LAW 531 Final Exam

LAW 531 Final Exam

Which of the following is a distinguishing feature of a common law legal system?

A. Requiring guilt be proven beyond a reasonable doubt

B. The sole source of law is a comprehensive civil code

C. An appeal process

D. The making of law by the judges and the following of precedent

2) Which best describes the types of agency authority held by officers of a corporation? 

A. Vicarious authority

B. Express and obvious authority

C. Implied and apparent authority only

D. Express, implied, and apparent authority

3) If an LLC fails to follow formalities such as keeping minutes of meetings, which of the following is true? 

A. Only the managers of a manager-managed LLC will lose limited liability. 

B. All members will lose their limited liability. 

C. This failure will not result in imposing personal liability on any member.

D. Only the parties responsible for the failure will lose limited liability.

4) Martha started a flower shop as a sole proprietor. After 1 year, she was forced to close the shop because business was so bad. At that time, the business assets totaled $50,000, but the business liabilities totaled $125,000. Which of the following statements is true?

A. Martha is personally liable for the additional $75,000.

B. Martha’s business creditors can collect only the $50,000 of business assets.

C. Martha’s business creditors can collect only the $50,000 now, but if Martha ever goes into business again, they can get the assets of the new business.

D. Once Martha terminates the sole proprietorship; the business creditors cannot even get the $50,000

5) Partners of a general partnership

A. Are protected from litigation against the partnership by statute

B. Are liable for the obligations of the partnership only to the extent of their capital contributions

C. Do not have to pay taxes on the profits of the partnership that are distributed to them

D. Are liable for all the obligations of their partnership

6) Which of the following forms of alternative dispute resolution allows both parties to see the strengths and weaknesses of both sides of the case through the presentation of evidence?

A. Negotiated settlement

B. Mini-trial

C. Mediation

D. Conciliation

7) A ___________ is a court-appointed party who conducts a private trial and renders a judgment

A. Fact-finder

B. Arbitrator

C. Judicial referee

D. Negotiator

8) What is a form of alternative dispute resolution that is often used when the parties involved do not want to face one another?

A. Arbitration

B. Fact-finding

C. Mini-trial

D. Conciliation

9) Which of the following is true regarding mediation?

A. A mediator often meets with both parties at the same time

B. A settlement agreement is never reached with a mediator.

C. A mediator does not make a decision or award

D. If a settlement agreement is not reached in mediation, then the parties hire a new mediator

10) There are no accountants on the board of the Oriole Corporation, a privately held corporation. The board routinely relies on a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to explain the financial situation of the corporation. Law 531 final exam. The board does not do an independent analysis of the CPA’s report. In these circumstances, the board is

A. Violating a duty of loyalty

B. Violating a duty to exercise due care

C. Violating the business judgment rule

D. Not violating any duty

11) Self-dealing by a director of a corporation can best be described as

A. A breach of a director’s duty of notification

B. A breach of a director’s duty of care

C. A breach of the Business Judgment Rule

D. There was no breach of duty

12) Which of the following is likely to be a breach of a corporate officer or director’s duty of care?

A. Failing to anticipate a precipitous drop in consumer demand of the company’s product

B. Failing to make a reasonable investigation of relevant facts

C. Failing to predict the unexpected startup of a new competitor

D. Failing to foresee a sudden rise in the interest rate

13) In what ways may officers and directors be protected by the corporation from liability for actions taken as an officer or director?

A. The officer or director must purchase personal liability insurance to cover such losses.

B. Have the corporation purchase liability insurance and indemnify the officers and directors

C. Officers and directors cannot be protected from liability

D. Officers and directors are automatically protected from liability by virtue of corporate

14) If a plaintiff voluntarily participates in a risky activity that results in injury, what is the most likely defense to a claim that the plaintiff assumed the risk?

