homicide.” 29

     

    Case Questions 1. Put yourself in the role of the recall coordinator for Ford Motor Co. It is 1973, and field reports have been coming in about rear-end collisions, fires, and fatalities. You must decide whether to recall the automobile.

    a. Identify the relevant facts.

    b. Identify the pertinent ethical issues and points of ethical conflict.

    c. Identify the relevant affected parties.

    d. Identify the possible consequences of alternative courses of action.

    e. Identify relevant obligations.

    f. Identify your relevant community standards that should guide you as a person of integrity. g. Check your gut. What will you decide?

    Level of Achievement General Presentation Reasoning, Argumentation
    Exemplary (10 pts) · Provides a clear and thorough introduction

    · Addresses the questions

    · Presents information in a logical order

    · Uses acceptable communication style and grammar (no errors)

    · Demonstrates an accurate and complete understanding of the questions

    · Uses appropriate information and examples to support answers

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"