solution

Instructions This is going to be your second assignment which is based on the Suez Canal. This canal playing a major role since 105 years of its inauguration. As a global supply chain management, we need to learn about such facilities worldwide to find out efficient movement of products throughout the globe. So this assignment is desk research for you to find out its economic importance, extensions for further benefits, handle the difficulties, and overcome the situations. Please try to reveal below matters: 1. Economic importance of the Suez Canal since its inception. 5 points 2. Factual information related to its benefits, cost, time savings and increase connectivity among the international players. 5 points 3. Problems facing by the Suez Canal users. 5 points 4. Also add the Ever Given ship incident in the Suez Canal and discuss the consequences of supply management worldwide. 5 Points 4. What could be the remedies? 5 points

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

Since 2011, PT had been exploring an entry into Trinidad’s national market, but it had a long way to go. Due to the unclear focus of the national market development, all parts of the country had moved forward together, increasing the number of stores blindly, but some resource allocations, such as for advertising, had been insufficient. Lemongrass, a regional tea brand, faced double difficulties in transforming into a national brand. Since 2013, some of the stores that had rapidly opened were restructured or closed due to poor performance. On the one hand, consumers’ brand recognition was unclear. PT had been rooted in Port of Spain for 20 years; however, its eight brands were not well-known in the rest of the country. In particular, consumers could not distinguish the categories of Lemongrass. On the other hand, the cost of channel construction was high. As consumers paid attention to the drinking experience when buying tea in branded stores, the investment in store construction was relatively large. PT had introduced the Amoeba business model in its stores and then co-operated with a positioning consulting company, but failed to find a strategic plan suitable for the national expansion. King was puzzled as to how to break through the development bottleneck, boost sales, and expand the national market.

Organizational Structure and Human Resources

The company was divided into a weird and vague organizational structure. Tucuche headquarters and the Ducheng marketing branch, which consisted of the Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary. The Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary were directly managed by King. He felt overwhelmed by simultaneously managing three major tea categories—green, black, and scented tea—as well as overseeing many managers in the national market. As an example, the Port of Spain Sales Subsidiary comprised five managers who held their own distinct opinions during a meeting, making it difficult to reach a consensus. In addition, due to the vague powers and responsibilities of the Port of Spain subsidiary’s operation department, the information transmission between the Ducheng branch and its subsidiaries was prone to information asymmetry, resulting in low work efficiency.

PT’s management, including the store manager, was mainly engaged in internal competition so that employees could see a channel for their career promotion. The top management team had strong cohesion, and most of the managers had worked with King since he started the business. The working atmosphere of the terminal store was deeply influenced by the slogan “Just Let It Be.” Due to front-line employees’ fixed salaries and the serious egalitarianism in the stores, most employees lacked enthusiasm for their work.

In July 2016, PT introduced the Amoeba business model to the terminal store management, with the purpose of activating each employee’s business awareness. A single store was taken as the accounting entity, which was independently operated and responsible for its own profits and losses. The evaluation standard for the store had changed from being based on sales revenue to being based on performance (i.e., evaluating both sales revenue and expenses). However, after the actual implementation, it was found that firstly, the store had a limited degree of cost control. Rent and decorating costs could not be changed; only the water and electricity expenses could be controlled. Secondly, the sales staff were unskilled in the use of office software, which took up time normally devoted to sales. Most importantly, the Amoeba business model did not provide enough incentives for stores. Employees focused on how to control costs, and the operating results showed no positive growth.

Value Creation Activities

The company’s value creation activities were the same as all links in the tea industry chain, which could be subdivided into tea plantation, procurement, primary processing, finishing processing, logistics, and sales. The raw materials of Lemongrass tea came from the company’s self-built base and the contracted base of tea farmers. All bases were selected to be built in the high mountain area of Mount Tucuche. The ecology of the tea garden was well preserved. The superior natural ecological environment provided good conditions for the growth of tea trees and laid a good foundation for the production of high-quality tea. The management of tea gardens was in accordance with the Lemongrass tea base management regulations for planting and production. The fresh leaves were sampled throughout the year to ensure the safety of the raw materials. They were single-bud, one bud and one leaf, all of which were picked by hand. The procurement method was divided into fresh leaf procurement and semi-finished product procurement.