A. Contributory negligence

B. Defendant was negligent per se

C. Defendant assumed the risk under the “danger invites rescue” doctrine

D. Comparative negligence

15) Mark is the treasurer of Sky-Hi Tech Corporation and, as such, he is responsible for protecting the assets of the corporation. One of Mark’s subordinates, Jill, is in charge of reconciling the monthly corporate bank statements. Law/531 week 5 final. Over a period of several months, Jill embezzled a large amount of money from Sky-Hi Tech, covering up the theft using her bank reconciliations. If Mark had adequately supervised Jill, she could not have embezzled this money. Mark’s actions (or inactions) constitute a breach of his duty of

A. Due care

B. Obedience

C. Loyalty

D. Good business judgment

16) Barry buys a new sports car. The car sits low to the ground and because of the styling; visibility to the rear is limited. About a month after Barry buys the car, he backs over his pet poodle as he is leaving for work. In his strict liability suit against the car manufacturer, Barry will

A. Win because driving a sports car is an inherently dangerous activity

B. Win on the basis of design defect

C. Win on the basis of packaging defect because the car could have been packaged in a differently styled body

D. Lose because he assumed the risk of backing up in a car when he could not see to the rear

17) If a judge rules that a party lost its case because of the Statute of Frauds, the judge has essentially stated which of the following?

A. The losing party purposely deceived the other party about a material fact.

B. The losing party will not be allowed to introduce evidence to contradict a written agreement

C. The losing party cannot enforce an oral contract that should have been in writing

D. The losing party was found by the court to have lied, and therefore will lose the case

18) What does the parole evidence rule do?

A. It limits the ability of parties to written contracts from introducing certain evidence related to the contract.

B. It sets the rules for admissibility of evidence relating to releasing a criminal from a prison term

C. It sets the general rules for the admissibility of evidence in criminal actions

D. It determines which contracts are required to be in writing

19) ABC LLC and XYZ Corp. entered into a contract whereby ABC is to supply XYZ with widgets. After receiving the first shipment of widgets, XYZ finds that the widgets, while meeting the physical standards specified in the contract, do not perform as XYZ anticipated. The contract is silent as to performance specifications, but XYZ suspects that ABC knew that it was manufacturing and supplying widgets that would not perform according to industry standard. XYZ initiates a lawsuit against ABC, alleging that ABC knowingly supplied defective widgets. What process will XYZ use to help it develop its case against ABC?

A. Pleadings

B. Motion for summary judgment

C. Discovery

D. Trial

20) Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), an employee’s benefits must vest

A. Within 10 years

B. By the time of the employee’s retirement

C. In total within 5 years or gradually within 7 years

D. Only as provided in the pension plan

21) Which of the following statutes provides that it is legal for employees to organize a union?

A. The Norris-LaGuardia Act

B. The National Labor Relations Act

C. The Labor-Management Relations Act

D. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act

22) William was a factory worker at the Spruce Industries plant. When management found out that William is gay, he was fired. The plant’s action is

A. Not prohibited under federal law

B. A violation of Title VII

C. A violation of the Equal Pay Act

D. A violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act

23) Janet is manager of a bank. She has all the qualifications to be promoted to bank manager. In fact, she is better qualified than any of the men being considered for the position. However, the owner of the bank believes that bank customers will LAW/531 not accept a woman as bank manager, so the owner promotes one of the males. The owner’s actions would best be described as what?

A. Quid pro quo

B. Hostile work environment

C. Gender discrimination

D. Pregnancy discrimination

24) Which one of the following statutes allows a prevailing party to recover attorney’s fees in an action against the government for an action of an agency?

A. The Freedom of Information Act

B. The Government Compensation Act

C. The Administrative Procedure Act

D. The Equal Access to Justice Act

25) Which of the following would prevent someone from acquiring land by adverse possession?

A. The person never had to fight the original owner to remain on the land

B. The person lived on the land secretly so that the original owner would not find out he or she was there

C. The person lived on the land without the original owner’s permission

D. The person was the only person who lived on the land in question

26) Which of the following would be classified as tangible personal property, as opposed to other property categories, such as fixtures or intangible property?

A. A freestanding desk

B. Built-in cabinets in an office

C. A copyright to a literary work

D. A field of corn

27) As the CEO of a high tech company, you become aware that your chief competitor is working on a new computer program that will revolutionize your industry. You know that if you can find out several key functions about the new product, LAW/531 final exams your own programmers will be able to duplicate the function of the program without actually copying its code. Which of the following actions can you ethically take?

