Case Discussion– Marketing Tag Heuer

Please read the case and analyze it by answering these case analysis questions.

  • You may answer each case discussion question in each paragraph and separate different paragraphs for different questions. You don’t have to copy the discussion questions in your answer.
  • Although quantity is not quality, however I do not accept 1-2 sentence answers to each question. Please make a thorough case analysis, post 300 to 500 words’ case analysis (roughly 1.5-3 pages double spaced with12-font), and post it in the text entry format online.

 

Case Discussion questions

  1. What is the SWOT of TAG? What does a Swiss luxury watch brand stand for?
  2. What was the situation at TAG Heuer when Biver took over as CEO? Which of Biver’s actions do you agree/disagree with? Why?
  3. How has Biver been able to turn around so many companies? What does he do for a marketing perspective?
  4. Was GAT Heuer right to go after the digital watch market? Why?

    GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

    Page 1 of 4

     

    CRITERIA FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

    0

    NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

    5

    MEETS EXPECTATIONS

    8

    EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

    10

    YOUR SCORE

    ORGANIZATION

    Clearly organized

    introduction, body,

    conclusion

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria;

    Disorganized and the

    reader can not follow

    the paper at any

    length

    Disorganized, leaves reader wondering

    what is being said;

    abrupt ending

    Paper has intro, body, and conclusion

    but may take a re-

    reading to understand

    Easy to read, topic introduced, organization

    clearly evident with

    proper introduction,

    body, conclusion

     

    Does this paper address the prompt

    or the topic?

    The topic of the paper is not addressed at all;

    Fails to stick to the

    topic therefore fails to

    meet the criteria

    Student does not clearly identify his/her

    reflections about the

    topic; may veer from

    topic

    The entire paper’s content relates to the

    prompt or topic; the

    student explains his/her

    reflections about the

    topic but may take a re-

    reading to

    understand

    The student’s reflection about the topic is

    explained in clear

    language; immediately

    interesting and supported

    with detail

     

    Paragraph Organization and

    Writing Style: Ideas

    are clearly

    connected and

    make sense

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria

    Paragraphs are disorganized; ideas are

    included which do not

    relate to the main idea;

    ideas are not connected

    and have little or no

    supporting details; one

    sentence paragraphs

    Each paragraph has a central idea that is

    supported with details;

    ideas are connected and

    important points make

    sense

    Each paragraph has a central idea; ideas are

    connected and

    paragraphs are

    developed with details;

    paper is easy to read and

    “flows” naturally in an

    organized pattern

     

     

     

    GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

    Page 2 of 4

    CRITERIA FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

    0

    NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

    5

    MEETS EXPECTATIONS

    8

    EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

    10

    YOUR SCORE

    ORGANIZATION

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria

    Paper is shallow and does not present

    detailed evaluation of

    reflection about the

    topic; little use of

    business literature to

    support thought

    The paper shows that the student has

    thought about the topic

    although the written

    presentation may

    appear weak or lack

    clarity; use of business

    literature to support

    thought

    Paper provides evidence (through the use of

    description, details, and

    use of business

    literature) that the

    student has examined

    his/her own belief

    systems and related this

    to their current views

    about the topic; use of

    business literature to

    support thought

     

     

     

    GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

    Page 3 of 4

     

    CRITERIA

    FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

    0

    NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

    5

    MEETS EXPECTATIONS

    8

    EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

    10

    YOUR SCORE

    GRAMMAR

    Basic writing expectations:

    mechanics,

    spelling,

    grammar, or

    punctuation

    errors

    More than 8 grammatical ,

    punctuation, or BWE

    errors

    4-7 grammatical, punctuation , or

    BWE errors

    Between 1-4 grammatical,

    punctuation, or

    BWE errors, but

    they are minor and

    do not detract from

    the paper

    No errors whatsoever!

    Use of transitions to connect

    sentences and

    ideas

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria

    Choppy; sentences do not connect or

    transition well; ideas

    do not connect

    Paper expresses the ideas of the author;

    sentences relate to

    one another; may

    take a re-reading to

    understand

    Paper is easy to read and makes sense the first

    time it is read. It is

    interesting and well

    written; sentences

    connect and flow.

     

    Correct choice of verb tenses, words, Avoidance of wordy phrases, correct use of pronouns

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria

    Improper use of language or slang;

    wrong word choice;

    appears “padded”

    Occasional wrong word choice;

    somewhat wordy

    but not enough to

    detract from the

    summary; May

    occasionally use the

    wrong tense.

     

     

    No wrong word choice or slang; uses correct

    verb tense and pronouns.

    Well written and use of

    words convey meaning

     

     

     

     

     

     

    GRADING RUBRIC for REFLECTION PAPER

    Page 4 of 4

     

    CRITERIA

    FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS

    0

    NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

    5

    MEETS EXPECTATIONS

    8

    EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

    10

    YOUR SCORE

    FORMATTING

    Follows APA professional

    writing style of

    using 12 point

    Times New

    Roman font,

    1inch margins all

    around, correct

    APA headings

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria; 3 or more

    errors

    Meets the criteria with 2 errors

    Meets the criteria with 1 error

    Exceeds this by completely meeting all

    of these requirements

    with NO exception!

     

    Correct format of title page

    including

    running head,

    page numbers,

    correct page

    justification

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria; 3 or more

    errors

    Meets the criteria with 2 errors

    Meets the criteria with 1 error

    Perfect title page, running head, page

    numbers, and page

    justification!

     

    Correct use of citations within

    paper according

    to APA; Correct

    APA reference

    page

    Fails to meet this criteria by obvious

    disregard for the

    expectations stated in

    the criteria; 3 or more

    errors

    Meets the criteria with 2 errors

    Meets the criteria with 1 error

    Perfect use of citations within paper per APA

    format; Correct reference

    page!

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"