Since 2014, PT had begun to upgrade its production layout and facilities, purchased top Japanese production equipment, and built a new tea preservation warehouse and testing centre. The whole process of production and processing had realized digital control, and had performed well in energy conservation and in emission reduction and improvement. Lemongrass tea was a spring bud tea. To ensure the stable quality of all grades of Lemongrass tea throughout the year, the semi-finished Lemongrass tea was graded and assembled into three levels of tea: “Discovery,” “Meditation,” and “Taste.” After the initial processing, the semi-finished products were refrigerated for later finishing, packaging, and sales according to orders received throughout the year.

PT’s sales channels were mainly direct sales, supplemented by franchising. In the process of tea sales, tasting services were offered, especially for high-end teas. Therefore, PT’s sales were mainly offline and supplemented by online orders. To meet customers’ purchasing needs, the store sold a host of brands, including Lemongrass green tea (main brand), Baoding green tea, Junlin black tea (main brand), Lundao black tea, and Bitan scented tea (main brand). Among them, LEMONGRASS and Bitan were divided into three series according to quality standards: “Discovery,” “Meditation,” and “Taste.” PT offered many categories of tea, many packaging specifications, and covered different price ranges. However, customers’ cognition of PT’s teas was fuzzy because of the brand’s unclear positioning.

In 2016, when the Amoeba business model was introduced into the management of terminal stores, the supporting incentive system was imperfect, and thus failed to mobilize the enthusiasm of employees. As a result, the stores were not doing well. Employees moved from increasing the store’s income to reducing expenditures. For example, employees turned off the air conditioning when no customers were in the store, and chose “Taste” tea when customers wanted to sample the tea, which had led to weak awareness of high-end drinking services in the stores, insufficient customer awareness of the brand, and more difficulty in acquiring new customers.

Although PT had attracted many customers, most were dormant after purchasing once. One reason for the low repurchase rate was the almost total lack of after-sales service in the stores. The employees lacked enthusiasm for work, and the work stopped at the store, which made it difficult for customers to think of the Lemongrass brand when buying tea the next time. Therefore, their purchase frequency was unlikely to increase.

The Road Ahead

PT, facing increasingly fierce competition in the tea industry, weak growth of the market in Sichuan Province, declining national market expansion, and weak team morale within the company, was trapped in a development bottleneck and therefore eager to seek a new development path. King thought about the out of-focus problem raised by SSSL.

PT operated three tea categories and eight brands, and its prices spanned high, medium, and low budgets. Diversification could not only meet the needs of different consumer groups but also share fixed costs and ensure the company’s stable profits. Coupled with the Amoeba business model, diversification provided customers with the most cost-effective tea and drinking services while implementing a cost leadership consumed by customers. If the best-value focus strategy was implemented, and only the main brand Lemongrass was developed, would consumers accept PT’s high-priced products? Would frontline employees have the ability to sell? How should the national market break through? Although King hesitated, it was time to make a strategic decision.

Direction 1: Adhere to the cost leadership strategy

PT operated three major categories and eight brands, covering consumer groups and market scope to the greatest extent, and providing mass-market customers with cost-effective products. However, the implementation of this strategy meant that only limited resources and attention would be allocated among the eight brands. Each brand would receive fewer resources and less attention. There was a risk that none of the brands would succeed in transformation.

Direction 2: Adopt the best-value focus strategy

PT focused on category and brand, and on transforming Lemongrass into Trinidad’s leading high-end green tea producer. Different from its first national market expansion, this expansion was undertaken on the basis of strategic priorities. The transformation of national tea brands needed to be realized in stages for PT to truly become the leader. The resources and organizational conditions required by the best-value focus strategy differed, which meant PT would face huge changes ahead.