A. Paying the garbage company to deliver the competitor’s garbage to you

B. Hiring a former employee of the competitor and paying her a bonus to tell you the competitor’s secrets

C. Hiring a researcher to review all available information about the competitor, including patents, types and names of employees hired, reports by the competitor, including all SEC filings

D. Hacking into the competitor’s computer systems to find out what you need

28) From a practical perspective, what are some of the elements of Sarbanes-Oxley?

A. Ensuring transparency, accountability and internal controls

B. Ensuring companies are profitable

C. Ensuring that CEOs do not make more than 10 times the lowest paid employee

D. Ensuring that large shareholders do not have board representation

29) Under Title IX of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the penalty for someone who certifies “any statements as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport . . .” is. Law 531 final exam answer

A. No more than $1,000,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 10 years, or both

B. No more than $500,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 6 months, or both

C. No more than $2,000,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 3 years, or both

D. No more than $5,000,000.00 or imprisoned no more than 20 years, or both

30) Which is prohibited under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act?

A. High salaries for corporate executives

B. Using an independent accounting firm for audit purposes

C. Public companies making personal loans to their directors and executives

D. Directors and executives attending board meetings on a regular basis

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Legal Case Analysis

Legal Case Analysis

Instructions
Please read the case DCS Sanitation Management v. Eloy Castillo (and supporting notes), linked in the reference below:
 

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1325757.html

Once you have read and reviewed the case scenario, respond to the following questions:
Discuss the legal implications for employers and employees for requiring employees to sign noncompete agreements. What factors did the court consider in making its decision? Compare and contrast Ohio and Nebraska’s positions on noncompete clauses.
Which state’s laws support ethical reasoning in the resolution of this case?
Your response should be a minimum of two pages in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying APA style citations.
Number of Pages: 2 Pages
Academic Level: College
Paper Format: APA 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Two Essays 550 words each (1100 words total) three citations APA format

Two Essays 550 words each (1100 words total) three citations APA format

#3 QUESTION #1

Write an essay consisting of at least 550 words addressing all of the following topics (a through h):
 

a. Explain riparian water rights.
 

b. Describe how Colorado’s groundwater use rules differ from California’s.
 

c. How did the 1969 fire on the Cuyahoga River influence clean water legislation?
 

d. What are the key differences between the 1977 Clean Water Act and the 1987 Water Quality Act?
 

e. Describe the portions of an NPDES permit.
 

f. Why is pretreatment required for industries that discharge into sanitary sewers?
 

g. Why was the 1972 Safe Drinking Water Act passed?
 

h. Explain how the Clean Water Act affects your employer or your personal life. 

—————————————————————-

QUESTION #2

Write an essay consisting of at least 550 words addressing all of the following topics (a through f):

a. Explain appropriative water rights. 

b. What are the key differences between the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the 1977 Clean Water Act? 

c. Explain how Best Conventional Technology (BCT) and Best Available Technology (BAT) requirements differ. Which requirement is more stringent? 

d. What activity requires preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)? 

e. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the Safe Drinking Water Act? 

f. Explain how the Clean Water Act affects your employer or your personal life.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

LAW 531 Week 4 Assignment Legal Risk And Opportunity In Employment

LAW 531 Week 4 Assignment Legal Risk And Opportunity In Employment

Assignment: Legal Risk and Opportunity in Employment
The following three Legal Encounters involve NewCorp, your employer. You are required to provide a brief answer to the questions asked at the end of each encounter. Your boss expects a substantive answer, not simply a recommendation to refer matters to an attorney. The majority of businesses in the U.S. do not have staff counsel, and your boss does not want to spend money getting advice until after you provide an assessment. In your answer, provide substantive answers to resolve each of the three legal encounters and identify what legal principles support your decision. All encounters can be supported from legal principles found in the readings for this week, including cases and statutes. Each answer must be limited to 350 words following APA format.
.

Legal Encounter 1:

Newcorp hired Pat Grey as manager of real property for Newcorp in Vermont, responsible for activities related to maintaining leased office space. In that role, Pat supervised 51 employees and lower-level supervisors, and dealt with tenants who leased commercial space. For the job, Pat relocated from another city 300 miles away, moving his spouse and children, selling and buying a home, and dealing with a spouse having to quit her job to seek employment in the new state.