Assignment Questions:

1. As of May 2018, what challenges had PT faced in recent years? Assess the factors in
the internal and external environment that led to those challenges?
2. Analyze the industry competition conditions that PT faced. Identify the key external
factors that affected PT’s strategic decision.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

Patrick Jackson sat at the table, trying very hard to keep his mouth from dropping open. He and the other nine executive directors on John Pointer’s leadership council were completing their annual talent reviews, discussing various individuals on their teams who would be good candidates for promotion to director. Of course, the logistics of this advancement opportunity would be handled through the Learning and Development Department. But Patrick was well aware that the conversations that he and his fellow executive directors were having in John Pointer’s “closed room” meeting were going to be very influential in who was tapped and who wasn’t. John, vice president of marketing, and his team sitting around the table, represented a powerful segment of the leadership at Millenial. 20

The informal banter belied the seriousness of the discussion they were having. There were several candidates that were being considered for the two spots available. As names were raised, each executive director shared his experiences with that particular associate director. Some of the candidates generated enthusiasm. For example, Alan Witherspoon was especially well regarded. Steve Winter, Alan’s executive director and another senior leader on John’s team, had worked closely with Alan. Others had observed and heard enough about Alan that they felt comfortable speaking on his behalf. They spoke strongly in support of Alan, with Steve joking that they had attended the same school so of course he was a strong player. Alan’s achievements were enumerated and the praise was being laid on thick and heavy.?.?.?a little too much from Patrick’s perspective.

Patrick worked in a cross-functional team with Alan. His own experiences with Alan had not been as positive. He saw Alan’s performance as primarily self-serving. He also noticed that Alan was rather absent from the team, especially when they were in crunch time. Alan didn’t seem particularly open to feedback either. When Patrick sent out congratulations to the team to acknowledge their strong work in finishing the project, he also offered an opportunity for each team member to meet for a post-mortem discussion. While the project had ended successfully, there were many learning opportunities along the way that Patrick wanted to discuss with his team members—learning that could be used to make their next project go more smoothly. Additionally, Patrick wanted to enhance his own learning, so he was interested in a discussion that drew from their insights. Alan had opted not to take up this invitation, curtly declining.

Patrick was waiting to hear how Alicia Conrad, another associate director, was going to be discussed by his colleagues. He breathed a slight sigh of relief when James Valencio, a fellow executive director, started the discussion with positive comments. He said that she was motivated, that she could be counted on to exceed her clients’ expectations, and that she was quite strategic in her approach to problem solving. But James quickly qualified that statement. Yes, she could be counted on to exceed her clients’ expectations. But did she need additional support from her coworkers to perform at that level? James also had some questions about Alicia’s readiness to be promoted. “You know, she doesn’t have that much experience. I think we should give her a year or two more to get better prepared for the director role.” Patrick felt himself tense up—these concerns were issues that had consistently been raised… but only in regards to their female candidates. Women, and some men, in the organization had noticed this troubling trend. Although the Learning and Development Department was monitoring the promotion cycle, the ultimate decisions rested with the leadership team. And… old habits die hard.

One of the initiatives that Learning and Development sponsored was the Male Ally Program. The Male Ally Program had been initiated to address the dearth of women in senior leadership positions. Alicia was his partner in this program. Because of their interactions, Patrick knew firsthand how Alicia was showing up and impacting the business. He wondered if Alicia’s collaborative style was what James saw as “needing support.” There was still an old-fashioned, outdated definition of leadership in Millenial; “leaders” were expected to ride in on a white horse and save the day. But Patrick was well aware that leadership was exemplified with many different behaviors. A primary aspect of a leader is that he—or she or they—achieved identified goals. Indeed, Alicia and her team had successfully managed a large portfolio of clients, winning high satisfaction scores and scoring repeat business despite the challenging nature of some of the clients. She had done everything from meeting goals, supporting a team, to satisfying customers. Was it still not enough?

Clearly Alicia was successful in her role, and Patrick felt certain that she was ready for this promotion now, not in a year or two. But as James continued to share his concerns about Alicia, doubts about her were spreading across the room. Patrick wondered if he should speak up. But he was running out of time—they had spent so much time talking about Alan that they couldn’t give the same attention to Alicia. And anyway, what happened in that room would stay in that room. They agreed to one more quick meeting in a few days before sharing their candidates for promotion with Talent Management.