After Pat had been on the job for three months, his boss explained that things did not seem to be working out, and said that Pat would be discharged with 30 days severance pay. Pat was surprised because his employer gave no indication of any problem on the job. Newcorp’s Personnel Manual, which had been provided to Pat upon his acceptance of employment, outlined the process for dealing with unsatisfactory employees:

Notice of Unsatisfactory Performance/Corrective Action Plan

If the job performance of an employee is unsatisfactory, the employee will be notified of the deficiency and placed on a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). If the employee performance does not improve to a satisfactory level within the specified period of time, termination will follow.

Pat acknowledged that upon employment, he signed an understanding that the company observed employment at will with respect to employment and discharge, but believed that the above provision limited Newcorp’s freedom to fire him at will. Finally, Pat observes that Newcorp senior management was “noticeably unfriendly” after Pat had been vocal at a local school board meeting. In the meeting, Pat insisted that school sports funds should be equally allocated among all student athletic programs, not just concentrated on the boy’s football and basketball programs. His position on the matter was unpopular, and although no one at the school board meeting identified Pat as a Newcorp employee, he believed that this contributed to the Newcorp decision to discharge him.

What liability and rights, if any, do Newcorp or Pat have in this situation? What legal principles (statutory or case law) supports those rights and liabilities? Remember to limit your answer to 350 words following APA format.
.

Legal Encounter 2:

Newcorp employed Sam as a supervisor of electrical manufacturing for auto under-dash wiring harnesses. Sam’s department employed about 100 men and women to create the wiring, coat it with various insulators, and then connect it to different types of universal couplings so car speedometers, oil gauges, and other instruments would work. The final product, an under-dash wiring harness, was sent to the final assembly plant for installation in cars.

Sam developed a relationship with one of his female employees, Paula. They began dating and it turned into a torrid affair that included frequent trysts at the workplace. Paula later met and began dating a man who did not work for Newcorp, and thereafter ended the affair with Sam. Sam did not give up easily and continued touching Paula and exhibiting a variety of other unwelcome behaviors, even after Paula clearly told him to stop. Sam suggested that Paula’s work might be suffering from a “lack of interest” on her part, and since she stopped dating him, she seemed to lack interest in work quality.

Paula decided to get away from Sam, and applied for a transfer to the wire-coating section, which would not be directly under Sam’s control. Sam blocked the transfer, citing company policy that there was evidence that the chemicals used in wire coatings could harm an early-state fetus being carried by a newly-pregnant woman. Because Paula was a young woman who could become pregnant, Sam argued, Newcorp could not take the chance for Paula to work in wire coating due to the possibility of Newcorp liability for a resulting birth defect. Paula believed this was probably Sam’s way of keeping her under his thumb, and that even if it was not, it was discrimination based on sex and therefore illegal.

What liability, if any, does Newcorp have in this situation? What can and cannot Newcorp do? In your answer, identify what legal principles (statutory or case law) support your belief. Remember to limit your answer to 350 words following APA format.
.

Legal Encounter 3

Paul called OSHA to complain about Newcorp requiring him to work in a dangerous situation.

Newcorp employed Paul as senior maintenance technician, which required him to work in confined spaces to repair equipment. Repair of the pulp shredder was particularly difficult because the space in which Paul worked was very narrow and the machine noise and vibration irritated Paul when he turned the machine on and off during repairs. After one employee was injured while working on the machine, Newcorp moved the machine a little to create more working area, but nearby building support beams allowed little movement for the machine.

Paul refused to work on the machine, saying that it was still too confining and dangerous. The safety manager for Newcorp reviewed the area and deemed it safe. Paul also said that he became claustrophobic because of working in such confining spaces, and that this condition arose out of his employment, making it a worker compensation issue. In addition to calling OSHA, Paul threatened to get a lawyer and sue Newcorp. Management was not sure what legal principles apply to the circumstances presented in this situation.

What liability, if any, does Newcorp have in this situation? What regulatory and compliance requirements and legal principles (statutory or case law) are relevant to this situation? Remember to limit your answer to 350 words following APA format.
.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"