As Patrick left the room, he wondered again about the Male Ally Program—about his involvement and the organization’s commitment. Was Millenial really committed to this “initiative?” All of the men around the table were signed up for the program; some of them even had partners who were also being considered for this director role. Interestingly, Patrick was the only Male Ally to speak on behalf of his partner. This lack of advocacy was not surprising; many of the women in Millenial shared their concerns that the program had been thrown together and launched as a tool to quiet their loud voices. With enough time, those voices would be quelled—isn’t this what had happened in the past? Patrick believed that the program was an important initiative that held great promise for advancing women and increasing their presence in the senior ranks. “If anyone is going to take a stand, not just for Alicia but for the program as well, I believe I am going to have to be the one,” thought Patrick. But he understood that taking a stand could result in some challenges for him. His colleagues were not going to be pleased if he spoke up more strongly on Alicia’s behalf. So, he wanted to think carefully about the meeting next week.

Discussion Questions

What are the reasons that Patrick might choose not to advocate for Alicia?

How should he go about advocating for Alicia?

What does Patrick risk if he speaks out on her behalf?

What will happen if he opts to say nothing?

What tensions has the launch of the Male Ally Program raised in Millenial?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

solution

Assignment Requirements:
You are a summer student intern at a management consulting company. The Managing Director is working with this client – Electroco, to develop an innovation strategy.
This Managing Director remembers that you took an Innovation course at KPU and wants you to provide some clear guidance on how innovation can be measured and what this client should measure to ensure their innovation is worthwhile. What would you suggest as possible measurement targets, and why?

Electroco
Background
This is a large, multinational organization, originally founded around electric motors and
transformers but which has diversified extensively into information and communications
technologies, medical instruments and software.
Innovation ‘Claim to Fame’
This firm is yet another of the ‘100 club’, having been founded in the late-nineteenth century. Its early years were characterized by many major product breakthroughs and they
established a strong brand name around the world with a reputation for quality and
innovation. Increasing pressure on their traditional markets and high competition in the
new technology fields which it entered (such as telecommunications) forced a realization
that the old and somewhat bureaucratic structures and procedures needed to be revamped around a capability for ‘reinvention’. They appear to have been successful in doing so,
maintaining their core businesses but growing strongly in new fields like computers and
medical instruments through opening up to multiple sources of new, ‘do different’
innovations.
How Do They Manage Innovation?
They already had a strong foundation in product development based on deep technological
roots and a high R&D spend. Recent years have seen a shift towards leveraging the wide knowledge base which the company has built up – as one interviewee put it, ‘If only
Electroco knew what Electroco knows …’!
There has also been a recognition that growth through innovation will depend on carrying
out a deliberate search for non-current products and enabling technologies (looking in
unexpected places) and in keeping the units which take those ideas forward as small and
focused as possible rather than trying to run them through the large and somewhat staid
organization of the present. (An example of the success of their approach to increasing the
volume of ideas is in their Medical Division where, in the first year of the innovation
programme ,450 project ideas emerged, 70% of which came from outside the division. These
led to 11 business plans for new ventures and 3 major product fields resulted. By the late 1990s, after this process had been running for five years, the company had around 1
invention per day and two thirds of their $5bn sales were being generated by products that had been introduced during the previous two years, 50% of the ideas for which came from
outside).
Innovation Strategy and Leadership
A number of key strategic enablers are worth flagging: • Strong cultural value around innovation, grounded in the company’s long history,
now being matched by a new, complementary value around entrepreneurship.
Case Studies
• Willingness to reinvent and to let go – a strong feature of recent history – changing
the vision.
• Specific change initiatives to increase the volume of ideas feeding into innovation
process.
• Management ‘coaches’ as expression of commitment to see the process through (counters the ‘flavour of the month’ problem).
• Resource allocation to allow for ‘slack’ and curiosity-driven working – effectively
gives ‘permission’ to try new things out.
• Internal venture funds to allow progression of new ideas along parallel fast tracks to
mainstream innovations.
Enabling the Process
The company has an effective and well-established process for ‘do better’ innovations but it
is interesting to explore the systems which they are putting into place alongside these to
enable them to find and exploit radical, ‘do different’ innovations. Mechanisms here include: • Active search for new and different knowledge to complement the in-house base, deliberately looking for those which do not fit the current product/technology
portfolio (a kind of parallel search approach).
• Training and use of ‘change agents’ with the task of turning new knowledge garnered through these networks into live projects (a kind of innovation product manager
role).
• Use of ‘technology accelerator’ and ‘technology to business centres’ as a way of
structuring a fast track for such ideas into action.
• ‘Spin-in’ and ‘spin-out’ system for converting innovative ideas into development
projects via non-traditional routes, more closely modelled on individual entrepreneurship.
• Emphasis on a ‘maverick’/ rapid execution process to move things through quickly
and enable fast failure and rapid learning.
• Use of alternative channels and networks for market research, running in parallel
with ‘do better’ mainstream structure.
• Use of new innovation tools like ‘innovation fields’ to explore future scenarios, road
mapping to define technology pathways, etc.
• Use of external ‘hot making’ process to increase the volume of externally-triggered innovation ideas (see below).
• Use of idea push approaches, such as ‘Impulse’, to increase the volume of internally-
driven ideas into the system – a regular process which attracts ideas and funnels
them via a selection board made up of cross-division representation. Around 25% of
ideas are taken forward so there is a continuing flow. Both ‘Impulse’-type and CC approaches generate large volumes of ideas but the problem is incubation and development. Electroco has a complementary venture arm and incubator units – an in-house start-up system for new business where seed capital, personal skills
development, etc. can be moved along. In turn these are passed to ‘Innovation Task
Forces’, dedicated groups recruited from across divisions (around five people usually)
and given a venture capital budget to work up a business plan for a new product field.
At the ‘go’/‘no go’ decision point, the project is launched or transferred to another
division to launch or spun out to the outside (but here an equity stake is retained to
Case Studies
ensure a return of funds for the venture capital pot). There is also concern about
knowledge management – ‘We are careful what we let out of the door!’.
• An alternative to spin-out is linkage to satellite firms, local hi-tech SMEs which can
act as innovation incubators. These have the advantage of retaining an entrepreneurial SME culture but with access to the resources and knowledge base of
a giant organization like Electroco.
• A dedicated team of ‘scanners’ whose role is to search and transfer knowledge across Electroco and from universities, research institutes, other firms, etc.
Building an Innovative Organization
• ‘Hierarchies kill innovation’: a deliberate attempt to get away from vertical structures
which typified the past and towards flat/knowledge-mixing structures.
• Knowledge culture as the new organizing model rather than efficient use of resources
as the key structuring principle.
• Structure shifted from region focus to one which has a strong customer sector focus.
• Empowerment and autonomy through giving people ‘slack’ time to explore new ideas.
• Idea generation/suggestion processes like ‘Impulse’: incentives for innovation that are based on participating not on the value of final ideas. However, for those ideas
that are taken forward, there is the incentive of playing a major role in the
subsequent development, which engages commitment and ‘championship’ of ideas.
• ‘Encourage the natural entrepreneur’.
Linkages and Networking
• Creation of internal (cross-division/functional/discipline) networks which bring
different knowledge sets together.
• Parallel setting up of new external networks. Staff (not marketing) are empowered to initiate a process of intense customer contact – ‘hot making’ – to identify/generate
new possibilities.
• Sales are also heavily involved in tracking lead users but also in actively searching out
new customers in this ‘hot making’ process. The idea is to generate leads for R&D via
a process of learning from and with customers. Sales teams are also rotated to bring
different perspectives to bear.
• Staff work as ‘hit teams’ to target conferences, scan academic and other journals, look
at competitor firms, etc. – essentially active scanning and then coming back to report
in a formal way, building a stronger technological intelligence system.
• Targeted search for new and complementary knowledge sources via alliances, joint
ventures, etc.
• Particular emphasis within these JVs on working with hi-tech SMEs who are then
allowed to retain their identity and character – i.e. not instantly absorbed into the
mainstream culture and procedures but ‘incubated’ and allowed to continue to grow along their own entrepreneurial trajectories.
Case Studies
4
Learning and Capability Development The company recognized that it needed to change a large firm culture but decided not to do
so in one hit. Instead they have made extensive use of a ‘learning laboratory’ approach where good practices evolved in one division are then transferred out into others so that the new
approach spreads organically. An early success was in the computer division where margins
had been 30% below the industry average but where they are now very competitive and
innovative. There is now extensive and deliberate cross-divisional learning about innovation
management.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"